Will there be any food stalls, khau-gallies after 14th August?
FSSAI's dictate on mandatory licence for road side food vendors, suppliers and transporters, like Mumbai's famous Dabbawala, would force them to down shutters forever as majority of them will not pass the stringent norms
Hot-steaming tea at your favourite chai stall, delicious-spicy street Chinese, garma garam vada pav, refreshing sugar cane juice, khatti-mithi pani puri, thandi lassi and chaas, fried kanda-bhujiya, cheesy Indian franky, hand-made chocolates by your neighbourhood auntie, or the all time favourite bread pakoda. WAIT. These mouth-watering items, a part of  long-struggling India's Unincorporated may not exist anymore. It may even be time to bid farewell to the khau gallis and dabbawalas present in every corner of India with the new law set to slaughter them. 
The Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI), a central regulator, has extended the deadline for food business operators (FBO) to obtain a license and registration to 4 August 2014. But it is still unclear as to how many of these food stall owners would survive the proposed license-raj. According to a report by the Confederation of All India Traders (CAIT), “…the enforcement of this Act in the present form, it will lead to the closure of over 17 lakh Indian food industries and will force unemployment on over 20 million people.” 
The idea of licensing and registration for FBOs mooted by FSSAI under the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, is aimed at preventing food adulteration. However, implementation of this regulation would require extensive administration and bureaucracy which is time-consuming and costly. This too is only likely to breed more corrupt practices due to the massive discretionary powers of the officials than prevent food adulteration. 
FSSAI license/ registration has been made mandatory for every hawker, kiosk or stall—whether your neighbouring mithaiwala or a multinational McDonalds'. Post 4th August, all of them are required to obtain a FBO license. 
FBOs are defined as “Any undertaking private or public, for profit or not” carrying out any of the activities related to any stage of manufacturing, processing, packaging, storage, transportation, distribution of food, imports and including food services, sale of food or food ingredients”. 
The license under the FSSAI Rules and Regulations 2011 was to be obtained with effect from 5 August 2011, but the deadline was postponed to August 2012 and now again to 4 August 2014. 
Under this regulation, already licensed FBOs operating under now repealed Acts and Rules such as the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act (PFA) need to convert their license or registration to the new rules under Section 31 of the act. The license fee is Rs2,000 and it will be issued only after a Food Safety Officer visits the manufacturing, processing and transporting units and certifies that it meets FSSAI standards. The penalty for non-compliance is 100 times more than that under the PFA act and could go up to Rs5 lakh or imprisonment of up to six months under Section 63 of the Food Safety and Standards Act 2006. 
Given the stringent provisions and the fact that the government provides no amenities to road side food sellers (many operate only in the evening or night after shops have closed), they are unlikely to meet FSSAI standards and will probably, have to shut down and become victims of endless harassment and extortion by government officials. 
Aamchi Mumbai cha vada-pav, road-side chai, street-corner bakery, pani puri, traveller's favourite roti-rolls etc are all likely to get out of the market if this law comes into force unless the the new government elected at the Centre furiously takes a reverse. One wonders if the most efficient enterprise in India, the dabbawala, which has been awarded the six sigma for service would also need a license, since he would fall under the definition of FBO for transporting food. Will the dabbawala’s rough-and-ready travel in the luggage van of suburban trains meet FSSAI’s hygienic standards? Or will the rule see selective application and exemptions?
With rising inflation and high costs and taxes at regular eateries, most of India’s working as well as middle class, at least in Mumbai, depends on road-side food that is served up by tiny entrepreneurs, who put up temporary stalls at breakfast, lunch and dinner time. This is especially true of large cities like Mumbai. Licensing and registration will kill these businesses, merely with the additional cost and compliance burden. What is worse, the government will contribute nothing to their lives or business other than harassment. Will a FSSAI license make them eligible for bank loans at the rates available to organised industry? Of course not. By forcing the industry to go underground, the government will not only harass hawkers but also their vast population of customers. It is probably this realisation that ensures that the deadline gets pushed back so often.
  • Like this story? Get our top stories by email.


    When lottery email scam turns into murder!

    A gang of five, who used to cheat people through lottery email, killed one of their own “aged 15-17 years”. The gang was using the girl's bank account for collecting money. How did the bank allow a minor girl to operate the account? Where were the KYC norms?

    With banks becoming 'hyper active' in creating awareness about not to share bank account numbers and passwords with anyone, the criminal minds are, more often, found using 'lottery' route to dupe people. Unfortunately, the loss in such lottery scam messages is not limited to money alone. As the recent incident from Pune points out, these criminals even killed their own accomplice as she wanted to leave the gang.


    According to a report from Mid-Day, on 7th May the police found body of 17-year old Rani Singh in a red suitcase abandoned at Talegaon railway station near Pune. Police arrested three people, Rahul Ravindra Barai, Ershan Ali Khureshi and Santosh Jugdar from Mumbai and after the probe found that they, including Rani belonged to a five member gang and were involved in cheating people. "Recently, Singh, the victim who was also a member of the gang, had told them that she planned to leave the group. Angry with her for defecting, the trio killed her on the orders of the gang leader,” the report says.


    "The gang of five consisted of the three arrested conmen, the deceased woman, and an absconding accused — the gang leader — who is based in Bangalore. The gang had been cheating people on the pretext of giving them hefty amounts of money through lotteries. They had also created a bank account in Singh’s name, in which they kept their ill-gotten wealth," the report says.


    The last two points in this report are serious and need detailed probe by authorities, including the Reserve Bank of India (RBI). As per the cheating through lottery mails is concerned, the RBI as well as Income Tax department, time and again, keep warning people not to fall prey to such emails.


    In media reports, the age of Rani is mentioned between 15 and 17 years and this is where it turns more dangerous. Although, there are no restrictions on opening bank account for a minor, the question in this case, is whether the know your customer (KYC) procedure was followed strictly by the bank while opening and monitoring the bank account of Rani Singh? Till recently, the RBI rules did not permit persons below 18 years to operate accounts and only the parent or guardian was entitled to sign cheques or withdrawal slips.


    It has been seen in many cases that banks and financial institutions have not been very particular about strict implementation of anti-money laundering (AML) and KYC. The regulator has also shown some leniency in this regard. KYC process in the banks mostly ends with collection of relevant document by the staff at the bank counter and transaction monitoring is assumed to be completed if a customer furnishes his PAN card, which is more of a tax compliance document.


    Even the RBI's KYC framework mentions ensuring appropriate customer identification and monitoring transactions of a suspicious nature. The guidelines of RBI on KYC process states that banks should follow ‘risk-based’ approach of KYC process and classify customers into low, medium and high risk. So was this followed in the case of Rani Singh, who had a bank account opened in her name, but is now dead?


    Coming back to the lottery mails, almost everyone who has an email account gets an email announcing a 'lottery (you have never heard of) won by you' or some 'rich and wealthy' but troubled individual wanting to move his/ her money to India.


    There are plenty of cases where people (unfortunately) continue to believe in such messages and were later found duped. In one of the famous cases, a manager at State Bank of India (SBI) in Andhra Pradesh transferred Rs1.83 crore from his bank account to a Nigerian bank account after the email informed him that he had won Rs2.95 crore.


    Last year in January, Delhi police arrested Franklin Idiumo, a Nigerian national, for allegedly cheating people of lakhs of rupees by making them believe that they have won a lottery from RBI. He was apprehended following investigations into complaints about cheating a woman of Rs22 lakh after falsely telling her that she had won a lottery of Rs1.7 crore. He along with his fellow nationals cheated people by creating a fake website of the RBI and sent text messages to people randomly wherein they stated that they have won a large sum of money in a lottery.


    People who replied to their messages were asked to deposit a sum of money in an account number they told in exchange of a code that would enable them to facilitate the transfer of the said money in to their account. Further, they told them to deposit more money on one pretext or the other.


    There have been some instances in India where Nigerian hackers befriended some locals and used the contact individual’s bank account to siphon off the money sent by victims. But the case of Rani Singh tells us that the danger is looming large near our homes.


    If you are a Moneylife reader, you will find plenty of 'red flags' in such message. Most important is the email ID, which may show the name of RBI or any other bank or financial institution, but definitely without the authentic domain, like rbi.gov.in. Second, even if one assumes that all else is true, why on the earth would the RBI offer money to an individual like you? Third, the RBI does not operate, manage or control any lottery schemes or donate money just like that.


    Here are some points to keep in mind while identifying fake or fraud messages. The scams are widespread, so governments and websites like www.truthorfiction.com, www.fraudwatchers.org or www.scambaits.com are giving special attention to this matter, to help potential victims and to catch scamsters. The website of the Nigerian Central Bank has a warning on the home page that says, "If it looks too good to be true, it usually is." The US Secret Service and the British National Criminal Intelligence Service undertake regular investigations and issue regular warnings to people.


    And last but the most importantly, there are no free lunches. So if you do not want to dig deep into the emails, then as soon as you read the word 'lottery', delete the message. It may not only save your money, but also your life.

  • Like this story? Get our top stories by email.



    Chandrabhan Bind

    10 months ago

    Rahul barai bachpan se chor tha aur ab scam aur murder acha hai aise log ko saja milna hi chaiye

    Sankara Narayan

    6 years ago

    Greed shuts down the brain !
    The investigative agencies should be pro active .If a lottery fraud mail is forwarded to them it should be easy for them to investigate by pretending to be the likely victim through a cyber cell.


    6 years ago

    very informative and useful


    6 years ago

    Hi, I do not agree with the way you are trying to solve the problem. I may encourage to collect the banking details from offerors' and inform the concerned bank with request to (1)deactivate the debit & credit both based on history of transactions (2) Verify the KYC immediately. RBI can also offer reporting of such bank accounts at its own website from mass public.

    That way entire edifice of frauds can be demolished this way.


    6 years ago

    Hi, I do not agree the way you are proposing to solve the problem. The best way is to be friendly with such offers and collect their entire bank account details and then inform that concerned bank to (1) deactivate the account for debit & credit both(2) recheck the credibility of accountholder immediately based on the transactions.

    That way entire edifice of winning lotteries shall be demolished immediately without police intervention.

    Sahara case: Justice Khehar recuses himself from hearing

    Justice Radhakrishnan, who retired on 14th May, has gone on record saying that the bench was under immense pressure in the Sahara case

    In a sudden twist in the Sahara Group case, Justice JS Khehar from the Supreme Court has recused himself from hearing the matter following which a new bench has been constituted.


    In a release, Rakesh Sharma, Deputy Registrar of the Supreme Court said, a “communication dated 6 May 2014 received from Justice JS Khehar was placed before the Chief Justice of India on 7th May. On 7th May itself, the CJI has been pleased to constitute another bench to hear the matter relating to Sahara Group...”


    The release, read out by the official at a press conference in New Delhi, said that Justice Khehar had written a letter the day when he and Justice KS Radhakrishnan decided a petition filed by Sahara Group chief Subrata Roy.


    Justice Radhakrishnan, who retired on 14th May has gone on record saying that the bench was under immense pressure in the Sahara case.


    The official from the apex court, however, did not disclose the details of the new bench, which will now hear the petitions relating to Sahara Group.


    The bench of justices KS Radhakrishnan and JS Khehar in its 6th May judgement had upheld its order jailing Subrata Roy and rejected his claim that rules of natural justice were not followed in the case.


    The 65-year-old Roy, who has been in jail since 4th March for non-refund of over Rs20,000 crore to depositors, was asked by the court to make a fresh proposal for paying Rs10,000 crore to get bail.


    The Court had passed the order on a petition filed by Roy challenging the constitutional validity of its order passed on 4th March by which he was sent to jail for not complying with its order to deposit around Rs20,000 crore of investors money with SEBI.


    The bench in a strongly-worded judgement had come down heavily on the Group for “systematically” frustrating and flouting all its orders with impunity on refunding investors’ money.


    It had said the Group “adopted a demeanour of defiance constituting a rebellious behaviour, not amenable to the rule of law” and justified its decision to send Roy along with two promoters of two Sahara companies to jail.

  • User 



    6 years ago


    Why didn't Justice Radhakrishnan take contempt of Court proceedings against the persons who pressured him in Sahara Case?


    Nagesh Kini

    In Reply to MOHAN 6 years ago

    Can he not initiate proceedings even now?

    We are listening!

    Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.

    To continue

    Sign Up or Sign In


    To continue

    Sign Up or Sign In



    online financial advisory
    Pathbreakers 1 & Pathbreakers 2 contain deep insights, unknown facts and captivating events in the life of 51 top achievers, in their own words.
    online financia advisory
    The Scam
    24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
    Moneylife Online Magazine
    Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
    financial magazines online
    Stockletters in 3 Flavours
    Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
    financial magazines in india
    MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
    (Includes Moneylife Online Magazine)
    FREE: Your Complete Family Record Book
    Keep all the Personal and Financial Details of You & Your Family. In One Place So That`s Its Easy for Anyone to Find Anytime
    We promise not to share your email id with anyone