Why should government fund PSU banks all the time?

At least some of the PSU banks cannot claim to be cash-strapped, especially looking at their cash reserves. By capitalising their reserves instead of seeking fund from the government, they would be rewarding their share holders as well

Press reports indicate that some of the public sector banks (PSBs) are seeking more capital ahead of the budget, which is scheduled to be presented by the second week of July. According to these reports, cash-strapped public sector banks "hit by a higher proportion of stressed assets and global Basel III requirements" have begun listing out capital requirements ahead of the budget in July.

 

In the interim budget, the Congress-led United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government had earmarked Rs11,200 crore as capital for all public sector banks. In 2012-13, the government had, in fact put in Rs14,000 crore. This kind of funding must stop, and the banks need to be able to generate their required funds from investing public.

 

Since the last couple of months, all leading newspapers have carried details of the balance sheet of a large number of organisations, including public sector banks. The following information has been collected from these announcements:

 

Name of Bank

Paid up Capital (Rs crore)

Reserves (Rs crore)

Allahabad Bank

544.61

10644.56

Bank of Baroda

430.68

36349.21

Bank of India

643

24629.95

Bank of Maharashtra

839.1

4917.02

Canara Bank

461.26

23660.6

Corporation Bank

167.54

9952.37

I D B I

16.03

202.93

Karnataka Bank

188.42

2863.78

State Bank of India

746.57

146623.96

Syndicate Bank

624.58

11387.25

UCO Bank

1014.71

9624.18

Union Bank

630.31

16544.67

 

From the above, most of the banks mentioned appear to have healthy cash reserves. If and when they need funds, they should be able to raise it from the investing public either by rights issue or even by capitalising their reserves.

 

However, in the present situation, specific amounts of assistance appears to have been sought from the government by IDBI and Indian Overseas Bank, and it is likely that some more may join the band wagon to seek capital infusion.

 

As mentioned above, at least some of the banks cannot claim to be cash-strapped! By capitalising their reserves, they would be rewarding the share holders too.

 

In the meantime, it is being reported in the press that GS Sandhu, secretary for financial services, has underlined the need for banks to sell off their non-core assets. The companies identified as non-core include rating agencies such as ICRA, CARE, National Stock Exchange (NSE), IL&FS, UTI, Multi-Commodity Exchange (MCX), Stock Holding Corp of India Ltd (SCHIL), Central Depository Services (India) Ltd (CDSL), and asset reconstruction corporations (ARCs). The estimated value of these assets would be around Rs25,000 crore.

 

As we can see from the details given above, the reserves are huge, compared with the paid up capital of these state-rund lenders. It is pay back time for these banks. Why not buy out the government share in line with the established formula for this purpose and reduce the government holdings?

 

Years ago, the Atal Bihari Vajpayee government had suggested that the Centre could reduce its stake in public sector banks to 33% but the move did not go through as the law could not be amended. Now this can easily be achieved and Vajpayee's proposal could be implemented!

 

After doing this, should the banks need any additional capital infusion, they ought to go to the shareholders instead of going back and forth to cash rich Life Insurance Corp of India (LIC) and other similar institutions, which only means that the Government stake would keep rising, instead of being held by the investing public.
 

(AK Ramdas has worked with the Engineering Export Promotion Council of the ministry of commerce. He was also associated with various committees of the Council. His international career took him to places like Beirut, Kuwait and Dubai at a time when these were small trading outposts; and later to the US.)

 

Comments
Ralph Rau
1 decade ago
This article seems based too be based on the assumption that Reserves = Free Cash

In reality the Reserves = Liability side of the balance sheet is not free cash. It is sitting blocked as a Loan to the bank's borrower. And a lot of these loans are sticky and being rolled over given the borrowers inability to re-pay ?
sabyasachi samal
1 decade ago
I find many who comment here on banks i find the writer or the opinion providers are ignorant of or not experienced in having banking related works...even they claim to be what so...I humbly request to all writers please understand why the situation is like this....Why only for government banks? If government banks will not fund the undeserved persons and did not fund the farmers who are the worst people in our country from banking point of view then these banks would not been in such a situation again if these banks do not fund mallya this could also be avoided...I find one thing behave like rural money lender if you do not able to pay i will throw you from your house and will auction your house...If this type of practices are being followed then no fund is needed from stupid government...I think all CA and Finance experts will be able to understand so...Please come to a village and live the life of a banker only writing in AC room will not yield anything.
Dr Anantha K Ramdas
1 decade ago
Thank you Mr Gopalakrishnan for your comments. There are quite a few PS Banks that are not asking for "infusion" of capital because they have learnt the art of banking and are self-reliant.

For once let the Government refuse and say that "you guys fend and fund yourself;if not we will sell our shares to public and the work be done on a professional basis" Such a stern warning would make them wake from their deep slumber and start working to get results.

No more spoon feeding please at the cost of tax payer.
suman chakraborty
Replied to Dr Anantha K Ramdas comment 1 decade ago
Blaming PSU bank management for the bad financials of PSU, is the typical blame it on somebody else mentality.
PSU banks and LIC has been subjected to financial raping by Central Govt. Mandatory loans to undeserved entities, whimsical loan waivers etc. adds to the NPA as well as overall de-motivation of Staff.
The problems are very deep rooted and no superficial solution will work.
Gopalakrishnan T V
1 decade ago
The only reason that can be adduced for PSU banks' dependence on tax payers' money is total Governance deficit. The Board is neither accountable nor respomsible and the members of the Board have no sense of involvement and commitment. When the balance sheets are strong,the reserves are very high,NPas are reasonably low and Capital adequacy ratio is well above the prescribed regulatory requirement, the Government should not extend any capital support. Further,if the dividend received by the Government far exceeds the normal return on equity investment,then also further capital induction is unnecessary. Is there any analysis done by the Board or by the Government or RBI before capital is inducted? It is time tax payers and depositors have some say in the management of the Bank. There should be representatives of tax payers and depositors on banks board or at least they should have some say when the NPAs reach beyond certain levels, expenditures exceed certain cut off limits, fall in dividend distribution and there is induction of capital by the Government.Time a close watch is kept on banks' functiong by depositors body.
Free Helpline
Legal Credit
Feedback