Why are PSUs being spared from penalties?
Public sector companies are flouting SEBI regulations with impunity. Why should SEBI discriminate between PSUs and private sector companies on levying penalties for non-compliance?
 
The official website of the British Monarchy states that although civil and criminal proceedings cannot be taken against the Sovereign as a person under UK law, The Queen, the present Monarch, is careful to ensure that all her activities in her personal capacity are carried out in strict accordance with the law. 
 
In fact, Queen’s daughter, Princess Ann faced court charges in March 2001, when she pleaded guilty to speeding while on her way to Hartpury College in Gloucestershire. She was fined ‎£400 by the Cheltenham Magistrate’s Court and had five points added to her driving licence. 
 
As per the reports, the following year, she became the first senior member of the Royal Family to have been convicted of an offence under the Dangerous Dogs Act, 1991. She pleaded guilty to the charge that her dog, Dotty, attached two children while she and her husband were walking the dog in Windsor Great Park. The Princess was fined ‎£500 by Berkshire Magistrate’s Court and ordered to give Dotty more training. 
 
Such is the level of compliance of law in United Kingdom. But in India, though we no longer have monarchy, it appears that the Government is above the law.
 
Women Directors on the Boards of Public Companies:
 
Last week, Finance Minister said that 1,707 listed companies, including public sector undertakings, do not have women directors.  In a written reply to the Lok Sabha, he said that prosecution has been launched against 121 defaulting companies, other than public sector units (PSUs). 
 
Market regulator Securities And Exchange Board Of India (SEBI) had prescribed fines on listed companies, other than PSUs, between Rs50,000 and Rs1.42 lakh depending on the period of default from 1st April to 30 September 2015. A daily fine of Rs5,000 is being imposed for continued violation after 1 October 2015. 
 
It is not made clear as to why PSUs have not been imposed with the fine for non- compliance. On the contrary, SEBI had requested the government to advice the concerned administrative Ministries to take appropriate steps for ensuring compliance by defaulting listed PSUs, the Finance Minister said. 
 
Why this discrimination between public and private sector companies in so far as compliance of legal requirements is not explained by SEBI, nor have they been exempted from compliance by SEBI so far.  
 
1 in 4 listed PSUs do not have independent directors:
 
As many as 25% of the listed public sector companies have no independent directors on the board, according to the India Board Report 2015-16 published by Hunt Partners in association with AZB and Partners and PWC. 
 
As per clause 49 of the listing agreement with stock exchanges, for a company with an Executive Chairman, at least 50% of the board members should comprise of independent directors. In the case of a company with a non-executive Chairman, at least one third should be independent directors. 
 
These regulations are the result of SEBI’s decision to improve corporate governance in listed companies for protecting interest of minority shareholders. This is applicable for all listed companies but surprisingly a large number of public sector companies are yet to comply with these requirements.
 
SEBI should act without fear or favour:
 
It is a sad state of affairs. Instead of leading by example, public sector companies are at  the forefront of non-compliance. This reflects badly on the Central Government who hold majority ownership of these companies. 
 
Enforcing compliance of securities regulations is the primary job of SEBI and hence the responsibility for ensuring compliance lies squarely on the market regulator, who should have pulled up all those companies, who fail to comply with its own regulations without any fear or favour.  
 
If Reserve Bank of India (RBI) can impose penalties on both private and public sector banks who fail to comply with banking regulations, there is no reason why SEBI should discriminate between public and private sector companies in so far as levying of penalties for non-compliance of securities regulations. 
 
Can we expect the Central Government to hold all those responsible for non-compliance of its own rules and regulations in its own backyard first, before launching prosecution against the private sector companies for non-compliance?
 
(The author is a financial analyst, writing for Moneylife under the pen-name ‘Gurpur’.)
  • Like this story? Get our top stories by email.

    User

    COMMENTS

    Meenal Mamdani

    4 years ago

    A very valid criticism. It seems that SEBI is derelict in its duties in various spheres, not just this one, as seen from several articles in MoneyLife.

    Is this because the regulator is not autonomous, as it should be, but is under pressure from the govt of the day? Or is it because it does not have enough qualified (wo)manpower to investigate and pursue the wrong-doers? Or is it because the mindset of SEBI officials is pro-govt as often these regulators are former govt officials?

    Whatever the cause may be, it must be addressed to restore confidence of investors in companies, whether public or private.

    Supreme Court appoints Uttar Pradesh Lokayukta
    The Supreme Court on Wednesday appointed Justice Virendra Singh, - former judge of the Allahabad High Court - as the Lokayukta of Uttar Pradesh and expressed its disapproval of the way constitutional authorities mandated to appoint the ombudsman failed to discharge their responsibilities.
     
    Noting that its earlier directions for the appointment of Lokayukta went unheeded, the apex court bench of Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Justice N.V. Ramana "deeply regretted" the "failure if not refusal of the constitutional functionaries" to comply with the court's order.
     
    The court said that it was "unimpressed" by the explanation given by senior counsel Kapil Sibal appearing for Uttar Pradesh that serious efforts were made by the collegium consisting of chief minister, leader of opposition and the chief justice of the high court to decide on a name to be appointed as Lokayukta.
     
    Sibal earlier told the court that the three-member collegium met for five hours on Tuesday and two hours on Wednesday morning.
     
    Sibal gave five names to the court. There was a consensus between the chief minister and leader of opposition on three names while the chief justice of the Allahabad High Court expressed no opinion.
     
    Having recorded this, the court in exercise of its extraordinary powers appointed Justice Virendra Singh, who is at present head of the state consumer commission, as the state's Lokayukta.
     
    Disclaimer: Information, facts or opinions expressed in this news article are presented as sourced from IANS and do not reflect views of Moneylife and hence Moneylife is not responsible or liable for the same. As a source and news provider, IANS is responsible for accuracy, completeness, suitability and validity of any information in this article.
  • User

    Prepare procedure, SC to centre on judges appointment
    The Supreme Court on Wednesday directed the central government to prepare a memorandum of procedure that will be followed by the apex court collegium in the appointment of judges to the higher judiciary.
     
    Pronouncing the order, the apex court constitution bench headed by Justice Jagdish Singh Khehar said that the government will prepare the memorandum of procedure in consultation with the Chief Justice of India who in turn will undertake the exercise with the unanimous opinion of the five-member collegium.
     
    The collegium consists of Chief Justice of India and the four senior most judges immediately following him.
     
    The court said that the eligibility criteria for the appointment of judges would include minimum age, both at the level of high court and the supreme court and a transparent method will be followed. However, the court in a rider said that confidentiality in the appointment would be maintained.
     
    Disclaimer: Information, facts or opinions expressed in this news article are presented as sourced from IANS and do not reflect views of Moneylife and hence Moneylife is not responsible or liable for the same. As a source and news provider, IANS is responsible for accuracy, completeness, suitability and validity of any information in this article.
  • User

    COMMENTS

    MG Warrier

    4 years ago

    The central government may, at this stage, consider a total overhaul ofthe entire processes and procedures for appointments to top positions in government and statutory bodies. Such a review can consider, among other things (a) making procedures professional and transparent, (b) creating a talent pool for consideration of candidates for succession when vacancies arise, (c) ensuring a market-related compensation package for top positions and (d) providing guidance on qualifications, experience and minimum tenure at top positions including at CJI’s level, which may need certain changes in the present concept of retirement.
    M G Warrier, Mumbai

    We are listening!

    Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.
      Loading...
    Close

    To continue


    Please
    Sign Up or Sign In
    with

    Email
    Close

    To continue


    Please
    Sign Up or Sign In
    with

    Email

    BUY NOW

    online financial advisory
    Pathbreakers
    Pathbreakers 1 & Pathbreakers 2 contain deep insights, unknown facts and captivating events in the life of 51 top achievers, in their own words.
    online financia advisory
    The Scam
    24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
    Moneylife Online Magazine
    Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
    financial magazines online
    Stockletters in 3 Flavours
    Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
    financial magazines in india
    MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
    (Includes Moneylife Online Magazine)
    FREE: Your Complete Family Record Book
    Keep all the Personal and Financial Details of You & Your Family. In One Place So That`s Its Easy for Anyone to Find Anytime
    We promise not to share your email id with anyone