What To Make of the New Road Transport Bill?

Despite much noise and fanfare, whether the Bill delivers for citizens, or for policemen and politicians, is yet to be seen

 

The draft of the ‘new’ Road Transport and Safety Bill 2014 has been on the road transport and highway ministry’s website and has been discussed at various forums for some time now. In some form or the other, this proposed successor to the Motor Vehicles Act has been in the offing for several decades and provisions have been added in fits and starts.

 

The end result appears to be a sort of hacked and pasted documents; bits and pieces are borrowed from online resources on legislation in other countries and some strong deterrents have been thought up locally. It is not likely to improve road safety for all stakeholders; it might have the effect of putting an AK-47 in the hands of a monkey would, considering that the previous Motor Vehicles Act was like a baton in those hands.

 

There appear to be very strong penalties and post-facto deterrents, but there is not much about pre-empting the causes of road accidents like issues of responsibilities and accountability for design, construction and management of roads. A motor vehicle-owner or operator can be penalised for missing a badly positioned traffic signal but a shopkeeper who usurps the pavement and a part of the road will continue to go scot-free.

 

In addition, several ‘exemptions’ and ‘benefits’ have been provided for those in power, making it a very unfair Bill. The culture of red beacons and toll exemptions, for example, will continue. While citizens may continue to face harassment for re-registration of vehicles, government employees will continue to be exempted.

 

The draft Bill does not appear to take into account two major parameters which are part and parcel of all sustainable and successful civilisations.

 

1) Free unhindered passage to all for legitimate purposes and intent, including for all people and vehicles carrying goods or passengers with minimal additional costs and inefficiencies;

 

2) Minimal inequity on the roads and lesser discomfort to more people, especially at inter-modal exchange points, with safety for all as a simple guideline. If you want to see what that means, please travel by Delhi Metro.

 

A Raw Deal for Car-buyers

On the issue of automobile companies seeking and accepting ‘bookings’ for motor vehicles not yet in the market, or for those with waiting lists for whatever reasons, the customer/consumer’s interests and point of view appear to be the last parameter on the minds of those involved. As somebody who has booked a Maruti Suzuki Ciaz, I speak from first-hand experience as well as wider research and other people’s experiences.

 

First of all, even though it is the manufacturer who solicits advance bookings from customers, it is the dealer who collects the money and in the name of the dealer. This is wrong and needs to be controlled immediately.

 

Next, there is no interest payable on the booking amount if the delivery of the vehicle is delayed beyond reasonable limits. In the case of the Ciaz, the manufacturer announced a ‘launch’ and an ‘introductory pricing’ with great fanfare; but, when it came to deliveries, prospective buyers were informed that it would take at least another three-four months. I leave it to the customer to judge whether this is a fraud or not.

 

Third, the manufacturer is clearly launching an untested and unproven product, as can be deduced from the feedback on problems being faced with the upper-end variants.

 

If one were to connect the dots, it appears to be no more than a way to work with dealers to raise funds at low cost and not deliver the promised goods. Imagine, for a moment, that an airline persuaded us to buy low-fare tickets months in advance and, closer to the date of travel, simply refused to communicate with customers and actually withdrew the flight and route? Something similar is happening with bookings for cars, lately.

 

(Veeresh Malik started and sold a couple of companies, is now back to his first love—writing. He is also involved in helping small and midsize family-run businesses re-invent themselves.)

Like this story? Get our top stories by email.

User

COMMENTS

Mahesh S Bhatt

4 years ago

The circus remains the same so does new jokers only ringmaster has changed.

These Ministries are touts for various industries designed to fleece trouble common man.There is no civil representations.This is the case of Auto Industry.

Check with Infrastructure Road who accounts for Tolls it seems its good money for political funding.

Look at Real Estate mother of all corrupt industries no Industry status.Poor agreement lop sided weighed for Builder even now Narayan Murthy cannot do anything if doesnot get his property as he is stuck in one of the deals with high profile builder.Same is the case with Sonu Nigam Vs Raheja These are supposed to be A class builders forget other builders/buyers OMG.

Gas prices up Mukeshbhai happy taxi drivers will cry for 2 days.Life would be as usual afterwards.

Airlines Delhi rates today Rs 30000 going to Dubai is cheaper higher airport tax/Industry sick.Cheers Mahesh

SEBI moves SC to get Sahara to pay up Rs47,000 crore
The regulator has applied to the SC seeking directions against Sahara and to obtain a schedule of payment for the whole amount.
 
SEBI on Thursday moved the Supreme Court seeking the directions against the Sahara Group for non-payment of dues of Rs47,000 crore.
 
In its petition, SEBI has said that it has received complaints from buyers that Sahara is not interested in selling its properties and repaying the investors. The SC directed and allowed Sahara sell properties to make good on the obligations worth Rs47,000 crore.
 
SEBI has also sought that Sahara Group must file a report to SC about the schedule of its payment of about Rs47,000 crore balance that it is said to owe to investors.
 
Since August, Sahara has been in the process of selling its properties to be able to furnish a record amount as guarantee for the release of Sahara Group Chairman Subroto Roy. The Rs10,000 crore amount which effectively became the bail amount, was being raised by Roy, by holding meetings in the Tihar Jail complex's conference room.
 

User

COMMENTS

Rajeev

4 years ago

It's just a plan and nothing else.....Keep the owner in jail....demand him to pay the refunds at any cost...he will sale all his assets at very low cost to come out....buy it an then become a king pin....and the Person "Subarata Roy" proven to be threat will no longer be stronger enough to fight back....so put some other charges on him and drag him to jail again....

Nilesh

4 years ago

Don't know why they are forcing sahara to sell his property at such lower rates.....nobody wants to sell his property which he earned with lots of hard work like vegetables on street....then why subrata roy will do so....?

Isha Patel

4 years ago

#sebi stop fooling people now. Everyone knows that #sahara and #subrataroy are innocent they always worked for the welfare of people..

Isha Patel

4 years ago

#sebi stop fooling people now. Everyone knows that #sahara and #subrataroy are innocent they always worked for the welfare of people..

manoharlalsharma

4 years ago

last news appeared in leading newspaper was that money deposited with S.E.B.I. by the SAHARA to be REFUNDED to its' Original lenders but failed to find them even after sending REMINDERS.then why SAHARA should wind up ? at DISTRESS.

Regulations on FDI in construction sector ease

FDI in construction sector will help the cash-starved realty sector raise funds, says Nomura in a research note

 

The government on 29th October relaxed rules for allowing FDI (foreign direct investment) in the construction sector including housing by reducing the minimum built-up area and capital requirement for foreign investment in such projects — a move that will help the cash-starved realty sector raise funds, says Nomura in a research note.


The specific changes in regulations include:


(a) The government is now permitting 100% foreign ownership of projects in the construction sector through an automatic route.


(b)  It has also eased the requirements on the amount of land, built-up areas and certain capital requirements for foreign investment in the construction sector.


(c)  It will now also allow investors to exit on completion of the project or after three years from the date of final investment.


(d) Investors can now bring in minimum FDI of USD5mn within six months of the project’s commencement and the investor can provide the remaining amount of investment committed over 10 years.


(e)  Further in the case of an investor committing 30% of the capital for low cost housing, the requirements on minimum built-up areas and on exiting the project have been relaxed further.


(f)  Also, the government may in certain cases permit repatriation of the investment or transfer a stake from one non-resident investor to another before completion of the project.


The Department of Industrial Policy & Promotion (DIPP), under the Commerce and Industry Ministry, moved the proposal to attract more foreign investment in construction and real estate sector that is facing a slowdown and liquidity crunch since last 2-3 years. Although 100% foreign direct investment is allowed in townships, housing and built-up infrastructure and construction developments since 2005, the government has imposed certain conditions.


Between April 2000 and August 2014, the construction development including townships, housing and built-up infrastructure, received FDI worth USD 23.75 billion or 10% of the total FDI attracted by India during this period.


According to Nomura, the new measures are intended to lower the threshold for new investment and facilitate larger FDI inflows in the construction sector, which accounted for about 10% of total FDI inflows in India over the last decade. The measure will aid developers and boost the government’s longer-term reform on affordable housing and smart cities. Additionally, this should boost growth in the construction sector, which is critical for India's infrastructure development plans.

User

We are listening!

Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.
  Loading...
Close

To continue


Please
Sign Up or Sign In
with

Email
Close

To continue


Please
Sign Up or Sign In
with

Email

BUY NOW

online financial advisory
Pathbreakers
Pathbreakers 1 & Pathbreakers 2 contain deep insights, unknown facts and captivating events in the life of 51 top achievers, in their own words.
online financia advisory
The Scam
24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
Moneylife Online Magazine
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
financial magazines online
Stockletters in 3 Flavours
Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
financial magazines in india
MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
(Includes Moneylife Online Magazine)