Investor Interest   Exclusive
What is high frequency trading and how it affects you?
What is it about high frequency trading that makes one rich overnight? Is it legal? If so, why is everyone not doing it?
 
I was always fascinated with Michael Lewis's writings... His Liar's Poker was truly a path breaker, giving fantastic insights into what happened in Wall Street in the 80s. On one of my TV channel surfing experiences, I stumbled on to an interview of Brad Katsuyama by Maria Bartiromo in Fox Business Channel on his new IEX exchange. In the course of this chat, I learnt that Michael Lewis had written about Brad and his company IEX in his new book titled ‘Flash Boys’ and that got me interested. If there is anyone who can explain a complex topic in simple, easy-to-understand terms, it is Michael Lewis. 
 
I left for India shortly thereafter and while in Bangalore, picked up Flash Boys. I had intended to read it but got caught up with other stuff and could not get to it. On my flight from Bangalore to Mumbai, I came across an article of how 2 friends moved back from Wall Street to a tiny office in Bandra-Kurla complex and are generating business worth Rs4,000 crore a day using high frequency trading strategies. The numbers were truly mind boggling - even if they were generating 1% profit, that works out to Rs40 crores a day or assuming 200 trading days in a year, Rs8,000 crore (about $1.25 billion)! It was one of those moments, when you start asking yourself if you were in the right profession. I filed away this information for future reference as I flew back to the US.
 
I finally got time to pick up Flash Boys and got hooked right away. Despite being a work of non-fiction, I could not stop turning the pages. When I put the book down, I started thinking as to how many other countries are now having high frequency trading (HFT) and I suddenly remembered the article about RKSV and their amazing turnover as a discount broker in Mumbai. What is it about high frequency trading that makes one rich overnight? Is it legal? If so, why is not everyone doing it? But first, let us take a step back and understand the evolution of high frequency trading...
 
On 19 October 1987, the Dow Jones Industrial Average crashed by 22.6%, the single largest one-day stock market decline in history. Many reasons were given for the loss, one of which was how globalization was affecting financial markets across the world. In those days, a stock was bought or sold using a broker whom you called up (or he called you!) and agreed on the stock, its price and how many. As the market crash was playing out, it was rumoured that many brokers stopped answering their phones! The US Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) addressed this and several other structural flaws and one of the remedies suggested was to have computerised trading. This set off a huge wave of modernisation and computerisation in Wall Street, which continues till date.
 
NASDAQ (and then NYSE) went public in 2000 and had their own profit targets and started finding ways to increase revenues.  To increase competition, the US government also allowed setting up of more stock exchanges and by 2010, there were 13 stock exchanges. Some of these, were setup by brokers and high frequency trading companies, which should have raised red flags (after all these are intermediaries and ideally stock exchanges should be run by those for whom they exist, i. e. investors) as Michael Lewis observes in this inteview, on how these 13 Public Stock Exchange have become an unfriendly place for the investor.
 
To be fair, there have been many benefits because of computerisation too. One of them is the cost of commission per trade. However, as technology advanced, faster computers and networks enabled some firms to start trading between computers based purely on algorithms (an algorithm can be thoughts of as a series of steps to solve a problem). At first, it seemed like all was well. In 2006, approximately 26% of all trades in the US were done by HFT firms and by 2010, this had reached 52%. What boggled the investors’ minds was how HFTs could have 4000 days of trading with NO losses! 
 
By 2008, many institutional investors, such as Royal Bank of Canada (RBC) started observing that even simple trades were costing them more than before. They started digging into this and uncovered a remarkable truth. It was as if HFT traders were lurking, waiting for them to put out an order and then act on it immediately, almost in a predatory fashion! What was even more frustrating was that they could do nothing about it. Brad Katsuyama, who headed the RBC trading desk at its New York office was determined to get to the bottom of this and with the help of other specialists, narrowed down the cause as being due to HFT companies. This led to his formulation of a process, which would make it fair for everyone and that is how IEX came about. However, more on HFT... I located this excellent description of how High Frequency Trading works on YouTube. It is only 11 minutes long and I urge you to watch it because it will help you understand this article better.
 
For those of you who are interested in knowing the state of US Stock markets today, there is an ongoing investigation by New York State Attorney General's office and by the Commodities Futures Trading Commission in Washington DC on high frequency trading practices. Ben Bernanke, the former chairman of Federal Reserve, announced last week that he is joining Citadel Group, one of the biggest HFT companies, in an advisory capacity. Please note that TD Ameritrade, one of the biggest online trading platform sells all its orders to Citadel Group! If an HFT is willing to buy all the orders from TD Ameritrade, there must be a very good reason. Today, in the US, HFT traders are essentially driving the market. For more, see the diagram below:
 
  1. HFT companies pay brokers to buy all their trades (e. g. Citadel Group buys all orders of TD Ameritrade)
  2. HFT companies pay stock exchanges huge sums of money to co-locate at the stock exchange in order to minimize the delay in monitoring orders
  3. Stock exchanges (since they need to generate profits) pay banks and institutional investors to direct orders their way. Sometimes, it happens the other way too!
Where is the investor in this picture? Was the stock exchange not established so capital could be directed to the company that needs it the most? So why are HFT companies paying brokers and stock exchanges? The answers to these questions can be found in Michael Lewis's book. The explanation is too long for this article. The number of Americans trading in stocks and derivatives has fallen to 52% from 63% about six years ago. The average investor is losing confidence in the market.
 
Now let us see how all this applies to Indian markets. HFTs make money in several ways and here are some of these:
 
1. Front running - In a simplistic way, this is similar to scalping movie tickets. Let us take a real life example... Infosys trades on NSE, BSE and several other exchanges in the country. An institutional investor (II) wants to buy for a mutual fund (MF) company about 10,000 shares of Infosys. The MF company, stipulates that the range of the purchase of the 10,000 shares be between Rs2,150 - Rs2,200. The institutional investor's trading desk runs an algorithm whereby it tries to buy a small lot (since it does not want to reveal its hand) of 100 shares at Rs2,150. Assume that the II is located close to NSE, and therefore the order appears first at NSE.
 
An HFT, co-located at NSE, picks up this order at Rs2,150 and then tries to gauge the upper limit of the II. It may try selling to the II at Rs2,250 and the II computer will reject it (because it can go only as high as Rs2,200). The HFT computer lowers the price to Rs2,225 and gets rejected again. Then it tries Rs2,200 and II buys the order!
 
Now the HFT knows the upper bound of the II and will out run the buy request of the II to all the other exchanges and buy up INFY stock and then sell it back to the II, all at Rs2,200, which the II accepts since it does not find any other lower priced shares. All this happens in a matter of milliseconds because the speed at which data runs between exchanges is slower than that of the HF traders.
 
Who loses out? The investor, who has put money in the mutual fund hoping that they will do a good job of managing his investments.
 
The profit margin may not be big but if you can do this on EACH and EVERY sale, the numbers do add up and that is what HFTs do.
 
2. Dark pools - Some of the HFTs get both sell and buy orders of stocks and instead of routing them to a stock exchange, do the trading themselves, thereby not exposing the real value of a share in the market. Regulatory bodies will not even be aware of a sale of this kind. There are 45 dark pools in the US, with companies such as Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley having at least one such pool.
 
This is not to say that all HFTs are doing this but it behoves the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) and Reserve Bank of India (RBI) to create a fair trading platform. 
 
My suggestion is to create an exchange designed along the lines of IEX. IEX opened for business in 2013 and now does about 1% of all US stock transactions. They offer only three types of trade - Market, Limit and mid-point.  IEX does not allow co-location nor does it offer any speed benefits for HFTs and therefore levels the playing field. Some of the investors in IEF are Bain Capital Ventures, Belfer Management, Brandes Investment Partners, Capital Group, Cleveland Capital Management, Franklin Resources Inc, Greenlight Capital, MassMutual Ventures, Maverick Capital, Pershing Square, Scoggin Capital Management, Senator Investment Group, Spark Capital, TDF Ventures, and Third Point Partners. 
 
Goldman Sachs announced its support to IEX and even sent some business its way for a few days (Dec 18-19, 2013) before they changed their mind and went back to their (good or bad) ways. Moreover, one more thing - the new exchange (let us call it FAIR - Fair and Intelligent Retail platform) should be located geographically in the middle of the country so as to be equidistant (more or less) to all cities... Did I hear someone say Nagpur?
 
Final Note: If this subject seems complicated, I encourage readers to click on the URLs which have a lot of information. This video stopped trading at US markets as it was playing out!
 
Like this story? Get our top stories by email.

User

COMMENTS

KAVIRAJ B PATIL

4 years ago

HFT when taken to it's logical end may result in individual investors deserting the market. Later, after more entities discover the raw deal that they get, only HF traders may remain in the market and it will be a fight to the finish and the last man standing will have to shoot himself in the head because there is no one ready to trade on a rigged market.

Senior Citizen

4 years ago

One should also consider STT in India. That can severely dent margings for HFT.

pravsemilo

4 years ago

Keeping aside the controversy around algorithmic trading, there is a company operating from India which provides algorithmic trading solutions for US equity markets (deepvalue.net). Their algorithms are used by NYSE.

I had the privilege of being part of this team. This was my first hand exposure to both the workings of a stock market & algorithmic trading.

Minoo Mody

4 years ago

i found the article about High Frequency Trading by Sree Iyer interesting. But he is way off the mark in estimating the profit in the HFT business. Assuming that the figure of turnover as Rs. 4000 crores is itself not exaggerated, a profit margin of 1% is a gross
over-estimate. Profits in HFT are of the order of 0.001%. With high volumes that can add up to a respectable figure. But nowhere near his number.

Nifty, Sensex, Bank Nifty still under pressure – Weekly closing report
Nifty will have to close above 8,700, as a first step for the downtrend to reverse
 
The S&P BSE Sensex closed the week that ended on 17th April at 28,442 (down 437 points or 1.51%), while the NSE’s CNX Nifty closed at 8,606 (down 174 points or 1.99%). In the previous week, we had mentioned that the upmove on the Nifty may continue. However a weekly close below 8,600 maybe a signal temporary reversal.
 
On Monday, Nifty closed higher for the seventh consecutive session. Nifty closed at 8,834 (up 54 points or 0.61%). Prime minister, who inaugurated the Hannover Fair in which India is a partner country, said that India aims at a stable and transparent tax regime and that development is "not a mere political agenda" but an "article of faith" and sought international support to achieve the objectives crucial for growth.
 
Government has shortlisted about a dozen state-run units including IOC, National Fertilisers, MMTC, Hindustan Copper and ITDC for stake sale to achieve the current fiscal's disinvestment target of Rs41,000 crore.
 
The stock market was closed Tuesday for Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar Jayanti. On Wednesday, Nifty upmove was arrested and it closed at 8,750 (down 84 points or 0.95%).  All-India general CPI inflation slowed down to three-month low of 5.2% in March 2015 (new base 2012=100) from 5.4% in February 2015.
 
The World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) said that there is a need for India to push forward the reforms agenda. IMF said in its bi-annual World Economic Outlook, released in Washington DC that India's growth at 7.5% in 2015-16 will surpass China's decelerating growth of 6.8% in the same year.
 
The loss on the Nifty continued on Thursday as well. Nifty closed at 8,707 (down 44 points or 0.50%). India has the potential to make 9%-10% growth rate "a new normal", Finance Minister Arun Jaitley said, while asserting that high growth was essential to meet the challenges posed by the country's burgeoning young population.
 
The market remained weak on Friday too. The loss of past three sessions (including Friday) wiped off almost the entire gain earned in the period of 6 April 2015 to 13 April 2015 (six days). Nifty closed at 8,606 (down 101 points or 1.16%). Indian economy is expected to grow marginally higher at 7.3% during the year compared with 7.2% in 2014 and interest rate cuts will support private sector spending, said a group company of global rating agency Moody's.
 
Among the top two losers, in the Sensex 30 pack, was TCS which fell for the fifth consecutive session today. On Thursday after market hours it posted it March 2015 quarter results, which showed its operating profit falling by 37%, mainly attributed to the charge of one-time bonus of Rs2,627.91 crore given to eligible employees.
 
We broke the news on Thursday that three of its directors of Helios and Matheson were arrested by Economic Offences Wing in Chennai, as it failed to repay deposit and interest to several depositors. On Friday, the stock fell 5.54% to close at Rs58.85 on the BSE. 
 
Out of the 27 main sectors tracked by Moneylife, top five and the bottom five sectors for this week were:
 

User

COMMENTS

Mohd.Tahir Sayed

4 years ago

sir
unable to find in weekly closing report which companys three directors were arrested on thursday.

CRISIL posts lower net profit in first quarter

The company board declared an interim dividend of Rs4 per share for the financial year ending on December 31, 2015, the company said

 

Credit-rating company CRISIL Ltd. closed the first quarter ended on March 31 with a lower top and bottomline, the company said on Friday.
 
The company board declared an interim dividend of Rs4 per share for the financial year ending on December 31, 2015, the company said.
 
In a regulatory filing in BSE, the company said its consolidated income from operations was Rs307.62 crore for the quarter ended March 31, as against Rs309.23 crore logged during the corresponding period of the previous year.
 
According to CRISIL, the consolidated after-tax-profit for the first quarter this year was Rs56.32 crore -- down from Rs68.71 crore posted during the corresponding period of the previous year.
 
The company said rating revenues were mainly impacted by reduced budgetary support from the government for the NSIC-Performance and Credit Rating Scheme for small and medium enterprises.
 

User

We are listening!

Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.
  Loading...
Close

To continue


Please
Sign Up or Sign In
with

Email
Close

To continue


Please
Sign Up or Sign In
with

Email

BUY NOW

online financial advisory
Pathbreakers
Pathbreakers 1 & Pathbreakers 2 contain deep insights, unknown facts and captivating events in the life of 51 top achievers, in their own words.
online financia advisory
The Scam
24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
Moneylife Online Magazine
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
financial magazines online
Stockletters in 3 Flavours
Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
financial magazines in india
MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
(Includes Moneylife Online Magazine)