‘We are not decoupled from the rest of the world’
ML: Are we witnessing the start of a new bull market?
VS: It’s like asking somebody in 2003 that whether they thought they were in a
multi-year bull market. I don’t think anybody knew at that time and it’s the same this time. The one parallel is that at the lows in 2003, the Sensex was trading almost at 10 times one-year forward earnings. At the lows of March this year or October last year, the market was in a similar kind of trough valuation. So that would suggest that in some ways those lows were significant but whether that is necessarily the start of the new bull market is a million dollar question. I say this in hindsight but not with foresight.
The only thing that I believe is actually comparable is the fact that valuations in March this year or October last year on the forward basis were similar to where the previous bull market started. Now whether you want to interpret that as a new bull market, or the last 18 months was a fall in the bull run that started in 2003, is hard to say. But the important point to keep in mind is that the valuations were at the trough levels that we have seen historically and in a way the price levels were suggesting that all the macro bad news had been discounted. I don’t think you answer that conclusively unless you answer with hindsight.
ML: How different is the current rally from 2004-06 or 2006-08 periods?
VS: The beauty of 2003-2008 period was that you had all cylinders firing. Will we get all those cylinders firing all over again? I have my doubts.
The only piece that is in place now is the local piece. The global piece is not really there. But about 40% of our earnings are not driven by the India story. It’s driven by what is happening at the global level. Reliance’s refining margins are not determined in India, they are determined globally. Steel prices for SAIL or TISCO are determined globally and not locally. The software sector is dependent on the US situation. So 40% of your earnings are affected in one way or the other by global environment and global growth.
Let’s face it, at the end of the day there is nothing in the last six years which tells you that we are anywhere decoupled from the rest of the world. It seemed that we were decoupled from the world during 2003-2008 but as somebody pointed out that even sub-Saharan Africa recorded a stellar growth till 2007. There is no data indicating that we have decoupled very significantly from the world in terms of growth rate or in terms of the way asset prices behave. And given the fact that the global scenario remains gloomy, at some point it even clouds the visibility of going back to 9% GDP growth. Can India go back to a 9% growth rate in the absence of a conducive global environment both in terms of growth and capital flows? That’s pretty much impossible. In that case, the current forces are very different from what fuelled the previous bull run.
In general, global cues remain very important because if the last five years have been correlated, last 18 months have been even more correlated and the last six months have been incredibly correlated in terms of the way prices are moving across all risky asset classes. That poses its own challenge. At the end of the day while you look at the macro factor and feel positive, you are not seeing the kind of lack of correlation that you would like to see in the behaviour of asset prices and that suggests to me that there is some level of risk and therefore global cues can create downside risk as much as they can create upside reward.
I think what the events in the last 18 months have shown me is that India’s secular growth story has been reinforced, given the way growth has come back so strongly. But it is very difficult to extrapolate that economic trend into a conclusion that the market concerns are off to the races again, as they were in the previous stretches of the bull run.
ML: Is there too much of complacency not only about global growth but also about the domestic growth situation?
VS: Let’s look at what goes into the 9% growth. The very first year when we had 9% growth RBI slammed the brakes in July 2006 saying that the growth is too fast; we don’t have enough productive capacity to support this growth level. They started tightening in 2006 and we got two years of 9% growth despite that because the capital flow was strong and because exports were strong. Today we are in an environment where the exports are not strong. Capital flows have picked up but going back to those levels I think is a bit of a stretch. Have we actually solved any of these so called supply constraints that YV Reddy so famously talked about three years ago? I am not sure. I haven’t seen any data indicating that the constraints have changed. Therefore 9% is a nice number to talk about. But is it a practical number? I don’t know. Presuming that the global environment continues to be difficult, the more practical number is 8% in the first year out of the slump and then settle back at 7.5% sort of a growth rate.
  • Like this story? Get our top stories by email.


    Recovery, credit quality stabilisation to be gradual
    Ratings agency CRISIL has said that credit quality of Indian companies is beginning to stabilise after being in virtual free fall for FY09 as companies are having easier access to funds following the Union government's fiscal and monetary easing and positive stock market conditions coupled with lower commodity prices which have led to lower working capital requirements.

     In a study, the ratings agency, however, cautioned that the recovery in credit quality will at best be gradual and may not necessarily be smooth.

     “There are signs that both the monetary and fiscal easing and the lower commodity prices are temporary. Additionally, unlike in the late 1990s, we see no prospect of a sudden and sustained upturn in economic conditions to lift corporate performance. We can therefore rule out a sudden jump in modified credit ratio (MCR) of the kind we saw in 1999-2000, when MCR rose to 0.92 from 0.61,” said Raman Uberoi, senior director, CRISIL.

     In India, fiscal and monetary authorities have begun to explore an exit from the present supportive stance and the timing and extent of these measures is likely to have a significant bearing on the pace and extent of economic recovery after the current phase of stabilisation, the ratings agency said. 

    In a research note, Standard Chartered Bank said although signs of recovery are apparent, most importantly in the industrial sector, the disappointing monsoon could impact private consumption expenditure which is a major contributor to overall gross domestic product (GDP) and remains weak. 

     Echoing the same, credit information company Dun & Bradstreet (D&B) said that a confluence of factors such as sustained improvement in index of industrial production (IIP), increase in direct tax collections and improving business sentiment indicate that the process of economic recovery has set in. Despite these developments, the pace of economic recovery is expected to be slow due to the emergence of certain downside risks such as a potentially lower agriculture growth and surging primary food articles inflation, D&B said. 

     CRISIL, the unit of Standard & Poor's further added, the return of stability to the global economy has also meant that commodity prices in India have retraced 25% to 35% of their decline from the peak levels of mid-2008.

     “Access to funds has eased considerably, but there is significant uncertainty with respect to exchange rates and consumer demand. Large exchange rate movements can hit export-dependent sectors hard, and domestic demand can be affected by rising prices in general and food prices in particular," said Ajay Dwivedi, director, CRISIL Ratings.  

    "We also note that the Reserve Bank of India’s window for restructuring of bank assets helped many companies avoid distress over the last 12 months. Looking ahead, we see a long and bumpy road for recovery in corporate credit quality,” Dwivedi added.

     Kaushal Sampat, chief operating officer, Dun & Bradstreet India said, “A sustained growth in industrial production will primarily be driven by the consistently improving business sentiment and recuperating demand conditions. Given the emergence of certain downside risks to growth and the limited scope for further fiscal stimulus, the timing of 'exit' strategies in terms of accommodative monetary policy becomes even more critical." 

    D&B said it expects that while RBI might consider increasing the cash reserve ratio (CRR) for draining of excess liquidity from the system anytime till the end of the current fiscal, it may maintain a status quo in terms of other policy interest rates. However, these changes to CRR are unlikely to happen in the policy review of October 2009.                              

    -Yogesh Sapkale [email protected]

  • Like this story? Get our top stories by email.


    Gammon Infra puts QIP on hold
    Gammon Infrastructure Projects Ltd (GIPL) which was planning to raise Rs500 crore through qualified institutional placements (QIPs) is now exploring other options like debt, stake sale and private equity funding due to its below expected performance in the stock markets and lower valuation.
    "QIP is always governed by the market value. We are not satisfied with the way our shares are performing currently. The market value is far below than what it was for the initial public offer (IPO) last year," said Parvez Umrigar, managing director, GIPL.
    Earlier, the company had planned to raise Rs500 crore through a QIP. Besides raising funds through debt or private equity placements, GIPL may also sale its stakes in its 15 special purpose vehicles (SPV).
    “We are now probably looking at some debt, as GIPL is currently a debt-free company,” Umrigar said adding that it may talk to private equity funds, which may look beyond the company’s current share price.
    However, Umrigar does not rule out QIP as an option completely. "QIP continues to be an option for us, as it is a faster process and not a time-consuming one. Liquidity is faster with QIPs," he said.
    Last year, GIPL raised Rs276.40 crore through its IPO but GIPL shares have fallen by 31% since its listing on 3 April 2008. Gammon Infra shares were listed on the BSE at a premium of 8% over its issue price of Rs167. GIPL shares closed 1.2% down at Rs108.5 on the Bombay Stock Exchange, while the Sensex ended 0.2% down at 17,195 points today.
    “GIPL entered the capital market when things were not so good, but still our issue was oversubscribed. Since then, the markets have not been stable,” Umrigar added.
    - Amritha Pillay  [email protected]
  • Like this story? Get our top stories by email.


    We are listening!

    Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.

    To continue

    Sign Up or Sign In


    To continue

    Sign Up or Sign In



    online financial advisory
    Pathbreakers 1 & Pathbreakers 2 contain deep insights, unknown facts and captivating events in the life of 51 top achievers, in their own words.
    online financia advisory
    The Scam
    24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
    Moneylife Online Magazine
    Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
    financial magazines online
    Stockletters in 3 Flavours
    Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
    financial magazines in india
    MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
    (Includes Moneylife Online Magazine)
    FREE: Your Complete Family Record Book
    Keep all the Personal and Financial Details of You & Your Family. In One Place So That`s Its Easy for Anyone to Find Anytime
    We promise not to share your email id with anyone