Vedanta Moves Supreme Court Seeking Stay on Adani’s Resolution Plan for Jaiprakash Associates
S N Thyagarajan ( Bar  and  Bench) 30 March 2026
Mining company Vedanta Limited has moved the Supreme Court seeking stay on Adani Enterprises's insolvency resolution plan for Jaiprakash Associates Limited (JAL) [Vedanta Ltd Vs Bhuvan Madan, RP of Jaiprakash Associates].
 
Vedanta has challenged an order passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) on March 24 refusing to halt Adani's plan.
 
The NCLAT had declined interim relief to Vedanta after noting that issues raised by Vedanta require detailed consideration after hearing all parties. It had also clarified that implementation of the plan would remain subject to the outcome of the appeal.
 
On Sunday, Vedanta chairman Anil Agarwal also weighed in on the dispute, stating that the company had been declared the highest bidder in a “transparent process” but that the outcome was subsequently altered.
 
 
Jaiprakash Associates, a debt-laden infrastructure conglomerate, was admitted into insolvency by the Allahabad Bench of the National Company Law Tribunal on June 3, 2024, on a petition filed by ICICI Bank.
 
The total admitted claims against the company exceeded ₹57,000 crore. The National Asset Reconstruction Company Limited emerged as the largest financial creditor with over 85 per cent voting share in the Committee of Creditors (CoC), which comprised 27 members including banks, financial institutions and a class of homebuyers.
 
As part of the resolution process, 28 expressions of interest were received, of which 25 prospective applicants were shortlisted. Ultimately, six entities submitted resolution plans, including Adani Enterprises, Vedanta, Dalmia Cement (Bharat), Jindal Power, PNC Infratech and Jaypee Infratech.
 
Adani Enterprises and Vedanta emerged as the leading bidders. Independent evaluation placed Adani’s plan ahead, particularly on upfront recovery and overall financial value. In its 23rd meeting in November 2025, the CoC approved Adani’s plan with a 93.81 per cent voting share. The NCLT approved this resolution plan on March 17.
 
Vedanta challenged the rejection of its revised bid, contending that the insolvency process lacked transparency and failed to maximise value for creditors.
 
After the conclusion of the challenge process, Vedanta submitted an addendum to its resolution plan on November 8, 2025. The CoC declined to consider the addendum, citing the bidding framework which prohibited post-process modifications to financial proposals.
 
The Committee of Creditors opposed Vedanta’s plea, arguing that the addendum was submitted after Vedanta became aware that its upfront payment was lower than that of the successful resolution applicant. It maintained that allowing such revisions after the conclusion of the process would undermine the integrity of the bidding framework.
 
Vedanta challenged the decisions before NCLT which approved Adani's plan.
 
The mining giant then filed an appeal before the NCLAT which refused to stay the plan.
 
This order has now been challenged before the apex court.
 
Courtesy :- Bar and Bench
Comments
Meenal Mamdani
2 weeks ago
Good that one Chor is policing another Chor, except that what matters is which Chor is in the current good books of the present govt.
ajeya
Replied to Meenal Mamdani comment 1 week ago
I don't understand the sick mentality of you people, in what way they are chor? just you hate rich people hence all rich people look like chor, as all made money by looting. What about JP group which defaulted on 57,000 cr? If you think or convinced the process is rigged file a petition or at least write a letter to concerned authorities with pointers. No nothing will be done, just keep on ranting in media.
Read how Hindustan Zinc almost gave 200 times return in 24 years after privatization (including dividends and accounting for share split). Visit JSW steel plant near Bellary it has provided job to 20,000 people directly and livelihood to almost 1,00,000 people. It was a state plan in 1960s but didn't took off for 30 years (even though land was acquired). JSW bought it in 1990s and it is a thriving steel industry.
The infrastructure rotting is a grave mistake of the system, auction it and let it function. Please check.
Bombay High Court Rejects Plea for CBI Probe against Reliance over Gas Extraction from ONGC Fields
Bar  and  Bench 27 March 2026
The Bombay High Court on Friday dismissed a petition seeking a criminal investigation by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) into allegations that Reliance Industries Limited (RIL) unlawfully extracted natural gas from the Oil...
Business This Week
Moneylife Digital Team 27 March 2026
The government launched the seventh round of auctions for 19 critical and strategic mineral blocks across multiple states under mining lease and composite licence, with revenues accruing to the respective states. The blocks cover...
Dr Reddy’s Tells Delhi High Court It Will Not Launch Diabetes Drug after Novo Nordisk Objects
Bar  and  Bench 26 March 2026
Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories on Tuesday told the Delhi High Court that it will not commercially manufacture or sell oral tablet Semaglutide falling within the patented range claimed by Novo Nordisk (Novo Nordisk Vs Dr Reddy's).   The...
Corporate CSR Spending Spikes 30% in FY23-24, but Uneven Distribution Raises Policy Concerns: CRISIL
Moneylife Digital Team 26 March 2026
Corporate social responsibility (CSR) spending by listed companies in India has crossed ₹1.22 lakh crore over the past decade, but a significant share of this funding has bypassed the country’s most underdeveloped regions, according...
Free Helpline
Legal Credit
Feedback