Vedanta Moves Delhi High Court against Denial of Extension for Cambay Basin Oil and Gas Block
Prashant Jha (Bar  and  Bench) 30 September 2025
Vedanta has approached the Delhi High Court challenging the Central government’s decision to deny extension to them to continue utilising the Cambay Basin oil and gas block [Vedanta Limited v Union of India & Ors]. 
 
Justice Amit Sharma heard the matter on September 26 when Attorney General (AG) R Venkatramani appeared for the Directorate General of Hydrocarbons (DGH) and challenged the maintainability of the plea.
 
According to the order, Vedanta made an offer after which the AG sought time to obtain instructions. 
 
However, the details of the offer made are not clear from the court order. 
 
The case will be heard next on October 10. 
 
Vedanta had been operating the offshore CB-OS/2 block in Gujarat’s Cambay Basin since its production sharing contract (PSC) was granted on August 30, 1998. The block includes the Lakshmi and Gauri fields, which, according to reports, currently produce around 3,400 barrels of oil per day and 3.4 lakh standard cubic metres of gas daily.
 
The PSC expired on June 30, 2023. Although operations continued while Vedanta’s extension request was under consideration, the Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas formally rejected the application by way of a letter dated September 19.
 
The government then directed ONGC to take interim control of assets, data, operations and responsibilities associated with CB-OS/2 until a new contract is awarded. 
 
In its plea, Vedanta has argued that the government decision is contrary to its own 2017 Policy, as it kept Vedanta’s extension application pending for more than four years in violation of the timelines even though it was obligated to decide the same in nine months. 
 
“Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 have, thus, wrongfully taken advantage of their own wrong and have acted unfairly and arbitrarily by rejecting the Application on the pretext of alleged factors which admittedly did not exist,” the company said. 
 
Further, it stated that the rejection of their application was “ex facie arbitrary, illegal and in unreasonable exercise of power.
 
According to the plea,
 
“It is based on irrelevant considerations and completely ignores relevant considerations. The decision in the Rejection Letter has been made without any application of mind. The grounds for rejection of the Application ex facie are common commercial issues that arise in the normal course of Petroleum Operations under contracts such as production sharing contracts. Further, the purported factors alleged to constitute defaults are false and factually inaccurate on the face of the record.”
 
Senior Advocates Mukul Rohatgi and Rajiv Nayar with advocates Anuradha Dutt, Anish Kapur, Nikhita K Suri, Gurudas Khurana and Raghav Dutt appeared for Vedanta. 
 
Union of India was represented through Central Government Standing Counsel (CGSC) Ashish K Dixit as well as advocates Umar Hashmi, Mayank Upadhyay, Iqra Sheikh and Aditya Sood. 
 
Attorney General R Venkataramani with advocates Nakul Sachdeva, Sagar Arora, Shreyang Rathi, Shrinkhla Tiwari, Abhinandan S and CGSC Ashish K Dixit represented the Directorate General of Hydrocarbons. 
 
Additional Solicitor General (ASG) Chetan Sharma with advocates Abhishek Gupta, Amit Gupta, RU Prabhat, Shubham Sharma, Vikramaditya Singh, Vinay Yadav, Naman, Yashwardhan Sharma, Kumar Kartikeya, Shaswat Pandey and Shubham Sharma appeared for the ONGC. 
 
Advocates Ajoy Roy, Avlokita Rajvi, Lakshya Khanna and Shradha Sriram represented the intervenors.
 
Comments
Taxman or SEBI: Who Will Eventually Police Corporate Brand Royalty Payments?
Sucheta Dalal, 03 October 2025
It began with a footnote. A line item in the accounts of Hindustan Zinc Ltd (HZL), a listed subsidiary of Vedanta Ltd (VEDL), revealed payments of nearly Rs1,060 crore in the first quarter (Q1) of FY25–26 for a so-called ‘brand fee’....
RBI Slaps Rs17.20 Lakh Penalty on 5 Cooperative Banks and Muthoot FinCorp
Moneylife Digital Team 29 September 2025
Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has imposed penalties of Rs17.20 lakh on five cooperative Banks and Muthoot FinCorp Ltd a non-banking financial company (NBFC) for non-compliance with the directions issued by the banking regulator. The...
SEBI Slaps Rs5 Lakh Penalty on Narendra Ramshankar Dubey for Manipulating MHIL Stock Price
Moneylife Digital Team 29 September 2025
Market regulator Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has imposed a penalty of Rs5 lakh on Narendra Ramshankar Dubey for manipulating the share price of Max Heights Infrastructure Ltd (MHIL), a company listed on the Bombay...
Lower Public Float: A Boon for Companies; Threat to Investors
Sucheta Dalal, 26 September 2025
There is always a good reason to do the wrong thing. On 12 September 2025, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), at its board meeting, approved significant changes to the minimum public shareholding (MPS) norms for large...
Free Helpline
Legal Credit
Feedback