The Supreme Court on Friday set aside a Delhi High Court order that had suspended the jail sentence of former Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) legislator Kuldeep Singh Sengar in the 2017 Unnao rape case (Central Bureau of Investigation v. Kuldeep Singh Sengar).
A Bench of Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi also directed the Delhi High Court to promptly decide on Sengar's appeal against his conviction in the case, preferably within two months.
It further added that the High Court should reconsider Sengar's plea for a suspension of his jail sentence if the appeal is not decided soon.
The Court passed the order on an appeal filed by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) challenging the High Court's decision to suspend Sengar's jail sentence and allow his release on bail while his appeal against his rape conviction remains pending.
"We allow the appeal. Set aside the impugned order. High Court shall make an endeavour to decide the main appeal within two months. In case appeal not likely to be heard, let a fresh order be passed concerning the application for suspension of sentence. No opinion expressed in merits. Nor the application for suspension of sentence be influenced by order of this Court. Let appropriate orders be passed preferably before commencement of summer vacations," the Court ordered.
During the hearing today, the Court also took a dim view of the Delhi High Court's earlier prima facie observation that the offence of aggravated penetrative sexual assault under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act was not made out against Sengar.
Notably, under the POCSO Act, penetrative sexual assault becomes aggravated penetrative sexual assault if it is committed by a public servant.
The High Court in its bail/ sentence suspension order had held that Sengar could not be strictly be termed a public servant or a person in “position of trust or authority” for aggravated penetrative sexual assault.
This was one of the primary grounds on which Sengar's sentence was suspended.
The Supreme Court expressed strong disagreement with this approach.
"We do not endorse the hyper-technical conclusion of the High Court. This is a penal legislation which protects children from sexual exploitation," said Justice Bagchi.
"MLA is in a dominant position," added Solicitor General Tushar Mehta.
Meanwhile, Sengar's counsel Senior Advocate N Hariharan questioned whether the POCSO Act was applicable at all.
"I am in the position to show that the prosecutrix is not a minor. The AIIMS board says she was not a minor. All reports are in his favour still he is in jail," Hariharan told the Court.
The case concerns the rape of a 17-year-old girl. She was allegedly kidnapped and raped by Sengar between June 11-20, 2017. She was then sold for ₹60,000, after which she was recovered at the Maakhi police station.
The survivor was thereafter continuously threatened and warned by the police officials against speaking out, as instructed by Sengar.
An FIR finally came to be recorded against Sengar for rape, kidnapping and criminal intimidation along with the provision of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO Act). He was arrested after an order of the Allahabad High Court.
In August 2019, the Supreme Court transferred the trial in four cases relating to the Unnao rape case to Delhi and ordered that the same be held on a day-to-day basis and completed within 45 days.
In December 2019, a trial court sentenced Sengar to life in prison and imposed a fine of ₹25 lakh after finding him guilty of the crime. Sengar approached the Delhi High Court challenging the trial court verdict, and his appeal remains pending there.
In December 2025, a Division Bench of the Delhi High Court suspended Sengar's sentence during the pendency of his appeal against his conviction. The Court also ordered Sengar not to come within 5 kilometer radius of the victim and remain in Delhi during the duration of his bail.
Today's Supreme Court order was passed on the CBI's appeal against this interim order from the Delhi High Court.
Why Put Up a Show of Independence in Election Commission Appointments? Supreme Court Asks Centre
Ritwik Choudhury (Bar
and
Bench)
14 May 2026
The Supreme Court on Thursday asked the Central government why it was putting up a “show of independence” in appointing Election Commissioners by keeping the Leader of Opposition (LoP) in the selection committee.
The current panel...
Indian LPG Carriers Transit Hormuz as India Condemns Attack on Cargo Vessel off Oman Coast
Moneylife Digital Team
14 May 2026
Two India-bound liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) tankers have successfully crossed the strategically crucial Strait of Hormuz amid continuing tensions in West Asia, even as an India-flagged cargo vessel sank after coming under attack...
Supreme Court Orders SIT Probe into Illegal Sale of Land Belonging to Maharishi Mahesh Yogi-founded Society
Ritu Yadav (Bar
and
Bench)
14 May 2026
The Supreme Court has ordered a Special Investigation Team (SIT) probe into the alleged illegal sale of properties belonging to the Spiritual Regeneration Movement Foundation of India, a society founded under the guidance of spiritual...
Chief Justice Surya Kant Constitutes Committee To Map Infrastructural Requirements for Courts; Seeks ₹40,000-₹50,000 Crore Funds
Debayan Roy (Bar
and
Bench)
12 May 2026
Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant has constituted a Judicial Infrastructure Advisory Committee to map the infrastructural requirements of courts across India and make a case for a government allocation of ₹40,000 to ₹50,000...
