Transparency Is the Key to Resolve NRC Chaos
There is considerable turmoil and controversy surrounding the Citizen Amendment Act (CAA).
 
Over twenty lives have been lost so far and, in many places, there are stories of pitched battles between police and protestors. I am trying to look at this dispassionately.
 
The CAA makes a provision for religious minorities from Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan to acquire Indian citizenship if they have entered India before 31 December 2014. The government’s stated reason is that these minorities suffer persecution in these Islamic countries and India is the natural home for them. The opponents of this law have pointed out that this law clearly discriminates against Muslims, since it is the only community left out,- and will be used to target Muslims in India. They contend that this amendment goes against the secular nature of India’s constitution and must be scrapped and questions why religious minorities from Myanmar and Sri Lanka have been left out. The government argues that India cannot offer to become the country for refuge to everyone in the world, and that India is the natural home for these minorities. 
 
Neither side is revealing the real reasons. Perhaps the principal reason for the government bringing in this law was to ensure that the lakhs of Hindus likely to be disenfranchised by the Assam national register of citizens (NRC) should be protected. This conflicts with the local Assamese desire to retain their cultural identity. Perhaps the earlier Central governments and the Assam state governments may have realized the complex problem and hence did not show much enthusiasm to finish the process as per the accord. On the other hand those opposing CAA are probably worried about the impact this will have on the NRC when it is implemented. The government argues that they have not decided on NRC so far.
 
To many citizens in the country the amendment promises the minorities of three neighboring countries the chance to lead a life of dignity and cannot understand what motivates the opposition. It feels this arises out of a visceral distrust of the Prime Minister and the government in power. What is the real issue?
 
The elephant in the room is the government’s stated objective of a National Register of Citizens. This was part of the manifesto of the ruling party and was mentioned by the President in his address to Parliament. The government’s intention to implement the NRC has been mentioned by the home minister numerous times. Presently the government has been claiming that no NRC has been finalised, and that it would not take away the citizenship of any Indian Hindu or Muslim. However, it has not spelt out how the NRC would be implemented and how citizenship would be established. 
 
It is well recognized that most people’s claim to citizenship arises from having been born in the country. Additionally,- at times,- it is the birthplace of their parents and grandparents. This has to be established by documentation. That is the real snag. It is likely that a significant percentage of India’s population will not be able to give any birth certificates, either because they did not obtain one or have lost it (I do not have my birth certificate). 
 
Aadhaar or ration card cannot be the basis for accepting citizenship claims. Some people have said election cards, passports or permanent account number (PAN) cards could be the accepted as valid documents. 
 
How will migrant labour be able to establish their citizenship? What about orphans, women whose names and surnames may have been changed at marriage? There are innumerable questions and doubts which need to be addressed. 
 
If the present CAA had not been enacted the difficulty would have been so universal and widespread that either the government would have given up the exercise or would have had to dilute the requirements to such an extent that it would have become a farce. 
 
It is no secret that there is widespread harassment and corruption even in issuing ration cards. If this is an issue of citizenship, which has to be established to avoid being hauled into a detention camp, the level of corruption is likely to be very high and the trauma and insecurity felt by the poor will make demonetisation look like a luxury holiday.
 
With CAA in place the norms for establishing citizenship could be stringent for those who may not be able to show documents. It could be argued that even if non-Muslims were not born in India, they would only have to show that they were in India before December 2014, and hence could not be denied Indian citizenship.
 
That would leave only the Muslims having to fulfil the near impossible task of proving they are Indian citizens. This would expose them to great harassment, humiliation and corruption. 
 
Many Indian citizens may be sent to detention camps and an uncertain future. It would leave a deep scar on the nation. This is the main fear. The government not spelling out how it will carry out NRC without subjecting to trauma the poor Indian citizens, creates great distrust.
 
This can be changed if the government transparently explains how the NRC will be implemented and lays down all the requirements and processes before the nation. Alternately it should assure the nation that it will not impose NRC in the next decade. The government must regain the trust of all Indians.
 
(Shailesh Gandhi is Former Central Information Commissioner and can be reached at [email protected]
  • Like this story? Get our top stories by email.

    User

    COMMENTS

    Nasreen Rustomfram

    2 months ago

    Clear and dispassionate article spelling out why CAA/NPR/NRC are ill-judged and open to mischievous implementation. CAA had to be rolled back. NPR should stick to what it was in 2010 without additional questions on parents birthplace etc.

    REPLY

    kedar Nayak

    In Reply to Nasreen Rustomfram 2 months ago

    Why are you worried as long as your parents birth place is in India

    m.prabhu.shankar

    2 months ago

    Excellent Article. Key issue is as mentioned in the article how you will estabilish the citizenship ? Nothing is planned on that as of now which is the main root cause for this problem.

    Meenal Mamdani

    2 months ago

    Mr. Gandhi, I beg to differ.
    The govt was advised by qualified individuals that it could achieve the same objective, namely protection of people seeking asylum without using terms "minorities", "persecuted", "religious" as these terms would create legal challenges.
    The govt deliberately chose to name religions in order to highlight that Muslims were excluded. This was clearly to appease and stoke its base.
    Not only are Rohingyas, Sri Lankan Tamils excluded but also Ahamadiyas+Shias+Bahais from Pakistan as well as Sunnis from Afghanistan who are fleeing the murderous war in that country.
    CAA was a mischievous exercise to divide the society.
    NPR is similar to census except that this time additional questions have been added so that people can be pinpointed for govt purposes.
    US will be conducting its census this year and it does not ask for social security number of respondents. The purpose of a census is to estimate how many people live in a particular area, district, state, etc so resources can be distributed based on these numbers. Trump wanted to add question of citizenship to target illegal immigrants. This was denied by the courts as it would have scared people from answering questions truthfully and thus the census figures would be inaccurate.

    Dr.Dhananjaya Bhupathi

    2 months ago

    1. In this over-charged atmosphere against CAA/NRC/NPR, prudent for every politician/student /citizen to view Sadguru’s enlightening speech just for 20 minutes and think judiciously with a cool mind whether to protest or accept? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=11RgVkZcPjY
    https://in.yahoo.com/news/bank-personnel-arrested-accepting-bribe-072823274.html
    1. Entire Indian citizenry, be it old or young pinned all hopes on our Karma Yogi PM, Shri Narendra Modi to rescue us. We believe in the God to see his election as first time MLA to become Gujarat CM & as first time MP to become the revolutionary PM-Modi’s revolutionary thoughts ensuring fast sweeping changes in the realization of his dream “‘THE BRIGHT FUTURE FOR THE TEEMING MILLIONS OF THE TALENTED, QUALIFIED & INTELLIGENT YOUTH; SO THAT INVESTORS FROM ALL OVER THE GLOBE SHALL INVEST HERE”. Entire Indians are lucky to have a vibrant Judiciary to have equi-vision in tune with a revolutionary PM. Our most dynamic Judiciary is the harbinger of jet-speed Indian social change. Indian PM Modiji is adjudged is as the best PM-UNESCO.


    2. Those citizens not interested to catch with jet-speed Indian social change, none can stop it.


    3. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Si8U02s8cQ.
    4. SATYAMAEVA JAYATHE!!!.

    S A Narayan

    2 months ago

    The tragedy of modern day governance and administration is that man is a nobody if he doesn't have a paper, a number, or possessions in his/her name. The fact of his/her physical presence in front of any authority will not be believed but 3 others who say he exists will be accepted! Numbers game bereft of common sense.

    REPLY

    Dr.Dhananjaya Bhupathi

    In Reply to S A Narayan 2 months ago

    Please, refer to Sadguru's enlightening video on youtube.

    N M Rajugopal Shreedhar

    2 months ago

    I think there is general agreement that a national register is indeed essential , in order to know how many citizens living in the country, alongwith other details. The problem is with the implementation, the previous experience in assam and also with aadhar has led to a trust deficit in the enabling government machinery ;, may be better if govt fixes the flaws in the system and then embarks on this exercise.

    REPLY

    Dr.Dhananjaya Bhupathi

    In Reply to N M Rajugopal Shreedhar 2 months ago

    Please, refer to Sadguru's enlightening video on youtube.

    FM outlines Rs 102 lakh cr National Infrastructure Pipeline
    Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman on Tuesday said that the government intends to launch a National Infrastructure Pipeline (NIP).
     
    Addressing the media here, Sitharaman said that the task force created by the government for infrastructure has recommended projects worth Rs 102 lakh crore under the National Infrastructure Pipeline, going beyond the government's initial target of Rs 100 lakh crore.
     
    She further said that investment of another Rs 3 lakh crore would be added to the pipeline and added that around 63 per cent of the projects in the pipeline are firmed up.
     
    The Centre and the states would have equal share of 39 per cent in the proposed NIP and private sector would have 22 per cent which the government expects to increase to 30 per cent by 2025.
     
    The minister noted that the task force held 70 different consultations with several stakeholders including ministries, states, infrastructure companies, developers among others in the last four months.
     
    Disclaimer: Information, facts or opinions expressed in this news article are presented as sourced from IANS and do not reflect views of Moneylife and hence Moneylife is not responsible or liable for the same. As a source and news provider, IANS is responsible for accuracy, completeness, suitability and validity of any information in this article.
     
  • User

    Firms, shops with a turnover of over Rs50 crore get one more month to go digital
    Shops, business firms or companies with an annual turnover of Rs 50 crore or more and required to provide digital payment facilities to customers as part of government's stride towards a less-cash economy, will not have to pay any penalty till January 31 for not installing the system.
     
    They would, however, be made to cough up Rs 5,000 per day as penalty for failing to accept payments in the prescribed digital modes from February 1, 2020.
     
    Clarifying this, the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) said that the move was aimed at giving sufficient time to the specified person to install and operationalise the facility for accepting payment through prescribed electronic modes.
     
    In a circular, the CBDT said that penalty under Section 271DB of the Finance Act shall not be levied if the specified person installs and operationalises the facilities on or before January 31, 2020.
     
    "However, if the specified person fails to do so, he shall be liable to pay a penalty of five thousand rupees per day from 1st February, 2020 under section 271DB of the Act for such failure," the circular dated December 30 said.
     
    In order to encourage digital economy and move towards a less cash economy, a new provision was inserted in the Income Tax Act to require every person having a business turnover of more than Rs 50 crore to mandatorily provide facilities for accepting payments through prescribed electronic modes.
     
    RuPay and UPI are among the prescribed mode of payment for digital transactions without any Merchant Discount Rate (MDR). The MDR is the percentage of the digital transaction that a merchant pays to banks. This cost is most often passed on to the customers.
     
    In her Budget speech in July, Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman had listed out BHIM UPI, UPI-QR Code, Aadhaar Pay, certain Debit cards among others as the low-cost digital modes of payment which could be offered without levying MDR in order to promote a less-cash economy.
     
    The Minister last Saturday announced that the MDR charges for businesses with over Rs 50 crore annual revenues will be waived off from January 1, 2020.
     
    Section 10A of the Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007 which was inserted by the Finance Act provides that no bank or system provider shall impose and charge on a payer, or a beneficiary receiving payment, through electronic mode prescribed under Section 269SU of the Act.
     
    "Consequently, any charge including the MDR shall not be applicable on or after January 1, 2020 on payment made through prescribed electronic modes," the CBDT circular said.
     
    Disclaimer: Information, facts or opinions expressed in this news article are presented as sourced from IANS and do not reflect views of Moneylife and hence Moneylife is not responsible or liable for the same. As a source and news provider, IANS is responsible for accuracy, completeness, suitability and validity of any information in this article.
     
  • Like this story? Get our top stories by email.

    User

    We are listening!

    Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.
      Loading...
    Close

    To continue


    Please
    Sign Up or Sign In
    with

    Email
    Close

    To continue


    Please
    Sign Up or Sign In
    with

    Email

    BUY NOW

    online financial advisory
    Pathbreakers
    Pathbreakers 1 & Pathbreakers 2 contain deep insights, unknown facts and captivating events in the life of 51 top achievers, in their own words.
    online financia advisory
    The Scam
    24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
    Moneylife Online Magazine
    Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
    financial magazines online
    Stockletters in 3 Flavours
    Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
    financial magazines in india
    MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
    (Includes Moneylife Online Magazine)
    FREE: Your Complete Family Record Book
    Keep all the Personal and Financial Details of You & Your Family. In One Place So That`s Its Easy for Anyone to Find Anytime
    We promise not to share your email id with anyone