Thousands transferred, branches closed, but no major protests in SBI
IANS 16 August 2017
India's largest lender, State Bank of India (SBI), has rationalised 716 offices (594 branches and 122 administrative offices) and several thousands of employees have been transferred beginning this fiscal, but, strangely, there have been no major protests, top officials said.
 
Several hundreds of offices would be closed and thousands of staff would be moved in the coming months, officials added.
 
Strangely one does not hear any major complaints of vindictiveness or arbitrariness from the normally vociferous banking sector employees. This, at a time when leading software companies are arbitrarily firing people at day's notice.
 
Even the unions that strongly opposed the merger of six banks with SBI and were apprehensive about treatment of incoming staff by the SBI management agree that there is not much of vindictive or arbitrary movement of people till now, making one wonder as to how and why this happened.
 
Around 70,000 employees (around 40,000 Cass III and IV and around 30,000 officers) were added to SBI's rolls following the merger of SBBJ (State Bank of Bikaner and Jaipur), SBM (State Bank of Mysore), SBT (State Bank of Travancore), SBP (State Bank of Patiala) and SBH (State Bank of Hyderabad) and Bharatiya Mahila Bank.
 
"By and large, the staff redeployment in SBI has been smooth. However, there seems to be complaints of vindictive transfers in Kerala which the management must address satisfactorily," C.H. Venkatachalam, General Secretary, All India Bank Employees' Association (AIBEA), told IANS.
 
But how is it that SBI is managing the show without the flag of protest being raised by the usually vociferous unions?
 
"The management did not deviate from the transfer policies that were signed between the management and the unions," Sanjeev Kumar Bandlish, General Secretary, All India State Bank of India Staff Federation (AISBISF), told IANS.
 
"There are set transfer policies for officers and the award staff. We have told the management not to transfer employees on a large scale," D. Thomas Franco Rajendra Dev, President, All India State Bank Officers Federation (AIBOF), told IANS.
 
Union leaders said the employees were consulted and posting preferences were sought prior to their transfer.
 
"The employees were moved to other branches located in the close vicinity of their earlier offices. This reduced tension in the minds of incoming employees to a large extent," Neeraj Vyas, Deputy Managing Director and Chief Operating Officer, told IANS.
 
He said those who opted to take higher responsibility under the Career Progression Plan (CPP) were transferred to another location as per the existing policy.
 
"The reservation about the merger was only in the incoming employees' minds. Once the merger happened and the employees saw the systematic way the policies were followed, the mental block against the merger has melted," Vyas said.
 
"When the merger was proposed, integrating the officers of associate banks was not considered to be a problem. However, in the case of clerical cadres there was a crucial difference between SBI and the associate banks," Vyas added.
 
Vyas said that under the SBI's CPP for clerical staff, those who accept higher responsibility are given additional powers and allowances.
 
"But such schemes were not there in the associate banks and the major union there -- the AIBEA -- had opposed the scheme," Vyas said.
 
He said many employees of the erstwhile associate banks have now opted for the CPP.
 
According to Vyas, there were no mass scale transfers in the associate banks prior to the introduction of Voluntary Retirement Scheme (VRS) before the merger.
 
A total of 3,569 employees opted for VRS.
 
"The VRS numbers were as per our initial expectations," Vyas said.
 
In the case of officers, they will be transferred on promotion or after completing three years at a location.
 
On the staff redeployment process, Vyas said the bank planned a mix of employees -- those who are originally from SBI and from associate banks -- so that they get culturally integrated with SBI.
 
According to SBI, the projected number of staff to be redeployed due to rationalisation of administrative offices and branches is around 10,616.
 
The bank has said that nearly 30 per cent of the 8,616 staff to be redeployed due to branch rationalisation will be posted in sales functions.
 
Questioned about the complaints on transfer in Kerala, Vyas replied: "Only 25 employees of erstwhile State Bank of Travancore (SBT) have complained out of 4,300 employees to whom the Career Progression Plan was offered."
 
He said the unions in SBT had vociferously opposed the career progression scheme prior to the merger.
 
According to Vyas, the acceptance of the career progression scheme amongst the erstwhile associate bank employees is around 80 per cent now, the same as in SBI.
 
Queried about the criteria for closure of banks, Vyas said it is based on factors like profitability, viability, period of lease, footfalls and others.
 
"We are not closing the branches of erstwhile associate banks. Even SBI branches will be closed if they do not fulfill the criteria. We move from rental premises to owned premises wherever possible," Vyas added.
 
According to Vyas, the total number of branches that would be rationalised will be around 1,400, of which 594 have been completed.
 
"The remaining will happen over a period of time. Further we will open new branches wherever needed," he added.
 
Disclaimer: Information, facts or opinions expressed in this news article are presented as sourced from IANS and do not reflect views of Moneylife and hence Moneylife is not responsible or liable for the same. As a source and news provider, IANS is responsible for accuracy, completeness, suitability and validity of any information in this article.
 
Comments
Ramesh I
8 years ago
The statements made by senior SBI officials in the article seems to suggest that the Bank exists mainly to accommodate their staff, and there is no mention of improving their service levels for their customers. Most PSUs are loss-making and survive only due to Govt infusing funds into them regularly. Unlike their private sector counterparts, most PSUs have no pressure to be profitable, hence there is no culture of being customer-friendly. I wish the amalgamation of the five Banks with SBI in Mar-Apr'17 had ensured that the Bank remains lean and their staff is absorbed into SBI only on a need-basis. Wish SBI also became customer-friendly, as it focuses on being employee-friendly.
Govinda Warrier
Replied to Ramesh I comment 8 years ago
Let's accept this position for a moment. If Private Sector is so efficient and competitive, what prevents that Sector from subsuming the business and services traditionally remaining with Public Sector? Why Private Sector Banks' Business Share and geographical penetration remain low and stagnant? Taking a recent report from UP, why there's only one Medical College for all of sixteen districts there? Why Private Sector is refusing to fill the gap?
A BANERJEE
8 years ago
The question is:will the customers'satisfaction level increase after these exercises by SBI which, measured in any terms, hardly cares for customer care. There are thousands of instances of failure to send, even electronically, statutory TDS certificates to account holders (despite repeated requests), refusal to respond to customers' e-mails, inconvenience caused to senior citizens, and the like. It may also be mentioned here that, by way of "modernising " its approach (to transparency?), the leading bank of India has removed from its website all the details of the email contact addresses of the the offices/executives!
K V RAO
8 years ago
5 associates and one other bank that hot merged with SBI had 6500 branches.Out of this only 750 branches are getting closed. The talk of synergy in terms of expenses and revenue is all buii shit to say the least.The current incumbent (read Ms.Arundathi Bhattacharya)has an urge to merge and she (like her counter parts abroad)believes in big size.Big banks in western and European countries have eaten dust when their banking system collapsed.Small banks in India are doing well in India on all parameters.SBI has a bagful of problems.The top management's appetite for size is highly misplaced.It is interesting to know that HDFC Bank does not want to grow big in terms of branches.It is not interested in augmenting capital as it would expand its balance sheet due to the advantage of leverage available for banking industry. Your report is highly misleading.Staff at any level will never cooperate with management. Integration of processes will eat precious time.Staff costs with less productivity,bulging bad eggs (read NPAs),lack of accountability,lack of motivation would all contribute to the mess.It appears as if SBI will become the second Air India.
K V RAO
Replied to K V RAO comment 8 years ago
Rao has succinctly narrated the whole issue of SBI merger. His predective ability is excellent.But the big question:is anybody listening?Prashanth
Govinda Warrier
8 years ago
Looks, the trouble is having no trouble to gossip about. Transitions can be smooth and with less pains, if not pain-free. Kerala case is always different. But that too will pass. The current mergers are not about "closure" of business, but more about professionalising, rationalising and restructuring.
Free Helpline
Legal Credit
Feedback