The truth about Satyamev Jayate’s donations

The donation numbers look strange, the actual terms and conditions are not so clear and the show is flagging


On 20th June, Moneylife wrote how Satyamev Jayate (SMJ), the do-gooding show that was to redefine prime time and claimed to reach a massive 40 crore Indians (over just five episodes) had collected just Rs1.7 crore for seven NGOs so far. Of this Rs85.25 lakh has come from Reliance Foundation (numbers provided by them), which had offered to match the donations received from others.

SMJ’s website ( had 13 NGOs on the list, of which seven received the funds until then: Unique Home for Girls, Snehalaya, Amarjyoti School, Family of Disabled, Himmat, Childline and Azad Foundation.

While I wrote to Reliance Foundation, I also contacted SMJ’s official PR agency (Hanmer MS&L) listed on its website and asked for the donation numbers. Late that night, after our report was published, a Hanmer executive wrote to say that she didn’t have the numbers, but the Rs85.25 lakh that Reliance Foundation had paid reflected only the first five days of donation and that Snehalaya had in fact received Rs70 lakh.  She promised to get me the exact numbers by 21st June afternoon.


This was after seven episodes had already been aired. We sent a reminder on 23rd June and also pointed out a mistake in the “terms & conditions”, which said that the exact donations received would be announced on Asar, a programmed aired on Aaj Tak channel every Friday night. In fact Asar is aired on ABP News, formerly Star News. This gross mistake was corrected on 25th June along with certain other changes.

Finally on 25th June (seven weeks after the show went on air), five days after our report, the Hanmer PR person wrote to say SMJ has received Rs1.9 crore through Axis Bank and another Rs25 to Rs30 lakh through text messages (so much for precision and disclosures), which means “Rs3 crore plus” of donations after adding “Rs85 lakh donated by Reliance”. She writes, “Reliance only doubles the amount collected in the first week (after telecast date). From a legal perspective, there needs to be a cut off date for Reliance to double the amount”.

But hasn’t Aamir Khan been looking us in the eye (through our TV screens) and telling us that Reliance Foundation will match the donations received? Then why is its contribution less than half the total received? As always, Reliance Foundation seems to have bargained a phenomenal deal—a big dollop of publicity for Nita Ambani’s plans to change the world, being economic with the truth (in terms of what it would match) and coughing up just Rs85 lakh over six weeks, when advertisers have been paying Rs8-Rs10 lakh for a 10 second spot! Bharti Airtel, the presenting sponsor, is understood to have paid Rs17-Rs20 crore while associate sponsors (Skoda, Coca Cola, Axis Bank, etc.) have paid Rs6-Rs7 crore each for far less visibility than Reliance. Why don’t the terms and conditions mention that Reliance Foundation only matches donations of the first week?

Naturally, we found this breezy obfuscation unacceptable and demanded a break up. By now, Star India officials had corrected the terms and conditions and updated the website. They have finally updated the website to say that the show had yielded—630,298,439 connections, 8,839,494 responses, 2,778,984 community members and Rs30,160,678 in donations. There was still no clarity about how these figures were arrived at and who got how much. On asking for a detailed break-up, we received an email from them.

The numbers are interesting (see table). Data for the first two episodes indicates that nearly half the donations were received in the second week after the telecast, despite the flutter on social media caused by the programme’s first episode. Secondly, Snehalaya, the NGO featured in the first programme garnered Rs1.3 crore or nearly half the total donations generated by the first six shows. Yet, barely 2.2% were through sms. Digital marketing experts may explain why sms-happy Indians were so reluctant to donate through texts, but apparently donated through more cumbersome online contributions to Axis Bank, that too a week after the episode. It will be interesting to see how many of the Axis Bank donations came from overseas transfers.

Childline and Himmat managed to attract the next highest number of donations (around Rs40 lakh each) while The Humanity Trust, West Bengal which has been subject of nasty innuendo because it was confused with another trust of the same name (finally corrected and explained by SMJ’s website only on 25th June) had the third highest collection of Rs27 lakh. But given the fact that it is this show that probably had the maximum impact on public consciousness, the amount collected was strangely too small.

What is however evident from the numbers, is that SMJ is fast losing steam. Only two episodes have really made waves—the first on female foeticide, mainly because it startled people and the second on medical malpractices, because it affects us all. Also, the massive clout of the pharmaceutical and medical equipment manufacturers ensures that we get to know so little of the sleazy underbelly healthcare sector. In fact, media reports on medical malpractice rarely go beyond doctor’s negligence.

The political class, which was wary after the first episode, has now begun to ignore the show. SMJ still has the potential to pack a punch for social transformation, but it needs some changes. For one, many viewers say that 90 minutes is far too long on a Sunday morning and there is no follow up action from the producers. They and Aamir Khan Productions obviously expected to just sit back and rake in the moolah and the glory. If activism could be reduced to show business, India would not need drastic transformation 65 years after independence.

  • Like this story? Get our top stories by email.




    5 years ago

    I dug a little on the SMS donation and found this

    Assuming that Airtel also charges the same as UK operators which the site confirms in it's T&C ( Rule 2A.2.3 "after the deduction of the mobile operator’s share and applicable government taxes and other service charges.") Isn't it gross misrepresentation when Aamir Khan says '5 Rs from each SMS will go to towards the NGO'?

    Praney Sharma

    5 years ago

    What is the objective of the Satyamev Jayate Trust and who are the trustees of the Trust and what are their background. Just by highlighting sensitive issues you can't bring about changes in the society therefore there must be follow up for actual benefits to people.

    Ramesh Poapt

    6 years ago

    This is high time to check up deeper on the working of the NGOs. A separate survey may please be done and it may please be taken up by ML and kindly publish it in ML.Lots of CSR activities taking place thru NGOs.Though basically it is a welcome change, much needed one.

    Veeresh Malik

    6 years ago

    The said NGO "HUMANITY TRUST" does not display any information under RTI nor does it place its accounts up for open scrutiny.

    Nor can any other real information be found anywhere online as yet.


    Nagesh Kini

    In Reply to Veeresh Malik 6 years ago

    It is time that the GOI comes out with pre-approving names for trusts to be registered and a new mechanism for getting those already registered by insisting on those latter with similar names to carry out changes. when it can be done for companies and product names it should not be difficult for registered trusts as well.

    Sucheta Dalal

    In Reply to Veeresh Malik 6 years ago

    Veeresh. There are at least three Humanity Trusts in India. That is how we work . Bu the one that got the donations is a legitimate NGO that is doing excellent work. I have posted this and details in some of my comments at the time the show was on last year.

    Mr Hi Fi

    7 years ago


    mohd jaffer

    8 years ago

    i have got a mail from reliance
    The Reliance Foundation would like to inform you that you have been chosen by the board of directors as one of the final recipients of a cash Grant/Donation for your own personal, educational, and business development in order to reduce the poverty rate in your Community. Reliance Foundation was established in 1966 Mumbai, Maharashtra, Indiaby His Highness the Dhirubhai Ambani the organization's chairperson and driving force, to celebrate the new year 46th anniversary program, Reliance Foundation is giving out a yearly donation of (Rs.6 Crores) to each lucky recipients all over India by which At least 15% of the awarded funds should be used by you to develop your local communities.

    This is a yearly program which is a measure of universal development strategy, for further information on how to transfer the donation cash awards to you contact foreign exchange department reserve bank of India with your complete Name; Address; Age: Contact Phone Number & Country of Residence through this e-mail Address:
    ( [email protected] )

    We the Board of directors of the Reliance Foundation Congratulate you.
    Mukesh Ambani, chairman and managing director (CMD), Reliance Industries Ltd

    London Office
    Tel :+447017413853
    Fax :44364474647
    Mail: P.O. Box 5825 London
    Name Robert Walpole


    8 years ago

    Good details . My compliments for presenting the facts and transparency to the public.

    Mohan Siroya

    Arhant Jain

    8 years ago

    Completely agree with Chitra Raman. Aamir does not claim to change the world but only highlight the important issues. Thanks to ML for the activism but pls keep the skepticism away and support whole heartedly.


    8 years ago

    The world of charity is not necessarily of human beings with charitable dispensation. Charity is big business, a very big vote catching machinery, a most reliable path to get international awards and recognition, and certainly a source of acquisition of wealth--the most powerful weapon of power.


    8 years ago


    Chitra Raman

    8 years ago

    Ms. Dalal, while I am glad people like you are keeping a watchful eye out and making sure that people put their money where their mouth is,I am disgusted with the mean-spiritedness with which Aamir Khan has been dealt with by certain sections of the media and viewers. After all he is not claiming to be an avatar or a prophet. He has presented his goal right from the get-go as being a catalyst to get people thinking about the issues he presents.

    During my last visit to India I found everything about the television landscape geared to getting people riled up-- and the more they got riled up the more immobile they seemed to get.

    In Satyameva Jayate you have a program format that presents a problem, presents people who have dealt with it or overcome/transcended it, and tells you that YOU have the power to get off your duff and make a difference. Change after all begins with attitude. Why are people being so negative and looking only at the moolah that Aamir Khan is supposed to be raking in? There are so many avenues open to him for moolah -- his colleagues like ShahRukh Khan are after all not past posing for skin-lightening creams(nauseating); Saif Ali Khan moves his hips for potato chips; and Amitabh Bachchan endorses cement and insurance and who knows what else.

    Sure, by all means hold Reliance accountable for delivering on their stated promise. But don't sneer at someone who steps forward with an innovative and well-intentioned initiative and portray it as "activism reduced to show business." It is being reduced to show business only by moomphali-chewing couch potatoes who are content to sit by the sidelines like vultures waiting for the next carcass to pick at.

    Unless the soul of India is dead, I am counting on there being idealistic people, young and mature among the show's wider audience for whom activism will EVOLVE from show business. Or, if they are activists already, that they will feel a sense of validation and comradeship with the causes portrayed. They will know that their work does matter -- even if they are making a difference in the life of ONE person, that their efforts are not worthless or futile. They might make more efforts to connect with like-minded people who share their values and vision instead of seeing opportunities only in terms of opportunities to curse the status quo, seeing challenges as not worth attempting because failure is inevitable.

    There is no television program, no force on earth that can shake people out of this copout mentality -- unless they feel inside that it is worth it. Aamir is merely the vehicle for the much-needed message that we're all in this together and each one of us can be either part of the problem or part of the solution. A good beginning would be for people to shut out the noise and suck in the substance.


    CarolineT Dalvi

    In Reply to Chitra Raman 8 years ago

    Dear Chitra,

    Rightly said! Amir is only a catalyst to get us thinking. And kudos to him for that!

    The problem is not just in the authorities. The problem is in us, we Indians who gloat & sneer over our prosperity in one hand and the poverty in another!

    Unless, we stand up now for our common good, can't say what will be India's future in the next decade!

    P M Ravindran

    8 years ago

    Atleast I, for one, am not surprised. By and large it must the same viewers who must be watching the show and how much can they donate to charity? Personally I am very much against charity because essentially it is for taking care of our weaker sections that we need a government at all and all that we can see our people in govt doing is looting in the name of these very same weaker sections. So, to my mind atleast, priority one for any socially conscious citizen should be making the people in govt deliver. We have just heard about eh Kolkatta high court order in the Singur case. What a tragedy that the courts hold displacing the poor to acquire land and give it to MNCs legally tenable and the reverse untenable!

    Coming to SMJ specifically, I have no doubt that Aamir Khan can easily carry the show on his shoulders. The SMSes and donations are only bonuses. In any case the charities sponsored by SMJ are not the only charities that need citizen support. I must say that it is the charities spread all over the country that is holding the maoists and naxalites at bay. Ther are plenty of them doing good jobs. For example Devasharayam, Chirakuakal, Karunya, Chaitanya in Palakkad. Whatever little I can spare after 'wasting' most of my income in judicial reform and RTI related activities, goes to these charitable organisations. They are in my neighborhood and I do see the fruits of their labour!

    Rajiv Chawla

    8 years ago

    We live in times where it's not easy to believe messages, ads, sermons, agents advisories. From claims and promises in ads & messages for sale of products to Insurance Policies, there remain issues & gaps. We have, therefore, become extremely sceptic. May be rightly so in some cases. However, we must let live and breath new saner, thoughts, ideas and presentations which are radically different and content wise well researched and positive. It's not strange when people like me, who have spent thousands to lacs in our lifetime on pilgrimages, stones & rings that we wear, rites & rituals, the amounts spent on various pujas, food for monkeys, draining food, sweets, fruits & pulses in flowing water, Food to dog, crow etc during shraadh, year after year and much much more, do not question the logic or rationale, however, and I admit, I haven't donated a single penny to any of the NGOs or causes that I've seen in the programme so far, even though I've been touched at times and also believe in the suggested solutions. Why am I taking so long? Would I have thought as much when I hear a Swami giving Upaaya which promises miracles straight from God or any of His subsidiaries? May be I'm not used to this. Not to be disheartened. Collection in case of SatyamevJayate or similar programmes shall always be less than 'SMS' collections at "Kaun Banega Crorepati" or the "Voting for Singing or Dancing Stars in TV Contests". We donate more to Nirmal & many Babas, Gurus & Swamis in sheer hope of 'miracles' to take care of our ailments and pains rather than strengthening institutions that work in those areas. Even donations to Mother Teresa and other notable foundations would be far less than JaiGuru Dev or Sai Baba or many other religious institutions and temples. Therefore, collection of money is no criterion to gauge a programme that aims at awakening, educating, providing right thoughts and giving option to donate without invoking God or religion. We need to wake up even to the fact that even money spent on 'Prasadam' on Tuesday or Thursday or any other day does not guarantee miracle, while a single rupee to these causes may make a difference. And if any Foundation or CSR activity makes promise to double the collection, it is welcome to and need to be encouraged, more so, if the offer is open ended and they keep doubling over a longer period. In fact, and I repeat, we as TV viewers need time to let the thought of donations to these or similar institutions percolate deep, and actually make donation. Because, we are not used to it. Miracle, in real life, lies in the hearts and mind of people. Hope it works soon. I see Satyamev Jayate making impact at the mass level.



    In Reply to Rajiv Chawla 8 years ago

    I really like your comment. It is from the heart and so true. Instead of the moralising by others, who do not want to read what Moneylife has been saying about SMJ and the support lent to the programme so far, this is by far the most touching response I have read.

    I also suspect that some of the criticism about this article is from producers of the show. I cant see how regular readers of this web-zine would have failed to notice the support to Aamir Khan's show by Moneylife.

    Also, as a reader, I am here because i get to read views that others dont dare to voice.
    I would only say Kudos to Mr Chawla and keep it up Moneylife. The expose was required, ignore the whiners who will crib whatever you do. And of course the vested interests in the garb of saints!

    Ramesh Poapt

    8 years ago

    SMJ-good show broadly,sensitized people on valid must go on!good effort indeed!but the above figures seems far from 'satyamev'-not'satyam'.AK seems serious prima facie.barring this, he is very smart businessman!better than many khans though!


    8 years ago

    The article is great as usual, i would like to make just one point why we are treating AMIR AS GOD, he can be honest/corrupt but yes as mentioned in the article he must inform the viewers about the actual terms and conditions. Sjm is doing good job but it will be appreciated if they maintain the transparency towards the donations.The SJM would become a rocking show if they keep track of steps taken after the previous episode and highlights it in the next show otherwise its just "fire and forget" for both presenter and viewer.At last i want to say that we are expecting too much from sjm; its just a show taking up public issues but ITS NOT COMPLETE SAMAJ SEVA.

    Public Interest   Exclusive
    Cement Cartel: A lesson in regulation

    Competition Commission of India again delivers on its mandate. If only older regulators had as much spine as CCI

    By imposing a stunning penalty of Rs6,307 crore on 11 cement companies for price fixing and cartelisation, the Competition Commission of India (CCI) has once again shown that it will not hesitate to use its powers against market abuses. The penalty is calculated at 50% of...

    Premium Content
    Monthly Digital Access


    Already A Subscriber?
    Yearly Digital Access


    Moneylife Magazine Subscriber or MAS member?

    Yearly Subscriber Login

    Enter the mail id that you want to use & click on Go. We will send you a link to your email for verficiation
  • Public Interest   Exclusive
    Healthcare system controlled by pharma companies at the cost of patients – Part I

    The healthcare industry is virtually run by “big money” pharma companies and manufacturers of modern equipment. Doctors are mere pawns in their hands. A new series on solutions for the ailing healthcare industry

    Aamir Khan has stirred a hornet’s nest, by exposing the malpractices in India’s healthcare services. Personally I am surprised by the sharp reaction of the medical associations and their intention to sue him or to boycott all his programmes. I thought he presented a rather balanced picture; the cut-practice, unnecessary investigations and operations, etc are issues that are discussed almost everyday by the media. What is more important is to find out what is ailing our healthcare services and what can be done about it. As a doctor, I feel that the least we could do is to stop the “blame-game” and the clamour to “punish doctors who misbehave”. Are they really guilty? If so, to what extent?         

    Even the most well-informed and well-placed intellectuals have not understood the complexities of our healthcare system. There are two distinct streams to this service. The state provides “public healthcare” for essential services to benefit the maximum population. The importance given to public health services and the amount of money spent on it by the state varies from country to country. India spends hardly 0.5% of its GDP (gross domestic product) on health, which accounts for just around 26% of the total amount spent on healthcare; the remaining 74% comes from the pockets of Indian citizens. Even though the importance given to this section is enormous and primary health service is so neglected that a survey by some social institutions found that 80% of the people opted for private services for their primary health—despite abject poverty. Moreover, it found that less than 20% of the MBBS doctors were involved in primary health care—private or public. This is because the union and state governments seem to be inclined to leave health services primarily in the hands of the private sector.            

    While the private sector dominates healthcare services in India, barring a small section of general practitioners, it consists of nursing homes, hospitals and specialists. The hospitals are turning high-tech and people end up spending three times of what the state is the spending for their health. Unfortunately, the private sector offers only the lucrative ‘cold’ work and modern high-tech services and thrusts all uncomfortable or non-profitable services on to the public sector—the poor, destitute, old people, tuberculosis, leprosy; even emergency services are a headache to them. “Health is the responsibility of the state” is a convenient argument.

    WHY? Though George Bernard Shaw warned society a hundred years back, the people have steadfastly refused to accept that the (private) healthcare sector is an INDUSTRY—a highly profitable industry because of extremely low consumer resistance. Worse, now it sells attractive healthcare ‘products’ at profitable rates. Profit gets priority and healthcare becomes a subsequent objective. Hence, actual “health service” becomes a by-product and the proportion of its availability depending on the moral concepts of individual doctors. In just around 10% of the cases one gets miraculously good results and the patient is gifted with some extra and valuable years of good life. By then, the remaining 90% suffer so much economic loss that nearly a crore of Indians are being pushed below the poverty line every year because of crippling medical expenditure. Who is at fault and what needs to be done to correct this situation?
    The medical industry is virtually run by “big money”, “ably aided” manufacturers of modern equipment and by big pharmaceutical companies. The media is cleverly used, first to create panic about every illness and then to glamorise new technology or a new ‘miracle’ drug/ invention which will save you from a ‘deadly’ illness. Doctors are mere pawns in their hands. The cost of research, PR and advertisements needs to be covered and the doctors must then earn money for the industry chain to make a profit. How can all this come cheap? The overuse of costly investigative and treatment modalities is further increased by:
    a) lack of knowledge and expertise in specialist doctors
    b) ever-increasing expectations of patients and
    c) growing intolerance in society towards any untoward consequences during the management of treatment.

    Earlier, there was a lot of emphasis on close observations and other clinical methods for diagnosis but now, due to the need to avoid ANY MISTAKE, the trend is towards “Objective Diagnosis”. Less you know, more you depend on technology. Less your expertise, more you need precision equipment to perform. The costs escalate, doctors are blamed, “internal trading” is suspected—and confirmed even without any evidence. But the fact is that many doctors are now totally dependent on these costly modalities; they are crippled without these aids for reasons mentioned. “Cut-practice” is but a small aberration for additional gains and merely indicates the same degree of corruption as is prevalent in the society in general. Totally unindicated misuse just for making money is an unpardonable crime. It does exist but I cannot judge the percentage of such unethical practices—could be 30% or so!

    But overall, are you better off than previously in terms of your health-care? Facts are stranger than fiction. Average life expectation at birth is a useful indicator of the health of the community. Sri Lanka and Thailand have a much better lifespan than for Indians (more than 71 years compared to 64 for us). Reason? Those governments depend more on public healthcare, spending more than 50% of the total health expenses. And there is more attention to primary (and secondary) healthcare needs as indicated by a much better ratio of nurses in those countries, despite less number of doctors per 10,000 population. Mumbai fares the worst. It has 20 doctors, all sorts of specialists and all sorts of modern facilities, yet a Mumbaikar lives just around 58 years. This is universal; small town people have a much healthier life than those in metropolitan cities, all over the world. MODERN TECHNOLOGY DOES NOT OFFER YOU A BETTER HEALTH CARE EXCEPT SPORADICALLY. Mr Aamir Khan, don’t blame the doctors, blame the market, blame faulty medical education.

    (Dr Sadanand Nadkarni, 80, is the former Dean of Sion Hospital, author of several books, a serious thinker of medical issues and hugely respected for a series of path-breaking ideas on improving the delivery of medical services to the aam aadmi. His book “Management of the Sick Healthcare System” is among the first to speak out about medical malpractice and other issues).

  • Like this story? Get our top stories by email.




    8 years ago

    We indians have the capacity to corrupt any system even though it is meant for the general good of all concerned. We perhaps were following the British system of family practioner- refer- consultants-refer- superspecialists. But look at now how we have degraded this good practice into a money spinner. Refered doctor gets a cut , refering doctor gets a cut and specialist make hay when the sun shines. Like link-chain sales we have prohibited honest practioner from thriving. He has to be in the vortex of corrupt practices if wants recognition.If AmirKhan were to produce a TV serial based on doctors and their 'true practices' then it would run for years because there would be enough subjects to deal with. It is time our public are educated in the body's capacity to heal itself in most of the complaints of ailments. Only condition is that we should provide an ideal environment for it to do so. This way medicines could be marginalised without giving it the undue prominance it commands now.

    Ganesh Krishnan

    8 years ago

    One of the reasons why the health care cost has increased rapidly in India is the prescription of newer drugs by doctors for trivial conditions. The reason for this is that the doctors' only source of information about drugs is from pharma companies and pharma companies would only like to promote newer products since they are more profitable. This results in higher costs for patients. Also indiscriminate use of antibiotics results in resistance to the drugs.

    Nagesh Kini FCA

    8 years ago

    The write-ups by Drs. Nadkarni and Hegde make for a lethal and effective indictment of the medical profession as well as the pharma industry.
    Both need to be reined in by the authorities and civil society in equal measure. Both deal with life and death matters of the citizens at large and should not exploit them which they are in fact indulging with impunity that needs to be urgently curbed.
    The need for effective health care and the upping of expenditure has to be emphasized. Some of our public hospitals render yeoman emergency services in the best of facilities that even the best of high end starred hospitals do not provide. With teaching institutions attached there is constant attendence of top specialists and residents so much lacking elsewhere.
    In any emergency nothing like a public medical facility.
    With the PPP model fast catching up the health sector needs to explore adopting it by inducting dedicated existing and retired medical professionals and activists on board.


    8 years ago

    Amir Khan and his team can do research on this and prevent public money going into drain/into pockets of corrupt doctors and administrators of ESIC when other hospitals in Maharashtra (ESIS)-becomes ESIC.( state govt. run hospital handed over to central govt.ESIC [corporation] ).Money contributed by employers and government does not benefit employees covered by ESIC / ESIS act.

    Similar situation must be there in ESIC model hospital in other states also.(MIDC,Andheri hospital is a ESIC model hospital)


    8 years ago

    From: Sucheta Dalal
    Date: Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 11:43 AM
    Subject: ESIC and its mindless spending...
    To: Sucheta Dalal

    Dear activists.

    The comment below makes and important point about how companies are spending money. Does anyone know any activist in that area who would like to do some research on this? We are too short staffed to do it ourselves and its not our core area either. Would appreciate inputs or if you can circulate it to people who can help.

    Sucheta Dalal
    Managing Editor

    316-317, 3rd Floor, Hind Service Industries Premises
    Shivaji Park Seaface. Off. Veer Savarkar Marg Mumbai 400028
    T: 022- 24441059 – 60. Fax: 022-24442771
    Name = shastrids
    Email Id = [email protected]

    Looks like advertising support from the strangest of organisations, for example ESIC, which is sponsoring an automobile show on NEWSX television channel that is bleeding money since hardly anybody watches the channel, is perhaps influencing the rhetoric.

    ==being a holder of ESIC card-a SAMPLE live example of mountain of corruption-at Mumbai-MIDC-Andheri-east-marol-chakala hospital of ESIC.

    Earlier State owned ESIS-hospital which might have been built with adultared cement in 1960/1970-by equally unscrupulus building contractors- is being just renoweted/repaired AT THE COST OF crores of rupees -instead of rebuilding entire building from scratch.

    Probably one can make make more money under option of repairs AND RENOVATION ?????


    Crores worth NEW equipments(indian and imported),furnitures are being purchased and dumped everywhere.

    OLD JUNK AMBULANCES LYING IN THE COMPOUND and New equipments are being purchased.Hospital building ceilings are leaking all over. OPD Patients do not have proper waiting and washroom area.I AM SURE ELSEWHERE IN THE COUNTRY SIMILAR SITUATIONS EXISTS.



    Nagesh Kini

    In Reply to shastrids 8 years ago

    ESIC has all the good conditions but badly managed by babus. The only remedy is a properly laid out PPP model, by inducting institutions or seeking the expertise of the likes of the Ramakrishna Mission which is successfully maintaining hospitals all over incl. Kolkatta and Mumbai

    We are listening!

    Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.

    To continue

    Sign Up or Sign In


    To continue

    Sign Up or Sign In



    online financial advisory
    Pathbreakers 1 & Pathbreakers 2 contain deep insights, unknown facts and captivating events in the life of 51 top achievers, in their own words.
    online financia advisory
    The Scam
    24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
    Moneylife Online Magazine
    Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
    financial magazines online
    Stockletters in 3 Flavours
    Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
    financial magazines in india
    MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
    (Includes Moneylife Online Magazine)
    FREE: Your Complete Family Record Book
    Keep all the Personal and Financial Details of You & Your Family. In One Place So That`s Its Easy for Anyone to Find Anytime
    We promise not to share your email id with anyone