In your interest.
Online Personal Finance Magazine
No beating about the bush.
Researchers are fabricating their findings to create the illusion of positive findings, instead of publishing their actual results, for the continuation of their steady stream of funding and grants.
“That the cartel’s medical monopoly has created a climate of bias in our educational system in which scientific truth is often sacrificed to vested interests.”— Edward Griffin
There was a bombshell in science journal Nature recently (Nature 483, 531–533-29 March 2012) about cancer research published in the leading peer-reviewed journals of the world. Authors of the paper, C Glenn Begley and Lee Ellis, were unable to replicate the results of 47 of the 53 (89%), studies examined. Begley stated in the paper: “These are the studies the pharmaceutical industry relies on to identify new targets for drug development, but if you’re going to place a $1 million or $2 million or $5 million bet on an observation, you need to be sure it’s true. As we tried to reproduce these papers we became convinced you can’t take anything at face value.”
Simply put, researchers are fabricating their findings to create the illusion of positive findings, instead of publishing their actual results, for the continuation of their steady stream of funding and grants. Based on such research papers, millions of hapless patients are led up the garden path to hell after spending all their life’s savings!
The Mayo Clinic, in 2009, concluded that data about harnessing the immune system to fight cancer had been fabricated, resulting in the retraction of 17 papers in nine research journals. Cancer research in the United States needs to be scrutinised. It is mainly money-driven and based on developing new drugs. Begley writes: “Fifty-three papers were deemed ‘landmark’ studies. It was acknowledged from the outset that some of the data might not hold up, because papers were deliberately selected that described something completely new, such as fresh approaches to targeting cancers or alternative clinical uses for existing therapeutics. Nevertheless, scientific findings were confirmed in only 6 (11%) cases. Even knowing the limitations of preclinical research, this was a shocking result.”
The final recommendation of the authors, at the end of the paper, is worth repeating verbatim here: “However, it is important to remember that patients are at the centre of all these efforts. If we in the field forget this, it is easy to lose our sense of focus, transparency and urgency. Cancer researchers are funded by community taxes and by the hard work and philanthropic donations of advocates. More importantly, patients rely on us to embrace innovation, make advances and deliver new therapies that will improve their lives. Although hundreds of thousands of research papers are published annually, too few clinical successes have been produced given the public investment of significant financial resources. We need a system that will facilitate a transparent discovery process that frequently and consistently leads to significant patient benefit.”
I must have written more than a dozen papers in the past about this ground reality. All that I earned was the wrath of the cancer lobby. We have a moral responsibility here. We are dealing with human life and cancer is probably the cruellest disease. What surprised me all these years is how we have been accepting chemicals and radiation in cancer treatment knowing well that such treatments also destroy healthy cells.
What would happen to the patient at the end of the day whose immune system cells are as damaged as the cancer cells? Have we ever given a thought to this human aspect of cancer treatment? One of the greatest brains in biology, a Nobel Laureate, Albert Szent-Györgyi, wondered how cancer treatment could be developed as the cancer cell works exactly like a normal cell. His concern was to develop a drug that kills the cancer cells and not the healthy immune body cells. In fact, cancer treatment does destroy all fast-dividing cells; the bone marrow and the immune cells do just that. How can anyone expect to heal a patient by destroying his immune system? Would any of you like to get on to a plane which is sure to crash 89% of the time? That is cancer treatment today!
“Everyone should know that most cancer research is largely a fraud and that the major cancer research organisations are derelict in their duties to the people who support them.”— Dr Linus Pauling (Twice Nobel Prize winner)
Professor Dr BM Hegde, a Padma Bhushan awardee in 2010, is an MD, PhD, FRCP (London, Edinburgh, Glasgow & Dublin), FACC and FAMS.
The sun teaches two important lessons: it does not make any difference and shines on everyone, rich or poor showing us the universality of existence. The more important lesson that the sun teaches us is humility, the kingpin for good health and happiness. The sun has been burning for so long without exhausting his fuel!
Niels Reyberg Finson was an Icelander who studied both in Iceland and Denmark. After graduation in medicine he started doing his own curious research although he tried to do many other things in addition, without much success. He was the first to treat skin tuberculosis with sunlight showing thereby the anti-germ effect of sunlight. In the year 1903, Reyberg, who was by then crippled by a killer disease, got a Nobel Prize for his work.
We get our energy for running the body chemistry from the ultraviolet region of sunlight. If the sun were to go on strike we will all perish! In addition, sunlight gives us the most useful vitamin D3, which is the basis of our immune system health and bone health. Animals which have their back to the sun all the time do not get decreased bone density. People in Europe and the northern hemisphere need more exposure to sun to remain healthy, especially in winter. They cannot tolerate very hot sun as they have melanin deficiency in their skin compared to us in the tropics. If they migrate to the tropics, after a few generations, their progeny also would be dark skinned like us and vice versa.
However, the drug and cosmetic industry funded research has created a myth that sunlight is bad for the skin and might produce skin cancers, etc. If that were true most of us and all Africans should be full of skin cancers. They sell billions of dollars’ worth skin care products—most of which contain dangerous carcinogenic chemicals. Independent research has proven that the skin cancer increase in incidence is basically due to these chemicals and not the sun.
Bio-mimicry is the new name for learning science from nature. Nature does not do any activity that is destructive to humans and other inhabitants of the planet. Sunlight, by no stretch of imagination, can be bad for us. Too much of anything is bad anyway. Lot of our elderly folk would do well to expose themselves to good sunlight to keep their health in good shape and specially their bone health. The need for taking artificial vitamin D3 and the dangerous calcium salts could all be stopped if we expose ourselves to sun without any cream. Even dark glasses might not be good for the eyes as our pineal gland and the pituitary gland get their stimulus from the sunlight entering the eyes!
Incidentally oral calcium supplements have come under great research and now we know that calcium does lot of damage to the health. Firstly, calcium intake as a chemical only increases the calcium loss in the urine—so called calcium induced calcium loss. At the end of the day one might end up with negative calcium balance. In addition calcium intake has been shown to increase vessel wall calcium deposits worsening atherosclerosis. But the calcium deposits in the heart vessels might stimulate heart attacks also!
Now comes another study from Edinburgh University where scientists observed that sunlight stimulates human cells to increase the production of nitric oxide, the best elixir for vessel health. Nitric oxide is the stuff that keeps our blood vessels relaxed and open thus lowering blood pressure and increasing blood flow to all organs. The ultraviolet light in the sun's rays stimulate the nitric oxide synthase in the cell cytoplasm which in turn switches on the production of more nitric oxide (NO), the health giving endothelium relaxing factor (EDRF).
The same rays also stimulate two other vital enzymes in the cell cytoplasm—HSP 70 and VEGF synthase. The first one, otherwise called the stress relaxing protein (SRP) helps many body functions while VEGF protein encourages neo-vascularisation, new vessel forming for collateral circulation, very good for the heart. All in all sunlight is the best tonic that you can get for free! It beats all the pharma giants in its protean actions in the body from germ killing to cell stimulation and supplying bone density promoter vitamin D3.
Philosophically the sun teaches a very good health giving lesson to mankind. Now we know that the mind runs the body, the health of the mind is vital to our health. Negative thoughts are the killers, jokingly put—it is NOT what you eat that kills; it is what eats you that kills you. Among the negative thoughts the worst killers are hatred, greed, jealousy, anger and pride. The sun teaches two important lessons: sun does not make any difference and shines on everyone, rich or poor showing us the universality of existence. The more important lesson that the sun teaches us is humility, the kingpin for good health and happiness. The sun looks very big as he emerges on the eastern horizon but as he goes up he becomes smaller and smaller thereby telling mankind that the higher you rise in life, the humbler you become. I think this is the best advice that one could give for keeping good health. When we become truly humble, according to Indian traditions humility if the highest education, we get rid of all negative thoughts, the true causes of illness and pain.
Sun is the be all and end all of all existence. The sun has been burning for so long without exhausting his fuel!
(Professor Dr BM Hegde, a Padma Bhushan awardee in 2010, is an MD, PhD, FRCP (London, Edinburgh, Glasgow & Dublin), FACC and FAMS. He is also Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of the Science of Healing Outcomes, chairman of the State Health Society's Expert Committee, Govt of Bihar, Patna. He is former Vice Chancellor of Manipal University at Mangalore and former professor for Cardiology of the Middlesex Hospital Medical School, University of London.)