Holding that a special court cannot take cognisance of certain offences under the Companies Act, linked to fraud based on private complaints, the Supreme Court on Monday dismissed a review petition filed by the Central government against its judgment. (Union of India v. State of Telangana)
A Bench of Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant and Justices K Vinod Chandran and Joymalya Bagchi was dealing with the Centre's plea seeking review of the Court's January 9 judgment concerning the bar contained in the second proviso to Section 212(6) of the Companies Act, 2013.
While declining to reconsider the judgment, the Court clarified that the Central government was at liberty to exercise its powers under the second proviso to Section 212(6) and authorise any officer, by a general or special order in writing, to institute the complaint.
The clarification assumes significance since Section 212(6) permits cognisance upon a written complaint by the Director of the Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO) or an officer of the Central government authorised by a general or special written order.
Additional Solicitor General Aishwarya Bhati, appearing for the Centre, raised concerns over the implications of the judgment for investigations which were not conducted by the SFIO, including those involving the Registrar of Companies (ROC).
The Court indicated that the Centre could address such situations by exercising its statutory power to authorise an officer to institute the complaint. It made clear that its earlier ruling concerning the maintainability of a private complaint did not prevent the government from using the route expressly provided under Section 212(6).
The judgment under review had been delivered by a Bench of Justices JK Maheshwari and K Vinod Chandran in January this year.
The case arose from a dispute concerning the management and control of a private company. A private complaint alleged, among other things, that former directors had illegally convened a meeting, fabricated resolutions and made false statutory filings with the ROC.
The Special Court for Economic Offences at Hyderabad had taken cognisance of offences under Sections 448 and 451 of the Companies Act along with several offences under the Indian Penal Code (IPC). The Telangana High Court subsequently declined to quash the criminal proceedings.
The Supreme Court, however, held that Section 448, which concerns false statements, could not be read in isolation since the punishment prescribed for the offence is linked to Section 447, which deals with fraud.
It consequently held that an offence under Section 448 was an offence "covered under Section 447" for the purposes of Section 212(6). The statutory restriction on taking cognisance therefore applied, and cognisance could not be taken merely on the basis of a private complaint.
The Court had accordingly quashed the proceedings insofar as the offences under Sections 448 and 451 of the Companies Act were concerned. It had, however, allowed the prosecution concerning the IPC offences to continue before the appropriate court.
In dismissing the review petition today, the Court maintained this position while expressly preserving the Centre's power to authorise an officer to institute a complaint in accordance with Section 212(6).
Chandrasekaran Gets 5-year Term at Tata Sons as Board Backs Listing Plan; Noel Tata Terms Reappointment 'Illegal'
Moneylife Digital Team
18 September 2026
Tata Sons Pvt Ltd has approved a fresh five-year term for chairman N Chandrasekaran, reversing his decision last month not to seek reappointment, while the board has also decided to take steps towards listing the holding company in...
Tata Sons Listing Can Be a Bridge, Not a Battle, Says SP Group Chief Shapoor Mistry
Moneylife Digital Team
18 September 2026
Welcoming Reserve Bank of India’s (RBI's) decision rejecting Tata Sons Pvt Ltd’ application to surrender its registration and paving way for listing, Shapoor Pallonji Mistry, chairman of Shapoorji Pallonji (SP) group, the second...
Business This Week
Moneylife Digital Team
18 September 2026
India's consumer price index (CPI) inflation rose to 4.82% in August, a 20-month high, up from 4.45% in July and above the Reserve Bank of India's (RBI) 4% target for a third straight month, driven by delayed monsoon rains disrupting...
CASE DIARY: From Wall Street Darling to Bankruptcy: The Hidden Risks Behind the ‘Glowing’ Numbers
SVVN Babji Rao
17 September 2026
A fictional investigative series inspired by patterns observed in publicly documented corporate governance failures.
It was a December morning in Houston. More people than usual were gathered outside the company's glass-fronted...
