Supreme Court asks govt to withdraw orders making Aadhaar mandatory

Directing the UIDAI not to share personal info of Aadhaar holder with any agency, the Supreme Court asked the Indian government to withdraw all orders making Aadhaar mandatory for availing services

In a path breaking decision, the Supreme Court on Monday asked the Indian government to withdraw all orders making Aadhaar or the unique identification (UID) number mandatory for residents. The apex court also asked Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI), not to share any information, including biometrics that it has collected under the Aadhaar project through registrars, with any government agency without the permission of the person.


The Supreme Court pronounced this decision on a public interest litigation (PIL) filed by retired Karnataka High Court judge Justice KS Puttaswamy and Maj Gen (retd) SG Vombatkere, who retired as Additional Director General, Discipline and Vigilance in Army HQ, challenging the Constitutional validity of Aadhaar. In addition, the UIDAI had also challenge a decision of Goa Bench of Bombay High Court asking it to share its biometric data to solve a criminal case. Both the cases were heard before the three-judge Bench.


Shyam Divan, the counsel for Maj Gen (retd) Vombatkere, told the Court, that there is no statute to back the (Aadhaar) project and even if there were one, the statute would be violative of Fundamental Rights under Articles 14 (right to equality) and 21 (right to life and liberty) of the Constitution as the project enables surveillance of individuals and impinges upon right to human dignity. “The action under the impugned project of collecting personal biometric information without statutory backing is ultra vires even where an individual voluntarily agrees to part with biometric information," he said.


Adv Divan had contended that “…the (Aadhaar) project is also ultra vires because there is no statutory guidance (a) on who can collect biometric information; (b) on how the information is to be collected; (c) on how the biometric information is to be stored; (d) on how throughout the chain beginning with the acquisition of biometric data to its storage and usage, this data is to be protected; (e) on who can use the data; (f) on when the data can be used.”


According to Gopal Krishna of Citizens Forum for Civil Liberties (CFCL), the SC order paves way for a verdict against the unscientific exercise of indiscriminate biometric data collection by Planning Commission's UIDAI, Home Ministry's Registrar General of India for Aadhaar number and National Population Register (NPR) and other government and private agencies.


The Goa case

Earlier, a Magistrates Court in Goa had asked UIDAI to share with the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), biometric data of all residents enrolled in Aadhaar scheme from the state, to help the agency solve the gang rape of a seven year old girl in Vasco.


UIDAI challenged the Court's decision before the Bombay HC. The Goa Bench, however directed the director general of the Central Forensic Science Laboratory to examine the technological capabilities of the UIDAI database. The HC also observed that UIDAI had agreed to test the competence of its database in comparing the chance fingerprints with its biometric record.


Aggrieved by the HC decision, UIDAI had approached the Supreme Court.


According to a report from the Indian Express, even as the UIDAI describes its biometric technology as one of the best in the world, it pointed out that there was a 0.057% occurrence of false identification. "Therefore, the implications of the False Positive Identification Rate of 0.057% when applied in the UIDAI database of 60 crore residents, will imply false matches of lakh of residents," the report says quoting the petition filed by UIDAI.


The biometric number is an identifier, which is used to "authenticate" and verify whether or not the person is what the person claims to be. A stunning aspect of how the UIDAI was sought to be implemented without the nod of parliament is the high level of ignorance about who can get an Aadhaar and implications of biometric based identification. On 31 January 2013, it came to light that the members of Union Cabinet were unaware whether it is a number or a card. Instead of facing the issue upfront, a Group of Ministers (GoM) was set up to resolve it but no one knows whether it has been resolved.


"Biometric data itself has scientifically been proven to be 'inherently fallible' especially because of constant decay of biological material in human body. Global experience demonstrates that the trust in junk science of biometrics is misplaced. The stolen biometric passport of a passenger in the missing Malaysian airliner has exposed its claims for good. We demand that the opposition parties should promise that new government after the Lok Sabha elections will destroy the illegal and illegitimate database of biometric features as has been done in UK and other countries," Gopal Krishna added.


Notably, the Strategy Overview document of the UIDAI said that "enrolment will not be mandated" but added, "This will not, however, preclude governments or registrars from mandating enrolment." It must be noted that Nandan Nilekani, former chief of UIDAI and now a Congress candidate from South Bengaluru constituency, headed dozens of committees whose recommendations made Aadhaar mandatory.


Tricked by the marketing blitzkrieg, some political parties were wary of taking a position that would appear anti-poor. They did not realise that what may be the real beneficiary of this biometric identification is UIDAI, which wants to meet its target of enrolling 60 crore Indians by 2014.


Earlier, in November 2013, Adv Divan, the counsel for Maj Gen (retd) Vombatkere, in the Supreme Court stated “The Aadhaar project was ultra vires as it did not have a statutory backing. Moreover, no statutory guidance exists on crucial questions such as—who can collect biometric information, how it is to be collected and stored, protection of collected data, who can use the data and when it must be used.”


He pointed out to a two-member bench of Justices BS Chauhan and SA Bobde, how UIDAI signed memorandum of understanding (MoU) with States which had no legal sanctity. He said, “State appoints registrars, who could even be a private person, who engaged private companies to collect biometric data. There is also the fear that the private party which collects the data then stores it in a personal laptop, which does not belong to the government.”


He also told the apex court about how UID changes the relationship between the state and the citizen. “Convicted criminals relinquish some privacy rights. They have their fingerprints taken for record. Here the government is treating all people as criminals,” Adv Divan had said.


Last year in September, the Supreme Court had ruled that Aadhaar or the UID number, the United Progressive Alliance (UPA)'s ambitious scheme, is not mandatory to avail essential services from the government. While hearing a public interest litigation (PIL) filed by retired Karnataka High Court judge Justice KS Puttaswamy and advocate Parvesh Khanna questioning the legal sanctity of Aadhaar, the apex court said, "The centre and state governments must not insist on Aadhaar from citizens before providing them essential services."


A Bench of Justices BS Chauhan and SA Bobde also directed central and the state governments not to issue the Aadhaar to illegal immigrants.


In its reply, the Centre had earlier claimed that for an Aadhaar, consent of an individual was indispensable and hence it was a voluntary project, with an objective to promote inclusion and benefits of the marginalised sections of the society that has no formal identity proof.


In July, replying to an un-starred question in the Lok Sabha on 8 May 2013, Rajiv Shukla, minister of state for parliamentary affairs and planning said, "Aadhaar card is not mandatory to avail subsidized facilities being offered by the Government like LPG cylinders, admission in private aided schools, opening a savings account etc."


Read more about UID/Aadhaar


You may also want to read…


The Prime Minister’s Fingerprints: Aadhaar and the garrotting of civil liberties


Aadhaar: Supreme Court exposes complicity of political parties


How Supreme Court issued notices to state governments over Aadhaar

Supreme Court says Aadhaar not necessary for essential services


Is the LPG subsidy in your bank account taxable?


Aadhaar & LPG: Cabinet puts subsidy transfer scheme on hold; raises subsidised LPG cylinder cap to 12


Aadhaar for LPG: Mess created by UIDAI, OMCs and citizen victims-Part 1


Aadhaar for LPG: How you can get justice? –Part2


Aadhaar: HPCL, IOC and BPCL in contempt of Supreme Court order?


Read more articles from a series on Aadhaar by Gopal Krishna


  • Like this story? Get our top stories by email.




    6 years ago

    Dear Author

    I would appreciate if you can study about Social Security Number aka SSN in USA Social Insurance Number in Canada and how it's connecting the government to common man in their day today life, you would understand the concept behind UID. UID is way ahead of SSN being used by USA. It's one of the best thing that has happened in India after independence. So please don't mislead people by writing wrong and basless article and bring down the credibility of other contents on your website. I do understand every new project may have some issues but that can be sorted and better process can be adopted but just don't the whole idea. UID is not just a number, it's platform to build welfare application for efficient governance and weed out ghost and duplicate beneficiary from the system. Just an example do you believe India has 81.4 crore actual voters as it is claimed by Election Commission?



    In Reply to Sandeep 6 years ago

    Thanks for your comment.
    There has been misinformation by UIDAI that the social security number (SSN) of the US is equivalent to the UID in India. This is not the truth. The SSN does not have your biometrics, it is just a number.

    Introduced in the 1930s in the USA, as a way to track individuals for taxation purposes, SSN were never designed to be used for authentication—moreover, these cards don't carry biometric data.

    The US was trying to introduce something called the Real ID, which has biometrics, and this is being stiffly resisted by Americans.

    The US, UK and Australia have shelved their proposed public ID cards after public protests. Even China withdrew the clause to have biometric data stored in its cards. A London School of Economics report has noted that "Identity systems may create a range of new and unforeseen problems. These include the failure of systems, unforeseen financial costs, increased security threats and unacceptable imposition on citizens."

    The possession of a UID can at best serve only as proof of a "unique and singular" identity and does not guarantee either citizenship or benefits.


    Dayananda Kamath k

    In Reply to Sandeep 6 years ago

    do you believe the gdp fiscal deficit inflation data of india. uid is just an adress and identity proof based on already existing data except biomatric details. they do not accept other data provided. just to give id proof do you have to spend so much of money. biomatrical data is picked up early of criminals only. so you have made all prople potential criminals list. what about the privecy of the individual.


    In Reply to Dayananda Kamath k 6 years ago

    money spent(3800 crore) on UID by looking at returns is just peanuts...UID has already paid off(5000 crore) by saving LPG subsidies by eliminating duplicates. India spends about 300000 Crore every year on subsidies and 10-40% is leakage just because of ghost, duplicates or diversions. So even if you save 10% every year because of UID, it's cash cow for coming generations.

    Yes you're right UID is just an ID proof but it's unique, verifiable online and next to impossible to duplicate if you combine other demographics.

    By giving bio metrics you don't become criminal,if that's case why people readily agree go for VISA and passport??

    Privacy?? in india!!? least I can say is UID is still safer than photo copy guy at your street's corner, selling your Driver license copy for 5 to anyone asking for an ID. when 70% population is struggling for 2 meals a day you talk of is just a shield by people trying to derail this project so that these middlemen keep looting the country. now don't tell me that bangladesis are getting this they don't have ration card,dl or some other form of ID that they showed to have UID??then why this noise for UID. even if there are some bangaladesi, nepali...1-2% in a population of 1.2 billion what difference does it make?? they were there before and they are now...UID has atleast provided a way to track them if they do something wrong


    In Reply to Sandeep 6 years ago

    Thanks for your comment.

    It seems that you will have to do a lot of reading to understand the UID/Aadhaar issues in India.

    Aadhaar is the UIDAI brand and logo. The Aadhaar Number is a random, unique 12 digit number issued to each person who successfully enrols. The project cost is in excess of Rs1.50 lakh crore and though there is no specific legislative or indeed even administrative notification that permits UIDAI to use ‘biometric information’, this is the foundation of the project.

    On 23 April 2013, Nandan Nilekani said, "We came to the conclusion that if we take sufficient data, biometric data of an individual, then that person's biometric will be unique across a billion people. Now we have to find that out. We haven't done it yet. So we'll discover it as we go along". At his lecture at World Bank on 24 April 2013, he said, “nobody has done this before, so we are going to find out soon whether it will work or not.” No one can tell as to what his premise is, what the inference is, or how the inference is deduced.

    Amidst leakage of files from the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) and leakage of public money from scam after scams in the Congress-led government, the claim of attempting to reduce leakage in the system by using questionable plumbers like Nilekani does not inspire even an iota of confidence. Nilekani admitted at his lecture the Centre for Global Development in Washington in April 2013 that UIDAI has "created huge business opportunity for fingerprint scanners, iris readers."

    The purchase of these machines is also a leakage that merits probe. Leakages can be plugged by rigorous implementation of Right to Information (RTI) Act and decentralisation of decision making, instead of adopting a centralisation approach and technological quick fixes.


    Dayananda Kamath k

    In Reply to Sandeep 6 years ago

    this could have been saved without resorting to uid. how you know that the amount has been credited to only those who have purchased gas cylinder. when you know that an mp can take delivery of 365 cylinders in a year as per rti quiry. no action is taken. it is only mechanism devised by congress so that nobody can verify where the subsidy amount has gone. whenyou can not monitor 5 accounts properly how you can monitor millions of accounts.

    Simple Indian

    6 years ago

    Despite the SC having said earlier that Aadhar / UID can't be made mandatory for availing government welfare schemes, just last week when i visited my LPG distributor, their staff asked me to provide Aadhar details. Seems govt works differently and hardly cares about SC verdicts.

    Dayananda Kamath k

    6 years ago

    it is high time supreme court initiate contmept of court proceedings against rbi and all other agencies who continued to make adhaar mandatory during the period. court should monitor implimentation of its order.otherwise it will take another decade of litigations to enforce it. a small example is s.c.civil appeal 10956/13 bob v/s s.k.kooldt 11/12/13. regarding pension elegibility banks are still refusing claims based on this judgement.

    Mahesh S Bhatt

    6 years ago

    Blue eyed IT boy from Banglore forgot the fundamental database maangement process of using Home Ministries existing database.

    Americans are snooping the world with Facebook/mails etc & encroaching upon fundamental issue of Individual privacy.

    Data later has risk of abuse by private/government tax & other security agencies.

    Hackers are easily breaking into US Pentagon/Wikileaks in leaking Government sensitive information cables much to global embarrassment.

    As a Security expert its best thing to have happened.

    Yerram Raju Behara

    6 years ago

    The Supreme Court has once more held the honour of the citizen high thanks to the judgment. But in a country that failed to provide resources for safe drinking water and affordable health and education to all indulged in this futile attempt amidst a ocean of controversies and the person who indulged in this vandalism is now aspiring to sit in the Parliament gallery. There is no accountability for the lakns of crores of rupees that wentdown the drain!! The UPA would any way not come to power but such men would move with honor is a shame.


    6 years ago

    What Government tells the Supreme Court and what it does on the ground are two different things. If the Government had any respect at all for the "Rule of Law" and "Equality under Law", more than 80% of the cases pending in Indian courts would never have been there in the first place!


    6 years ago


    Many people not received their Aadhar Cards. What happened to these cards? Any foul play?

    Is the LPG subsidy in your bank account taxable?

    It is absolutely necessary for the I-T department to come out with clear guidelines as to whether this LPG subsidy amount deposited in the bank accounts of some consumers is exempted from income tax. People who received LPG subsidy in their Aadhaar linked bank account are confused

    Much water has flowed under the bridges since the controversial Aadhaar project was launched and reams of paper would have been consumed writing about the pros and cons of this project for the last nearly five years. As per the statistics placed before the Parliament, the government has issued 57.62 crore Aadhaar numbers till 31 January 2014. This means nearly 48% of the country’s population has been issued with this identity number, which has several ramifications on people of this country as unearthed by a series of articles published in Moneylife so far.  


    As an offshoot of this project, the union government has been aggressively pursuing for crediting the subsidy due on the liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) to consumers directly through their bank accounts linked with Aadhaar with the stated objective of curbing leakages and preventing black marketing of cylinders.

    Till the end of last year, 66 million consumers in 184 high Aadhaar coverage districts, in 18 states, have been covered under the scheme. Till 31 December 2013 about 40 million cash transfers amounting to Rs2,000 crore to consumers’ bank accounts have taken place since the launch of the scheme in June 2013. And from 1 January 2014, it was proposed to cover gas consumers in Delhi and Mumbai who will get cash subsidy through their bank accounts, as the direct benefit transfer for LPGs (DBTL) scheme would be extended to 105 more districts. When this roll out is completed almost half the country covering 289 districts would get covered by this scheme.

    Then on 30 January 2014, bowing to political pressure and hue and cry from common citizens, the Indian government put on hold its scheme to transfer subsidy money into bank accounts of consumers through Aadhaar. Explaining the reasons behind the move to put on hold a scheme that was dubbed game-changer, oil minister M Veerappa Moily said there were complaints about the implementation of the scheme, and a committee has been formed to look into them.

    At present, in Delhi, the price of non-subsidised cooking gas is Rs1,080.50 and for subsidised LPG cylinder, it is Rs414.

    How does the direct benefit transfer scheme for LPGs work?

    As per the direct benefit transfer for LPG (DBTL), consumer will get her cylinder at full market price and the difference between subsidised price and full market price i.e. the subsidy will be refunded to her by crediting directly into her bank account. It was initially announced that this subsidy is restricted to only six cylinders in a year, where after, the consumer will have to pay full market price for every cylinder supplied. This cap was increased to nine cylinders and later to 12 cylinders per year for every consumer.

    To start with, this scheme was made available only to those who have obtained an Aadhaar number and submitted these details both to her bank and to the gas supplier/dealer, for linking the Aadhaar number to the DBTL scheme. The consumers in that district where the scheme was introduced were given three months’ time to enroll themselves into this scheme, failing to which they would be denied the benefit of subsidy and they will have to pay market price for all the cylinders required by them, as they will be ineligible for the subsidy from the government.

    Subsequently, under the Supreme Court order, the government announced that it is not mandatory to have Aadhaar number to be eligible for LPG subsidy and those who do not have Aadhaar number will continue to get the cylinders at the subsidised rates as before. There was however, considerable confusion as many banks and oil companies were not prepared with the logistics to credit the amount to beneficiaries’ accounts, and complaints started pouring in from the consumers, who did not know how to go about it if the subsidy was not credited to their account promptly. Due to the hue and cry from a large number of consumers, the government on 30 January 2014 decided to put on hold its scheme to transfer subsidy money into bank accounts of consumers through Aadhaar.                                                                        

    Read: Following articles in Moneylife:

    Aadhaar for LPG: How you can get justice? 
    Aadhaar & LPG: Cabinet puts subsidy transfer scheme on hold; raises subsidised LPG cylinder cap to 12

    Is the subsidy directly credited to your bank account taxable?

    As per the latest report dated 7 March, 2014 in the Indian Express, the Ministry of Oil and Petroleum has scrapped the ambitious Direct Benefit Transfer system for LPG subsidy with effect from 10 March 2014. A communication regarding this has been reportedly sent by the ministry to oil marketing companies (OMCs) and gas agencies a few days ago.  Consumers will now get their twelve cylinders till the end of March 2014, and get the benefit of 12 subsidised cylinders in the next financial year from April onwards.

    Though there is still no clarity as to whether the DBTL scheme will be revived at all, what is agitating the minds of many of the consumers, who have received the subsidy in their bank accounts during this financial year, is whether the amount so credited by the OMCs to their account would be considered as ‘income’ for the purpose of payment of income tax on such receipts. This is because, a number of consumers, who have received the subsidy through their bank account, are tax payers, who will have to take a view on this matter, before filing their return of income for the current year. This confusion arose because of an article that appeared in Economic Times on 12 December 2013 under the headline “Direct LPG subsidy payouts may be taxed: Experts”. The media story in short reads as under:

    “The money that the government transfers directly to consumers' bank accounts as LPG subsidy may well be considered as an income and taxed, say tax experts. There are no guidelines currently on taxing this type of subsidy payouts, and the income tax department may take a view on whether or not to claim a part of it. "

    This subsidy is a new development which will accrue in the bank accounts of individuals starting from this year. There is no circular on whether this income should be taxed or not," a senior income tax department official is reported to have said.

    The subsidy that gets deposited in the bank account is likely to be treated as an income and be taxed accordingly although the amount would be small, said a partner at KPMG, as per the media report.

    One of the affected consumers wrote to local office of Indian Oil Corporation seeking clarification on this matter, and he received a reply that states, “This subsidy is paid by government of India; hence, we will not be able to satisfy your query, you may ask any tax consultant.”

    Will the Income Tax department clarify this matter before it is too late?

    It is preposterous to treat LPG subsidy as income, as it is contrary to reason. It is only a refund of the excess amount paid by the consumer to the gas dealer, which the oil company refunds to the beneficiary to comply with the government order to sell the LPG cylinder at the stipulated price to the users. It is therefore, impetuous for tax authorities to take a view that this amount is taxable at the hands of beneficiaries.

    Besides, now that linking of Aadhaar is not mandatory for receiving the gas cylinders at the subsidised rates, and the whole scheme of direct benefit transfer has been scrapped for the time being, any decision to tax the subsidy received through bank accounts during this financial year would tantamount to penalising those who faithfully complied with the government instructions, leaving all those who have abstained from doing so unaffected by this decision.

    The onus, therefore, is on the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) to clarify this matter well in advance of the date of filing the tax returns for the current financial year, to enable the tax payers to file their returns correctly. This, however, does not apply to those not coming under the tax bracket, and who are not required to file their tax returns. But since this subsidy is given to a large number of tax payers, it is absolutely necessary for the tax department of the government to come out with clear guidelines as to whether this subsidy amount is exempted from income tax, so that this matter is settled once and for all and all the tax assessing officers take a uniform view through out the country.       

    (The author is banking analyst and he writes for Moneylife under the pen name ‘Gurpur’)

  • Like this story? Get our top stories by email.



    Syedimran Khan

    2 years ago

    Want to known subsidy info

    Anti Corruption

    5 years ago

    Let this government be voted out for imposing the bank account/aadhar and related problems with bank accounts upon the people, just like the previous government was voted out. Let them never come to power again. Let these burdens never be imposed by any government on the people again.

    Anti Corruption

    5 years ago

    Let this government be voted out for imposing the bank account/aadhar and related problems with bank accounts upon the people, just like the previous government was voted out. Let them never come to power again. Let no government bring up these burdens again and let any government that brings these burdens be totally voted out for ever.

    MG Warrier

    6 years ago

    Just for academic interest, copied below is my December 23, 2011 response to an article published in The Hindu Business Line:
    Review Aadhaar

    “Aadhaar or Niraadhaar? That’s the question!”(Business Line, December 23) sums up the present predicament of UID project and the not so envious situation in which Mr. Nanden Nilekani is placed. Nilekani doesn’t lose much, because he gains experience in the learning process which will take him to greater heights. Government has no prestige issue on such matters, because this sort of meddling, cost and time overruns and huge losses are part of any game government plays, at least in the recent past in India. 70 per cent of the 120 crore people for whose benefit the project was allegedly conceived, are also not bothered about the present and future of this wonderful exercise as they are literally unaware of the goings on, because they are out of reach for the media. Then, why B S Raghavan is getting over-worked about the success or failure of this Aadhaar? He represents the voice of the taxpayer whose hard-earned money is being wasted and at whose doors finally the buck will stop.
    UID, for various reasons including inadequate funding, non-availability of in-house expertise and resultant dependence on external agencies including banks and government departments is bound to take much more time than originally envisaged, even to cover the already ‘identified’ citizens. If government is convinced about the utility of UID, the project should be allowed to merge with the Census of India and access the infrastructure and methodology in use by that organization for decades and fast-track the process.
    M G Warrier, Thiruvananthapuram

    Rajinder Pal Jindal

    6 years ago

    it should be abolished

    S K Nataraj

    6 years ago

    All the intended routing of subsidy through bank accounts is unnecessary. It is very cumbersome, and unworkable. We have a very huge population, and the level of literacy is generally low, particularly in aspects relating to Banking. The banking system is today not fully equipped, in my opinion , to handle such a large amount of workload. Further, the public , in rural areas where ATM network is currently very low in comparison with cities, will face extreme hardship in withdrawing subsidy. But the more important problem will come from non- credit/ wrong credit of subsidy and their rectification. I foresee a flood of complaints which will pour in, and banks struggling to cope with the situation.

    In my opinion, it will be best to allow the present status-quo to continue. The oil- companies alone should handle the matter with the government, not brining the subscribers into the picture at all. This will save the subscribers from all unnecessary hassles.

    Subrata Das

    6 years ago

    When you buy the cylinder , book the full amount under "Expenses " . When you receive the subsidy , credit that to "Expenses " .


    B Ramesh Adiga

    In Reply to Subrata Das 6 years ago

    Quite fair, sensible reasoning.

    MG Warrier

    6 years ago

    The issue raised, namely ‘whether LPG subsidy credited to bank accounts is taxable’ is very relevant. However, it is for Income-tax authorities and GOI to find out ways to ensure that those ‘law-abiding’ citizens who have complied with the AADHAAR-linking and other formalities for getting the subsidy credited to their bank accounts should not be punished twice. First punishment is, already they are paying for every cylinder a higher price than his friends who could not comply with such requirements. I paid Rs1194 for one LPG Cylinder in February 2014. The subsidy credited to my account subsequently is Rs712/-. Thus I paid Rs482/- which is more than the price being charged for a cylinder delivered to one who has not taken efforts to AADHAAR-link his gas account. This is not a personal complaint, but to highlight that if Rs712 credited to my account is taxable, that will be a second punishment for the same crime of ‘supporting AADHAAR’.


    6 years ago

    I have a doubut whether 33% subsidy of Rs.30 lacs rice sorting machines imported by the Rice Millers is taxable in the same way as Gas subsidy is dealt with?

    Veeresh Malik

    6 years ago

    What I am worried about is being taxed for presumptive income on gas sylinders not utilised for subsidy. (We use about 4-5 cylinders per annum and the delivery guy has been asking me to make additional bookings for this year so that he can make some money . . . )

    Vaibhav Dhoka

    6 years ago

    Actually DBTL scheme the consumer has to pay extra 23 Rs as vat in Maharashtra.So he is looser.


    6 years ago

    No wonder, schemes are implemented without application of mind.


    Dayananda Kamath k

    In Reply to Anurag 6 years ago

    they have applied their mind to loot the public money on the garb of saving paise 85 from rs.1being provided by govt which is also being looted. and demcocracy is also looted by freebees.

    How BJP’s Yashwant Sinha is wrong about ‘biometric’ National Population Register –Part 29

    BJP seems to have accepted Aadhaar as irreversible and as a face saving stance, it will have citizens believe that it will not accept the UID number but will gladly do so if it is mentioned as national population register or NPR

    In the animal kingdom, the rule is, eat or be eaten; in the human kingdom, define or be defined.

                                                                               -Thomas Szasz in The Second Sin, 1974 

    “Through a curious transposition peculiar to our times, it is innocence that is called upon to justify itself.”

                                                                                                                                                             -Albert Camus

    When Yashwant Sinha headed Parliamentary Standing Committee on Finance (PSCF) inconsistently and insincerely recommended handing over of the data collected by Planning Commission’s Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) for biometric number branded as Aadhaar to Home Ministry’s Registrar General of India (RGI) for biometric National Population Register (NPR), it appeared inadvertent and a result of lack of imagination. 

    Now Sinha’s support for it reveals that it was by a questionable design, which is inconsistent and insincere because the same parliamentary panel had categorically raised question about the absence of legal mandate for biometric data collection. The parliamentary committee’s report observes, “The collection of biometric information and its linkage with personal information of individuals without amendment to the Citizenship Act, 1955 as well as the Citizenship (Registration of Citizens and Issue of National Identity Cards) Rules, 2003, appears to be beyond the scope of subordinate legislation, which needs to be examined in detail by Parliament.

    Notably, the Committee’s report revealed that “Bharatiya - Automated Finger Print Identification System (AFSI), was launched in January 2009, being funded by the Department of Information Technology, Ministry of Communications and Information Technology, for collection of biometric information of the people of the country.” But admittedly the same is not being used by UIDAI because according to the Government, “The quality, nature and manner of collection of biometric data by other biometric projects may not be of the nature that can be used for the purpose of the Aadhaar scheme and hence it may not be possible to use the fingerprints captured under the Bhartiya-AFSI project.” It is bizarre as why the Parliamentary Committee did not question AFSI program of Ministry of Communications and Information Technology headed by A Raja. How can this program be allowed to continue without “amendment to the Citizenship Act, 1955”?

    Despite such observation of the Parliamentary Committee that Sinha heads, his support for NPR brings to mind his failure to defend himself during the debate in the Lok Sabha on Black Money, when he faced factual attack on his person and integrity in his role as Union Finance Minister from Manish Tewari. His questionable defence exposed him to the core. Tewari’s name calling exposed Congress as well. The link between black money and three sectors—real estate, the gold-bullion and the Mauritius round tripping of black money route has been underlined. Tewari contended, “Interesting thing about the Mauritius route that there was a Circular called 789, issued on 13 April 2000, by the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) government-led by Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). It prevented the assessing officers from finding out whether a person was a bona fide resident of Mauritius or not. This exempted anyone who claim to be Mauritius resident from tax.”

    Tewari added, “I can give you far more examples to show the manner in which the NDA, during those six years, actually diluted the provisions of the law help, to generate black money.” Responding to it Sinha, the then finance minister said, “The Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) with Mauritius was signed in 1982 when Indira Gandhi was the Prime Minister and foreign direct investment (FDI) and other investments were opened in 1993 when Manmohan Singh was the finance minister. We did nothing except continuing the policy. Sinha added, “Facts can be twisted by ignoring facts and that is what Manish Tewari has done.”

    On Hasan Ali issue, Tewari submitted that between 1997 and 2006, money in Ali's bank account rose to $8 billion. “Out of those nine years, who was ruling for six years? The NDA. Was it not its responsibility to find out how money was siphoned off and went abroad?” he questioned. These exchanges of allegations and counter allegations, which is now part of parliamentary record has revealed beyond any reasonable doubt that both BJP-led NDA and Congress-led United Progressive Alliance (UPA) are neck deep in patronising generation of black money.

    Now Sinha’s dubious advocacy for NPR exposes him once again. His advocacy of NPR is an exercise in sophistry akin to his defence of his role in issuing circulars that facilitated and nourished black money. Similar stances are being taken in the case of illegitimate and illegal biometric data collection. Sinha and the Parliamentary Committee’s silence on illegality of AFSI program undertaken during A Raja’s tenure appear to be either an act of grave omission or complicity. Sinha’s role in promotion of corporate funding of political parties to the tune of 7.5% of company’s annual profit also merits rigorous attention. The complicit silence of non-NDA and non-UPA parties is quite inexcusable as well. 

    This Parliamentary Committee had recommended, “The data already collected by the UIDAI may be transferred to the National Population Register (NPR), if the Government so chooses.” The Committee’s report itself recorded, “Registrar General of India was engaged in the creation of the National Population Register (NPR) and issuance of Multi-purpose National Identity Cards to citizens of India, it was decided with the approval of the Prime Minister, to constitute an Empowered Group of Ministers (EGoM) to collate the two schemes – the NPR under the Citizenship Act, 1955 and the UID scheme. The EGoM was also empowered to look into the methodology and specific milestones for early and effective completion of the scheme and take a final view on these. The EGoM was constituted on 4 December, 2006.”

    When convergence of biometric NPR and Aadhaar/UID scheme was part of the conceptual design, it had left not even an iota of doubt that both the schemes were in fact one.  

    Besides the Ministry of Planning in their written reply stated, “UIDAI is adopting a multiple registrar approach and the Registrar General of India (RGI) will be one of the Registrars of the UIDAI. To synergize the two exercises, an Inter-Ministerial Coordination Committee has been set up to minimize duplication. The UIDAI is making all efforts to synergise with National Population Register (NPR) exercise.” This recorded reply illustrates that BJP’s proposal for NPR and Congress’s Aadhaar is simply the same rose with different names. 

    A seasoned politician and an ex-bureaucrat like Sinha cannot be so naïve as to fail to understand that Aadhaar and NPR are one and the same. This feigned ignorance seems to demonstrate the collusion between BJP and Congress on biometrically profiling Indians.  Admittedly, biometric data is a property. It is not surprising that property dealers of all shapes and shades are visible on the horizon.  

    Let us revisit the terms of reference of UIDAI. The entire political class and citizenry was taken for a ride regarding a so called turf war between the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) and UIDAI, which media was made to understand that got resolved by diving the Indian population in two parts of 60 crore for coverage under Aadhaar and the rest under National Population Register or NPR, which also generates Aadhaar number. The fact is the terms of reference of the UIDAI mandated it "take necessary steps to ensure collation of National Population Register (NPR) with UID (as per approved strategy)", to "identify new partner/user agencies", to "issue necessary instructions to agencies that undertake creation of databases… (to) enable collation and correlation with UID and its partner databases" and UIDAI “shall own and operate the database". The executive notification dated 28 January 2009 that set up UIDAI mentions this. The entire exercise has been staged to hoodwink unsuspecting Indians.

    If there was still any doubt about the oneness of NPR and Aadhaar, the report of Press Trust of India of 30 January 2014 revealed the proposal of the Planning Commission to allow UIDAI to start enrolments in areas other than 18 states and Union Territories allocated to it. The Commission's proposal is based on the view that this is required to speed up collection of biometrics details of residents and for issuing them Aadhaar numbers as well as a National Multi-purpose Identity Cards (NMIC) based on NPR. It was reported, "The Commission discussed the proposal with Registrar General of India (RGI) under the Ministry of Home Affairs. They have agreed that UIDAI can be allowed to enroll in some states where they are collecting biometrics details of resident, to speed up enrolments."

    In such a situation Sinha’s proposal of replacing biometric Aadhaar with biometric NPR is reminiscent of Danish King Cnut who commanded the crest and trough of tidal wave to obey him and lived in a make believe world thinking that the waves become go up or down in order to obey his command! It indicates that BJP has accepted Aadhaar as irreversible and as a face saving stance it will have citizens believe that it will not accept Aadhaar but will gladly do so if it is mentioned as NPR.   

    It may be noted that the states and union territories where RGI is enrolling residents and collecting their biometrics details under NPR are Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Bihar, Chhattisgarh, Jammu & Kashmir, Meghalaya, Mizoram, Odisha, Tamil Nadu, Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand and West Bengal, Andaman and Nicobar Islands, Dadar and Nagar Haveli and Lakshadweep. Notably, RGI is also enrolling residents in Udupi, Gadag, Uttara Kannada, Haveri, Davangere, Bangalore rural, Chikkabalapur and Kodagu districts of Karnataka. So far 14 crore Indians have been enrolled under NPR.

    UIDAI has been enrolling residents in Andhra Pradesh, Goa, Chandigarh, Daman and Diu, Gujarat, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh, Jharkhand, Karnataka, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Delhi, Puducherry, Punjab, Rajasthan, Sikkim and Tripura. It claims that so far it has enrolled 56 crore Indians.

    Both NPR and Aadhaar are online databases by design.  

    James Ball, Julian Borger and Glenn Greenwald reported for the Guardian referring to revelations of earth wide surveillance by Edward Snowden have stated that the leaked files show that the US’ National Security Agency and its UK counterpart Government Communication Headquarters (GCHQ) have broadly compromised the guarantees that Internet companies have given consumers to reassure them that their communications, online banking and medical records would be indecipherable to criminals or governments.

    According to media reports, the MHA accused telecom operator Vodafone of secretly sharing subscriber data with a British GHCQ, a charge denied by the company. According to documents of the Internal Security Division of the Home Ministry, Vodafone is alleged to have given the GCHQ, "secret unlimited access to their network of undersea cables, which carry much of world's phone calls and Internet traffic".

    "GCHQ's mass tapping operations has been built up over the past five years by attaching intercept probes to the transatlantic cables where they land on British shores," the home ministry documents claimed. "Intercept partners are paid for logistical assistance," it added.

    The drive to mastery over men is not merely a by-product of a faulty political economy but also of a world view, which believes in the absolute superiority. It has become more and more apparent that genocides, Eco disasters and ethnocide are but the underside of corrupt sciences and psychopathic technologies wedded to new secular hierarchies, which have reduced major civilisation to the status of a set of empty rituals, observes Ashish Nandy in his book The Intimate Enemy: Loss and Recovery of Self under ColonialismThe lessons from database based genocides are part of recent world history and should not be forgotten in the face of a large section of complicit and partisan corporate media.

    Now that it has been established that surveillance agencies of the US, UK and their allies have dismantled firewalls created for online privacy and encrypted Internet communications, the alliance of political parties who get the electoral verdict post 2014 parliamentary elections must promise in writing in their manifestoes their resolve to dismantle the illegitimate biometric database to undo the damage to done to Indians. The political parties must be made to promise creation of a mandatory decentralised, secure and offline communication structure. The new regime will have to unequivocally reject the proposal of Aadhaar based GST, GST Network and the intricately linked solutions architecture of World Bank Group, NATO, Interpol and WTO.

    You may also want to read…

    Why biometric identification of citizens must be resisted? Part I

    Biometric identification is modern day enslavement -Part II

    Biometric profiling, including DNA, is dehumanising -Part III

    Marketing and advertising blitzkrieg of biometric techies and supporters -Part IV

    History of technologies reveals it is their owners who are true beneficiaries -Part V

    UID's promise of service delivery to poor hides IT, biometrics industry profits –Part VI

    Technologies and technology companies are beyond regulation? -Part VII

    Surveillance through biometrics-based Aadhaar –Part VIII

    Narendra Modi biometrically profiled. What about Congress leaders?-Part IX

    Aadhaar: Why opposition ruled states are playing partner for biometric UID? -Part X


    Is Nandan Nilekani acting as an agent of non-state actors? –Part XI


    Aadhaar and UPA govt's obsession for private sector benefits–Part XII

    CIA-funded MongoDB partners with UIDAI to handle Aadhaar data –Part XIII


    Are Indians being used as guinea pigs of biometric technology companies? -Part XIV

    Aadhaar: Is the biometric data of human body immortal and ageless? Part XV

    Aadhaar: The propaganda of transnational vested interests –Part XVI


    Aadhaar: Pakistan handed over, India giving database on a platter– Part XVII

    Engineered row in US-India relations, an attention diversion tactics of big brothers?—Part XVIII


    Aadhaar: UIDAI and the ‘fifth column’ of Napoleon—Part XIX

    Aadhaar: Turning citizens into subjects through social control technology companies –PartXX


    Why Kejriwal govt in Delhi should abandon biometric Aadhaar?—Part XXI


    Aadhaar for LPG: Oil companies, Ministry of Petroleum & UIDAI disobeying Supreme Court order–Part XXII


    Why Vasundhara Raje should immediately withdraw circulars making Aadhaar mandatory -Part XXIII


    How Congress has been proven wrong on biometric Aadhaar and NPR -Part XXIV


    Aadhaar, NPR, UN resolution and deafening silence of political parties –Part XXV

    Is Congress converging UID numbers of EVMs and Indian voters? –Part XXVI


    Is our political class trapped by economic hit men from database empires? -Part XXVII

    Aadhaar & database risks: Will India evaporate to become nobody in our life time? –Part XXIX


    (Gopal Krishna is member of Citizens Forum for Civil Liberties (CFCL), which is campaigning against surveillance technologies since 2010)

  • Like this story? Get our top stories by email.



    Mukesh kamath

    6 years ago

    This article is probably in anticipation of the BJP coming to power and going by the looks of it they may continue the aadhaar project possibly with a name change and some changes such as ownership of biometric data, alignment with national security imperatives etc. I did not read the complete article as it meanders to banter. What is worth mentioning is that people have started to see value in the aadhaar project. For a brief time our area was under DBTL and prices of gas cylinders in black market had risen. My family had made arrangements to sell a cylinder in black. People realized that this is also a method to make some fast buck.


    Snoop Dawg

    In Reply to Mukesh kamath 6 years ago

    Are you a lobbyist/PR agent for CIA funded biometrics collection? You've have been going around on all the articles criticizing AADHAR/NPR like you're on payroll to defend while cooking up fake stories about your "family" & what not!

    We are listening!

    Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.

    To continue

    Sign Up or Sign In


    To continue

    Sign Up or Sign In



    online financial advisory
    Pathbreakers 1 & Pathbreakers 2 contain deep insights, unknown facts and captivating events in the life of 51 top achievers, in their own words.
    online financia advisory
    The Scam
    24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
    Moneylife Online Magazine
    Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
    financial magazines online
    Stockletters in 3 Flavours
    Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
    financial magazines in india
    MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
    (Includes Moneylife Online Magazine)
    FREE: Your Complete Family Record Book
    Keep all the Personal and Financial Details of You & Your Family. In One Place So That`s Its Easy for Anyone to Find Anytime
    We promise not to share your email id with anyone