Rethink Aadhaar, a non-partisan campaign concerned about the Aadhaar project, has raised serious queries, supported by documentary evidence, regarding the Aadhaar-bank linkage in the context of the death of a 64-year old widow, Premani Kunwar, due to hunger and exhaustion on 1 December 2017 in Danda block of Garhwa district in Jharkhand. The death underscores the vulnerability of the Aadhaar-bank integration system, which victimises the defenceless poor at the grassroots.
Till September 2017, Premani Kunwar received her old age pension in her State Bank of India (SBI) account in the Danda branch. Thereafter, without her knowledge, her pension amount was redirected to the SBI bank account of Shanti Devi in Piprakala branch (22 km from Danda). Shanti Devi, who died 25 years ago, was the first wife of Premani Kunwar’s husband, the late Mutur Mahto.
Following the release of the fact-finding report on Premani Kunwar’s death by the Right to Food Campaign, the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) conducted an inquiry on 8th December. Its report acknowledges that Premani Kunwar’s old age pension had indeed been credited to Shanti Devi’s account, which was linked with Premani Kunwar’s Aadhaar number on 10 October 2017.
The report also acknowledges that Premani Kunwar did not receive her ration for the month of November 2017, even though the dealer authenticated her biometrics in the point of sale (POS) machine for that month and also made an entry of 35kg in her ration card. The issue of denial of ration was discussed at length in an earlier press release of the Right to Food Campaign on 7 December 2017.
According to a news report published in the the Economic Times on 23rd December, as per the report of the local police, Premani Kunwar, along with her youngest step-son, Sunil Mahto had “fudged her Aadhaar card” to avail Shanti Devi’s family pension. Shanti Devi’s account was being credited with a monthly family pension amount of Rs849 from the Coal Mines Provident Fund. As per the report submitted by the branch manager of Piprakala to the inspector of Garhwa police station, Shanti Devi’s account was operated by Premani Kunwar and her family members. It further states that a sum of Rs30,000 was withdrawn in the name of Shanti Devi on 6 November 2017. The police arrested Sunil Mahto on 13th December for this withdrawal.
The reports of UIDAI and The Economic Times leave many pertinent questions unanswered. As per the UIDAI report, the name in Premani Kunwar’s Aadhaar (UID no XXXXXXXX7606) was changed to “Shanti Devi” on 23 September 2015. This report fails to explain how, despite this change, Premani Kunwar continued to receive her pension in her Aadhaar linked bank account till September 2017. There is also no explanation of how a bank account could be opened in the name of Shanti Devi in 2007, given that she died over two decades ago.
Even the know your customer (KYC) record of Shanti Devi’s account was last updated on 7 December 2017, just a day before the UIDAI team’s visit. This draws suspicion on the complicity of bank functionaries, among others, in the fraudulent withdrawal of money from this account. The bank manager of the Piprakala branch of SBI refused to share with the Right to Food Campaign fact finding team, the KYC documents that were used to open Shanti Devi’s account. There is also no explanation from UIDAI on how UID no XXXXXXXX7606 was linked with the bank account numbers of Premani Kunwar as well as Shanti Devi.
These issues highlight the vulnerability of the Aadhaar-bank integration system. Recently, a massive scam of opening Aadhaar-linked Airtel payment bank accounts of Airtel network subscribers without their consent was unearthed. In 2016, ICICI Bank opened accounts of around 6,000 workers under National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (NREGA) in the Boram block of East Singhbhum district without their consent and linked them to their Aadhaar. Shell accounts have been used to siphon off NREGA wages, as a recent investigation in Mahuadanr block (Latehar district in Jharkhand) revealed. A member of parliament (MP) also recently became a victim of fraudulent withdrawal after fraudsters used the one time passcode (OTP) sent to the MP’s mobile to authenticate Aadhaar-based online transfer of fund.
The police report holds Sunil Mahto solely responsible for the fraudulent withdrawal of money from Shanti Devi’s bank account. Even if he was involved in this misdeed, he could not have done so without the complicity of bank functionaries involved in opening Shanti Devi’s account in 2007; persons who verified the change of name from Premani Kunwar to Shanti Devi in UID no XXXXXXXX7606; bank functionaries, who linked Premani Kunwar’s Aadhaar number with Shanti Devi’s account and bank functionaries, who updated KYC of Shanti Devi’s bank account on 7 December 2017.
The bare, two-room, dilapidated kutcha house of Premani Kunwar stands witness to her death amidst abject poverty. In the absence of the public distribution system (PDS) grain, she had to borrow rice from her neighbours to survive. There is no doubt that Premani lived in a state of semi-starvation. It is now well established that she did not receive her grain entitlement for August and November and her pension for September and October.
Premani’s death is a grim reminder of how vulnerable people like her routinely experience uncertainties in accessing their lifelines owing to complex systems like Aadhaar. Premani Kunwar’s son, Uttam Mahto has clearly testified in a video as well as a written statement that his mother died due to starvation. However, as per the report of the block development officer (BDO) of Danda, Uttam Mahto testified to his mother’s death due to illness. This exposes the local administration’s attempt to cover up the actual cause of Premani Kunwar’s death.
Further, the administration lodged complaints against the local whistle-blowers who drew attention to Premani Kunwar’s death due to starvation. It filed first information reports (FIRs) against Birendra Chowdhary, Pramukh of Danda, Kalicharan Mahto and Sushma Mahto for “causing disruption of government inquiry and for instilling fear in the government inquiry team”. It is also alleged that they tore government documents in the process which the defendants have denied.
As in the cases of previous deaths due to starvation in Jharkhand, the government has denied the role of Aadhaar integration with welfare programmes or administrative lapses that led to the denial of entitlements. It has instead been harassing the surviving members of the families suffering from starvation. The Right to Food Campaign demands that the FIRs against the local whistle-blowers be withdrawn. It also demands answers to these puzzling issues:
Why – and by whom - was the KYC of Shanti Devi’s bank account updated on 7 December 2017, a day before the UIDAI inquiry report?
How was an account opened in the name of Shanti Devi (who died 25 years ago) in the Piprakala branch of SBI in 2007?
On what basis, was Premani Kunwar’s name of changed to Shanti Devi in UID number XXXXXXXX7606 in 2015?
If Premani Kunwar had indeed changed her name in the Aadhaar to Shanti Devi in 2015, why did it take two years to get her Aadhaar number linked to the SBI account of Shanti Devi?
How was UID no XXXXXXXX7606 in the name of “Shanti Devi” (since 2015) linked to both Shanti Devi and Premani Kunwar’s bank accounts and the latter’s old age pension?
Premani Kunwar’s son, Uttam Mahto has clearly testified that his mother died due to starvation. Why then does the BDO’s report claim that Uttam ascribed his mother’s death to illness?
The Thane Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB) officials have arrested Dr Prakash Harishchandra Jadhav, Health and Medical Officer from Mira Bhaindar Municipal Corporation (MBMC) for accepting liquor bottles as bribe.
Dr Jadhav was caught red handed by the ACB while accepting imported liquor bottles of various brands that he had demanded as bribe from one Dr Vishnukant Sharma to enroll him in the panel of civic doctors.
Recently, MBMC had recruited several doctors and staff for Pandit Bhimsen Joshi (Temba) Hospital, and other municipal dispensaries. One of the doctor who was in waiting list of recruitment approached Dr Jadhav to update his status from waiting to confirmed in the panel enrollment process.
However, to change the waiting status to confirmed, Dr Jadhav demanded liquor and gave Dr Sharma a list of various brands of liquors in writing on a piece of paper. Dr Sharma then approached activist Pradeep Jangam of Ziddi Maratha Pratishthan (NGO). Mr Jangam took Dr Sharma to Thane ACB and registered the complaint. After verifying the complaint, the ACB team led by Police Inspector Salil Bhosale laid a trap outside a wine shop in Bhaindar and arrested Dr Jadhav while accepting a box containing 10 bottles of Blender’s Pride Whisky and three bottles each of Vodka and Rum worth Rs15,884.
"Dr Jadhav was caught accepting 16 bottles of liquor of different foreign brands worth Rs15,884 from the complainant doctor in front of Government panch witnesses," ACB said in a statement.
Dr Jadhav had demanded the liquor bottles for a party on Sports Day organised for a local medical association on 17 December 2017. Dr Jadhav who is also president of the Association has been booked under the relevant sections of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
However, till writing this story, the MBMC has not yet suspended Dr Jadhav as Chief Medical Officer. According to MBMC Deputy Commissioner Dr Sambhajirao Paanpatte further decision in this matter is under procedure.
The Reliance Anil Ambani group has filed a Rs 5,000-crore ($ 780 million) defamation suit here against Congress spokesperson Abhishek Singhvi, accusing him of making "false, defamatory and libellous statements".
The suit has been filed in the Gujarat High Court.
According to company sources, the Congress leader "made false, defamatory and libellous statements against the group. We have filed a Rs 5,000-crore suit for damages against him for making these false and defamatory statements".
Singhvi had, on November 30, attacked Finance Minister Arun Jaitley, contending that he was "fooling" people by saying the government had not waived loans of big defaulters.
Alleging that the government had written off Rs 1.88 lakh crore debt of wilful defaulters, he had said: "We all know that top 50 corporates owe Rs 8.35 lakh crore to banks and out of those, three top Gujarat-based companies -- Reliance (Anil Ambani Group), Adani and Essar -- owe Rs 3 lakh crore."
He had charged that the Finance Minister, instead of declaring these liabilities as NPAs, was "trying to help the defaulter with further defence contracts like the Rafale deal".
A Reliance Defence statement had earlier clarified the joint venture between Reliance Aerostructure Ltd and Dassault Aviation was a bilateral agreement between two private companies -- and had nothing to do with the government.
The statement had added: "Dassault Reliance Aerospace Ltd will be only one of the key players in the discharge of offset obligations. Over 500 large, medium and small Indian companies will benefit from the offsets which are nothing but an export obligation for goods and services from India. Offsets referred to are spread over a period of nearly 10 years."
Disclaimer: Information, facts or opinions expressed in this news article are presented as sourced from IANS and do not reflect views of Moneylife and hence Moneylife is not responsible or liable for the same. As a source and news provider, IANS is responsible for accuracy, completeness, suitability and validity of any information in this article.