Sridevi: The Chandni Whose Dreams Remained Unfulfilled 
It has been two years since Sridevi passed away in a freak mishap on 24 February 2018. The other day I was watching English Vinglish (2011), the Gauri Shinde directed film that was acclaimed by critics and masses alike. In between watching her histrionics on screen, what pained me was her physical appearance.
 
One felt a lump in the throat in scenes where Sridevi excelled with her subdued expressions, gait, and poise. Whether it was expressing her frustration with her colleague who falls for her charms, by telling him that she was a married woman with two children or expressing appreciation for her husband’s (Adil Hussain) selection of the saree – Sridevi delivered a scintillating performance that fortuitously became her swan song.
 
 
Unfortunately, Sridevi looked a paler version of the actress who once enthralled audiences in Pathinaru Vyadinile (1976), Priya (1978) and Mr India (1986). In fact in most scenes in the film, Sridevi looks famished and sick: as if she couldn’t draw the line between maintaining weight and follow a healthy lifestyle, and starving oneself in an attempt to look slim. 
 
It made me think – why did Sridevi shun the arc lights for 14 years (1997 to 2011) when she could have chosen to do select films like Kajol and Vidya Balan did?
 
What prompted her to return to films after so many years? What made her tacitly support the avaricious demands made of the producers on her behalf? 
 
The producers of the Tamil film Puli had a hard time meeting her demands during the shoot. In fact, she even sued the producers, demanding her pound of flesh even though the film slumped at the box office. Her fees for a special appearance in the film were allegedly so high that it scared other producers to even approach her. The same Kollywood that recognized her acting skills and made her a superstar now shunned her. She got an offer to act in the iconic Bahubali but she turned it down after the makers refused to accede to her demand for astronomical fees.
 
 
There were also reports in the media about how Sridevi went berserk shopping while she was shooting in the US for English Vinglish. The filmmakers were magnanimously tight-lipped about this, considering the film raked in decent profits at the box office.
 
 
A film magazine called Show Time was launched way back in 1984 which had Sridevi as the cover girl on its inaugural issue. One of the articles mentioned that Sridevi’s fees per film were Rs14 lakh during those days. 
 
Sridevi was steadily climbing the ladder of success as her films (that released in quick succession) proved to be blockbusters. She had a permanent suite in a five-star hotel in Mumbai. Her movies like Himmatwaala, Justice Chowdhury, Mawali, Nagina, Chandni became huge successes. The audiences went berserk with her beauty and acting competence, until her mannerisms became monotonous beyond a point. 
 
Her pairing with Amitabh in Inquilab (1984) was fresh but the movie was a damp squib. Later Sridevi did movies like Akhri Raasta (directed by K Bhagyaraj) and Khuda Gawah with Amitabh and these became successful and iconic films. So enamoured was Bollywood with Sridevi that Dharmendra called her the Marilyn Monroe of India and compared her joi-de-vivre with Mumtaz, his co-star in the 70s.  
 
The people who managed Sridevi's dates angered Padmalaya Films when they approached her for a new film. This company had given Sridevi her big break in Hindi films (Himmatwala, 1983) after a disastrous debut in Solva Sawan (1977).
 
The film, a remake of Bharati Raaja's legendary Tamil film Pathinaru Vayadinile  had Amol Palekar playing the lead. Palekar was unconvincing as a village bumpkin, unable to evoke the sympathy that Kamal Haasan had managed to gather in the original.
 
Embittered and furious, Padmalaya Films cast another upcoming South Indian actress Radha in their Kamyaab that starred Shabana Azmi and Jeetendra – a regular pair in Hindi films made down South. That the movie tanked at the box office is another story. Padmalaya Films had to eat a humble pie and Sridevi had the last laugh.
 
Her rumoured liaison with Mithun Chakraborty did nothing to dent her image and popularity. Her so-called rivalry with her contemporary Jayaprada kept both of them in the news. She allegedly made her displeasure clear while acting with Jackie Shroff. Her only film with Sanjay Dutt (Gumrah) was widely appreciated. Shroff’s close friend designer Anna Singh was so miffed with Sri’s high-handedness that she claimed that she threw a chappal at her! 
 
  
Her pairing with Anil Kapoor that began in Mr. India (1987) continued in many films until her last film  Judai (1997), before she took a sabbatical to take care of her first-born Jhanvi. Her mother Rajeswari, who was her pillar of support right from her days as a child actor, had passed away earlier. Sridevi was then like a babe lost in the woods. Her troubled relationship with her younger sister Srilatha added to her unhappiness.
 
 
Sridevi’s altercations with film producer Sattee Shourie in later years became the grist of gossip mills. There were reports that her mother had approached tennis player Vijay Amirtharaj with a matrimonial proposal earlier. But the deal fell through. By the time Sridevi entered into a forced matrimonial bliss with the much-married Boney Kapoor (who called himself a Bollywood producer) she was already 36 years old. 
 
 
A lot of questions remain unanswered. Whatever happened to all the money that Sridevi earned during her prime? Unconfirmed reports claim that her parents dipped into their daughter’s fortunes to give loans to their relatives at high-interest rates. Having lost the opportunity to go to school, Sridevi did not have sufficient knowledge or expertise to invest her hard-earned wealth well. 
 
 
(Sridevi shared this photo on Twitter with her father, mother & sister on 18 June 2013 on Father’s Day)
 
Unlike Jayalalitha, Sridevi never expressed her anguish in public about a childhood that she lost as she began acting in films right from the age of four years. Sridevi had trouble speaking fluently in English and her interviews in the media appear doctored. Residents of Andheri in Mumbai often saw Sridevi shopping in retail stores all by herself without anyone even noticing her or acknowledging her presence.
 
Acting was the only profession that Sridevi knew and excelled in. She could have chosen scripts carefully, demanded compensation commensurate with market forces and could have come to terms with the fact that age was no longer on her side. Rather than looking at artificial ways of enhancing her beauty, how wonderful it would have been had Sridevi chosen to age gracefully!
  • Like this story? Get our top stories by email.

    User 

    COMMENTS

    Ramesh Popat

    1 month ago

    welcome back- BS!

    kpushkar

    1 month ago

    The official last rites seems another avoidable controversy. Whay should the taxpayer pay fir it??She never dis anything for society , no public service campaign Or such work.

    Pay Hikes in India To Fall to Decadal Low in 2020: Report
    A new survey report on Tuesday said that India will see the lowest salary increase in a decade this year and even the real estate and transport sector—the top national job generators—will witness lowest pay hikes in 2020.
     
    The sharpest drop in pay hikes was projected in the auto sector, reflecting its stress; e-commerce sector was seen giving a double-digit pay hike—among the highest across 20 sectors -- surveyed by on Plc, a human resource consultancy firm .
     
    "The Vehicle Manufacturing industry reported the biggest drop, from 10.1 per cent in 2018 to 8.3 per cent for 2020," the survey showed.
     
    As per the results of the survey, companies in India gave an average pay increase of 9.3 per cent during 2019, reflecting a slowdown in the economy compared to 2018. 
     
    "The projection for 2020 is down by 20 basis points to 9.1 per cent. However, despite the dip in the projections, two out of five participating companies in the survey are projecting a double-digit increase, expecting a positive economic outlook," the report added.
     
    Disclaimer: Information, facts or opinions expressed in this news article are presented as sourced from IANS and do not reflect views of Moneylife and hence Moneylife is not responsible or liable for the same. As a source and news provider, IANS is responsible for accuracy, completeness, suitability and validity of any information in this article.
  • Like this story? Get our top stories by email.

    User 

    Coronavirus: 231 Indian, 7 Maldivians sent home from ITBP camp
    A total of 238 people, including seven Maldivians, housed at a quarantine facility here in Chhawla ITBP camp have been sent home after they tested negative in the final check -- with no coronavirus infection symptoms, officials said on Tuesday.
     
    They are among 406 inmates, including seven children, who were shifted to the west Delhi quarantine facility of Indo-Tibetan Border Police (ITBP) after the group was brought back from China's Wuhan -- the epicentre of the deadly virus -- on February 1 and 2.
     
    "Out of 406 inmates, 238 were sent to their home on Monday after their final report found negative. Their disbersal began on Monday afternoon. Most of the 238 inmates left from Chhawla camp to their destinations by Monday night," ITBP Spokesperson Vivek Pandey told IANS.
     
    Of the 238, seven are from Maldives and they left for their country in a flight around 4.30 a.m. on Tuesday.
     
    As per the ITBP spokesperson, the disbersal process of other inmates will continue through Tuesday.
     
    The disbersal process of the 406 inmates began following the Indian Council of Medical Research's (ICMR)-- the apex body in India for the formulation, coordination and promotion of biomedical research -- final report submitted on Sunday to the ITBP confirmed negative findings mentioned negative coronavirus symptom.
     
    The inmates, including an infant were kept under observation of an expert team of doctors and medical professionals. 
     
    Disclaimer: Information, facts or opinions expressed in this news article are presented as sourced from IANS and do not reflect views of Moneylife and hence Moneylife is not responsible or liable for the same. As a source and news provider, IANS is responsible for accuracy, completeness, suitability and validity of any information in this article.
  • Like this story? Get our top stories by email.

    User 

    We are listening!

    Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.
      Loading...
    Close

    To continue


    Please
    Sign Up or Sign In
    with

    Email
    Close

    To continue


    Please
    Sign Up or Sign In
    with

    Email

    BUY NOW

    online financial advisory
    Pathbreakers
    Pathbreakers 1 & Pathbreakers 2 contain deep insights, unknown facts and captivating events in the life of 51 top achievers, in their own words.
    online financia advisory
    The Scam
    24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
    Moneylife Online Magazine
    Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
    financial magazines online
    Stockletters in 3 Flavours
    Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
    financial magazines in india
    MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
    (Includes Moneylife Online Magazine)
    FREE: Your Complete Family Record Book
    Keep all the Personal and Financial Details of You & Your Family. In One Place So That`s Its Easy for Anyone to Find Anytime
    We promise not to share your email id with anyone