SEBI imposes fine on CA firm owner in BoR matter
MDT/PTI 25 September 2012

SEBI had summoned Mehta, the CA, to examine his link to Sangeeta Jayram Sawant, director of 30 companies that were connected to the promoters which were buying and selling shares of BoR, but he did not comply with the order


New Delhi: Market regulator Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) imposed a penalty of Rs6 lakh on Dilip S Mehta, owner of a chartered accountancy firm, for failing to respond to summons issued by it in relation to a probe into the affairs of erstwhile Bank of Rajasthan (BoR), reports PTI.

 

The matter pertains to alleged irregularities committed by former promoters of Bank of Rajasthan (BoR).

 

Imposing a "penalty of Rs6 lakh", SEBI in its order said Mehta's failure indicates that the default is repetitive in nature.

 

SEBI had summoned Mehta to examine his link to Sangeeta Jayram Sawant, director of 30 companies that were connected to the promoters which were buying and selling shares of BoR.

 

It had issued two summons to Mehta. Both were received by him but did not comply with them.

 

The market regulator observed that the information sought from Mehta was critical and imperative to the investigation and failure on his part to comply with the summons had hampered the probe.

 

SEBI noted that the "information provided by the noticee now is of no relevance and cannot be accepted as the same was required by the Investigating Authority before the completion of the investigation. Hence the submissions made by the noticee are not accepted".

 

The matter relates to SEBI's investigation into the affairs of BoR for a period between June 2007 and December 2009. Since then, BoR has been acquired by ICICI Bank.

 

The probe revealed that BoR's then promoters, led by Pravin Kumar Tayal, along with some companies that were connected to him and his relatives, by way of their continuous disclosure publicly announced that their stake had come down from 44.2% as on quarter ending June 2007 to 28.6% as on quarter ending December 2009.

 

However, it was alleged, though as per disclosure their holding seemed to have reduced, but in reality the holding of the promoters actually increased with the active collusion of front entities.

 

Thus, the shareholding of the promoters of BoR with person acting in concert (PACs) had increased from 46.8% in June 2007 to 63.15% in December 2009.

Comments
nagesh kini
1 decade ago
The Market Regulator, SEBI has necessarily to move the Accounting Regulator, the ICAI to initiate appropriate action under its disciplinary jurisdisction to convey the message that such acts will not be tolerated. Mere penal penalties won't do.
Vaibhav Dhoka
Replied to nagesh kini comment 1 decade ago
None of regulatory authorities usually take action may be Medical council for Doctors or Bar Council for advocated.These authorities have been established by Act of Parliament and they are supposed to be alert for malpractces in thier proffession ,but all in slumber sleep with with rarest of rare action by them.
nagesh kini
Replied to Vaibhav Dhoka comment 1 decade ago
All regulators are tooth less, rather than being watch dogs they neither bark nor bite. They are a pain!
ArrayArray
Free Helpline
Legal Credit
Feedback