SEBI Chief's Asset Declaration: When FinMin's FAA Also Can't Understand Difference between a Date and Weblink!
Moneylife Digital Team 31 October 2024
When the bureaucrats decide not to understand simple things like a date and a weblink, the common citizen faces a stonewall. Upholding a reply given by the central public information officer of the department of economic affairs (DEA) under the Union ministry of finance (FinMin), the first appellate authority (FAA) discarded a first appeal filed under the Right to Information (RTI) Act. The RTI and first appeal filed by Delhi-based RTI activist commodore (Cmde) Lokesh Batra (retd), is related to the appointment and financial asset declaration by Madhabi Puri Buch, the chairperson of the Securities & Exchange Board of India (SEBI). 
 
While sharing dates related to the appointment of Ms Buch as SEBI chief, the CPIO of FinMin refused to share information on dates when Ms Buch and her family declared their financial assets. Instead of sharing dates, Jasvinder Singh, undersecretary to the government of India and CPIO stated, "The disclosures to be made by the members and chairman of the board are governed by the code of conflict of interests for members of board, which may be accessed at https://www.sebi.gov.in/commondata/conf.pdf."  
 
When Cmde Batra filed the first appeal, Shekhar Chaudhary, director of the FM division in DEA, simply said, "I have gone through all records related to the appeal in respect of the RTI application as well as the reply of the CPIO dated 27 September 2024. Based on the available records, it is perceived that the point-wise reply provided by the CPIO to the said RTI application is correct, based on facts."
 
 
The basic issue with both the CPIO and FAA of FinMin is that Cmde Batra has simply asked to provide dates on which Ms Buch declared the complete details of the 'financial assets and equities' held by her and her family. 
 
However, instead of sharing the dates, all the CPIO did was provide a link to SEBI's code of conflict of interest for members of the board. (Read: After SEBI, FinMin Refuses To Provide Information on Madhabi Puri Buch and Her Family's Asset Declaration)
 
The FAA also seems not to understand the difference between dates and a weblink and disposed of the appeal filed by Cmde Batra in a routine matter.
 
The RTI activist filed applications on the same subject with SEBI and FinMin. SEBI told him that it does not have any information readily available on its chairperson's appointment, her application for the post, declaration of assets and cases where she had recused herself due to conflicts of interest.
 
Going one step ahead by sharing dates related to the appointment of Ms Buch as chairperson of SEBI, the FinMin CPIO denied sharing information on dates when Ms Buch and her family declared their financial assets. 
 
In his first appeal, Cmde Batra stated that "The CPIO did not provide information on Points 2(d) and 2(e) specifically about date/ dates. Please note that each of the above two queries seeks 'dates only'. The CPIO instead provided a link to 'Code on Conflict of Interests for Members of Board'."
 
The FAA, however, upheld that the information(!) provided by the CPIO is correct and based on facts. 
 
Cmde Batra says, "Did the current chairperson of the SEBI, Ms Buch, make a declaration(s) to the government of India of complete details of 'financial assets and equities' held by her (Ms and her concerned family members? Going by the RTI and first appeal responses from the FinMin, the answer is 'NO'."
 
As reported by Moneylife, except for sharing the dates of Ms Buch's appointment, SEBI did not provide any information on the appointment, her application for the post, declaration of assets, or cases where she had recused herself due to conflicts of interest. In fact, by denying the information, SEBI contradicted its statement issued on 11 August 2022.
 
In that statement, SEBI stated, "...it is emphasised that SEBI has adequate internal mechanisms for addressing issues relating to conflict of interest, which include disclosure framework and provision for recusal. It is noted that relevant disclosures required in terms of holdings of securities and their transfers have been made by the chairperson from time to time. (The) chairperson has also recused herself in matters involving potential conflicts of interest." (Read: SEBI Contradicts Own Release, Denies Information on Madhabi Puri Buch's Appointment, Asset Declaration and Recusal)
 
You may also want to read...
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Comments
pradipchindmotor
1 week ago
I do not think madam Buch is possibly not involved in any irregularities,however when question arises I think appropriate authority higher than sebi must inquire in details place it before public.otherwise people can think otherwise.
Meenal Mamdani
Replied to pradipchindmotor comment 1 week ago
That would be the Finance Minister and then the Prime Minister. But they will not initiate and will even stall the inquiry as they stand to gain.
sbhplnm
1 week ago
Before publishing this, it could have been vetted by any legal expert.

As per the RTI Act, information which is available to public ( Published on the web page), It need not be responded
MDT
Replied to sbhplnm comment 1 week ago
You may want to go through this again... Also note, Cmde Batra never asked for information that is available in the public domain as you claimed.

Here is the information asked by Cmde Batra...
(d) Provide me the date/dates when the current chairperson of the SEBI, Ms Madhabi Puri Buch had made declaration(s) of complete details of ‘financial assets and equities’ held by her (Ms Madhabi Puri Buch) to the government of India. Copies of the said declaration(s) are also requested.

(e) Provide me the date/dates when the current chairperson of the SEBI, Ms Madhabi Puri Buch had made declaration(s) of complete details of ‘financial assets and equities’ held by her concerned family members to the government of India. Copies of the said declaration(s) are also requested.

Here is the response given by the CPIO, which was upheld by the FAA...
(d) and (e) The disclosures to be made by the members and chairman of the board are governed by the code of conflict of interests for members of board, which may be accessed at https://www.sebi.gov.in/commondata/conf.pdf.

Cmde Batra has clearly asked for date or dates, while the CPIO/FAA gave a link to the SEBI code of conduct (BTW, it is from 2008!), which is just a PDF file irrelevant to the date(s) and other information sought under the RTI Act. Also, the SEBI code doesn't even share any information or date(s) about asset declaration by its board members, including the chairperson.
Meenal Mamdani
2 weeks ago
Of course, the powers that be understand the difference.
This is how officials make the inquirer run around with repeated appeals.
Not surprising is it?
Who Will Hold SEBI Accountable? The Legal Void in India’s Market Infrastructure
Sucheta Dalal, 31 October 2024
When asked to address serious charges of conflict of interest, by Hindenburg Research and the Congress Party which have made media headlines for the past two months, Madhabi Puri Buch, the chairperson of the Securities and Exchange...
Congress Alleges Violation of Code of Conduct by SEBI Chief Buch, WTM Anant Narayan by Earning Rents, Holding Shares in Unlisted Companies
Moneylife Digital Team 31 October 2024
Updated at 12.45pm on 30 October 2024 to include statement issued by Anant Narayan, WTM, SEBI...

Pawan Khera, chairman of the media & publicity department in the All India Congress Committee (AICC), on Tuesday made fresh allegations...
SEBI Imposes Over Rs2 Crore Penalty on 17 for Non-compliance in Eros International Media Case
Moneylife Digital Team 30 October 2024
Market Regulator Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) imposed penalties totalling Rs2.04 crore on 17 directors of three contend providers for non-compliance with its investigation into alleged financial irregularities at Eros...
RBI Imposes Over Rs14 Lakh Penalty on 4 Cooperative Banks from Maharashtra, 1 from Madhya Pradesh
Moneylife Digital Team 29 October 2024
Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has imposed a penalty of Rs14.10 lakh on four cooperative banks from Maharashtra and one from Madhya Pradesh (MP) for non-compliance with the directions issued by the banking regulator. The highest penalty...
Free Helpline
Legal Credit
Feedback