SC Stays Implementation of 3 Controversial Farm Laws; Forms 4-Member Committee
The Supreme Court (SC) on Tuesday stayed implementation of the three farm laws till further order, while forming a four-member committee of agriculturists and agri-economists to hear farmers’ grievances against these Acts.
A bench headed by chief justice Sharad A Bobde says, "We are going to suspend the implementation of the three farm laws until further orders."
Justifying the stay on implementation of farm laws, the apex court says, "We deem it fit to pass the following interim order, with the hope and expectation that both parties will take this in the right spirit and attempt to arrive at a fair, equitable and just solution to the problems."

The bench added that this step would improve the trust and confidence of the farmers. "We are also of the view that a stay of implementation of all the three farm laws for the present, may assuage the hurt feelings of the farmers and encourage them to come to the negotiating table with confidence and good faith," it said, reiterating that it has no intention to stifle a peaceful protest.

A bench, headed by chief justice Bobde and comprising justices AS Bopanna and V Ramasubramanian, observed that the negotiations between the farmers' bodies and the union government have not yielded any result so far. "Therefore, we are of the view that the constitution of a committee of experts in the field of agriculture to negotiate between the farmers' bodies and the government of India may create a congenial atmosphere," it said in its order.
Members of the committee include Bhupinder Singh Maan (president of BKU), Dr Pramod Kumar Joshi (international policy head), Ashok Gulati (agricultural economist) and Anil Dhanvat, (Shivkeri Sangathna, Maharashtra).
The SC says the committee has been constituted for the purpose of listening to the grievances of the farmers relating to the farm laws and the views of the government and to make recommendations. The bench added that the representatives of all the farmers' bodies, whether they are holding a protest or not and whether they support or oppose the laws, shall participate in the deliberations of the committee and put forth their viewpoints.

While welcoming the SC's decision to stay implementation of the three farm laws, farmer leaders and opposition parties expressed doubts over the neutrality of the committee appointed by the apex court.

In a statement, the All India Kisan Sangharsh Coordination Committee (AIKSCC) says, "It is clear that the court is being misguided by various forces even in its constitution of a committee. These are people who are known for their support to the three Acts and have actively advocated for the same."

Darshan Pal, chief of Krantikari Kisan Union, says farmers' bodies will not accept any committee and their agitation will go on. "We had issued a press note Monday night stating that we will not accept any committee formed by SC for mediation. We were confident that Centre will get a committee formed through the apex court to take the burden off their shoulders," he says.

Shiv Sena's farmer leader, Kishore Tiwari, supported the stay on the implementation of the three farm laws but slammed the appointment of the committee which will look into the farmers' issues.

"The expert committee members appointed by the chief justice are puppets of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) and Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), who are notorious as blind advocates of market-economy and globalisation. It is a hoax and betrayal of the agrarian community," Mr Tiwari told IANS.
The apex court also issued notice on the application filed by Delhi police seeking to stop farmers from entering the national capital to hold a tractor rally on the Republic Day.
After the hearing on farm laws concluded on Monday, the Centre hurriedly filed an affidavit in the SC, stating that the legislations were not hurriedly made but are the result of two decades of deliberations and their repeal is not justifiable or acceptable. 
The Union government told the apex court that it has been actively and intensively engaging with the states for about two decades to introduce reforms to provide accessible and barrier-free market system for better price realisation, but states either showed reluctance to adopt the reforms in true spirit or made partial or cosmetic reforms. 
Against the backdrop of COVID-19 pandemic, the Centre had said that the situation may have a prolonged effect globally on demand side, hence, it became necessary and expedient for it to promulgate Farm Reform Ordinances, namely, (i) "the Farmers Produce Trade and Commerce (Promotion and facilitation) Ordinance, 2020"; (ii) "the Farmers (Empowerment and Protection) Agreement on Price Assurance and Farm Services Ordinance"; and (iii) "the Essential Commodities (Amendment) Ordinance, 2020".
Meanwhile, the agitation by farmers entered in to 48th day today. All India Kisan Sabha General Secretary Hannan Mollah told IANS on Tuesday that the farmer organisations respect the Supreme Court but they are unwilling to go before any committee which may be appointed by the apex court. He clearly said, "These Acts are not in favour of farmers, so we are demanding to repeal it."
On the suggestions of the Supreme Court to stay and appoint a committee to look into the matter, he said, "The government will not discuss the issue of repealing the laws as seen during eight rounds of talks.
"The government wants to linger the matter. We are not in favour of putting the implementation of new farm laws on hold, we want them to be repealed," said Hannan Mollah.
A farmer leader from Punjab and general secretary of Bharatiya Kisan Union (Lakhowal) Harinder Singh had told IANS that farmers are going to burn the copies of the three farm laws on the auspicious occasion of Lohri in a move to intensify stir against these laws.
He said, "Farmer's agitation will continue till the government is ready to withdraw these laws. Thousands of farmers have been demonstrating here at the bordering points of the national capital since November 23, 2020. They are demanding the repealing of the new laws enacted by the Centre last year and framing a new law which will give legal guarantee of minimum support price (MSP) of crops to the farmers."
  • Like this story? Get our top stories by email.




    1 week ago

    The farmers have stated that they will not accept the Committee's recommendations. Then what is the use of having such a Committee? If the Supreme Court thinks that they can solve the problem, they should themselves sort out the matter instead of giving it to an unacceptable Committee.

    This is not a judicial function but administrative. The SC should not involve in it but leave it to the govt to tackle.


    2 weeks ago

    This is a great example of project management aspects, and its called as stakeholder management, It mentioned that always the people will oppose the change, so the project may be too good, but you have to identify direct and indirect stakeholders, get confidence from them, so that, later they will not resist. The laws are good, but they should have consulted with leaders, otherwise, we won't have faced so many hurdles. I don't understand one more thing is--agriculture is subject in the control of states, and so it's upto them if they want to implement it or not, then why so much oppose from states, when they had already declared that, they will not be implementing it? So looks like, it's a hidden political agenda. Here is the link, if you want to support these laws, I had started on the petition, let us see how many support --


    2 weeks ago

    Credibility of the Supreme Court is at stake. It has selected members to the Committee who have supported the laws publicly. Second, stay has been granted on laws even before they are put to test through implementation. Third, instead of examining the validity of laws in the context of Agriculture as a Concurrent Subject in the Constitution of India, without mentioning about the States' involvement in such legislation, it has stayed the laws.


    2 weeks ago

    1. 3 Farm Bills passed by the Indian Parliament have been opposed by several NDA/ UPA partners ; not for political gain; but for apprehended loss of Farm-votes
    2. The blame goes to Union Agriculture Ministry, BJP/RSS cadres for their inabilities to study & inform the farmers' community., who are on war-path. Even the octogenarian, Shri Anna Hazare is not well informed, who declared Satyagrah in Delhi, in support of Farming community on war path..
    3. On studying the entire 3 acts, any prudent farmer must appreciate the clauses which are totally in favour of the farmer. KCR, TS CM & Ms.Mamatha Banerjee, West Bengal CM amended their stand after thorough study of the Farm Acts and amended their stand.
    4. The richest farmers are agitating, since they lose Rs.2 lac crores worth subsidies which they have , allegedly, been getting annually since past 7 decades.


    Meenal Mamdani

    In Reply to saioamshyd 2 weeks ago

    Sir, you should not label those who are against these laws as hypocrites.

    As a person who is not sufficiently knowledgeable about either agriculture or legal system, I tend to look at the bona fides of the people who are speaking out against these laws.

    Aruna Roy, Abhijeet Bannerji, to name just two amongst many, are not self serving people. They have come out against these laws.

    I think that we should keep politics aside and help India enact progressive policies.


    In Reply to Meenal Mamdani 2 weeks ago

    Respected Meenal Mamdani,
    GM. Kindly , enlightens with a precise comments of intellectuals' comment against the Farm Acts.
    More over, annual subsidies worth Rs.2 trillions freely enjoyed for decades, by the rich farmers of adjoining states of seat of power [Delhi] are the most unhappy lot for losing easy moneys, just like that. They are true since their fundamental rights are abrogated.

    We are listening!

    Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.

    To continue

    Sign Up or Sign In


    To continue

    Sign Up or Sign In



    online financial advisory
    Pathbreakers 1 & Pathbreakers 2 contain deep insights, unknown facts and captivating events in the life of 51 top achievers, in their own words.
    online financia advisory
    The Scam
    28 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
    Moneylife Online Magazine
    Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
    financial magazines online
    Stockletters in 4 Flavours
    Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
    financial magazines in india
    MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
    (Includes Moneylife Online Magazine)