SBI Shareholder Writes to FM Nirmala Sitharaman Seeking Complete Information on Loan Write-offs
Pune-based activist Vivek Velankar has requested finance minister (FM) Nirmala Sitharaman to direct State Bank of India (SBI) to share detailed information on loan write-offs, efforts taken for recovery, properties attached against these bad debts and manpower allocation done by the lender over the past eight years. 
 
Mr Velankar, who is a shareholder of SBI, in a letter to the FM says "I request your kind attention to this serious offence by SBI and request you to kindly instruct SBI to put forth transparently all information about the efforts bank has made on recovery of written off accounts of big defaulters above Rs100 crore. In fact, I request you to compel all other nationalised banks also to publish this information proactively on their websites in larger public interest."
 
As reported by Moneylife, using his rights as shareholder, Mr Velankar had found out that SBI had written off of Rs1,23,432 crore, and then recovered just over 7% or Rs8,969 crore over the past eight financial years. (Read: SBI Writes Off Rs1.23 Lakh Crore of Bad Debt, Recovers Paltry Rs8,969 Crore in 8 Years!)
 
In his latest letter, Mr Velankar, who is also president of Pune-based Sajag Nagrik Manch, told FM Nirmala Sitharaman that, "There were lot of heated arguments in the country a couple of months ago on written off loans of big accounts. That time it was clarified by your department that technical write off does not mean waiving off loans and efforts are on for recovery of these written off loans and due to stringent laws brought in by your department the process of recovery has become more effective and faster."
 
Earlier, Mr Velankar had tried obtaining this information under Right to Information (RTI) Act, but SBI denied it claiming that collating this information would be a waste of its resources. Being a shareholder of SBI, he then asked for this information as question for the annual general meeting (AGM). While he did not get a chance to ask his question during SBI's annual general meeting (AGM), the Bank shared this information which is quite shocking. "This information also exposes how the bank writes off loans of 100s of crores of rupees of large defaulters while denying waiver of simple interest on loans for common customers," Mr Velankar had told Moneylife.
 
Here is the information sought by Mr Velankar with help from the finance minister...
 
1. You (SBI) have given me list of accounts which have been written off technically; I would like to know when case was filed in NCLT for each of this account.
 
2. What efforts Bank has made to recover the written off amounts for year 2012-13 to 2016-17.
 
3. How much property is attached for each of the written off account and what is the status of sale of those properties. 
 
4. Provide me manpower allocation done by bank for recovery of written off accounts grade wise. (Is there separate cell formed for this purpose and if yes constitution of the cell as far as manpower allocation is concerned?)
 
5. Amount of expenses incurred by bank from 2012-13 till 2019-20 year-wise for recovery of written off loans. (This should include legal as well as staff salary and other expenses). 
 
The Bank’s reply to Mr Velankar shows that during the eight years from FY12-13 to FY19-20, SBI has 'technically/prudentially written off’ a massive sum of Rs1.23 lakh crore from its books, but manged to recover only 7% or Rs8,969 crore in this period. This makes a mockery of the aggressive claims by a string of high-profile government spokesperson and economic advisors that a ‘technical’ write-off does not stop the recovery process. 
 
When a bad debt is written down, some of the bad debt value remains as an asset because the bank expects to recover it. However, as SBI has shown, most of the times, there is no recovery or negligible recovery for the amounts written off. 
 
The fact is that once a loan turns bad in India, it is almost impossible to recover anything because it has already been ever-greened for several years, a former chairman of a bank had told Moneylife.
 
 Earlier in April, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) had said that Indian banks have technically written off a staggering amount of Rs68,607 crore due from 50 top wilful defaulters, including absconding diamantaire Mehul Choksi. RBI had revealed this information in reply to an RTI filed by Saket Gokhale.
 
RBI said that this amount (Rs68,607 crore) comprising outstanding and the amounts technically or prudentially written off till 30 September 2019. 
 
Mr Velankar, in his letter, says, "I even wrote to them (SBI) to at least convey me whether this information is not available or bank cannot provide me this information but till date no response what so ever is received by me. This raises doubts in minds of common citizen like me about bank’s intentions. 
 
"It seems that in spite of efforts made by your department to make stringent provisions for recovery of written off loans bank is not acting on this with some fraudulent motives. In fact, this information should have been available on bank website but in spite of asking also this information is not disclosed clearly means that either bank is not intentionally taking much efforts to recover these written off loans or doing only selective recovery. This seems to be intentional move by the bank to let down the efforts done by your department on this issue," the activist says in his letter to finance minister Nirmala Sitharaman.
 
You may also want to read…
 
 
 
 
 
  • Like this story? Get our top stories by email.

    User 

    COMMENTS

    kd.paranjpe

    4 months ago

    I do not know why banks are lax when they deal with large defaulters. One reason given is that all these defaulters who take loans to never intend to return have no real assets in their accounts that could be attached as collateral. Some of these people have fictitious assets made with the express purpose of defrauding the banks. Then there is the usual association with those in power and who control who should get how much loan. The politicians do not serve as guarantors for fear of later default and media exposure. Our Institutions seem to be lacking upright men at the helm.
    A direct effect of the lax recovery is the need to increase the provision to account for write offs without a dip in the bank profits. This only means lower deposit interest rates for the depositors and higher interest for new loan customers. Such an arrangement is most public unfriendly.

    s5rwav

    4 months ago

    Why CM Maharashtra, Mumbai Not Declare Mr Rajnish Kumar Chairman SBI as Anti National for Gigantic Financial Frauds and Open Brazen Loot of Public Money of Poor Indians? I am Babubhai Vaghela from Ahmedabad. Thanks....

    s5rwav

    4 months ago

    Suo Moto Empowered Judges sitting at High Courts and Supreme Court of India should Take Cognizance and Direct the State Bank of India Headed by Rajnish Kumar to Disclose the Larger Public Interest Information about Public Money.

    rajoluramam

    4 months ago

    Now investment in YES bank was eroded 30% with in a short period. It will not be far off, 100% investment in YES bank will be eroded. Writting off bad loans is a regular habit of public sector banks. These banks never seriously pursue the recoveries. Why to bother about recoveries, when easiest method of
    " writting off" is available. Those who had sanctioned these written off loans might have retired long back or reached the heavenly abode.
    To get a huge loan from public sector bank, What one reqires is a strong recommendation or benami partnership from a high level politician. Who recommend Baba Ramdev?

    Meenal Mamdani

    4 months ago

    Hats off to Mr. Velankar for filing this RTI request.

    Even though he will have to spend months to get at the bottom of this, the positive is that the pols are worried that someone is looking over their shoulder and will nail them sooner or later. Hopefully that puts fear in their hearts and therefore fewer malfeasance.

    Newme

    4 months ago

    Pickles Nimmy is an arrogant lady. I don\'t think she will even read the letter.

    likipa1993

    4 months ago

    Dear Vivek Velankar,
    If you are reading this, Banks and especially like SBI which are too big to fail will never disclose such information. For this you have to understand how a bank loan scam works.
    Bank loans these big are sanctioned in tandem with a cut of bank executives and in no way these executives will let the blade fall on them.

    In a successful scam you need to share the cut not only with the loan approvers/executives but you also need multiple scapegoats and fake companies to make it successful. Unsecured loans are definately scam but there are ways to scam a secured loan too.

    Get a loan sanctioned for 100 crores, pay your cut to the bank executives, pay your cut to the fake company and directors, let the fake firm buy equipment or materials with the loan amount, bank will try to recover the amount from the fake firm, make your directors move to a new country (some countries require paltry sum for changing citizenship). Bank can sell your paltry equipment for pennies and you can do your business legitimately.
    Now this is a basic foundation of scam. You can involve many fake firms and use your creativity to scam any bank. But always remember you need the executive or the loan approvers in your pocket to successfully execute that.

    muralidhard2002

    4 months ago

    I dont think that SBI Officers (AGMs/DGMs, etc.) will leave the defaulters just like that! I have heard an Officer has been given memo. for failing to report an`irregular' loan of Rs.90,000/- (Not NPA) given to a TG (Transgender). (being a very big amount). He was lamenting that he had received a memo. first time in his service. So just 'Imagine' the fate of the `culprits' who have sanctioned `small loans' to poor men like Malya, Chocksi, etc. May be the officer `did not fall in line' with the `Honest Group'!

    rs235m

    4 months ago

    Loan takers and defaulters fill pockets of politicians and bank executives to write off loans It is very funny that in one case reason for write off was that the address of defaulter was not known to the bank or the addressee has left that place. DHFL company asks for PAN , signature across photo ,ID address proof etc while taking deposits from public and default while repayment.
    There are hoodlums in corporate world.

    Indian State Banks To Require More Capital as Safeguard against Stress: Fitch
    The plans of public sector banks (PSBs) in India to raise capital from private sources will not be sufficient to mitigate anticipated risks unless supplemented with additional capital support from the State, says Fitch Ratings. 
     
    Several large State-run banks have recently announced plans to raise a total of around $6 billion in fresh equity from the capital market. 
     
    According to Fitch, state-run banks are already facing significant execution risks in raising equity due to depressed stock market valuations and weak investor interest. A recent news report citing the government's plan to reduce the number of state banks to five from 12 while selling majority stakes in several others, including Bank of India to raise resources, could add to uncertainties. 
     
    It says, "A reduction in the state's majority shareholding in some of its banks may dent depositor confidence and potentially lead to negative rating action as their long-term ratings are anchored to state support. It may also reduce investor appetite at a time when government capital support has stuttered, and an acceleration in new coronavirus cases is hampering a meaningful economic recovery and increasing risks for banks' balance sheets." 
     
    "We believe the proposed stake sales will be very challenging in the current economic climate and in light of the potential capital shortfalls we calculate at the state banks in our stress test. It could also require amendments to the banking company acts, which currently prescribe a minimum government shareholding of 51% for the state banks, thus adding to execution risk," Fitch added.
     
    The ratings agency says it expects PSBs in India will remain reliant on fresh equity injections from the state as the proposed capital amounts, if raised fully, will likely add only around 100-150 basis points (bps) to State banks' existing common equity tier-1 (CET1) ratios. It says, "Under our high stress scenario, this may provide some interim capital relief, testing the banks' ability to raise fresh equity on their own, but will not be enough to stave off heightened solvency risks. It would also increase the prospect of further regulatory forbearance." 
     
    Fitch says it believes recapitalisation requirements will be substantially higher once pandemic-related asset quality deterioration starts manifesting on bank balance sheets when regulatory forbearance ends, in which case raising equity from the market will be more difficult. 
     
    "Recent comments by the central bank governor highlighting the need for recapitalisation further underscores this imperative, emphasising the risks that deteriorating asset quality will pose to state banks' limited capital and earnings buffers. This is consistent with the outcome of our stress test on individual banks, whereby the state banks have significantly larger capital shortfalls than their private counterparts," the ratings agency added.
     
    Indian private banks' recapitalisation requirements are comparatively more modest than their proposed fresh capital raising, with ICICI Bank Ltd and Axis Bank Ltd likely to add around 200bps-245bps to their existing CET1 ratios. This, according to Fitch, will further widen the capital gap between private and state banks, which, on average, is about 350bps. 
     
    Fitch says it believes ICICI Bank and Axis Bank—which have proposed plans to raise $2 billion each—will likely be encouraged by recent investor appetite for the almost $1 billion and $1.9 billion raised by Kotak Mahindra Bank and Yes Bank, respectively. Yes Bank was also recently supported through an injection of capital by the largest State-owned bank, State Bank of India (SBI), it added.
     
  • Like this story? Get our top stories by email.

    User 

    Banks' Gross NPA ratio may surge to 14.7% in FY21: RBI repor
    The Covid-19 pandemic is likely to worsen India's bad loan scenario, as the latest Financial Stability Report of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) predicts that gross non-performing assets (NPA) ratio of Indian banks may increase to 14.7 per cent by the end of the current fiscal, in case the stress scenario severely worsens.
     
    Under the baseline scenario, the gross NPA may increase to 12.5 per cent by March 2021. At the end of the FY20, the gross NPA ration was at 8.5 per cent.
     
    "Macro stress tests for credit risk indicate that the GNPA ratio of all SCBs may increase from 8.5 per cent in March 2020 to 12.5 per cent by March 2021 under the baseline scenario; the ratio may escalate to 14.7 per cent under a very severely stressed scenario," it said.
     
    The forecast comes at a time when several experts and economists have raised concerns that the loan moratoriums and collateral free loans announced in the recent economic package would lead to more stressed assets and weaken the asset quality of the banks.
     
    The report showed that the capital to risk-weighted assets ratio (CRAR) of scheduled commercial banks (SCBs) edged down to 14.8 per cent in March 2020 from 15.0 per cent in September 2019 while their gross non-performing asset (GNPA) ratio declined to 8.5 per cent from 9.3 per cent and the provision coverage ratio (PCR) improved to 65.4 per cent from 61.6 per cent over this period.
     
    It noted that bank credit, which had considerably weakened during the first half of 2019-20, slid down further in the subsequent period with the moderation becoming broad-based across bank groups.
     
    Disclaimer: Information, facts or opinions expressed in this news article are presented as sourced from IANS and do not reflect views of Moneylife and hence Moneylife is not responsible or liable for the same. As a source and news provider, IANS is responsible for accuracy, completeness, suitability and validity of any information in this article.
  • Like this story? Get our top stories by email.

    User 

    We are listening!

    Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.
      Loading...
    Close

    To continue


    Please
    Sign Up or Sign In
    with

    Email
    Close

    To continue


    Please
    Sign Up or Sign In
    with

    Email

    BUY NOW

    online financial advisory
    Pathbreakers
    Pathbreakers 1 & Pathbreakers 2 contain deep insights, unknown facts and captivating events in the life of 51 top achievers, in their own words.
    online financia advisory
    The Scam
    24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
    Moneylife Online Magazine
    Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
    financial magazines online
    Stockletters in 4 Flavours
    Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
    financial magazines in india
    MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
    (Includes Moneylife Online Magazine)
    FREE: Your Complete Family Record Book
    Keep all the Personal and Financial Details of You & Your Family. In One Place So That`s Its Easy for Anyone to Find Anytime
    We promise not to share your email id with anyone