SBI Earned Rs2,043 Crore from ATM Cash Withdrawals in 5 Years while Other Public Sector Banks Lost Rs3,739 Crore: Govt
In a striking revelation, the Indian government has disclosed that, while the State Bank of India (SBI) is earning significant fee income from automated teller machine (ATM) cash withdrawals, other public sector banks (PSBs) are struggling with financial losses in this domain. During the past five years, SBI earned an income of Rs2,043 crore from cash withdrawals at ATMs, while nine PSBs suffered a loss of Rs3,738.78 crore. On a cumulative basis, Punjab National Bank (PNB) and Canara Bank are the only other two PSBs that have earned a profit of Rs90.33 crore and Rs31.42 crore from ATM cash withdrawals, according to a written reply in the Lok Sabha. 
 
According to the government's reply, SBI has consistently earned higher fee income from ATM transactions over the past five years, while other PSBs have suffered losses. The year-wise ATM fee income (or losses) figures for SBI and other PSBs are as follows:
 
 
NK Premachandran, a member of Parliament (MP), has asked the government about money earned by PSBs after the stipulated limit for withdrawals from ATMs. 
 
Pankaj Chaudhary, minister of state for finance, says as per guidelines issued by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), customers are eligible for five free transactions, including financial and non-financial transactions, every month from their own bank ATMs. "They (customers) are also eligible for a fixed number of free transactions, including financial and non-financial transactions,  from other bank ATMs, viz. three transactions in metro centres and five transactions in non-metro centres. Beyond the free transactions, charges are levied for each ATM transaction, as per the respective Board approved policies of banks, and the ceiling or cap is Rs21 plus applicable taxes, if any, per transaction."
 
The response revealed that SBI, India's largest PSB, has successfully turned ATM cash transactions into a significant source of fee income, mainly due to its extensive network and structured fee policies. In contrast, other PSBs have been incurring losses, unable to balance operational costs against declining transaction volumes and fee structures.
 
Data shared by RBI shows that as of January 2025, PSBs have 135,908 ATMs installed across the country. As expected, SBI has the highest number of ATMs at 64,993 installed. It is followed by PNB at 12,974 ATMs and Canara Bank at 11,968 ATMs.
 
 
Additionally, banks are required to comply with RBI guidelines on service charges and minimum balance requirements which, often, limit their ability to recover costs effectively. 
 
RBI's circulars from 2014 and 2015 permit banks to determine service charges based on their board-approved policies, but most PSBs have not been able to structure these in a way that makes ATM operations financially sustainable. 
 
Mr Chaudhary, the minister, clarified that banks are allowed to set their own penal charges and service fees within the framework of RBI regulations. 
 
However, it also noted that SBI has not been levying any penalties on customers for non-maintenance of minimum balance in regular savings accounts since March 2020, a move aimed at making banking more accessible but also potentially impacting revenue streams for smaller banks.
 
For accounts under the Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojana (PMJDY), no minimum balance is required, ensuring financial inclusion but further limiting banks' ability to generate revenue from these accounts.
 
As ATM usage patterns evolve with increasing digital transactions, PSBs need to recalibrate their ATM strategies to sustain operations and improve financial viability. SBI's ability to generate significant fee income from ATM transactions while other PSBs struggle presents a stark contrast that demands urgent policy attention.
 
With customer preferences shifting towards digital banking, the future of ATM fee income for PSBs will depend on how efficiently they adapt to the changing landscape while ensuring that financial inclusion remains a priority.
 
Comments
milindhonwad
3 weeks ago
The banks, RBI and Govt are cheating the bank accountholders through ATM. First, installation and use of ATMs was encouraged and staff in banks was reduced stating that cost of ATMs was less as compared to salaries and other perks of Staff. Then, banks started this 'game' of limited free transactions in banks'own ATM and charges for use of other bank's ATM. But RBI and the Govt conveniently forgot that bank accountholders are compelled to use other banks' ATMs because their own bank's ATMs are either 'Out-of-Order' for many days continuously or there is no cash in them. Now, I also carry the cheque book when I go to the bank to withdraw cash, in case the bank's ATM is out of order or does not have cash. There are many lawyers who file 'PILs' in courts on many issues but none has filed a PIL on this issue in any court. I request such public spirited lawyers to file a PIL on this issue as well, praying that the bank account holders be saved from this 'scam' and transactions in other bank's ATM be also not be charged because many accountholders are compelled to use other banks' ATM as their own bank's ATM is non-functional or does not have cash.
utpalsen001
3 weeks ago
There is no doubt that bank customers are now more inclined with digital banking especially availing ATM services. But the issue remains that while banks are pursuing to withdraw cash from ATM, they are levying charges on use beyond a threshold number. By installing more and more ATMs and reducing footfalls at branches, banks' operating expenses are getting reduced by reduction of staff/ officer at the branches, reduction of floor spaces and other operating expenses. Having kept all these in mind, it is believed that threshold number of use of ATMs shall be increased with reduction of charges on crossing the threshold number. Ultimately the sufferers are bank customers in return of which banks are increasing revenue income from customers' wallet which is ultimately benefitting the stakeholders. It should be kept in mind that bank deposit at a cheap cost is the main sources of means to generate income by the banks, but the customers are being restricted to use ATMs besides, when there is also a fixed limit of withdrawal of cash in a single stroke.
utpalsen001
3 weeks ago
There is no doubt that bank customers are now more inclined with digital banking especially availing ATM services. But the issue remains that while banks are pursuing to withdraw cash from ATM, they are leaving charges on use beyond a threshold number. By installing more and more ATMs and reducing footfalls at branches, banks' operating expenses are getting reduced by reduction of staff/ officer at the branches, reduction of floor spaces and other operating expenses. Having kept all these in mind, it is believed that threshold number of use of ATMs shall be increased and reduction of charges on crossing the threshold number. Ultimately the sufferers are bank customers in return of which banks are increasing revenue income from customers' wallet which is ultimately benefitting the stakeholders. It should be kept in mind that bank deposit at a cheap cost is the main sources of means to generate income by the banks, but the customers are being restricted to use ATMs besides, when there is also a fixed limit of withdrawal of cash in a single stroke.
IndusInd Bank: Insiders Offload, FIIs Exit and DIIs Step in
Moneylife Digital Team 13 March 2025
IndusInd Bank has been at the centre of financial turmoil following the revelation of discrepancies in its derivative portfolio, leading to a 2.35% reduction in net worth. This triggered a sharp decline in its stock price on Tuesday....
IndusInd Bank's Rs1,520 Crore Shock: Accounting Flaw or Governance Failure?
Ranganathan V, 13 March 2025
The unprecedented revelation of an accounting fluff by the fifth biggest private bank in the country is not a routine year-end journal entry to gloss over. Nor the niceties to be observed to await a full investigation report to air...
SBI Slammed by Delhi HC for Frivolous 'Luxury' Litigation in Loan Recovery Case
Moneylife Digital Team 12 March 2025
Coming down heavily on the State Bank of India (SBI) for challenging an innocuous order passed by a chief metropolitan magistrate (CMM) in a loan recovery case, the Delhi High Court (HC) called the matter a 'luxury litigation' by SBI,...
Citigroup Erroneously Credited Client Account with US$81trn in 'Near Miss': FT
Moneylife Digital Team 28 February 2025
Citigroup mistakenly credited a client's account with a staggering US$81trn (trillion) instead of the intended US$280, in what has been described as a 'near miss', says a report from the Financial Times (FT). The error, which took...
Free Helpline
Legal Credit
Feedback