Roll out resolution scheme for Covid-related stress by Sep 15: FM
Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman on Thursday directed banks to roll out resolution schemes for Covid-related stress by September 15.
 
During her interaction with the heads of scheduled commercial banks and NBFCs, through video conference, she focused on lenders immediately putting in place board-approved policy for resolution, identifying eligible borrowers and reaching out to them, said an official statement.
 
Sitharaman also called for quick implementation of a sustained resolution plan by lenders for revival of every viable business.
 
She told the lenders that as and when moratorium on loan repayments is lifted, borrowers must be given support and Covid-19-related distress must not impact the lenders' assessment of their credit-worthiness.
 
Further, she also called for a sustained media campaign to create awareness among the borrowers for the resolution scheme. She advised lenders to ensure that regularly updated FAQs on the resolution framework are uploaded on their websites in Hindi, English and regional languages, and also circulated to their offices and branches.
 
"The lenders assured that they are ready with their resolution policies, and have started the process of identifying and reaching out to eligible borrowers, and that they will comply with the timelines stipulated by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI)," said the Finance Ministry statement.
 
The ministry said that it has also been engaging with the RBI to ensure that the lenders are assisted by the central bank in the resolution process.
 
As the pandemic has led to severe economic stress across sectors, the RBI in August announced to provide a resolution framework to enable the lenders to implement a resolution plan, in respect of eligible corporate borrowers without change in ownership while continuing the account status as standard, subject to specified conditions.
 
Jyoti Prakash Gadia, Managing Director of Resurgent India, said that the resolution framework can be in several forms including restructuring of debt with extended repayment period, conversion of working capital debt to term debt, reduction in rate of interest, conversion of debt to equity instruments, one-time settlement of debt among others.
 
During the virtual meet on Thursday, the Finance Minister also reviewed the progress made by various lenders under ECLGS, PCGS 2.0 and subordinate debt schemes announced as part of the 'Aatmanirbhar Bharat Abhiyaan', and advised lenders to try and extend the maximum possible relief to borrowers before the festive season.
 
As per the government, an amount of Rs 1.58 lakh crore has been sanctioned as on August 31, under ECLGS, out of which more than Rs 1.11 lakh crore has been disbursed. Under PCGS 2.0, bonds or commercial papers of Rs 25,055.5 crore have been approved for purchase by public sector banks so far, out of which Rs 13,318.5 crore amounting to more than 53 per cent of the portfolio pertains to bonds or commercial papers rated below 'AA-'.
 
Disclaimer: Information, facts or opinions expressed in this news article are presented as sourced from IANS and do not reflect views of Moneylife and hence Moneylife is not responsible or liable for the same. As a source and news provider, IANS is responsible for accuracy, completeness, suitability and validity of any information in this article.
  • Like this story? Get our top stories by email.

    User 

    Don't Declare Any Account Not in Default till 31st Aug as NPA: SC
    In an interim relief to borrowers, the Supreme Court on Thursday directed banks not to declare loan accounts, which were not under default till 31st August, as non-performing assets (NPAs), until further orders.
     
    A bench comprising Justices Ashok Bhushan, R Subhash Reddy and MR Shah said: "At the request of Tushar Mehta, Solicitor General, the matter is adjourned for September 10... Harish Salve, senior advocate, submitted that no account shall become NPA at least for a period of two months. In view of the above, the accounts which were not declared NPA till August 31, shall not be declared NPA till further orders."
     
    The bench was hearing a batch of pleas challenging the interest on interest on the deferred EMIs (equated monthly instalments) during the moratorium.
     
    The top court also considered the aspect of the role of the National Disaster Management Authority (NDMA) under the Disaster Management Act to provide relief in connection with the repayment of loans against the backdrop of a disaster situation such as the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.
     
    Petitioners have raised the issue of accounts being rendered NPAs after the moratorium period expired, and apprehended that on 1st September, the accounts would be declared NPAs. Therefore, in such circumstances, the moratorium limit should be extended, they urged the top court.
     
    The bench noted that the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) should clarify, if it is the discretion of banks to give relief to borrowers, and also sought clarification on demand of compound interest in the meantime. The bench observed banks grant benefits to borrowers to allow businesses to continue.
     
    The Solicitor General, representing the finance ministry and the RBI, submitted before the bench that an expert committee on resolutions is to decide sector-wise relief to ease stress caused by the pandemic.
     
    "Expert committee does not come in way of individual borrowers," said Mr Mehta, who also cited the August 6 RBI circular which deals with stressed accounts and provides for a resolution plan and restructuring of loans for eligible accounts.
     
    The bench noted that petitioners have claimed the Centre did not exercise powers to mitigate suffering and the court is not an expert body to change decisions taken by financial bodies. "Whether under Disaster Management Act something can be done, needs to be seen," it said.
     
    The bench said it will not get into whether the measures by the government were correct or not, or how to give relief to various sectors. Mr Mehta contended that the moratorium is not a default period, in fact, it was granted initially for a period of three months and extended till August 31. He informed the bench that from September 1, companies will become NPAs, if they do not pay in 3 months. He insisted that the idea of moratorium was to defer payments in view of the burden created by lockdown, so businesses can manage working capital.
     
    "The idea was not to waive interest," said Mr Mehta, citing that a one-size-fits-all solution cannot be granted.
     
    The top court will continue to hear the matter on September 10, as many parties involved are yet to argue.
     
    Disclaimer: Information, facts or opinions expressed in this news article are presented as sourced from IANS and do not reflect views of Moneylife and hence Moneylife is not responsible or liable for the same. As a source and news provider, IANS is responsible for accuracy, completeness, suitability and validity of any information in this article.
  • Like this story? Get our top stories by email.

    User 

    COMMENTS

    Newme

    2 months ago

    No body at Bank branches follows SC or even RBI guidelines.

    Union Bank of India Writes Off Rs26,027 Crore as Bad Loans in 8 years; Stalls Query on Recoveries and Big Defaulters’ Names
    The malaise of big loan write-offs and poor recovery extends across public sector banks, as is evident from the Rs26,072 crore bad loans written off by Union Bank of India (UBI) in the past eight years. The Bank has, however, refused to share information on money recovered from defaulters.
     
    As in the case of the State Bank of India (SBI), Bank of Baroda (BoB), and Bank of Maharashtra (BoM) that have been reported by Moneylife, this is yet another example massive ‘technical’ write-offs with minuscule recoveries, leading to frequent recapitalisation of banks with taxpayer’s money. Such write-offs also debunk the aggressive posturing by the government and policy-makers about their so-called recovery efforts. . 
     
    Information provided by the UBI under the Right to Information (RTI) Act to social activist Vivek Velankar shows that the lender wrote off bad debt worth Rs26,072.81 crore between FY11-12 and FY19-20 (this information pertains only to loans of over Rs100 crore). 
     
    However, the Bank has refused to share information about loan recovery under the RTI Act. UBI told Mr Velankar, "The information sought, the segregation and collation of which would cause disproportionate diversion of resources, hence, in terms of section 7(9) of RTI Act, we express our inability to provide the said information."
     
    The Bank ought to have published on its website the names of big defaulters, whose loans of Rs100 crore and above have been written off. Yet, the Bank says, "The information sought is held in commercial confidence with the Bank. Since no larger public interest is involved, we are exempted under section (8)(1)(d) of RTI Act to provide information to you." Much of this information has also been published by the All India Bank Depositors Association (AIBEA), and, yet, Union Bank of India’s sympathies seem to lie with the defaulters.
     
    The amounts written off by the UBI eat into its profits and cause a range of charges to be slapped on ordinary depositors. Yet, the Bank asserts that there is no larger public interest involved, even though it relates directly to money in the form of savings accounts and deposits made by common people.
     
    Mr Velankar, president of the Pune-based Sajag Nagrik Manch, who has been assiduously exposing the details of the written-off loans, says, "If this information is in commercial confidence, then how did SBI share the names of its top 225 defaulters, whose loans were written off? Or does the definition of commercial confidence change with every bank? Moreover, why do the names of these big defaulters need to be kept a secret?" 
     
    "When a common borrower defaults, the same bank publishes his name and all the details through advertisements in newspapers. Why do they want to keep the names of bigger defaulters hidden? Why doesn’t the 'confidentiality' clause apply while publicising the names of the common borrowers?" he asks.
     
    In its reply under the RTI Act, the central public information officer (CPIO) of UBI also refused to share information on loans written off in a year-wise manner. The CPIO instead directed Mr Velankar to check the annual report of the Bank for the past eight years to know bad debts written off in that particular year. 
     
     
    Technically speaking, when debts are written off, they are removed as assets from the balance sheet because the bank does not expect to recover payment. 
     
    This practice is frowned upon by experts but is routinely done by banks as part of their tax management clean-up process. The beneficiaries are invariably some of our biggest industrialist defaulters. 
     
     In contrast, when a bad debt is written down, some of the bad debt value remains as an asset because the bank expects to recover it. However, as SBI, BoB and now BoM have shown, most of the times, there is no recovery or negligible recovery for the amounts written off.    
     
    As reported by Moneylife, Bank of Maharashtra has written off bad loans of over Rs7,402 crore in the past years, while recovering a paltry 4% in over eight years through recovery efforts. The lender wrote off bad debts worth Rs7,402 crore during four out of the past eight years, while recovering just Rs253.55 crore. (Read: Bank of Maharashtra Writes Off Rs7,100 Crore Bad Loans; Recovers Just 4% in 8 Years)
     
    From 2012 to 2020, BoB had technically written off 97 accounts with bad debts of Rs100 crore and more. These add up to Rs21,476.89 crore over eight years, while recovery in that same period is just 4.91% or Rs1,056.53 crore. (Read: Bank of Baroda Follows SBI, Writes Off Rs21,474 Crore in Bad Loans; Recovers only Rs1,057 Crore in Past 8 Years)
     
    Similarly, from FY12-13 to FY19-20, SBI, the country's largest lender, wrote off bad loans worth Rs1.23 lakh crore of bad debt but recovered a paltry Rs8,969 crore. (Read: SBI Writes Off Rs1.23 Lakh Crore of Bad Debt, Recovers Paltry Rs8,969 Crore in 8 Years!)
     
    A few months ago, there were a lot of heated arguments about written off loans of big defaulters. In April, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) had said that Indian banks have technically written off a staggering amount of Rs68,607 crore due from 50 top wilful defaulters, including absconding diamantaire Mehul Choksi. RBI had revealed this information in reply to an RTI query filed by Saket Gokhale. 
     
    However, at that time, everyone from the government, including the Union finance ministry and supporters of the government had  insisted that technical write-off does not mean waiving off loans and efforts are on for the recovery of these written off loans.
     
    Meanwhile, State-run lenders continue to write off huge amounts of bad loans without any real effort on recovery. All this happens, as Mr Velaknar has rightly pointed out, due to lack of checks & balances in banks by the regulator and the concerned authorities. In the end, it is the common bank customer who pays for all this financial manipulation and bad book-keeping, either through increased charges for every service or by receiving lower interest rates from the lenders on deposits or savings account. 
     
  • Like this story? Get our top stories by email.

    User 

    COMMENTS

    saioamshyd

    2 months ago

    https://www.moneylife.in/article/union-bank-of-india-writes-off-rs26027-crore-as-bad-loans-in-8-years-stalls-query-on-recoveries-and-big-defaulters-names/61409.html
    1. SBI’s policy – One CMD liberally finances to willful borrowers and his successor writes off and so on. Right from the beginning, it has been going on since past 7 decades with moral support from RBI. Now, SBI’s policy is replicated by all other PSBs [UBI, BOM, & PMC Bank, etc.,] with impunity. How come SC judgments are ignored by GOI, PMO/UFM, RBI & PSBs?
    2. Every year, SBI writes off INR.1 or 2 trillion. In this milieu of circumstances, Congress, allegedly, amassed INR.17 quadrillion; which is 45 times more than Karma Yogi PM’s plan to mobilize US$.5 trillion or INR.375 trillion.
    3. When the honest youth repays honestly, the PSBs hesitate to sanction moratorium for next 2 years on par with Companies, post-COVID pandemic. What an irony came to light?
    4. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Si8U02s8cQ.
    5. SATYAMAEVA JAYATHE!!!

    REPLY

    bhogibhaigandhi

    In Reply to saioamshyd 2 months ago

    Is it any legal and democratic process to get name of defaulters,while pm is most honest person Everdeen,why we appreciate to contact pm

    Newme

    2 months ago

    Another Bank, another looting, same India.

    kd.paranjpe

    2 months ago

    Sir, It is difficult to understand the reason for not disclosing recoveries made against loans over 100 cr. Regarding Information: " segregation and collation of Information would lead to significant diversion of resources" it is not clear how significant or what resources are referred ( I guess it is money). In these days when all India exam results are available in 15 days what is the big deal in getting recovery information. We can expect debtor management and upto date information with the debt recovery officers. In my opinion, this is just some lame excuse to fob off the RTI enquirer. This lack of transparency is sure to erode public confidence.

    REPLY

    saioamshyd

    In Reply to kd.paranjpe 2 months ago

    https://www.moneylife.in/article/union-bank-of-india-writes-off-rs26027-crore-as-bad-loans-in-8-years-stalls-query-on-recoveries-and-big-defaulters-names/61409.html
    1. It is a pity to note the stoic silence of PM, FM vis-a-vis PMO/UFM, SC Bar Association, Ms.Prashanth Bhushan & Co. Is India a democratic republic or a Jungle Raj? How come RBI/PSBs write off such colossal open-loot by the caucus going since independence? How come the Parliament/ President's office turned out to be silent spectators?
    2. When will the Karma Yogi PM Shri Narendra Modi realize his coveted dream even after his election with full mandate? Unless & until the PM with a revolutionary mindset acts, nothing changes.
    3. Why the BJP/RSS cadres are silent? It sends wrong signals to the teeming qualified & intelligent youth; which culminated in SC’s wise judgment against Shri Prashanth Bhushan’s tirade against corruption in courts.
    4. The Indian citizenry had seen MESSAIAH IN THE KARMAYOGI +MOST NON-CORRUPTIVE PM Shri Narendra Modi S/O.Latr Shri Damodardas Modi.
    5. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Si8U02s8cQ.
    6. SATYAMAEVA JAYATHE!!!

    We are listening!

    Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.
      Loading...
    Close

    To continue


    Please
    Sign Up or Sign In
    with

    Email
    Close

    To continue


    Please
    Sign Up or Sign In
    with

    Email

    BUY NOW

    online financial advisory
    Pathbreakers
    Pathbreakers 1 & Pathbreakers 2 contain deep insights, unknown facts and captivating events in the life of 51 top achievers, in their own words.
    online financia advisory
    The Scam
    24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
    Moneylife Online Magazine
    Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
    financial magazines online
    Stockletters in 4 Flavours
    Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
    financial magazines in india
    MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
    (Includes Moneylife Online Magazine)
    FREE: Your Complete Family Record Book
    Keep all the Personal and Financial Details of You & Your Family. In One Place So That`s Its Easy for Anyone to Find Anytime
    We promise not to share your email id with anyone