In your interest.
Online Personal Finance Magazine
No beating about the bush.
The 2006 IPO scam has dented SEBI’s credibility. Will SEBI go ahead with the 22nd December board meeting without CB Bhave & exonerate NSDL?
What started as a move to protect chairman CB Bhave from allegations of interference with the NSDL (National Securities Depository Limited) investigation being conducted by SEBI (Securities and Exchange Board of India) has now turned into a farce that...
Institutions cannot be built on the reputation of individuals or daily sermons on governance and morality; they have to be based on systems and processes
On Sunday evening, I ran into a friend who has just stepped into the role of a harried Indian father, scouting for a potential groom for his two daughters. Yes indeed, the arranged marriage still rules in India and although his daughters are both management graduates who have studied abroad, when it comes to marriage, they are happy to have papa find them a hubby.
The friend hails from a southern Indian community where dowry rules, no matter what the law says about it and the groom-hunt is nothing but a bazaar where the highest bidder snaps up the 'boy'. In this case, the parents of the 'boy' apparently opened negotiations by quoting a base price of Rs50 lakh, even before the potential couple had met each other.
After all, his son was a prize catch—he was an IIT Engineer and now worked at Infosys—and his parents saw no point in wasting his time unless the girl qualified in the financial bid!
But it is the bit about the IIT degree and job at Infosys that has triggered this piece. The company prides itself on its good governance practices, high ethical standards and sense of social responsibility. The company also organises lectures and development courses for its employees, presumably to make them better human beings. Does any of it really rub off on the employees? Apparently not; after all, the potential groom of our story doesn't have any problem with his parents auctioning him to the highest bidder (although, strictly speaking, he may be given a choice of two or three short-listed possible brides) when it comes to marriage, even though accepting dowry is illegal. And he ignores the fact that the potential bride that his parents are vetting, is well-educated, works in a multinational and earns as much as he does.
But my issue is not about arranged marriages and the dowry system but about the popular corporate delusion that endless discussion on corporate governance will lead to more ethically correct companies. Just as our engineer will not give up on a fat dowry, just because he starts working at Infosys, companies will observe good governance principles only if it is part of the DNA of individual senior managers and has nothing to do with the organisation they work for. On the contrary, we have plenty of evidence that those who preach and teach good governance, don’t bother to follow it at all.
What could be a better illustration than the twin debacles at the International School of Business (ISB), Hyderabad. ISB is a B-School whose pedigree and board of directors would even be the envy of Ivy League institutions. Set up by Wharton, Kellogg and the London School of Business, the three most famous destinations for a management education, it was founded by two partners of McKinsey & Co, the world's top consulting firm. A couple of days ago, one of them, Anil Kumar, pleaded guilty to charges of insider trading and admitted that Raj Rajaratnam of the Galleon Hedge Fund paid him $1.75 million in exchange for confidential information.
Kumar is understood to have made $2.6 million in illicit funds by leaking information on Advanced Micro Devices Inc and eBay Inc. He was asked to step down from the ISB board in October, when it was clear that he was being investigated in the Galleon securities fraud case.
Earlier, ISB's dean Dr Rammohan Rao had to quit in similar ignominy after the Satyam scandal erupted. Dr Rao had made things worse for himself by initially defending the board's support of a dubious rescue deal between Satyam Computers and Maytas Infrastructure, an entity owned by the Satyam founders.
But again, Dr Rao was not the only Ivy League don who did not practice what he preached. Harvard don and author of several management books, the arrogant Prof Krishna G Palepu used to charge a steep fee to lecture the Tatas and other Indian business tycoons on governance. When Ramalinga Raju confessed to India's biggest accounting fraud, we learnt that Prof Palepu earned nearly Rs one crore from Satyam in various fees and consultancy services. And he used to lecture business on "Making corporate boards more effective"!
Whether it is a young engineer at Infosys who will not sacrifice his right to a dowry or obscenely paid academics and consultants who will throw ethics to the wind for more fees, clearly the road to good ethics is not lectures, seminars or even leading by example. It has to be part of your DNA.
Indian companies are not really serious about the governance business. If they were, they would make the effort to get people with the right mental wiring. In fact, they would do what the better companies in the hospitality business are doing. The hospitality sector recognises that there are certain people who are hard-wired to be gracious and patient and perfectly suited to an industry where consumer demands can be trying on the nerves of most people. They do this by conducting overt or subtle psychographic tests to find people with the right attitude. And when they do find these people, the results can be amazing. The best but most extreme example of how this works are all the stories that emanated from survivors of the terrorist attacks on The Trident and The Taj Mahal Hotel in Mumbai on 26/11/08. The stories of the bravery, service and sacrifice of these executives (many of them paid with their lives) make for business legends. Similarly, Kingfisher is rated the best airline, mainly because of the service quality. It can be taught, but there is no substitute for starting right by picking the right people.
That is why, institutions cannot be built on the reputation of individuals or daily sermons on governance and morality; they have to be based on systems and processes to ensure correct business practices day in and day out.
With the BSE indicating that it can pose a serious threat and the MCX group waiting to enter the equity space, the NSE now has to gear up for some tough competition
To those who only watch television, it may seem as if the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) took a lot of flak for triggering a controversy with its decision to extend trading time by a token 10 minutes. But appearances can be deceptive. In fact, the broking community is delighted at the BSE's new aggression; although the National Stock Exchange’s (NSE) near monopoly ensures that nobody wants to go public with their view yet. While the support will count only when it translates into increased volumes, the BSE already has a lot going for it because almost all the brokers that matter now hold shares in the bourse. As the head of one major brokerage firm said, "We want the BSE on top again; after all, we hold shares in the BSE, not the NSE.” Another leading brokerage firm with a long history with the BSE is also advising team-Kannan on how to take on the competition and prepare for its listing.
Hindi Chini bhai-bhai
We learn that the BSE extended trading time by 10 minutes only after consulting its members and explaining to them the strategy of creating a little buzz for its new derivatives trading by this gesture. This apparently included a rousing little speech and a lot of cheering by the members and references to how the days of "Hindi-Chini bhai bhai" (alluding to the infamous slogan of the Nehru era that lulled India into believing that China was a close friend and ally until it declared war on an unprepared nation). Of course, all this was forgotten under the onslaught of the vicious media attack, when NSE decided to extend trading by an hour and forced the BSE to revise its plan.
The new team at the BSE, led by Madhu Kannan, is also doing things differently. While the top four have come with formidable global or technical experience, they have quickly given up their rarefied offices with spectacular views on the 25th floor of the Jeejeebhoy Towers. Instead, they have opted for smaller office spaces on the 13th floor, in order to be in the middle of all the action. They also work long hours, often coming into office before 8.30am.
Another major plus for the BSE is the new profile it presents to the regulator as well as the public. In SEBI meetings, the entire BSE team is knowledgeable and articulate and the NSE (National Stock Exchange) is no longer able to dominate discussions or be the only one able to provide background and inputs. Their willingness to take on the NSE, directly and publicly, is like a breath of fresh air.
James Shapiro, a key member of Madhu Kannan's team and his former boss at the NYSE (New York Stock Exchange) set the cat among the pigeons by openly discussing NSE's little trick of rejecting applications for algorithm trading. The NSE is clearly caught by surprise. It has always operated through quiet, informal and off-the-record interactions and in its recent, 'master of the universe' phase, even refused to respond to queries on its anti-competition strategies, especially with regard to MCX. But all of a sudden, NSE's managing director Ravi Narain is more accessible, at least to what is perceived as friendly media. The bourse itself is seen struggling to change its DNA and be more friendly with brokers and other intermediaries.
James Shapiro is a veteran of such battles. He is calm, extremely articulate and fluent in Japanese and Chinese. We can surely expect a lot more frank-speaking from him in the coming days.
For those of us who have covered the media for decades, the capital market space had turned extremely dull with NSE's near monopoly. With BSE indicating that it can pose a serious threat and the MCX group waiting to enter the equity space, the war of the bourses is promising to provide plenty of media fodder. Things will intensify when BSE and MCX get listed, because the analyst community will start tracking the exchange space. Although the NSE has no plans for listing just yet, it is bound to face pressure from its shareholders. One thing seems certain, it can no longer operate with the same secrecy that it did for the first 15 years of its existence.