RBI's Proposed Corporate Ownership of Indian Banks Poses High Risks: S&P
S&P Global Ratings says that the recommendations of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI)'s working group on awarding new licences to well-managed Indian non-banking financial companies (NBFCs) could improve financial stability. However, it says it is sceptical of allowing corporate ownership in banks, given India's weak corporate governance amid large corporate defaults over the past few years. 
 
"In addition, RBI will face challenges in supervising nonfinancial sector entities and supervisory resources could be further strained at a time when the health of India's financial sector is weak," the ratings agency says. 
 
In the ratings agency's view, the working group's concerns regarding conflict of interest, concentration of economic power, and financial stability in allowing corporates to own banks are potential risks. 
 
It says, "Corporate ownership of banks raises the risk of intergroup lending, diversion of funds, and reputational exposure. Also, the risk of contagion from corporate defaults to the financial sector increases significantly." 
 
The performance of India's corporate sector over the past few years has been weak with large corporate defaults. Non-performing loans (NPLs) for the corporate sector stood at around 13% of total corporate loans as of March 2020 (around 18% as of March 2018), highlighting the more pronounced risk in India compared with that in other countries.
 
The working group has recommended that corporates should be allowed to control banks after necessary amendments to the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 to prevent connected lending and exposures between the banks and other financial and non-financial group entities. In addition, the group proposed strengthening of the supervisory mechanism for large conglomerates. 
 
The recommendation to harmonise licensing guidelines for all banks, new and old, will help restore a level playing field for all players, S&P says, adding the RBI's proposal to raise the minimum net worth for all universal banks to Rs10 billion will also ensure better capitalisation and that only promoters with deep pockets can enter the banking sector. 
 
In addition, it says, the recommendations would limit the size of shadow banking in India and ensure stronger supervision. RBI proposes that only well-managed NBFCs with over 10 years of experience and Rs500 billion of assets will be allowed to convert to a bank. 
 
S&P says, "We believe the NBFCs have numerous strengths that will give them a head start in their entry into banking. These include their existing client bases, distribution networks, brand and risk management systems. Conversion to a banking entity could provide more stable funding, in particular low-cost deposits." 
 
"Still, we do not expect the competitive banking environment in India to deteriorate with these new licenses. This is because the finance companies that are converting into banks will have huge upfront regulatory costs. They will incur additional costs in terms of cash reserve ratio and statutory liquidity ratio requirements; priority sector lending; and adjusting their existing portfolios to reduce concentration in one segment," it added.
 
The performance of new banks set up in India over the past three decades has been mixed. Of the 14 new universal bank licences issued by RBI since 1993, Global Trust Bank and Yes Bank Ltd had to be bailed out by government-owned banks. In addition, three banks were eventually acquired by HDFC Bank Ltd, while ICICI Bank Ltd and IDBI Bank Ltd merged with their parents. 
 
Nevertheless, S&P says, the RBI has adopted a very calibrated approach in awarding new licences. "A change in regulation by itself would not lead to RBI liberally allowing corporates to start a bank. The RBI's fit and proper criteria for banks give it large latitude in decision-making. Also, most importantly, it remains to be seen how many of these recommendations become law," the ratings agency added.
 
  • Like this story? Get our top stories by email.

    User 

    COMMENTS

    tillan2k

    2 months ago

    It is ruse and pretext to hand over finance sector to crony capitalist totally reversing 1969. and repeat 2008 in short time . As regulatory system is weak . regulators are supposed to be watch dogs in this extant they are lap dogs

    drptgiridharan

    2 months ago

    The reason why the objective of this proposal of corporate houses running bank business is sceptical and skeptical is due to the fact that it is germane to their fundamental business and it is ultra vires.

    It requires change or alteration in their memorandum as funds from main business will be jet flown into banking business to state as if promoters contribution is there and then borrow from public, consolidate into one consortium and make a wholesale and retail business.

    The wherewithal of effectiveness and efficiency of its main corporate business and subsidiary business as ancillary would reverse.

    It is just like looting in an IPO. Recently RBI reviewed it's stand on Muthoot entering into buying of IDBI MF. Please see how much gold would loot MF.

    dayanandakamath29

    2 months ago

    They have kept some inconsiquence 5 shares in their pool account and hindering my request for closure of trading and demat accounts. Saying my request is not in their prescribed form even though my request contains all the details as well customer master of the DP to which it is to be transferred. Hope at least now they will transfer my holdings.

    m.prabhu.shankar

    2 months ago

    This is exactly what came to my mind on the previous article published few days back on allowing Corporate Houses to own banks. Banks default is because of corporates only. Not because of farmers or other common citizens. How will you solve this issue by giving the ownership of banks to the same corporates ? Strange.

    We are listening!

    Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.
      Loading...
    Close

    To continue


    Please
    Sign Up or Sign In
    with

    Email
    Close

    To continue


    Please
    Sign Up or Sign In
    with

    Email

    BUY NOW

    online financial advisory
    Pathbreakers
    Pathbreakers 1 & Pathbreakers 2 contain deep insights, unknown facts and captivating events in the life of 51 top achievers, in their own words.
    online financia advisory
    The Scam
    28 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
    Moneylife Online Magazine
    Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
    financial magazines online
    Stockletters in 4 Flavours
    Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
    financial magazines in india
    MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
    (Includes Moneylife Online Magazine)