The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has overhauled its framework for identifying upper-layer non-banking financial companies (NBFCs-UL), replacing a complex scoring-based methodology with a simple asset-size threshold of ₹1 lakh crore. The move has once again brought the future of Tata Sons Pvt Ltd into focus.
The change marks a significant departure from the earlier framework, under which NBFCs were classified into the upper layer based on a combination of asset size, interconnectedness, complexity, and other systemic risk parameters.
Simpler Framework, Same Focus on Tata Sons
RBI says the revised methodology is intended to make the identification of upper-layer entities more objective, transparent and predictable.
Under the amended directions, any NBFC with assets of ₹1 lakh crore or more becomes eligible for inclusion in the Upper Layer, subject to annual identification by the regulator. The threshold will be reviewed every three years.
The development is significant because Tata Sons, the principal holding company of the Tata group and a registered core investment company (CIC), is estimated to have stand-alone assets of around ₹1.75 lakh crore to ₹1.9 lakh crore, according to media reports—well above the new threshold.
Tata Sons had earlier been included in RBI's upper-layer list and was expected to comply with the regulatory requirements applicable to such entities, including a stock market listing. The company subsequently applied for deregistration as an NBFC-CIC and sought to surrender its certificate of registration, triggering a prolonged debate over its regulatory status and listing obligations.
RBI Rejects Calls for Higher Threshold
The final framework indicates that the central bank was not persuaded by industry representations seeking a significantly higher asset threshold.
Several stakeholders had argued that the cut-off should be raised to at least ₹2.5 lakh crore and supplemented with additional indicators such as profitability, leverage, asset quality and interconnectedness.
Rejecting these suggestions, RBI said: "The extant asset size and parametric criteria for identification of NBFC-UL was reviewed and it was observed that asset size is a reasonably good proxy for systemic significance for NBFCs. Hence, it has been decided to replace the extant criteria with asset size criteria of ₹100,000 crore and above, to make it simpler, more transparent and absolute, to make it predictable for NBFCs for enabling better transition to NBFC-UL regulations."
By retaining the threshold at ₹1 lakh crore, RBI has effectively ensured that large financial holding structures such as Tata Sons remain within the ambit of enhanced regulatory scrutiny.
Annual Identification Still Matters
While the new framework introduces a clear asset-size test, inclusion in the upper layer is not entirely automatic.
The amended directions specify that the upper layer will comprise NBFCs that are 'specifically identified annually' by RBI as warranting enhanced regulatory requirements.
This distinction could prove critical in Tata Sons' case because the company continues to await RBI's decision on its application to surrender its NBFC registration.
Consequences of Upper-layer Classification
RBI's directions prescribe a detailed transition mechanism for entities identified as upper-layer NBFCs.
Once classified, an NBFC must formulate a board-approved implementation plan within three months and comply with the enhanced regulatory framework within a maximum period of 24 months.
The regulations further provide that an NBFC classified as an upper-layer entity will ordinarily remain subject to the enhanced framework for at least five years, even if it subsequently falls below the qualifying threshold.
These provisions are particularly important because NBFCs-UL are subject to tighter governance, disclosure and regulatory requirements, including listing obligations introduced under the SBR framework.
Tata Sons' Deregistration Strategy
For nearly two years, Tata Sons has pursued a strategy aimed at exiting RBI regulation as a registered core investment company.
According to earlier reports, the company reduced borrowings, sold shares in Tata Consultancy Services (TCS) and scaled down certain financial activities to position itself as an unregistered CIC, which could potentially fall outside the mandatory listing framework.
Moneylife reported in April that the key issue was not whether Tata Sons satisfied the upper-layer criteria, but whether RBI would allow it to exit the NBFC regulatory structure altogether.
The report argued that if Tata Sons were successfully reclassified as an unregistered CIC, it could potentially move outside the SBR framework and avoid the listing requirement.
Governance Implications of a Listing
The issue extends well beyond regulatory compliance and carries significant governance implications for India's largest business group.
A public listing would require Tata Sons to convert from a private company into a public company, potentially altering governance rights currently exercised by the Tata Trusts, which collectively own about two-thirds of the company.
Under the existing structure, certain key decisions require affirmative votes from nominee directors of the Tata Trusts. A public company framework could place directors on a more equal footing, potentially reshaping the balance of control within the group.
The prospect of a listing has generated differing views within the broader Tata ecosystem. While some senior executives have argued that listing could unlock value and improve transparency, others maintain that the holding company should remain privately held.
Why the RBI Move Matters
RBI's decision comes against the backdrop of lessons drawn from the collapse of Infrastructure Leasing & Financial Services (IL&FS) in 2018 which exposed the risks posed by large, complex and insufficiently transparent financial groups.
By replacing subjective parameters with a clear asset-size benchmark, the central bank appears to be seeking greater predictability in identifying systemically significant NBFCs.
For Tata Sons, however, one key uncertainty remains unresolved: whether RBI will approve its long-pending application to surrender its NBFC registration.
What the amendments make clear is that if Tata Sons continues as a registered CIC and is formally identified by RBI as an NBFC-UL, its asset base places it comfortably within the new regulatory threshold.
As a result, the long-running debate over a Tata Sons stock market listing is unlikely to fade anytime soon. Instead, RBI's latest reforms have ensured that the issue remains firmly on the regulatory and corporate governance agenda.
You may also want to read...
