RBI Focus on Sahara

Will whistleblowers’ missives work?

 

Even as Subrata Roy is working on a 15-day extension to meet the Supreme Court’s condition to release him from jail, a whistleblower has, after many efforts, managed to catch RBI’s attention on the issues at Sahara India Financial Corporation Limited (SIFCL).

 

This is a residuary non-banking company which is under RBI supervision. SIFCL was barred from accepting any fresh public deposits in June 2008 and asked to repay existing deposits as and when they mature. In 2011, RBI issued a notice warning depositors about Sahara which also said it would not guarantee repayment of deposits by SIFCL or other group entities. A similar warning was issued by the market regulator.

Little information is available in the public domain about SIFCL, except a fact sheet which says that one Mr Madhukar and BM Chaturvedi are independent directors and Om Prakash Srivastava is a whole-time director of the company as of 5 September 2014. This means that Subrata Roy, who was the chairman of SIFCL, has also stepped down and there is no immediate family member on the board. Nobody is designated chairman either.

This means that the two independent directors, Mr Madhukar and Mr Chaturvedi, who are accused by the whistleblower of colluding with various entities to sell off assets belonging to depositors, form a majority on the board. He claims in a letter to RBI that over Rs500 crore had already been diverted until September this year. The whistleblower also alleges that the two independent directors have been improperly appointed without seeking prior approval from RBI.
 
Who are these directors? Mr Madhukar is on the board of several Sahara group companies including its mutual fund and Sahara Infrastructure & Housing Limited (SIHL). More importantly, he is a former whole-time member of the Securities & Exchange Board of India (SEBI) and former chairman of United Bank of India.

Mr Madhukar’s faith in Sahara and loyalty to the pariwar seems unshakable, despite all the allegations against the group. He has stayed on, even when another loyalist, Amitav Ghosh, a controversial former deputy governor of RBI, stepped down as independent director on the SIHL board in April 2013 (well after the path-breaking Supreme Court order asking two Sahara group companies to refund Rs25,000 crore raised through hybrid convertible bonds without SEBI approval). Mr Madhukar stepped in to replace by Mr Ghosh on that board.

On 20th August, RBI’s Kanpur office wrote to the whistleblower that the “two issues flagged by you are being examined by our Central Office at Mumbai.” It remains to be seen if RBI will act in time or take shelter behind a long-drawn ‘examination’ of issues. The whistleblower’s emails seem to suggest that nothing has changed at Sahara pariwar.

 

As for RBI, the stringent action by the Supreme Court has apparently not made this regulator more vigilant about the goings on at this controversial group.

 

Comments
Rajeev
1 decade ago
Now RBI is after Sahara. It's really difficult to understand that person who always stood high to help India in every cause. He worked harder for welfare of India. There are people who fraud and never contribute for India and are still living respectful lives.
Why they are after such great person.
Dayananda Kamath k
Replied to Rajeev comment 1 decade ago
supreme court has exercised its independence as advocated by CJI. its judgement is penalizing the accused before proving his guilt.it is asking for 50% of the amount for a bail. it is nothing but extortion. further how it can facilitate and allow him to sell the company property for his personal bail. supreme court is siding with him to deprive other stake holders in the property or is forcing him to do one more offence. legal luminaries and supreme court itself must look into these aspects.
Aamir
1 decade ago
I don't understand why every organisation is stretching this thing.....yet it is big question that whether Subrata Roy is a culprit or not. Just because he is paying all the money doesn't mean that he is the culprit. It is unnecessary to stretch such issue.
Ravindra
1 decade ago
Woke up at last.
Dayananda Kamath k
1 decade ago
it is really an improvement on the part of rbi to inform the complaint that issue is flagged. but it has not told whether it is re flag or green flag. rbi who is custodian for foreign exchange transactions issues a circular that third party gold imports are irregular. but do not initiate action against violators. it may be time enforcement director initiate action against rbi. what you can expect from such a regulator. it is the sponsror of all the financial scams in india.
Ramesh B Mhadlekar
Replied to Dayananda Kamath k comment 1 decade ago
Unless guilty officials of RBI are punished at the regulator level,such financial scams shall continue.They should be held accountable and the officials responsible should go behind the bar.
TIHARwale
1 decade ago
THE Chairman and Managing Director of United Bank of India, Mr Madhukar, will retire on March 1, 2004 after a career spanning 37 years in banks.

He started as a probationary officer in State Bank of India as early as 1967, became MD of State Bank of Bikaner & Jaipur in March 2000 and CMD of United Bank of India in July 2001. In SBI he had assignments in Europe, West Asia and Africa for nearly 10 years, got out of turn promotions. When he accepted the United Bank of India, a few warned him against taking up the assignment as the bank had already been written off by various experts within the government and outside.
"The challenges were formidable. On the one side, there were 18,000 employees, a demoralised lot at that, and on the other end, he was fighting a lone battle. Even the Ministry declined any financial support and he took up the challenge.

United Bank of India was promoted by a group of individuals mostly based in the erstwhile East Pakistan and with the Partition, the bulk of the business was off. At the initiative of the then Chief Minister, Dr B.C. Roy, United Bank was created through amalgamation of a few small banks. More than 80 per cent of its branches were located in areas known for their backwardness.

Ramesh B Mhadlekar
1 decade ago
How can RBI as a Regulator take action or be serious about their duties.They have number of such executives themselves who are claiming dishonest financial facilities.Only the officers having clean hands would take action but they are few and they would not be able to survive if action is taken by them.First the Regulator has to be cleaned,which can be done by CAG only.An audit by CAG will set the house of Regulator in order and generate fear which is missing as on date.If an dishonest EX-Regional director of Mumbai having claimed bogus overtime for his driver during absence from the headquarters be appointed as Administrator of Coop bank at Nasik, what can you expect from RBI.One should try to find out what was the compulsion of the executives who appointed such an person as Administrator in Coop bank at Nasik?Did The Ex-Regional director know too much of those executives secret? or is it a policy of RBI to reward persons who loot the nation with bogus intentions or corrupt mind?
Array
Free Helpline
Legal Credit
Feedback