The Supreme Court on Wednesday warned real estate company Supertech of 'consequences' over the non-payment of refund to home-buyers, who had paid for flats in two 40-storey towers which are being demolished on the court's order.
A bench of justices DY Chandrachud and AS Bopanna told counsel appearing for Supertech to keep their house in order and not make deductions, which have not been ordered by the top court.
Senior advocate Ravindra Kumar, representing the Noida authority, informed the top court that the authority has almost finalised the agency, which would conduct the demolition of twin towers of the Supertech Emerald Court housing project.
A contempt plea was filed by home-buyers, who had paid for the flats in two 40-storey towers. Home-buyers have alleged that Supertech called them to collect the refund; however, they were later told that payment would be made in instalments, including certain deductions. The counsel, representing the home- buyers, said the home-buyers are aggrieved with the delay in the refund and also added that the Court order did not mention about any deduction.
In its 31st August judgement, the Supreme Court, besides ordering demolition of Supertech twin towers in Noida and refund for the flat purchasers, ordered prosecution of errant NOIDA and real estate company officials under Section 49 of Uttar Pradesh Urban Development (UPUD) Act for their 'nefarious complicity', which resulted in the construction of towers.
Justice Chandrachud orally told the counsel appearing for Supertech that if the Court order is not implemented, the persons concerned will have to face consequences. The bench made it clear that Supertech cannot make any deduction, which has not been ordered by the Court and scheduled the matter for further hearing on 17th January.
The top court also asked the Noida authority to finalise the name of the agency to conduct demolition and directed to respond on this aspect on 17th January.
On 4th October last year, the Supreme Court on junked an application by Supertech Ltd seeking modification in the Court's direction to demolish its twin 40-storey towers in Noida.
A bench of Justices Chandrachud and BV Nagarathna noted that grant of such a relief is in the nature of a review of the judgement passed by the top court, as it held that its judgement directing demolition of twin towers specifically affirmed the directions which were issued by the Allahabad High Court for the demolition of the towers - T 16 and T 17.
Disclaimer: Information, facts or opinions expressed in this news article are presented as sourced from IANS and do not reflect views of Moneylife and hence Moneylife is not responsible or liable for the same. As a source and news provider, IANS is responsible for accuracy, completeness, suitability and validity of any information in this article.
Alexa tells girl to touch live plug with penny, Amazon fixes bug
29 December 2021
Tech giant Amazon has updated its Alexa voice assistant after it "challenged" a 10-year-old girl to touch a coin to the prongs of a half-inserted plug.
According to the BBC, the suggestion came after the girl asked...
The Low-and-Slow Approach to Food Safety Reform Keeps Going Up in Smoke
Bernice Yeung, Michael Grabell
Mollie Simon (ProPublica)
28 December 2021
This story was originally published by ProPublica.
The U.S. has one agency that regulates cheese pizza and another that oversees pepperoni pizza. Efforts to fix the food safety system have stalled again and...
Survey Points Out Newer E-commerce Platforms Like Meesho, Shopee, Swiggy Instamart Flouting Legal Metrology Rules
Moneylife Digital Team
23 December 2021
Most consumers could not find information on the maximum retail price (MRP) and best-before dates for products on sale on e-commerce sites, according to a survey by LocalCircles, which hosts online communities on consumer issues,...
Worst False Ad Settlements of 2021: How Class-action Settlements Leave Consumers Behind
22 December 2021
It’s not always the case that a class-action settlement resolving allegations of false advertising or deceptive marketing results in what’s best for consumers (or class members as they’re known in litigation). Here are some of those...