A whopping 74 lakh names went missing from voters’ list in Maharashtra, out of which around 4.5 lakh are from Pune over the past two years. Moneylife explored the route of retracing how one voter’s name was deleted without follwing any norm. Was this done deliberately?
Missing names of voters in the voter list during elections is not new. What is new this time is the exceptionally large number of deleted names. In Pune for example, the names of about 4.24 lakh voters’ have been deleted between 2013 and 2014 as per the documents put up on its website, www.ceo.mah.gov.in. That accounts for 25% names which have been deleted, and allegedly replaced by other ones.
As per the Section 4 of the Right to Information (RTI) Act as well as the Representation of the People Act 1951, a citizen has the right to inspect documents in order to know the procedure that led to the deletion. Also specific procedure has been laid in the Representation of Peoples’ Act 1951.
When asked about the procedure in case the voter’s name has been deleted because he is shifted, Stella Paul, the election officer, who was checking out the documents of Sharad Phadke, which led to the deletion of his name, said, “the deletion process involves physical verification of the voter’s address, sending him or her a notice by physically pasting the notice on his front door; giving a public notice in the newspaper; seeking his suggestions and objections by conducting a hearing and if the person remains absent for the hearing, then the officer deletes the list.”
Quite clearly, the deletion route is not as simple as striking off a name in a jiffy.
Sharad Phadke and I, who had gone for inspection of files on Monday and Tuesday at the Mamledar Kacheri, that is the Tehsil’s office, which is the branch officer for the Election Commission for Kothrud Assembly Constituency. We asked for the following documents:
• Copies of the pages of the electoral voters list of 2012 which had the name and photograph of Mr Phadke and the list of 2013 from where his name has been deleted
• Copy of the note by the verification officer, stating that Phadke no more resides at the same address after physical verification by the election officer
• Copy of the notice sent to Phadke which was allegedly pasted by the election staffer on his front door
• Copy of the hearing in which it has been mentioned that Phadke remained absent for the hearing, with reference to the notice sent
• Copy of the public notice published in a newspaper, calling for suggestions and objections from voters who have been claimed to have shifted residence by the Election Office,in which Phadke’s name has appeared.
After four long hours of waiting patiently all through Monday and Tuesday until 6pm, the officials procured copies of the electoral voting list of 2012 in which Mr Phadke’s name appears with a photograph; the 2013 list sees his and his wife’s name deleted while his son’s and daughter-in-law’s names are intact because of which they could vote on 17th April.
However, Mr Phadke states, “no copy of the notice was pasted on the door of my house and I did not get any intimation of the hearing. They have not asked my neighbor about my whereabouts in case they have asked them during their physical verification of my address. Why didn’t they put the notice in my postal box outside my house if I am not available?”
Also, what’s shocking is the copy of the hearing contains no reference to the notice, which they allegedly sent to Mr Phadke. Every copy of hearing has a reference number for the notice that has been issued earlier because of which hearing was called. From the time, we asked for the various documents, the officials kept saying that they are searching for the copy of the newspaper in which the public notice has been issued. At the end of Tuesday they said that the public notice was not published as it was deleted during a special campaign for deletion of names from the voters’ list. Where is the rule which says that? There were vague answers to this query.
RTI activist Vijay Kumbhar, who went through these documents says, “the copies of the documents show that no correct procedure was followed for the deletion of Mr Phadke’s name. In fact, the documents seem to have been 'created' for the justification of deleting his name.”
Another citizen, Girish Prabhu, whose name was deleted along with his mother’s had also put an application for inspection of files in the Kothrud Assembly’s election office, for documents, similar to what Mr Phadke has procured. The officers concerned have promised to give them but we have to follow it up.
In a couple of days, Mr Phadke would be filing a first informaiton report (FIR) with the police, which will be perhaps the first of its kind in the political history of India.
Phadke’s case is a indication that a huge conspiracy is behind the mass deletion of names and we are determined to follow up the issue. As per a Supreme Court judgement, the Election Registration Officer must go beyond the usually followed norms for re-election in case it is going to affect the electoral result. Irrespective of that, citizens of Pune who were over-enthusiastic to vote this time but could not due to some mysterious reasons of deletion of their names, must be given a chance.
Mr Kumbhar says, “Last week, I sent a letter to Election Commission of India asking them to communicate relevant information to voters. The Commission has put names of deleted voters from Maharashtra including Pune and it’s reasons on website. Though I had requested to put all the forms on website. Commission has only provided facility to search names of deleted persons. Voters can visit https://ceo.maharashtra.gov.in/ and search in “Deletion List PDFs Year [2013] Year [2014]” or Search Deletion List.'
In order to keep up the pressure, citizens are requested to file a complaint at the Election Office, 3rd floor, Old Zilla Parishad Office or Saraf Association office on Laxmi Road or Grahak Peth on Tilak Road. Citizens can get in touch with me on [email protected] if they would like to do file inspection for their name deletion.
• Pune loksabha constituency, Total number of voters name deleted in 2013 -2014 is 4,23,952 ( four lakh twenty three thousand nine hundred and fifty two) • Total Number of voters names deleted in 2014 was 14.112 ( Fourteen thousand one hundred and twelwe ) https://ceo.maharashtra.gov.in/Search/SearchDeletedPDF2013.aspx |
Assembly constituency wise data of Pune Lok Sabha Constituency
Sr No | Assembly constituency | 2013 deletion list | 2014 deletion list |
1 | 208 Vadgaon Sheri | 52799 | 5182 |
2 | 209 Shivajinagar | 63986 | 1799 |
2 | 210 Kothrud | 72375 | 3419 |
4 | 212 Parvati | 64719 | 776 |
5 | 214 Pune cantonment | 72533 | 1661 |
6 | 215 kasba peth | 83428 | 1275 |
Total | 409840 |
(Vinita Deshmukh is consulting editor of Moneylife, an RTI activist and convener of the Pune Metro Jagruti Abhiyaan. She is the recipient of prestigious awards like the Statesman Award for Rural Reporting which she won twice in 1998 and 2005 and the Chameli Devi Jain award for outstanding media person for her investigation series on Dow Chemicals. She co-authored the book “To The Last Bullet - The Inspiring Story of A Braveheart - Ashok Kamte” with Vinita Kamte and is the author of “The Mighty Fall”.)
Inside story of the National Stock Exchange’s amazing success, leading to hubris, regulatory capture and algo scam
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance.
1-year online access to the magazine articles published during the subscription period.
Access is given for all articles published during the week (starting Monday) your subscription starts. For example, if you subscribe on Wednesday, you will have access to articles uploaded from Monday of that week.
This means access to other articles (outside the subscription period) are not included.
Articles outside the subscription period can be bought separately for a small price per article.
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance.
30-day online access to the magazine articles published during the subscription period.
Access is given for all articles published during the week (starting Monday) your subscription starts. For example, if you subscribe on Wednesday, you will have access to articles uploaded from Monday of that week.
This means access to other articles (outside the subscription period) are not included.
Articles outside the subscription period can be bought separately for a small price per article.
The maratha warrior
What can be total population in Pune. This figure seems to be surprising number of fraudulent with current voted figures.
Regards,
It is the Maratha Chieftain who was openly advocating fraudulent voting by voting twice in on 2 diffrent days by wiping the voting mark overnight.
GV
Assuming even half of the 4.2 lakh voters came back to the EC for rectification / adding their deleted names, the EC would have to process and rectify at least 12,000 entries per day.
It is physically impossible to handle this kind of workload for EC. Any sane person knows this is.
Were they even equipped to handle this workload ?
What is the maximum workload that the EC can process in day - this can perhaps be known through an RTI.
This is a prima facie case of incompetence, negligence, improper planning and perhaps conspiracy.
THE VIEW EXPRESSED BY MR.PINTO IS A BALANCED ONE.IT IS A FACT THAT NO BODY IS INTERESTED IN CHECKING HIS STATUS IN ELECTORAL ROLL BEFORE HAND.ON THE POLLING DAY THEY WAKE UP TO SEE THAT THEIR NAMES ARE DELETED HAD THEY CHECKED THEIR STATUS THEN& THERE THERE WAS TIME TO REMEDY IT.I FEEL THAT IT IS THE VOTER WHO HAS TO BE VIGILANT AND SEE THAT THEIR NAME IS INCLUDED IN THE LIST AT THE APPROPRIATE PLACE.DONT MAKE A HUE AND CRY UNNECESSARILY.
Before you make sweeping statements, please take the trouble to determine what the facts are. There are many in Pune who did not find their names on the roll before the election (online etc. etc.) and went on to register complaints, but NOTHING happened. So please ... let's keep this rubbish argument that people didn't do their duty away from this.
Of course, Vinita-tai is right in raising a hue and cry about this --- if you want to call it that. I just wish more people joined her in what she's trying to do. I've done my bit --- have told people I know who couldn't vote to contact her.
You must be congratulated for the painstaking work done in following up on the process for deletion of names. And your research does establish that the office was lax and may not have followed the procedure prescribed for deleting names. What a pity that the 74 lakh persons did not go to the Election office when the lists were publicly displayed (well before the election) and check if their names were on the lists or not. If they had displayed half the initiative and effort you have shown in the matter their names would probably have come right back on the roll.
Finally the last sentence in the first paragraph of your piece says that these names have allegedly been substituted by other names. Any evidence of this? If you do have any, this is where you can nail wrong doers. Including in the voters list names of people who do not reside in the constituency or have no right to vote is a truly serious offence and one which, if true, should not be difficult to establish. This is where investigation should concentrate instead of on minor infringements of the procedure for updating the voters list.
M P Pinto
Either you genuinely don't know how voter deletion is done or you are acting innocent. I sincerely hope it is the former. It is done on the basis of the last name, which in Maha often provides a clue regarding your caste. My own parents were able to vote because our last name is ambiguous. But my relatives with last names such as Bhagwat, Dandekar, and Sulakhe were not as lucky. With names like Phadke, Limaye, Datar, and Sane there is no ambiguity. In Kothrud, many people were not able to vote. It is a tragedy that caste is still a major factor in elections in many parts of India. Fantastic work by Vinita Deshmukh.
1) What could be the intended outcome of deleting names from voters list on such a massive scale?
2) How did so many names just disappear?
and & even more important question to be raised is
3) WHY?. . .(For whose benefit?)
If we think backwards i.e. most probable outcome of such large scale name deletion it becomes fairly obvious
And finally
4) About Lack of evidence: There's no evidence either which suggests 'No mischief'. And benefit of doubt must not be given to those, who have failed in protecting the fundamental right of citizens to vote.
CEOs of Delhi and Karnataka got such awards this year for all the malpractices in their Electoral Roll Management System this year. You can see a smug CEO and smiling CEC at the home page of Delhi CEO.
This is a fit case to get the entire election process stayed by the Supreme Court on grounds of blatant and proven fraud. There's enough evidence with you.
Only a dedicated pro bono senior counsel to argue its admission as an urgent matter.
This is a fit case to get the entire election process stayed by the Supreme Court on grounds of blatant and proven fraud. There's enough evidence with you.
Only a dedicated pro bono senior counsel to argue its admission as an urgent matter.
This is Serious Menace in India. CEO should Take Action on Such Concerned Officers and Staff .NO Such Action Taken Was Repored so Far. CEOs Must Concentrate in This Menace , Without Escaping Telling that List Preperation is State Govt. and its MUncipalty's Job and CEOs Go as Per that List.