NSE: Need to have a relook at turnover reporting

Isn’t it time to report options turnover based on the premium and not on the notional contract?

Futures and Options (F&O) segment in the stock exchange attracts huge volume of transactions. The turnover reported by the National Stock Exchange (NSE) on a daily basis is so high that it sounds too good to be true on any given day. Did you know that NSE reported a turnover of more than 2 lakh crore in its F&O segment on 20 June 2013? While it was one of the highest in recent times because of upheaval in the market yesterday, the fact is that the turnover did not happen for this amount in NSE in the F&O segment. Most of this turnover volume reported is notional. Let us look at the data to understand this.
 

As per NSE website, on 20 June 2013, the F&O segment of NSE reported following turnover:
 


The trade statistics clearly reflects that majority of the turnover was Index Option segment. In fact more than 80% of the transactions happened in the options segment including index and stock options. But this number has been reported as notional by the NSE. Now the question is—why is the word notional here? This needs to be understood as follows. Suppose you buy a single lot of call option on the Nifty with a strike price of 6,000 and pay a premium of Rs6 per lot size, the amount paid by you will be Rs300 only as the lot size of the NIFTY is 50, so the amount works out to be (Rs6 x lot size—fifty). So for a trader the amount is equal to premium* lot size*number of lots.
 

But the exchange will treat this transaction differently and report differently as far as turnover reporting is concerned. The turnover in this case will be treated as (Strike price plus premium) * lot size. This means that in the previous case the transaction value will be 6,006*50 i.e. Rs3,00,300. So for a Rs300 position that was taken by a trader, the turnover reported was more than 1,000 times. While it may not be thousand times always, it is indeed substantially higher than the position taken by trader in options transactions.
 

This method of recording turnover can be related to the Rs200 crore reported in case of Wing Commander CR Mohan Raj, who is fighting his case against Motilal Oswal Securities Ltd . The high turnover reported shows that that the investor needs to be filthy rich to transact for this kind of volume while the case is different practically. This is based on my assumption that Mr Raj took position in options transaction.
 

While it is true that the payoff position of an investor in the options contract depends on the difference in the spot and strike price and strike and spot price in respective cases of call option and put option at the time of expiry, it does not make sense to report this turnover.  This can make sense to the exchange only if it levies charges from brokers based on the turnover. Inflated turnover means more revenue which is not the case now as NSE and SEBI (Securities and Exchange Board of India) both charge turnover fee based on the premium in options. Isn’t it time to report option’s turnover based on the premium and not on the notional contract?
 

(Vivek Sharma has worked for 17 years in the stock market, debt market and banking. He is a post graduate in Economics and MBA in Finance. He writes on personal finance and economics and is invited as an expert on personal finance shows.)

Comments
Chandragupta Acharya
1 decade ago
Does this 'notional' turnover get counted in the country's GDP figures?? Just curious to know....
sachchidanand
1 decade ago
If a MP cannot get justice , poor Investors will continue to be fleeced. SEBI is only aiding and supporting unscrupulous Brokers. It is high time that SEBI is penalised for such acts of negligence .
sachchidanand
1 decade ago
I agree absolutely to Vivek's prognosis. It is completely unjustified to report turnover in Options trading to 1000 times the actual transaction . It is a misstatement of liability of an Option trader. I am sure the real & correct exposure taken by a Option trader is the amount invested and not the fictional "value". Would SEBI intervene to correct this ? I have my own doubts about any proactive action by the Regulator. It appears that reporting such highly inflated turnover by Stock markets in India leads to a false reporting of factual reporting. Similar reporting in Commodities bourses is also wrong. It is high time that this big anomaly is immediately rectified
Jose Koshy
1 decade ago
The reason for recording turnover is because the Put/Call writers, need to maintain the margin as in Futures ie. 11 %. The Call/Put buyers pay just the premium. So notionally the Put/Call writers losses can be unlimited if the position goes against them. So if you see of the Rs 2 Lac turnover reported, notionally the Margin maintained would be approx. Rs 20 - 25 K ! As Derivatives is a hedging tool, that is being misused as a casino coin by most retail traders. That is the reason Derivatives is referred as the 'financial weapon of mass destruction' !. Sad on the Wing co's story but thats the way market unfortunately works (Mis selling products) and am sure Motilal Oswal would be well covered with their contracts & POA's !
sachchidanand
Replied to Jose Koshy comment 1 decade ago
Not only Motilal Oswal but others also misuse the POA's. When Wing Commander insists that the POA is a forged document, there is an urgent need for SEBI to instruct all Brokers to CANCELL all POA's & obtain fresh POA 's , which will weed out all forged POA , as also protect those Investors who have been victims .
sathyacumaran
1 decade ago
mycase was similar in case of wing commander he was unaware of margin funding but in my case i was aware and i have given written letter to india infoline stock broking from the branch i was delaing requesting them to remove me from amrgin funding and also revocking my POA as well non issuance of DIS booklet none had been implemented and they have traded in F& O segment from 2006 till 2010 without my consent

sathya cumaran
9444021822
sachchidanand
Replied to sathyacumaran comment 1 decade ago
The problem lies with Investors not insisting on zerox copies of the Account opening form from Brokers. SEBI must make it obligatory for Brokers to obtain confirmation from Investors that they have received zerox copies , after the Agreements have been executed by Brokers controlling Office. Best way for SEBI is to inspect the Records at Brokers office, whenever Investors complain about unauthorised trades. Currently grievances department of SEBI is so lethargic and careless that complaints lodged on SCORE are merely forwarded to Brokers , just like postman and Brokers have perfected the art of hoodwinking SEBI .
sathyacumaran
Replied to sachchidanand comment 1 decade ago
even if we have the copies of the opening form what is earthly use i have opened an account and immedaitely when i came to know about margin funding i issued an letter requesting thme to remove from the branch where i was trading thorugh the same companies Relationship manager signed by the RM of the company with seal of the company till date no action by the company nor sebi nse bse now we have only option to go to media and channel and expose and create as one more stock scam but this would affect the indian investor
sathyacumaran
Replied to sathyacumaran comment 1 decade ago
we can clearly state that sebi and nse bse officials are just puppets in the hands of stock brokers because their frequent visit to these offices the legal deaprtment of all broking house becomes the employees of the sebi nse bse and they visit sebi nse bse to igrc and no action is taken so we need justice who is other alternative help us
Free Helpline
Legal Credit
Feedback