In your interest.
Online Personal Finance Magazine
No beating about the bush.
Except may be backing of a bigshot like Microsoft, there is nothing in Nokia Lumia 800 that can make it compete with other smartphones from Samsung or HTC. Launching handsets in the league of Apple iPhone is still a miles away dream for Nokia
Before I start, let me confess that this review is completely based on technical specifications and not a hands-on experience. Although, Nokia is not leaving a single stone unturned through publicity events in order to grab attention towards its’re-entry' into the smartphone category, it is the technical specifications that makes the Lumia 800 an 'also ran' in the race.
In addition, the price factor is a big disadvantage for Nokia Lumia 800, especially in a country obsessed with low or ‘value-for-money’ mobile handsets. While the value-for-money tag has worked for Nokia in the past, the lack of this feature would only shrink its market share from 30% at present.
Purely looking at the technical specifications, I found there is one handset, Samsung Galaxy S Plus that competes with Nokia Lumia 800. Both have 1.4GHZ Scorpion processor with Qualcomm MSM8255 Snapdragon chipset and Adreno 205 as graphics processing unit (GPU).
Screen: While Lumia 800 has 3.7 inches AMOLED capacitive touchscreen, the S Plus comes with 4 inches Super AMOLED capacitive touchscreen. Both have 480x800 pixel resolution and are protected by Corning Gorilla Glass. (Compared with the first-generation active-matrix organic light-emitting diode or AMOLED, some of the Super AMOLED advantages are brighter screens, less sunlight reflection and reduced power consumption).
Storage: Both handsets have 16GB internal memory and 512MB random access memory (RAM). However, S Plus comes with 2GB read-only memory (ROM) and a memory card slot for up to 32GB. ROM is mainly used to distribute firmware or software that is very closely tied to specific hardware, and unlikely to need frequent updates.
Data Connectivity: Both Lumia 800 and S Plus supports GPRS and EDGE network and offers speed up to 14.4 Mbps on HSDPA (3G). Both support Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n protocol, with S Plus also offering digital living network alliance (DLNA) and Wi-Fi hotspot features. (DLNA certified device makes it easier for consumers to use, share and enjoy digital photos, music and videos across similar devices).
Camera: While Lumia 800 has an 8 megapixel camera with Carl Zeiss optics and dual-LED flash, the S Plus comes with just 5 megapixel camera and no flash. Both can record HD quality ([email protected]) videos. The Lumia 800 does not have a secondary camera like S Plus, which comes handy for video calls.
OS: Although, after its alliance with software giant Microsoft, the Finnish mobile maker was expected to come out with handset based on Windows. The Lumia 800 comes with Windows Phone 7.5, also known as Mango and offers one-touch social network access, easy grouping of contacts, integrated communication threads and Internet Explorer 9. On the other hand, Galaxy S plus comes with Google Android 2.3 or Gingerbread and loads of applications that can be downloaded either free or paid for from the internet. (Android is a mobile operating system developed by Google and Open Handset Alliance and according to a report by NPD, enjoys 53% market share compared with mere 2% share for Windows Phone 7 in the US).
Multimedia: When it comes to enjoying music or videos on the handset, Samsung clearly leads the way. While both handsets supports, MP4, H.263, H.264 and WMV files, the S Plus also supports DivX and Xvid. In addition S plus also support TV-out feature that is not there in Lumia 800.
Documents/Editor: Both handsets have document as well as video and image viewer and editor.
Battery: This is really interesting. While Lumia 800 comes with a 1450mAh Li-Ion battery, the S Plus comes with 1650 mAh Li-Ion one. However, there is big difference between the talk time and standby time of both the handsets. On a 3G network, Lumia 800 claims to offer stand-by time of 335 hours and talk time of up to 9 hours and 30 minutes, the S Plus claims a stand-by time of up to 625 hours and talk time of up to 6 hours and 30 minutes. The fast draining of battery, in case of S Plus can be attributed to its operating system. Android phones use more battery due to their constant need to communicate over the internet; especially applications like Google Maps and Latitude are known to drain the battery fast.
Price: Nokia Lumia 800 comes with an official price tag of Rs29,999 and can be bought for less than it. Samsung Galaxy S Plus sells at around Rs23,500.
Conclusion: Although Nokia sees its Lumia 800 to be a competitor to Apple iPhone, it is nowhere near the niche product. In fact compared with iPhone, the Lumia 800 can be termed as 'noPhone'. Even compared with Samsung products, Nokia is trying to sell this handset with specifications similar to S Plus but charging a premium. Four factors work in favour of Samsung Galaxy Plus, one, its screen is Super AMOLED, two the screen size is 4 inches and third and biggest is it runs on Android and fourth it is available at around Rs23,500. By the way, if interested one can grab the elder sibling, the Galaxy S II for a lesser price than the Nokia Lumia 800.
“Growth is clearly decelerating. This reflects the combined impact of several factors—the uncertain global environment, the cumulative impact of past monetary policy tightening and domestic policy uncertainties,” the RBI said in monetary policy review
Mumbai: Amid deceleration in economy, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) today said the domestic policy uncertainties and the tight monetary stance are among the factors leading to slowdown and cautioned against downside risks to growth, reports PTI.
“Growth is clearly decelerating. This reflects the combined impact of several factors—the uncertain global environment, the cumulative impact of past monetary policy tightening and domestic policy uncertainties,” it said in monetary policy review.
While several key economic legislations, including insurance and Pension Funds Regulatory and Development Authority (PFRDA) bills, are pending in Parliament, the government had to recently put on hold its decision to open the multi-brand retail sector to foreign investors.
Before today’s halt in rate hikes, the central bank had increased key policy rates 13 times since March 2010 to tame rising prices.
The central bank said since October the global economic outlook, amid Eurozone crisis, has worsened significantly and is posing threats to emerging market economies (EMEs), including India.
Referring to its earlier gross domestic product (GDP) growth projection of 7.6% for the current fiscal, the RBI said “considering the global and domestic macro-economic situation, the downside risks to the RBI growth projection, as set out in the second quarter review (in October), have increased significantly.”
In October, the RBI had revised downward its growth projection to 7.6%, from 8% earlier, citing high inflation and global slowdown, as major reasons.
The government has already lowered its estimates for the economic growth to 7.5% from 9%.
“Overall, the growth momentum in the economy is clearly moderating,” the RBI policy document added.
RBI further said that while agricultural prospects look promising on account of expected record kharif output and satisfactory progress on rabi sowing, there are concerns on industrial performance.
“Industrial activity is moderating, driven by deceleration in investment, which is a matter of serious concern,” the central bank said.
The review said the deceleration in economic activities during the second quarter was mainly due to a sharp moderation in industrial growth. Factory output shrank by 5.1% in October, mainly due to contraction in manufacturing and mining activities.
Economic growth in July-September quarter slumped to a 6.9%, the lowest in over two years, against 8.8% in the same quarter of last fiscal. Growth in the first half (April-September) stood at 7.3% as against from 8.6% in the year-ago period.
Referring to the recent European Union summit, it said the “agreement did not assuage negative market sentiments, thereby increasing the likelihood of persistent financial turbulence as well as a recession in Europe”.
The central bank also expressed concern on high crude oil prices despite global slowdown. India imports about 80% of its crude oil requirements.
Global growth in 2011 and 2012 is expected to be lower than earlier anticipated.
In the first three quarters of the current financial year, Hindustan Zinc has cumulatively paid Rs1,025 crore in advance tax
Vedanta Group firm Hindustan Zinc has paid Rs400 crore as advance tax for the October-December quarter, an over 23% rise on a year-on-year basis, the company said.
"The higher advance tax payment is due to improved efficiency in business operations and expansion in business," it said in a statement, adding that the company had paid Rs325 crore for the same period last fiscal.
In the first three quarters of the current financial year, the Rajasthan-based zinc, lead and silver producer has cumulatively paid Rs1,025 crore in advance tax, the statement added.
Hindustan Zinc, in which the government sold a majority stake to Vedanta Group in 2002, currently produces 10,64,000 tonnes of zinc and lead, while its silver production stood at about 180 tonnes in 2010-11.
Stating that the Vedanta Group firm has invested about Rs12,000 crore on expansion since its disinvestment, the statement said the company recently commissioned a 1,00,000 tonnes per annum lead smelter at Dariba, in Rajasthan, and 350 tonnes per annum silver refinery at Pantnagar, in Uttarakhand. "These are only going to give a boost to the company's revenue," it added.
In the late afternoon, Hindustan Zinc was trading at around Rs116.80 per share on the Bombay Stock Exchange, 0.09% down from the previous close.