In a significant development reflecting growing fissures within the Tata Trusts, Mehli K Mistry — a long-time confidant of the late Ratan Tata — has written to all trustees, including chairman Noel Tata, announcing his decision to step down and calling for calm amid 'speculative reportage' and internal discord.
In his letter dated 4 November 2025, shortly after his return to Mumbai, Mr Mistry says that his decision was driven by a desire to uphold the values of integrity and public service that Ratan Tata had espoused. “It has been my privilege to serve as a Trustee, an opportunity granted through the personal endorsement of the late Mr Ratan N Tata, my dearest friend and mentor,” the letter reads. “I have been made aware of the recent reportage surrounding my trusteeship in the Tata Trusts… I believe this letter should assist in putting the quietus on speculative news reports that do not serve the interests of the Tata Trusts and are inimical to its vision.”
Emphasising his commitment to Ratan Tata’s ideals of ethical governance and 'quiet philanthropy', Mr Mistry wrote that his foremost responsibility was to prevent controversy that could damage the Tata Trusts’ reputation. “Precipitating matters would cause irreparable harm,” he warned, adding that future actions by trustees should be “guided by transparency, good governance, and public interest.”
He ended his letter with a remark once made by Ratan Tata: “Nobody is bigger than the institution it serves.”
Mr Mistry’s letter follows a turbulent week in which his reappointment as trustee was blocked after failing to secure unanimous consent from the board of the Sir Dorabji Tata Trust and the Sir Ratan Tata Trust — which together control about 52% of Tata Sons’ shareholding. Under amended rules adopted last year, even a single dissenting vote automatically nullifies a reappointment proposal.
Three trustees — chairman Noel Tata and vice-chairmen Venu Srinivasan and Vijay Singh — reportedly voted against Mr Mistry’s continuation, while Darius Khambata and Pramit Jhaveri supported him. The outcome effectively ended Mr Mistry’s tenure.
Mr Mistry, appointed by Ratan Tata in October 2022, was part of the inner circle that helped shape key decisions during the final years of Tata’s leadership. His deep personal and business ties with the Tata family — including his relation to both Noel Tata’s wife Aloo and the late Cyrus Mistry — positioned him as a trusted intermediary in past corporate transitions. Outside the trusts, he heads the Meherji Pallonji group, which has interests spanning dredging, shipping, logistics, and automobile dealerships.
Mr Mistry’s exit underscores the widening gulf between two principal camps within the trusts — one led by Noel Tata, and the other aligned with Mr Mistry and his allies. The faultlines became visible last month when members of the Mistry faction questioned the chairman’s authority and challenged the unanimity rule, calling it a mechanism that consolidates power among a few trustees and paralyses decision-making.
The latest flashpoint arose when Siddharth Sharma, chief executive officer (CEO) of the Tata Trusts, proposed Mr Mistry’s reappointment, only for the Noel Tata camp to block it via a circular resolution circulated earlier that week. The decision came days after the trusts approved lifetime trusteeship for Mr Srinivasan, sparking speculation of reconciliation — a notion now dispelled by fresh developments.
The Union government, aware of the growing internal discord, is understood to have urged the trustees to settle their disputes 'in the larger national interest,' given the Tata group’s vast economic footprint. The group’s holdings — spanning steel, automobiles, aviation, IT, power and finance — make the governance of its controlling trusts a matter of strategic significance.
The Tata Trusts’ governance has long been central to the Tata group’s structure, controlling over half the equity in Tata Sons and influencing key appointments and strategy. The internal power struggle recalls the 2016 boardroom battle that led to Cyrus Mistry's ouster as Tata Sons chairman — an episode that resulted in years of litigation between Tata Sons and the Shapoorji Pallonji (SP) group, which continues to hold an 18.4% stake.
Three distinct power blocs now shape the group’s internal dynamics: the SP group, the Noel Tata-led camp, and the faction until recently represented by Mehli Mistry, seen as upholding Ratan Tata’s personal ethos. Noel Tata, who assumed the chairmanship of the trusts last year, has sought to assert authority through governance reforms, including the introduction of a unanimity clause, which critics argue enables minority vetoes and stifles dissent.
Mr Mistry’s departure marks another turning point in this evolving power matrix, with implications for both philanthropic governance and corporate control within the Tata empire.
For many close observers of the Tata group, Mr Mistry’s farewell letter reflects a larger question confronting one of India’s most respected business institutions: how to preserve its founding values while navigating modern governance challenges.
By invoking Ratan Tata’s reminder that “nobody is bigger than the institution,” Mehli Mistry appeared to signal both an end to his own chapter and a cautionary message to those who remain — that the Tata Trusts’ credibility depends on unity, transparency, and fidelity to their philanthropic mission.
You may also want to read…
