NHAI too blocks inspection of files under Section 4 of RTI Act

Though information was procured instantly from NHAI regarding action after the Neera River deaths, the officer insisted on writing an application under Section 6 of the RTI Act

The unique part of Nav Bharat Nagarik Manch’s agitation on Wednesday morning was inspection of files under Section 4 of the Right to Information (RTI) Act. Nav Bharat Nagarik Manch held a demonstration in front of the NHAI office before procuring documents under RTI. Nav Bharat members DVR Rao, Commander Ravindra Pathak (retd), Raja Narsimhan, Mahesh Tele, Omkar Virkar, Dhananjay Oval, Akash Jadhav, Mrs Sonawane, Hrushikesh Patankar and Prashant Salunke held the demonstrations.


We wanted to procure following documents after the horrendous Neera River bridge tragedy of 2nd November, which killed four young ad professionals from Pune after their car plunged into the river in the absence of a crash barrier at the tip of the bridge:

1.     Correspondence between NHAI and Reliance Infra (or whatever are the names of the sub contractors) regarding action on the repair of the Neera River bridge after submission of the Inspection Report of Neera Tragedy by your Safety Consultants, sometime last week.

2.     Correspondence between NHAI, Pune and the central authority of NHAI/Union Ministry of surface, road and transport, regarding repair of the Neera Bridge to make it safe, post the November 2 tragedy.

3.     Correspondence of the last one year, from NHAI Pune office to Reliance Infra pertaining to the condition of the highway road constructed by Reliance Infra in the 300 km odd Maharashtra portion of the stretch of the Mumbai-Bangalore highway

4.     Photographs taken out by NHAI regarding the condition of the Maharashtra stretch of the Mumbai-Bangalore stretch which is under operation, maintenance and security of Reliance Infra

5.     Documents pertaining to action taken by NHAI against Reliance Infra in the past one year for shoddy work.

6. Unlike Section 6 of the RTI Act, where you need to write a formal application and pay Rs10 in cash or through IPO for a central government office, no formal application is required to inspect files under Section 4.

7. Yet, this writer sent a previous intimation to Rajesh Kaundal, Project Director, NHAI stating: “I wish to bring to your notice that a citizen desiring to inspect the documents containing information covered under Section 4 of the Right to Information Act, 2005, need not make any formal requisition under Section 6 of the Act because these documents should have already been published by the public authority so that citizens have ‘minimum resort to the use of this Act to obtain information’'

8. The contract given to Reliance Infra is clearly covered under `permits and authorisations' and hence is covered under Section 4. I intend to exercise my right as a citizen to inspect these documents in your office with my colleagues during our peaceful protest today at your office between 11 am and 1 p m.  Please note that it is not necessary for me under the Act to give such notice before inspection of documents covered under Section 4 of the Act.  However, being a responsible citizen, I thought it appropriate to intimate you beforehand.’’

Despite this, Mr Kaundal replied to my email request stating: “Section 4 (1)(b) is designed to ensure that public authorities disclose certain information which are important to the public voluntarily at every level of operation. Please log on to www.nhai.org for the information published by NHAI.” 

“For any other information requested in specific, it is requested to submit application to PIO with requisite fee so that the same can be made available to you within the stipulated time period including inspection of the documents for extraction of the information if required by you. In case of any difference of opinion, it is requested to contact CPIO on the following address:- VS Darbari, GM (Coord) & CPIO, National Highways Authority of India, No.G-5 & 6, Sector – 10, Dwarka, New Delhi – 110 075.Contact No.011-25074100 (Extn : 1520).  Email : [email protected].’’

The writer wrote back stating: “The information I have asked for comes under Section 4 of the RTI Act. However, it is not put up on your website, as far as I searched. In the absence, of you not having uploaded it in the public domain, that is uploaded on www.nhai.org, I, as a citizen, is allowed physical inspection of files in your office.’’

However, no amount of explanation convinced Mr Kaundal, when this writer met him in the office. He insisted that I file an application under Section 6 of the RTI Act and he has no problem about providing me information immediately. Since he assured me of immediate inspection of files, I relented. However, I am filing a complaint to the Information commissioner today, for not providing me information under Section 4.

It is so exasperating that, even after seven years of the implementation of the RTI Act, neither do most public authorities suo motu upload information under Section 4 on their respective websites and hesitate to allow physical inspection of files by citizens.

Amongst the several documents I procured, the following one is very worrying, as the contractor now says all major bridges from Dehu Road to Satara need crash barriers for safety but insists that the NHAI must pay for the repairs. And therein lies the ping-pong game of NHAI Pune sending this request to the Delhi office.

The details are as follows:

PS Toll Roads Pvt Ltd, the subsidiary agency of Reliance Infra has sent a letter to Project Director, NHAI on 25th November, stating that raising and strengthening of the Median wall (wall in between the two bridges) to the height of the crash barrier, is required for all the six major bridges between Dehu Road and Satara and not only for the Neera River bridge. This was revealed through the documents procured under RTI Act by Vinita Deshmukh and other members of Nav Bharat Nagarik Manch, from the NHAI office at Warje.


The major bridges which need urgent repairs, in the light of the terrible tragedy of 2nd November, where four ad professionals died, have been identified by the contractor as Pawana Bridge, Mula Bridge, Mutha Bridge, Krishna River Bridge, Venna River Bridge and Neera River Bridge. Repairs have also been recommended for a series of culverts and small bridges.


The letter written by Nagendra Rai, officer of the PS Toll Roads Pvt Ltd to Mr Kaundal,  admits that all the major bridges and some of the culverts are ‘unsafe’ for commuters. The letter states, “you are aware that gap between all existing minor/major bridges and slab culvert is not properly closed by cras barrier or extending medial wall up to the level of crash barrier and same is leading to unsafe situation for the traffic.”


Nav Bharat Nagarik Manch is shocked that there is no urgency shown regarding the repair of the Neera Bridge despite the most horrendous tragedy earlier this month.


Instead, the NHAI Pune has washed its hands up stating that such a decision can be taken only by the Delhi office of NHAI. The reason being the statement in the letter in which Rai states, “As per schedule B of Concession Agreement, no scope is defined for improvement/strengthening of the median walls for all existing major/minor bridges and slab culverts.”


This in effect means, that the Reliance Infra’s subsidiary agency, PS Toll Roads Pvt Ltd, is asking NHAI to provide the funds. NHAI Pune in turn says they are not the authority and so the letter has been sent to Delhi.


In the end, Nav Bharat Nagarik Manch is appalled that the final victims are citizens. It has begun the process of procuring documents under RTI to file a public interest litigation (PIL).


(Vinita Deshmukh is the consulting editor of Moneylife, an RTI activist and convener of the Pune Metro Jagruti Abhiyaan. She is the recipient of prestigious awards like the Statesman Award for Rural Reporting which she won twice in 1998 and 2005 and the Chameli Devi Jain award for outstanding media person for her investigation series on Dow Chemicals. She co-authored the book “To The Last Bullet - The Inspiring Story of A Braveheart - Ashok Kamte” with Vinita Kamte and is the author of “The Mighty Fall”.)

  • Like this story? Get our top stories by email.



    Atul Kumthekar

    7 years ago

    great...but will someone b punished ever? same companies will keep getting conracs by bribing officials and that money will be recovered by low quality or incomplete work, risking tax payers lives. Sad reality here is unless Sharad Powar's car does not go in a ditch, nothing happens. We still have king's culture, not democracy by any standard.

    Shoma Chaudhary resigns from Tehelka

    Shoma Chaudhury, managing editor of Tehelka, resigned after nearly eight days since the magazine's editor Tarun Tejpal stepped down following allegations of sexual assault

    Shoma Chaudhary, who was under fire for the way she handled a junior colleague’s sexual harassment charge against Telekla editor Tarun Tejpal, on Thursday resigned as managing editor of the magazine.


    Chaudhary, in a letter addressed to the employees of Tehelka, said, “Over the past week, I have been accused of an attempt to "cover-up" and for not standing by my feminist positions. While I accept that I could have done many things differently and in a more measured way, I reject the allegations of a cover-up because in no way could the first actions that were taken be deemed suppression of any kind. As for my feminist positions, I believe I acted in consonance with them by giving my colleague's account precedence over everything else. However, despite this, as a result of what's transpired over the past few days my integrity has repeatedly been questioned by people from our fraternity and, in fact, by the public at large. I would like to take cognizance of this”.


    Her resignation came after six other senior journalists quit the magazine after the alleged sexual assault came to light. Writers including Jay Mazoomdaar, Ayesha Siddiqa, Revati Laul and Rana Ayyub put in their papers following the incident.


    Just yesterday, Chaudhary, in a statement had rejected the charge of her being involved in "slander, intimidation or character assassination" of the complainant of the alleged sexual assault by the Tehelka’s editor Tejpal and termed it a "malicious campaign".


    She said, “I strongly reject the allegations in the media that I am involved in any manner with any slander, intimidation or character assassination of the complainant journalist. This is a malicious campaign that has no basis in truth”.


    The Tehelka journalist, who had accused Tejpal of sexually assaulting her, had in her resignation letter accused him and Chaudhury of a “cover-up” and resorting to “tactics of intimidation, character assassination and slander".

  • User 

    Tarun Tejpal issue and double standards of women activists

    Equality should be manifested in absolute terms and not be choice based. Everything should not be availed of by playing the victim card and one must stand for the choices one makes - be it a man or a woman

    Tarun Tejpal's case has brought to light the often unspoken world of murky sexual liasons in corporate circuits. I am not commenting on the developments in this case, where the law shall take its course. But I read this article with advice for men on how to deal with women (http://m.ibnlive.com/news/some-openly-feminist-advice-to-men-on-how-to-deal-with-women/436211-3.html ) and I thought it's time for someone to speak up in this highly feminists dominated media and political atmosphere. I am actually compelled to thrash the hypocrisy of this attitude.

    After reading comments from few readers, I am moved to clarify my stand on the Tejpal issue. I salute the woman who has dared to question a person with as much clout as he has. I have no doubt that she is telling the truth. Though the cause I have taken up makes me believe very little of what women say, there is no reason for this woman to lie. Moreover, her statement that she wants to fight to save other women from this kind of torture makes me respect her even more. She is not like those cowardly women who first file cases, then take money to settle the case and move on. And, the way most eminent feminists are behaving in this case exposes the farce of what they preach.

    To begin with, I am all for women’s empowerment and I strongly believe that women need to stand shoulder to shoulder with men in every strata of society. But equality should be manifested in absolute terms and not choice based. Everything should not be availed of by playing the victim card and one must stand for the choices one makes—be it a man or a woman.

    I have worked in the corporate world for couple of years including media and have been privy to a lot of conversations that often don't go public because of the mere fact that it’s not considered right to talk bad about a woman. Yes, no one has the right to do character assassination of anyone but I wouldn't hesitate to say, characters of men are assassinated perhaps more than women. Women are themselves victim to perks and promotions given to other women because of reasons that can very well be understood by any adult.
    Affairs, flings, drunken banters, one night stands, selective promotions, undue adulation, flirting - we see them day and night in offices. Married men with single women, married women with single men—offices are replete with stories like these flying around. I am not morally questioning anyone's behaviour here. Every individual has the right to do whatever they wish to do in their life. But I think it's high time that the educated, empowered and liberated women of India, stand up for the choices they make in life. I mean, for how long can you keep blaming the society, the surroundings, and the circumstances for your behaviour? If you dare to take a risk (neither all men nor all women in this world are saints), you must understand the fallouts that are possible of that risk. If you call sexual advances by a man as assault then undue advances by a woman should also be called assault on the dignity of a man. But as this article proves, women of today want to do whatever they want to and then blame everyone else for it!

    I am flabbergasted seeing rape cases with charges like rape on pretext of marriage after relationship of three years, four years, five years.....

    I mean how insane is that?  How can you keep on having physical relationship with a person for years if you have an iota of doubt that the person will not marry you? And if marriage was that sacred an institution for you to have sex, then go get married first and then get intimate. Girls are running away with boys on their own wish and parents are filing rape cases. What is happening here? (http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2013-07-28/delhi/40848274_1_false-cases-false-allegation-anita)

    Anyways, to keep it short, here is my advice to young, carefree, party freak women of India, smitten by the feminists 'your body your choice' and 'your body your no responsibility' campaign…

    1. Please don't use your gender as a trump card whenever you wish to use it that way.

    2. Alcohol doesn't affect only your mind and your actions, it does to the other gender also. Drink safe and be safe. But please don't cry rape after you realise that you went too overboard.

    3. Being physical with someone is entirely your choice. If you think sex is being used, then better don't get used and then cry later.

    4. STOP using men for every need of yours, hurt them emotionally and then say sorry. They are not tissue papers. They are human beings too. Yes, they can't file a rape case on you if you dump them, but please don't cry rape just because you have the option to do so.

    5. Stop LYING and then cry crocodile tears to hide your deeds.  If you have made a choice of living the life the way you want, then don't be apologetic about it and run from it when discovered. Have guts to be what you are! Have multiple partners? Allow your man to have it too...don't call it violence then. AND PLEASE marriages are not a license to have EMA (extramarital affairs). Don't get married if you want to have several sex partners.

    6. Begin your rebellion from your own homes, and stop fantasising a world full of roses in your in-laws home. Those parents are also born, brought up and fed with the same principles as your own father and mother. If you call your mother in law cruel for not allowing you to go for late night parties, then call your mother cruel first, to whom you always lied while going to the late night parties. Dun wanna get married? Tell your parents. Dun wanna live in a joint family? Tell before you get married. Can't manage a home, be upfront. But be Honest.

    7. PLEASE STOP SETTLING CASES IN EXCHANGE OF MONEY. I mean that's RIDICULOUS. Justice can't be done with compromises if you are fighting a real criminal. STOP THIS LEGAL EXTORTION.

    8. A man's NO also means a NO. Don’t feel hurt and go around and call him a womaniser since he did not like you.

    9. Don't feel bad if you are decked up so well and no man is looking at you. After all you are asking men to refrain from looking at girls.

    10. You give Respect. You earn Respect. You don't get respect for just being a woman.

    11. Men want to live their life their own way as well. Stop trying to change them for what you want them to be. They are human beings. Not dogs that you can tame them the way you want. And file CRIMINAL charges on them when they don't adhere to your ridiculous demands.

    12. STOP GIVING DOWRY. Ask your share from your father's property, that's your first RIGHT.

    13. Rights come with responsibilities. If MEN would stop taking all the responsibilities that you tag as privilege for them, then no one but you will suffer the most.

    14. If women value generosity in a man, than Men also value decency and generosity in a woman. You can't go and shout on a man to vacate a seat just because you are a woman.

    15. Don't take Men for granted. They are extremely good and caring as long as they are not deeply hurt. Think about the sacrifices your brother and father have made since you were a toddler. Be thoughtful about them and don't blame them for everything.

    16. Don't think the entire world is full of good people. Your SAFETY is your RESPONSIBILITY first.

    17. Men and women are differently equal. Don't try to make a man a woman and a woman a man. Appreciate the similarities and accept the differences. Nature has made us the way we are for a reason.

    18. "My Body My Choice", His Body My choice. His life My choice. His money My choice. His freedom My choice. His mannerisms My choice. His family My Choice. His decisions My Choice - Stop these double standards and then say this is a patriarchal society.

    19. Know when he needs your emotional support and stop ridiculing him for being what he is. We all face failures. Don't punish them for failing in life.

    20. Last but not least, A FALSE CASE destroys families, lives, career, soul and everything. It's nothing less than a rape. Please don't legally rape men, just because you are privileged to do so!

    Disclaimer: I am not a person infected with patriarchal thoughts, if any of you feminists reading this article would want to keep me in that bracket. I call a spade a spade. I don’t play the gender cards. I don’t cry equality first and then suddenly define the rules for others to LIVE. For anyone who is reading this, it would be worthwhile to see the state of 'FALSE' rape cases being filed in India: https://www.facebook.com/notes/deepika-narayan-bhardwaj/false-rape-files/639495616090186

    And also, how these feminists wanting to have several sex partners are killing their husbands: http://ekhusbandkimaut.blogspot.in/

    (Deepika Narayan Bhardwaj is a journalist and working on a documentary film on the misuse of IPC section 498A)

  • Like this story? Get our top stories by email.




    6 years ago

    I have a lots and lots of respect for this women who stood by the man side....each and every word penned down by her is true...she clearly depicts the other side of the coin and in much better way than a man would have depicted....feminists you don't have any right to violate the privacy of males in any way....


    6 years ago

    I condemn this misogynistic article and who is this woman offering other women advice on family and marital issues?

    Rashmi Singhania, a feminist



    In Reply to rashmi 6 years ago

    Respected Rashmi Singhania, a feminist,



    Amit Bhandari

    In Reply to rashmi 6 years ago

    Have the guts, sense and morality to accept the reality. If your house is safe, it does not mean other burning houses is not your concern. God made Men and Women equal. Who are you and I to create a divide between them and make one less and the Other more privileged. FYI, any law made on the basis of gender (not sex) is unconstitutional, arbitrary, unfair and illegal. The protection given to women in terms of A 15(3) of our Constitution is not carved in stone, it is temporary. Open your eyes and check for yourself the false rape, gang-rape, molestation, dowry harassment, murder charges that are slapped on men by some unscrupulous women, solely because there is a legal provision for it. For every gender-biased law made, some husband, father, brother is destroyed in some corner of India. If you think that women are getting empowered by this, get a reality check. The society is getting destroyed, moral values are getting corrupted, family fabric is eroded, marriage is turned into a must gain commercial deal for women. When a man has sex outside marriage, he is punished for adultery, but when a woman does the same, she goes scot-free. Nice way to get empowered and you cannot digest a woman choosing to be gender-neutral.

    Steven boyd

    6 years ago


    Look! This is a man who has suffered enough. 81 days in a filthy prison for
    a 60 second grope is punishment enough. He may be accused of rape, but it could
    be just an aggressive hug. He said it was a misunderstanding of the situation
    in his e mail, but there were no ‘specifics’ that he confessed to.

    But his detractors have found him guilty of rape even before a trial.

    Its one young woman’s word against his, (there is no medical or forensic
    evidence) that’s all the evidence we have of rape.

    Finger penetration is the woman’s version. Tejpal did not admit to that in his
    e mail.

    The Goa police charge sheet says it was virginal penetration with Tejpal’s

    But if the women was resisting, in my
    opinion, it would be quite difficult to.

    (a) Remove women’s clothes

    (b) Penetrate with tongue.

    (c) All this in sixty seconds, did the woman knee his face or move her hips

    (d) To hold a resisting young woman’s, strong hips steady, while bending down,
    and penetrating with tongue is impossible.

    Now for all we know, it could have been just be a fond kiss and the woman
    making the rest up, in a self delusional kind of way.

    Tejpal says “I apologise unconditionally
    for the shameful lapse of judgement that led me to attempt a sexual liaison
    with you on two”. That is the only admission.

    Every man is entitled to his previous good name to be
    taken to consideration; he should have got bail on the first day. If it proved
    to be just a grope Tejpal has now served his sentence already ten times over in

    He will not intimidate the victim if he gets bail, as alleged by Police, the
    victim is a very resourceful woman, she has now got herself a job paying one
    lakh a month and is writing a book about rape funded by a large organization.
    It is alleged that she makes sure, on meeting strangers at parties, they are
    made aware, about her famous rape case.

    Meanwhile Tejpals reputation is destroyed something which had great value to
    his business. A famous magazine that gave a vital service to the nation,
    defended the most vulnerable and was a means of livelihood for dozen of staff
    and their dependent families, is down the gutter, all for a ‘fondling’ for a
    few seconds of a Woman by her boss, …. this is all we know from the evidence
    presented on the charge sheet..

    Tejpal atoned via an e mail & offered to absent himself for six months from
    the magazine. He was shamed before his employees. I think this was enough
    blood, he has given more than his pound of flesh for the sixty seconds of
    inappropriate behavior. what do the feminists want, a hanging?

    Enough is Enough. It begins to disgust ! The whole sordid case.

    This is a lynching no less, Tejpal’s enemies getting the boot into a fallen

    The sisterhood of scorned feminist ‘she dogs’ baying for blood, to avenge all
    the wrongs inflicted by the Indian man, to be paid by this one TarunTejpal, who
    is to be torn to pieces, and buried alive, entombed in a cell. This feeding
    frenzy of cruelty must stop!! Public opinion must halt this crucifixion of an

    There is talk of a ten year prison sentence if found guilty! Ludicrous, absurd,
    but there is real danger that will be his sentence, given the new law on rape,
    if the feminist man haters, aided and abetted by gleefully, corrupt politicians
    get their way.

    Come on lets keep things in proportion else it will all backfire, on the

    Tejpal incriminated himself by writing in good faith an e mail of apology and
    genuine remorse. He was tried already and the e mail was a condition of his
    punishment. With confession obtained this way from Tejpal, the Victim is now
    going to court to seek equity with unclean hands. It is the victim who should
    now ensure that Tejpal be acquitted as the victim has already had the benefit
    of seeing Tejapl tried, to use his (plea bargain) e mail as confession in the
    first trial as evidence in the second is unjust.

    Well, from now on no man will incriminate himself by saying sorry for any
    assault, as it could be used later to incriminate him. Tejpal was entrapped
    into apologizing to this woman via e mail; a lesser man would have denied
    everything and sacked the woman.

    Tejpal has become a victim in the eyes of all good men. Julian Assange the wiki
    leaks founder is another good man entrapped by strong rape laws

    Bhawani Cheerath

    7 years ago

    Great to see that there are women who see the hypocritical stand taken under the banner of 'Feminism' and 'Empowerment'.

    You are spot on about this growing duplicity.
    This sentence takes the cake.

    "My Body My Choice", His Body My choice. His life My choice. His money My choice. His freedom My choice. His mannerisms My choice. His family My Choice. His decisions My Choice - Stop these double standards and then say this is a patriarchal society.



    7 years ago

    excellent article to control the infected mind of women. False cases are killing men.


    7 years ago

    A wonderful article to stop law misuse by greedy women.

    George Pulikuthiyil

    7 years ago

    Dear Deepika

    This is simply great indeed. I have never seen before a balanced response having been meticulously honest to oneself as yours.
    I truly admire your firm and blunt disposition and sincerity.
    Thank you for ever
    George Pulikuthiyil


    7 years ago

    Hi Deepikia, A wonderful honest and truthful article. Kudos. But I want you to judge the women or for that matter Men who keep quiet many of the abuses due to poverty. The Tehelka girl or the intern who worked for Judge Ganguly or that Air hostess who committed sucide after the Minster owner of Haryana pestered her, all try to think about their future and job security.Even the boy friends fo tehelka journalists who stood by her must be thinking about their futurre because many in middle class in India have to think about their aged parents, unmarried sisters or education of their brothers etc etc.Even Shoma choudhry was thinking about the company because she know how much Tehelka will suffer once it is open and so she was ready to sacrifice the Girl's agony for her company's future.More over these powerful predators are normally serial offenders and for one victim coming out, there are ten who are keeping silent again due to poverty.

    nilesh sharma

    7 years ago

    Dear Deepika, We celebrated International Men's day on 19th Nov. at CST. We did Signature campaign for a cause, to create awareness among men to have a heart for a fellow men. The society and the media usually gives a BLIND EYE when it comes the problem of men, What men faces in Life.
    Thanks a Ton to you and dear Suchita to raise the issue and writing a wonderful fact driven article.

    Suiketu Shah

    7 years ago

    One of the best articles you wl read on the http://www.Great piece for anyone.

    Hemlata Mohan

    7 years ago

    This article is spot on. Having worked in corporate world for over three decades, I have seen several such "emancipated" women using men to climb all the ladders they want and shout when things go horribly wrong. It is time women wake up to the reality that they too have atleast 50% ( if not more) responsibility in a given situation by their actions, overt or covert. It is time to remember that not all men can be treated as "bhaiyas" or "uncles" as these untrue relationships never exist in the first place!

    nagesh kini

    7 years ago

    Great Deepika - you are bang on!
    The 20 points are most relevant and apt at that.
    Why only the corporate world even in our legal fraternity we have sexual harassment being shoved under the carpet - the case involving a high profile senior counsel was given a burial, a SC Committee has been looking into one with a former SC justice. A leading audit firm in Mumbai had a lady demonstrating publicly, the Air Hostess-Captains liaisons are all well known.
    Deepika's "Check list" should act as bench mark in empowerment.

    Simple Indian

    7 years ago

    Very balanced and bold article, that too from a woman. It's heartening to read such articles which acknowledge the reality and call the spade a spade (as Deepika too puts it). Having spent over a decade with the corporate sector, I too have made similar observations as stated in the article. As the title of the article says, women may be educated and empowered, but are they independent enough (or choose to be so?) ? Shoma Choudhary of Tehelka seems to bely the image or principles of a true feminist, by letting down one of her own women employees. Women have far better choices in these times, being well educated and empowered as never before. Hence, they alone are responsible for the choices they make.


    7 years ago

    Deepika Ji,

    You have hit the nail on the head.... Reading this thoughtfully written article I am prompted to commend you for This truly neutral article (for it brings a sisters perspective, mothers perspective too).
    I would also like to say that this advice is also applicable to the Mothers and Fathers of Girls who support them in these false cases.... (earlier it was covertly now it is openly)... They too need to own up the rrsponsibility in creating and maintaining responsible citizens of this country... by Destroying Men from other families....(son in laws)

    BrijMohan Sharma

    7 years ago

    Your analysis is in right perspective and direction. You are cautioning the society in the most structured manner. Right now one has to understand comply existing laws. Honorable Courts/ Society shall be in a position to judge wrong cases. If men are not indulging in unethicals; there is not much to fear. If few women would like to take wrong advantage of the laws; still they could take it whether there is a law or not; the past is an evidence. Laws are never perfect and so the human beings - men and women. With laws or without laws, men and women both have suffered and it is impossible to ensure just administrative management systems of the nation. It is all a matter of long term. In the long term, many of us shall be dead. These laws by intent protect the most honest women/ good moral character women. Prima facie the laws could potentially put a man under stress/disadvantage if he had done nothing; but the women by wrong intent has proceeded against him. Still, within the existing laws; there is a case registration; police enquiry; statement in front of the magistrate; so many logical links are there. In my view; men should avoid such women. And such women are easily identifiable too. When the matter goes to the court; total profile of man/women etc. comes transparent; and one can establish the bonafides of the case. So nice thought providing discussion by all concerned.

    We are listening!

    Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.

    To continue

    Sign Up or Sign In


    To continue

    Sign Up or Sign In



    online financial advisory
    Pathbreakers 1 & Pathbreakers 2 contain deep insights, unknown facts and captivating events in the life of 51 top achievers, in their own words.
    online financia advisory
    The Scam
    24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
    Moneylife Online Magazine
    Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
    financial magazines online
    Stockletters in 3 Flavours
    Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
    financial magazines in india
    MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
    (Includes Moneylife Online Magazine)
    FREE: Your Complete Family Record Book
    Keep all the Personal and Financial Details of You & Your Family. In One Place So That`s Its Easy for Anyone to Find Anytime
    We promise not to share your email id with anyone