Need a CEC Who Can Even Take Action against PM, Says SC
IANS 23 November 2022
The Supreme Court on Wednesday orally observed that the need is for a chief election commissioner (CEC) who can even take action against the prime minister and also asked the Centre to show the mechanism adopted in the appointment of an election commissioner (EC) last week.
A five-judge Constitution bench headed by justice KM Joseph said: "We need a CEC who can even take action against a PM."
The bench, also comprising justices Ajay Rastogi, Aniruddha Bose, Hrishikesh Roy and CT Ravikumar, said suppose, for example, there is some allegation against the prime minister and the CEC has to act, but the the latter is weak-kneed and does not act.
The bench queried the Centre's counsel that was it not a complete breakdown of the system. The CEC is supposed to be insulated from political influence and should be independent.
It further added that these are aspects on which "you (the Centre's counsel) must delve into, and why we require an independent larger body for selection and not just Cabinet."
The bench orally observed that committees say dire need for changes, and politicians also shout from rooftop but nothing happens.
The Centre is represented by attorney general R Venkataramani, solicitor general Tushar Mehta, and additional solicitor general Balbir Singh.
The bench also queried the Centre's counsel to show the mechanism adopted in the appointment of the election commissioner.
Former Bureaucrat Arun Goel assumed the office of election commissioner on Monday, after being appointed to the post on 19th November. Since May,this year, the post of one election commissioner in the three-member commission was lying vacant after Sushil Chandra retired as the CEC.
During the hearing, the AG contended that the convention is that all senior bureaucrats and officers at the state and the Central government are taken into consideration while appointment and this is scrupulously followed.
The AG further submitted that the appointment is done on the basis of convention and there is no separate appointment procedure of CEC.
He added that one is appointed as EC and then on the basis of seniority a CEC.
Justice Rastogi observed that there should be a transparent mechanism in the appointment of the EC, and the mechanism should be such that people should not question it.
He added that, "you just appointed someone as EC 2 days ago... It should be fresh in memory. Show us (the mechanism applied in the appointment)."
At this juncture, the AG replied: "So are we saying that there is no confidence in the Council of Ministers?" to which justice Rastogi said, "no, we are saying for our satisfaction show us the mechanism you adopted in the appointment two days ago."
The AG replied that he has already shown how a convention is followed, the process involved in the appointment, and appointments are made on the basis of seniority, and on the aspect of recent EC appointment, he added that the office was vacant since May.
"It is not a pick and choose system at all there is a process," said the AG.
The bench said it understands that CEC is appointed from amongst the ECs, but then there is no basis, and why is the Centre only confined to civil servants?
The AG said that is a completely different debate, and can we bring in a national pool of candidates, that is a larger debate.
He further added that there is also an in-built guarantee in the system, whenever the president is not satisfied with the suggestion, he can take an action. The hearing in the matter will continue after lunch.
The top court is hearing a batch of pleas seeking a collegium-like system for the appointment of the CEC.
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court said the CEC heads an institution, though with his truncated tenure, he cannot do anything substantial and added that 'silences of the Constitution' is being exploited by all and expressed concern at the absence of a law governing the appointments of ECs and CEC.
Last week, the Centre opposed petitions seeking a collegium-like system for the selection of CECs and ECs.
The apex court in October 2018, referred to a PIL (public interest litigation) seeking a collegium-like system for the selection of CECs and ECs to a five-judge Constitution bench.
Disclaimer: Information, facts or opinions expressed in this news article are presented as sourced from IANS and do not reflect views of Moneylife and hence Moneylife is not responsible or liable for the same. As a source and news provider, IANS is responsible for accuracy, completeness, suitability and validity of any information in this article.
Meenal Mamdani
2 weeks ago
I am happy and relieved to see the Supreme Court display such courageous questioning of the Executive.
Prior Supreme Court Chief Justices have bowed to the wishes of the Executive and have been suitably rewarded with lucrative and prestigious appointments.
Looks like Modi/Shah's complete disregard for constitutional proprieties is finally being challenged.
Will we see the rule of law, not Modi/Shah law, return to India?
2 weeks ago
That’s the way it should be but then our political systems and the politicians don’t allow TN Sheshans to multiply. It would be hard to find a system that’s working independently. We have gone from bad to worse.
In Light of SC Judgement on EWS, Petition Seeks Tax Exemption on All Families Earning below Rs8 lakh; Madras HC Issues Notices to Union Govt
Moneylife Digital Team 25 November 2022
The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court (HC) has sought the response of the Centre on a plea (Case No: WP(MD) 26168 of 2022) challenging the fixation of Rs2,50,000 as the base income for the purpose of collecting income-tax...
I-T dept detects unaccounted transactions exceeding Rs 100 cr across country
IANS 22 November 2022
The Income Tax Department on Tuesday said that it has unearthed unaccounted transactions exceeding Rs 100 crore during searches on a few groups engaged in jewellery and real estate business across the country in connection with...
Self-declaration Submission on Air Suvidha Portal No Longer Required for Int'l Passengers
IANS 22 November 2022
After the sustained decline in the COVID-19 trajectory across the globe and in the country, the guidelines of health ministry on submission of self-declaration form on the Air Suvidha portal has been discontinued. The decision will...
Government Unveils Framework To Prevent Fake Reviews of Products
IANS 22 November 2022
Aiming to guard customers from fake online reviews of products, the government on Monday issued a comprehensive set of guidelines which would come into effect from 25th November and would be voluntary in nature.
Free Helpline
Legal Credit