Mumbai Development Plan 2034: Deciphering Future of the Mega City
Moneylife Digital Team 15 November 2018
The government has released the latest version of Mumbai Development Plan 2034 - Development Control Promotion and Regulation (DCPR 2034). This plan took everyone by surprise as it is significantly different from the DP 2034 passed by BrihanMumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) in February 2018. The current DP has several positives and, in a way, is a step in the right direction, but implementation of some of the objectives may be a challenge, says Knight Frank India. 
The international property consultant has released a report titled "DCPR 2034 - Deciphering Mumbai's Future" which delves into the fine print of the DCPR 2034 and what it spells for the residential and office sectors.
Commenting on the report, Shishir Baijal, chairman & managing director, Knight Frank India, said, "With the release of DCPR 2034, the last level of uncertainty has ended. The developer community can now progress with confidence. The policy provides clarity and focus for future development of Mumbai. The development plan (DCPR 2034) is a crucial policy, which can shape the future of our city, hence, it should be given paramount importance. The current DCPR 2034 has several positives and is a step in the right direction, however, we believe that there will be areas to work on further." 
"The DCPR 2034 has provided a fillip to the commercial sector in Mumbai by way of incentivised floor space index (FSI), however, the high cost of the FSI could be a challenge. On the residential front, measures such as opening up of land for promoting affordable housing and unification of carpet area definition will prove to be a boon for homebuyers. All in all, the current DCPR 2034 has something to offer to all stakeholders and we are optimistic that it will have far-reaching implications on Mumbai's growth over the next two decades," he added.
Here are key findings of Knight Frank from the DCPR 2034…
Linking of Permissible FSI to Road Width
  • Past policies have been limited in checking congestion, leading to construction of tall residential/commercial towers on narrow roads
  • By linking permissible FSI to road width, the DCPR 2034 would ensure that taller buildings can be constructed only if the road width can support it, thereby reducing congestion


Minimum Road Width of 12 Metres for Higher FSI for Commercial
  • The DCPR 2034 provides higher FSI for office developments, only if the road width is greater than 12 metres or else it is the same as residential
  • As the number of vehicles moving in and out of a commercial building throughout the day is higher than residential, the incidence of traffic jams outside commercial buildings can be reduced, to some extent.
Increasing FSI through Increase in Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) Limits and Premium FSI
  • The FSI for island city has been increased in the DCPR 2034. This increase in FSI accrues from increase in FSI on payment of premium and the increase in the quantum of TDR that can be loaded on the plot; 
  • This would ensure that there is demand for TDR generated through - surrendering land for road widening, slum rehabilitation and surrendering of reserved plots;
  • Further, the government and the municipal corporation would earn revenues from selling premium FSI.
Increasing Development Rights for Area Surrendered
  • The state urban development department, in its November 2016 notification, had increased the TDR generated for land surrendered to the BMC due to reservation on the plot. This was increased to 2.5 times the area of land surrendered in the island city and 2 times the area of land surrendered in the suburbs. Prior to that, TDR under both was 1. The same regulation has been continued in the DCPR 2034;
  • This would ensure that there would be incentives for the stakeholders to expedite the process of slum rehabilitation and surrendering of reserved plots
Adopting Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (RERA) Definition of Carpet Area
  • DCPR 2034 has altered its definition of carpet area from the one defined by the Maharashtra Ownership Flat Act (MOFA) and has adopted RERA's definition of carpet area. Aligning to a uniform definition will help reduce ambiguity amongst buyers.
Slum Rehabilitation
  • Only 100,000 slum units have been rehabilitated over the past 20 years under the current slum rehabilitation policy. At this pace, it would take approximately 300 years to rehabilitate the 1.5 million-1.6 million slum units in Mumbai.
  • The inadequacies of the past policy may get carried forward under the current DCPR 2034, as it continues the same norms.
Reduction of Consent Clause for Redevelopment of Buildings in Certain Categories
  • The minimum irrevocable consent required for redevelopment of cessed and Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority (MHADA) buildings has been reduced from 70% to 51%;
  • Redevelopment of buildings under these categories is stuck due to other reasons, hence, reducing consent may not help in addressing the issue completely.
Key Findings - Office
Increasing FSI for Office Development
  • The DCPR 2034 aims to create eight million jobs in Mumbai by increasing the supply of office space
  • The FSI given under DCPR 2034 for commercial development is higher than residential for road width more than 12 metres. The additional/higher FSI is aimed at incentivising commercial development over residential development. This additional FSI (incentive) for commercial development has to be purchased from the BMC by paying a premium @ 50% of Annual Schedule of Rates (ASR);
  • As per our analysis, the current set of incentives in the form of additional FSI may not sufficiently promote office developments to the extent required.
Development of Smart Fintech Centres
  • Similar to the office development, the DCPR 2034 aims to promote the development of smart fintech centres, by providing additional FSI as incentive. In should be noted that for smart fintech centres the premium charged for additional FSI is at a rate of 50% of ASR;
  • As per our analysis, while attempting to bring about the growth for Smart Fintech, the DCPR may still face challenges in attaining this objective.
Mahesh S Bhatt
6 years ago
10 years since Adarsh absolved Ashok Chavan quit our MHADA redevelopment project is stuck in GTB Nagar after paying Stamp Duty Registration charges to Government of Maharashtra.Mahesh Bhatt
Aditya G
6 years ago
I doubt anything will happen...

Whatever happened to the vision of Mumbai being the "international financial centre"?
sanjay shah
Replied to Aditya G comment 6 years ago
just spend money but dont work, see masjid bunder buildings, over 100 years old but bmc is sleeping there, why no action on trust owned buildings,, why bmc is sleeping,. what is the reason for not punishing those trust owners who own building, why not force them to redevelop those old buildings, after buildings fall people there will die than will u force, till than sleep and keep taking bribes, all over, shame on such government just sleeping now vote time comes than come out to beg for votes, why people are also silent on this cant understand
Free Helpline
Legal Credit