Moneylife IMPACT: I-T dept asks officials to use official email IDs

Income Tax officials that were seeking tax details on their Gmail and Yahoo! email IDs would henceforth use only official email IDs for official communication

The Income-Tax (I-T) department has directed all of its officials to use official email IDs for all official communication. Moneylife had raised the issue of I-T officials sending mails to taxpayers using IDs from free email service providers like Gmail and Yahoo!.

 

In a circular, issued on 27 September 2013, the Directorate of I-T, has said, "Since official IDs are available with most of the Departmental Officers, it is instructed that hereinafter all official communication(s) on mail shall be only through the official email IDs detailed above. In the event that an official email is required to be sent urgently and the official email ID not available, the official IDs of the Commissioners of I-T (CsI-T) or Directors of I-T (DsI-T) may be utilised for the same.”

 

As Moneylife pointed out one of the I-T officers sent a reminder to a wealthy individual to pay his advance tax in time and send details to his Gmail email address.

 

Here is the circular issued by the I-T department...
 

Like this story? Get our top stories by email.

User

COMMENTS

SKRISHNAN

3 years ago

Some little known facts about Service Tax:
According to provisional figures the Service Tax Collection during 2013-14 was Rs.1, 54,780crores. It was observed that actual collection of Service Tax fell short of the budget estimates by 14.08% during FY 14. Further while the collection against the arrears of Rs. 20,361 crores at the beginning of the F.Y 13, was Rs.2,332 crores (11.4%) the collection against the arrears of Rs. 39,557 crores during F.Y.14, was only Rs.1232 crores (3.12%) indicating that while the arrears had increased considerably the recovery rate had fallen drastically. It is however important to note that in almost all cases of arrears, the Service Tax would already have been collected by the Service Provider from the Service Receiver!-Source: CAG's Report
S.Krishnan

SKRISHNAN

3 years ago

Who is interested in the Bhavishyavani of "ÄCHE DHIN ARAHE HEN". Let us ask in Kishore's melodious voice "Kal khya hoga kisne jana"
We however see and hear everyday what is happening today. It was all right for Omar Khayyam to say "Unborn tomorrow and dead yesterday,why fret about them, if today be sweet! If today is not sweet we have necessarily to bemoan what happened yesterday and worry about what more is going to happen tomorrow and the day after and so on. So let us solve today's problem first before we think of the faraway ache dhin! Don't let us be led away by the"brave music of a distant drum"!
S.KRISHNAN

TIHARwale

5 years ago

why only Income Tax Dept officials, all Govt and Public Sector officials should use authorised e mails only and additionally all Depts should display the mail ID of helpline of the organisation who in turn should provide email ID of specific Depts within the organisation ( because most of the organisation web sites don't display the mail administrators mail ID so that their assistance can be sought, also Deptartmental ID is needed in addition to individual ID so that if Individual is not in seat , nails will still go to Dept Heads so that contents of messages are followed up. It is also seen Dist Courts don't have mail IDs of Dist Judges to whose notice shortfalls in functioning of sub ordinate courts can be brought on record for remedial action. Just have more clarity see the web site of Election Commission of India or Central Vigilance Commission one will see how informative is their site.

Builders must pay VAT on under construction flats says Supreme Court

The Supreme Court upheld the Bombay High Court’s verdict that asked builders to pay 5% value added tax -VAT for under construction flats sold during 20 June 2006 to 31 March 2010.

The Supreme Court had ruled that value added tax (VAT) cannot be imposed on buyers and builders, developers have to pay the tax (5%) for under construction flats sold during 20 June 2006 to 31 March 2010. The apex court also clarified that VAT is not payable, if a fully constructed flat is sold to the buyer and builders will be liable to pay tax only on cost of construction.
 

However, there are chances that builder will recover these charges from buyers by adding it in costs and it will only create litigations between builders and buyers.
 

Earlier, citing a circular issued by the Maharashtra Sales Tax Department, builders were asking flat buyers to pay the additional money before 31 October 2012 for their homes bought between 2006 and 2010. However, several consumer organizations like the Grahak Panchayat had maintained that it is the builder, developer who will have to pay VAT and not flat buyers.
 

The Supreme Court order will have a direct impact on realtors from Karnataka, Maharashtra and Uttar Pradesh. The order also empowers all state government to issue circulars to levy VAT. Maharashtra government had issued a circular in 2006, and subsequently in 2007 levied a VAT of 5% on sale of flats.
 

The Supreme Court had clubbed 14 appeals from Karnataka and 12 from Maharashtra. Verdict means that developers in states such as Maharashtra, Uttar Pradesh and Karnataka, where VAT has been levied on such transactions will have to pay the charges. Builders were trying to recover this amount from the buyers.
 

Although, the state governments and even High Court has said that developers have to pay VAT, several were reluctant to pay the tax.
 

Advocate General for Maharashtra clearly stated, “Implementation of Rule 58(1-A ) of Maharashtra VAT shall not result in double taxation and in any case all claims of alleged double taxation will be determined in the process of assessment of each individual case." As builders have already paid taxes for raw materials and this may create issues of double taxation. However MVAT rule 58 (1-A) provides deduction of expenses on labour and service charges for the execution of the work related to the goods that has already been transferred.
 

Earlier, builders’ association CREDAI had approached the apex court after the Bombay High Court rejected their plea to impose only 1% VAT. In 2006, the state government imposed a VAT of 5% on constructions made between 2006 and 2010. The move resulted in an additional tax liability on flats, shops and bungalows sold by developers between 20 June 2006, and 31 March 2010.
 

To know more about VAT read, VAT on sale of under-construction flats in Maharashtra: All you need to know

User

COMMENTS

Gaurav Goyal

4 years ago

purchased flat in oct 13 of rs 4100000 including service tax, paid 600000 as booking amount enterted into aggrement for apply of loan, loan sanctioned in a month paid rs 1200000 as part payment ,after three mont another payment of rs 500000 after two month rs 500000 part payment total 2800000 has been paid now the bulder offer final payment and includes 5% vat on 41 lac who has to pay and on what amount.

Finance ministry notifies safe harbour rules

The ‘safe harbour’ rules would ensure certainty in taxation of overseas transactions between related parties and reduce transfer pricing-related cases

In a move aims to curtail tax-related disputes with multinational corporations (MNCs) operating in India, the finance ministry has notified ‘safe harbour’ rules. These rules are easier than those announced in a draft and would ensure certainty in taxation of overseas transactions between related parties and reduce transfer pricing-related cases.

 

"This is a welcome move. It reflects the fact that the Indian Government has its ears to the ground and is listening to the taxpayers and softening the disparity between the transfer pricing positions adopted by the revenue officials and the taxpayers to the extent feasible," said Fatema Hunaid, partner for tax and regulatory services- transfer pricing at Grant Thornton India LLP.

 

This follows a slew of transfer pricing disputes with many MNCs in the past year, which had hurt the investment environment.

 

The new rules will be applicable for five years beginning from Assessment Year 2013-14.

 

Safe harbour rules lay down the framework within which the Income Tax authority shall accept the transfer price declared by the taxpayer. Here, taxpayers follow a simple set of rules/margins under which transfer prices are automatically accepted by the Income Tax authorities.

 

Transfer pricing, or the value at which companies trade products, services, shares or assets between units across borders, is a regular part of doing business for a multinational. According to experts, transfer pricing is used by companies to minimise their tax payouts.

 

Hunaid said, "The rules seem like a condensed Advanced Pricing Agreement (APA) kind of mechanism for the taxpayers (IT, ITES, KPO and auto-components manufacturers, intra-group outbound loans and corporate guarantees).  Notwithstanding the similarity of the safe harbour rules with the APA regime, these do not have the trappings of a regular APA program and is quite real-time and cost effective in providing a fast-track transfer pricing certainty to the taxpayers so to say."

 

The rules also provide for an almost real-time audit by the revenue officials regarding the eligibility of the safe harbour claim of the taxpayers. The taxpayers have now also been provided with a resolution mechanism in case their claim is objected to by the revenue officials. This heralds real-time course correction by the taxpayers as against waiting for the normal period of three to four years from the end of the relevant financial year for a normal scrutiny audit to take place.

 

The other key highlights of the final safe harbour rules are that the turnover ceiling of Rs100 crore for IT/ITES has been removed entirely, thereby making this route available to the industry as a whole. A differential safe harbour profit margin declaration of 20% for below Rs500 crore and 22% for above Rs500 crore has been prescribed.  Another positive outcome for Knowledge Process Outsourcing (KPO) services in the final rules is that the initial profit margin of 30% has now been reduced to 25% and the definition has also been rationalised to remove regular Business Process Outsourcing (BPO) activities.

User

We are listening!

Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.
  Loading...
Close

To continue


Please
Sign Up or Sign In
with

Email
Close

To continue


Please
Sign Up or Sign In
with

Email

BUY NOW

online financial advisory
Pathbreakers
Pathbreakers 1 & Pathbreakers 2 contain deep insights, unknown facts and captivating events in the life of 51 top achievers, in their own words.
online financia advisory
The Scam
24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
Moneylife Online Magazine
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
financial magazines online
Stockletters in 3 Flavours
Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
financial magazines in india
MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
(Includes Moneylife Online Magazine)