Modicare: All Sound and Fury...
The big take-away from the Union Budget 2018 was the mega National Health Protection Scheme that is probably aimed at getting Modi sarkar through the 2019 general elections. The programme, dubbed as Modicare, is already claimed to be the largest government-funded healthcare scheme in the world by providing a cover of Rs5 lakh to 100 million families (or 500 million Indians) for secondary and tertiary care. 
 
Typical of this government, the scheme is tall on claims and short on details. Only Rs2,000 crore has been provided for the grand plan in the Budget, but that has not stopped acolytes and apologists claiming it to be a game-changer, while detractors are calling it another jumla (empty statement). And, yet, no political party would dare to oppose a scheme that promises much-needed healthcare to our poorest people. 
 
Will Modicare work and be a game-changer? It is too early to say, except that there are too many contradictions and questions. Over the past four years, the Narendra Modi government has demonstrated its ability to ram through big and audacious programmes but has fallen far short on implementation. Demonetisation and the Goods and Services Tax (GST), with its many glitches and frequent change in rules, caused immense hardship and anger by treating people like guinea pigs. The government adamantly refuses to admit to any flaws in the mega unique identification programme (Aadhaar), despite sickening reports of denial of benefits and rights, data leaks and faulty implementation every other day. 
 
When it comes to Modicare, puffery and media management is giving us different signals. On the one hand, an interview by Union health minister, JP Nadda, to The Economic Times suggests that the scheme is still being designed and will evolve over the next six months or longer. He told the newspaper that the best practices of various state governments that already have large healthcare schemes, will be studied to see “how the programme can best reach the masses.” They may also be persuaded to subsume their schemes into Modicare and then “a separate body will be put together to run the programme on mission mode.” This suggests a big-bang launch and media blitzkrieg just before the election code comes into operation, whose reach will be limited by the Budget allocation for it. 
 
In complete contrast to what the health minister has said, Firstpost.com claims that a 28-page report titled “Universal Access and Quality” was prepared by top bureaucrats, way back in 2016, under the direct supervision of the prime minister. The report,  it says “clearly stated that the government must provide health protection to 10 crore deprived families as per the Socio-Economic Caste Census (SECC) absolutely free of cost.” Why then is the health minister saying that the scheme is still being formulated, two years later? 
 
Writing for the Scroll, T Sundaraman, a healthcare expert, points out that a smaller version of Modicare “was, in fact, announced in the 2016 Budget—the only difference being that the sum assured was raised from Rs30,000 to Rs1.5 lakh then and to Rs5 lakh now. The scheme has not been operationalised in the last two years. Moreover, not even 50% of the funds under the existing health cover scheme have been spent in the past year.” 
 
Dr Sunil Nandraj, a former advisor to the health ministry, has written that the government is already struggling with the Rashtriya Swasthya Bima Yojana (RSBY) which offered a Rs30,000-cover to 36 million people. 
The issue is: What kind of healthcare infrastructure is really being offered to 100 million people? Ultimately, won’t Modicare depend on the creaky government healthcare system or the massive corruption, malpractices, pass-backs, unnecessary procedures and extortive costs of private healthcare? There have been several hard-hitting books such as Dissenting Diagnosis and The Ethical Doctor that have exposed the rot in India’s healthcare system from within and also suggested practical reform. 
 
Serious corrective action and a clean-up of the healthcare industry ought to precede the roll-out of a massive, insurance-based, national healthcare programme; but this will take ages. The timing is so close to the general elections that this is wishful thinking. 
 
Dr Arvind Mayaram, former finance secretary
 
So far, the government has only tried to cut costs by fiat. Last year, people cheered the dramatic 80% cut in the cost of cardiac stents and price control over several medicines. But this effort, to force down costs, has also had mixed results, with hospitals hiking up the cost of consumables and manufacturers squeezing supply. Media reports suggest that a rethink on costs is in the offing amidst hectic lobbying by the industry. 
 
The poor need free primary healthcare as much or more than secondary and tertiary healthcare. Modicare requires availability of high-quality medical and diagnostic facilities within reach in small towns and villages of India which covers 70% of the population. Otherwise, the costs in bringing patients to hospitals will be prohibitive for many poor families. The Budget announced the Ayushman Bharat Programme to develop 150,000 health and wellness centres which is also only a proposal. 
 
There is nothing to indicate that India can circumvent the pathetic public health infrastructure with public-private partnerships anytime soon. In fact, global experience suggests that government schemes are only a bonanza for the private sector and escalate healthcare costs for all. 
 
Moreover, researchers, who have studied the RSBY of 2008, covering five persons per household below the poverty line (BPL), found severe problems with its implementation and corruption; over half the households enrolled were not even BPL. A health secretary in Maharashtra had expressed concern about needless surgeries (mainly bypass surgeries and hysterectomies) being performed due to the funding available under such schemes; but this has not even been studied in detail. 
 
While the poor suffer enormously, due to absence of healthcare facilities and costs, the middle-class has borne the brunt of medical malpractice, galloping healthcare and insurance costs as well as rampant mis-selling of products. Other than a small set of organised sector employees who benefit from corporate group insurance policies, the majority of Indians have three big financial worries for their families—housing, education and healthcare. 
 
Action to regulate the insurance industry has always been slow and inadequate; grievance redress is poor (all 17 posts of the insurance ombudsman in India are currently vacant) and affordable coverage for senior citizens remains a serious issue with insurers brazenly circumventing regulation to double insurance premiums in this segment.
 
As if this is not bad enough, the middle-class also pays an indirect price when the exchequer covers the losses of existing schemes. For instance, the Pradhan Mantri Suraksha Bima Yojana, an accidental death and disability cover with 130 million subscribers, has a 200%+ claims ratio. Insurers were told to hold premium at Rs12 per year for three years and it is now likely to treble.
 
If, as claimed, the government’s vision is to provide universal life and health assurance to citizens “with defined standards of services and at affordable rates,” a lot more work is required. So far, there isn’t enough groundwork to make the big healthcare announcement very credible and it does appear more like election bombast. 
 
Also, while one set of bureaucrats, led by the current finance secretary, is credited with formulating Modicare, here is what former finance secretary, Dr Arvind Mayaram (who was shunted out to tourism ministry in 2016), tweeted immediately after the Budget speech on 1st February: “Universal health insurance through private hospitals has not worked for the poor anywhere. The biggest beneficiaries are the private hospitals and insurance companies. There is no substitute for public healthcare. More money should have been pumped to strengthen it.” 
  • Like this story? Get our top stories by email.

    User

    COMMENTS

    Silloo Marker

    2 years ago

    The Modicare program announced in the budget is actually just a political gimmick to fool people into voting for the BJP in 2019. Just look around at the poor who don't even have enough to get a small room in a slum. They live on pavements all over the city, some drunk, some just plain sick. Ever wondered how these people, mostly unwashed, illiterate, could ever hope to get medical help? Mr. Modi really thinks you can fool everybody all the time. He needs to put across more a more detailed plan before the public if he really cares for the poor. Primary health centres need to be overhauled and made attractive enough to young doctors to devote their time there at least for a few years. Right now, most of them just try to change their postings to a big city where more money can be made. The government cannot just bulldoze people into doing what they choose not to do. More incentives have to be provided for things to work. Even if our PM was a saint as his cronies would have us believe, he needs to do his homework if he wants to implement even a fraction of the health for all scheme successfully.

    MOHAN SIROYA

    2 years ago

    Modi Caree is like a story of two lovers. Boy promises to bring MOON for her if she marries him . Is this not suffice ? Well then the girl falls for the bet .Marraige is
    going to take place in 2019.

    SuchindranathAiyerS

    2 years ago

    Obama sold Modi two things. Tolerance i.e. appeasement and Obama Care. The Devil in Modi Care is in the Money. There isn’t enough money to do the job. That IS the detail. No other detalil will be forthcoming in thehope this Jamela is forgotten like “Equality under law”, Uniform Civil Code and so many other promises.

    REPLY

    MOHAN SIROYA

    In Reply to SuchindranathAiyerS 2 years ago

    Apart from Money, where is the required infrastructure ?

    Meenal Mamdani

    2 years ago

    All the points in the article are very valid. Let us assume that people bring BJP back to power but with a much smaller margin. What then happens to Modicare?
    Will the govt still be interested in pursuing this scheme? Will it start pilot projects with varying criteria in several states and then analyze the data to see which works best?
    This should appeal to Modi who would like to claim that his policies are scientifically analyzed before being propagated nationwide.
    Look, we don't have a credible opposition so even if it captures the central govt, we may get worse schemes.
    We might as well shame this govt into improving the schemes it is proposing as the alternative is worse.

    Treasury benches disrupt RS, opposition says government shying away from debate
    Members from the treasury benches on Thursday disrupted the Rajya Sabha and forced an adjournment by shouting slogans and coming into the aisle as Congress MP P. Chidambaram stood up to speak on the Budget in the post-lunch sitting.
     
    The opposition accused the government of running away from a debate on the Budget.
     
    As soon as the House met at 2 p.m., the Chair called out Chidambaram's name who was scheduled to speak on the Union Budget. As Chidambaram, a former Finance Minister stood up to speak, some members from the treasury benches stood up and started making noise.
     
    A minute later, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Ananth Kumar walked into the House. Kumar, after taking his seat, was seen gesturing at the ruling party MPs all of whom then stood up and trooped into the aisle.
     
    Leader of Opposition Ghulam Nabi Azad told Ananth Kumar that it did not behove the treasury benches members to disturb the House.
     
    "Mr Parliamentary Affairs Minister, with a great difficulty the Chairman and the opposition parties succeeded after a great deal of discussion since yesterday in deciding that this House should function. And this time not a single opposition member got up," Azad said.
     
    "For the first time, the ruling party does not want to discuss the government business. This is a total failure of the government," he added.
     
    Kumar replied that Azad's accusations were not right as the members (who were making noise) had "every right" to raise their issues.
     
    "The Leader of Opposition is unnecessarily accusing that we do not want to run the House. We want to have a fruitful debate on the Budget. But if there are issues pertaining to the members, they have every right to raise their issues," Kumar said.
     
    However, it soon became clear that the ruling party MPs were creating the ruckus on purpose.
     
    "The Leader of Opposition should also advise his colleagues in Lok Sabha that when the Prime Minister was giving reply to President's address (on Wednesday), they did not allow the Prime Minister to speak. They should have advised Rahul Gandhi and Mallikarjun Kharge. They did not try to stop their members from protesting," Kumar said.
     
    "They want to disturb the Prime Minister in Lok Sabha and want support of the House when they speak in Rajya Sabha," he added.
     
    Trinamool Congress MP Derek O'Brien said that the BJP and the NDA members were disturbing the House as they "do not have facts to face the opposition".
     
    "Come and debate with us," O'Brien said.
     
    Kumar said that for disruption in the Lok Sabha during the Prime Minister's reply, the Congress should apologise to the Prime Minister and the nation.
     
    Senior Congress leader Anand Sharma said that it was "most unfortunate" that the Parliamentary Affairs Minister was "inciting" the members of the treasury benches.
     
    T.K. Rangarajan, who was presiding, adjourned the House for 10 minutes.
     
    Disclaimer: Information, facts or opinions expressed in this news article are presented as sourced from IANS and do not reflect views of Moneylife and hence Moneylife is not responsible or liable for the same. As a source and news provider, IANS is responsible for accuracy, completeness, suitability and validity of any information in this article.
     

     

  • User

    Will deal with Ram Mandir-Babri Masjid case as pure land dispute: SC
    The Supreme Court on Thursday said it will deal with the Ram Mandir-Babri Masjid case as a pure land dispute and refused to hear it on day-to-day basis.
     
    A bench of Chief Justice Dipak Misra, Justice Ashok Bhushan and Justice S. Abdul Nazeer refused appellants' plea for day to day hearing, saying "over 700 poor litigants are waiting for justice, we have to hear them".
     
    Posting the next hearing for March 14, it asked parties in the case to file translated copies of the documents before it.
     
    The court was hearing a batch of cross petitions challenging 2010 Allahabad High Court verdict that had divided the disputed Babri Masjid-Ramjanambhoomi site between the Nirmohi Akhara, Lord Ram deity and the Sunni Waqf Board.
     
    The top court was moved challenging the High Court verdict by petitioners M. Siddiqui represented by his legal heirs, the Nirmohi Akhara, the UP Sunni Central Waqf Board, Bhagwan Shri Ram Virajman, All India Hindu Mahasabha's Swami Chakrapani, the Akhil Bharat Hindu Mahasabha, the Akhil Bharatiya Sri Ramjanam Bhoomi Punardhar Samiti and others.
     
    Disclaimer: Information, facts or opinions expressed in this news article are presented as sourced from IANS and do not reflect views of Moneylife and hence Moneylife is not responsible or liable for the same. As a source and news provider, IANS is responsible for accuracy, completeness, suitability and validity of any information in this article.
  • User

    We are listening!

    Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.
      Loading...
    Close

    To continue


    Please
    Sign Up or Sign In
    with

    Email
    Close

    To continue


    Please
    Sign Up or Sign In
    with

    Email

    BUY NOW

    online financial advisory
    Pathbreakers
    Pathbreakers 1 & Pathbreakers 2 contain deep insights, unknown facts and captivating events in the life of 51 top achievers, in their own words.
    online financia advisory
    The Scam
    24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
    Moneylife Online Magazine
    Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
    financial magazines online
    Stockletters in 3 Flavours
    Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
    financial magazines in india
    MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
    (Includes Moneylife Online Magazine)
    FREE: Your Complete Family Record Book
    Keep all the Personal and Financial Details of You & Your Family. In One Place So That`s Its Easy for Anyone to Find Anytime
    We promise not to share your email id with anyone