Public Interest   Exclusive
Maheshwar Peri, Chairman of Careers360, vanquishes IIPM in court
After a long and bruising legal battle - both civil and criminal - across several states, Maheshwar Peri's dogged persistence and staying power has led a big victory for freedom of the press and will protect students who have long been misled by IIPM's advertisements in every publication. In the course of the battle, IIPM closed its many campuses and chose to withdraw all cases against Peri, when the matter reached the Supreme Court 
It is a big victory, not merely for Maheshwar Peri, but for all the students and parents who were lured by the fake claims of Indian Institute of Planning and Management (IIPM) and its poly-tailed, self-proclaimed economic guru Arindam Chaudhuri. IIPM’s strategy was to gag the media — sweeten large newspapers with advertisements and viciously target smaller publications with court cases filed all over India. But Maheshwar Peri, chairman and chief executive of Careers360, decided to take on Chaudhuri and IIPM and fight each of the cases filed against his publication. After IIPM lost a couple of important battles, he sought a transfer of all the cases to the Supreme Court; that is when IIPM capitulated and withdrew all the cases on 22 January 2016.
But even before that, a hard hitting order by the Delhi High Court had forced IIPM to shut down many of its campuses and to stop making false claims. People may recall how Arindam Chaudhuri, a big advertiser in the mainline media, puffed himself up with claims to be an economist, best-selling author (Count Your Chickens Before They Hatch), film maker (delivered a flop). He also set up events and seminars, which saw Bollywood stars (Shah Rukh Khan), top bureaucrats and politicians in attendance, enhancing his credibility and luring students to enrol for his management courses. This also allowed him to get away with the most audacious claims and actions - at one time he claimed to be setting up a campus at Boston near Harvard, to give the Ivy League university a run. He also tried to create a fake equivalence by claiming to be better than the Indian Institutes of Management (IIMs).
And yet, IIPM was never even recognised by either All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE) or by University Grants Commission (UGC).
This carried on for decades while the mainstream media chose to remain silent because of his generous advertisements.  It finally took one man's willingness to brave 50 court hearings, bear the eight figure costs and intimidation to bring down the dubious empire.
Before being dragged by Peri to the Supreme Court, Chaudhuri and IIPM had lost four cases, one each in Uttarakhand High Court and Punjab & Haryana High Court and two in Delhi High Court
Chaudhuri and IIPM have been penalised and criticised several times by the High Courts. In September 2014, the Delhi High Court, while slapping a cost of Rs25,000 on IIPM for misleading students, restrained IIPM from publishing advertisements as a management and business institute. While IIPM and Chaudhuri had filed or fought cases till the High Court level, they surprisingly never ever challenged any order passed at this level before apex court.
The Delhi HC order says, “In our opinion, the aforesaid is clearly a maze created by the respondent No.4 (IIPM) to entrap students to enlist with it in the hope of acquiring a qualification which the respondent No.4 (IIPM) is not entitled to confer and thereby enriching the respondent No.4 (IIPM) to a considerable extent as is evident from the huge expenditure earlier as well as now being incurred by the respondent No.4 (IIPM) in publicity in print and electronic media.”
"There were two more cased pending in Guwahati. When me moved to the apex court, armed with these wins (in HCs), they probably decided not to challenge as the verdict may be adverse than the HC decision and withdrew the cases," Peri says.
While asking Chaudhuri to prominently display on IIPM website that they are not recognised by any statutory body or authority to offer courses, the Delhi HC Bench said, "IIPM and its management or officials including its dean Arindam Chaudhuri are restrained with immediate effect from using the word 'MBA, BBA, management course, management school, business school or B-school' in relation to the courses or programmes being conducted by them or in relation to the representations if any made to the public". 
In the order issued on 22 January 2016, the Supreme Court Bench of Justices Jagdish Singh Khehar and C Nagappan, said, "Learned counsel for respondent nos. 1 and 2 (IIPM & Others) states, that he has been in instructed to inform this Court, that respondent nos. 1 and 2 have decided to withdraw the proceedings, which are subject matter of transfer in the present petitions. The statement made by Mr Arunabh Chowdhury, Advocate is taken on record. In view of the above, the instant transfer petitions do not survive, and these are accordingly disposed of."
Arindam Chaudhuri-led IIPM had filed multiple civil and criminal defamation cases against Pathfinder Publishing Pvt Ltd, the publisher of Careers360 and Maheshwer Peri, across different places. "I lost count of the number of cases I defended myself against. At one point, there were 14 matters that I was seized of at different levels, in different courts on different counts," Peri says.
He is reportedly have made appearance in over 50 court hearings. He says, "When we did carry the series of three articles in 2009, we never imagined the assault would be so severe. There was a case in Delhi where I along with the promoter of Outlook (his family including wife and children) were dragged in. Later the Delhi High Court struck off the names of the (Outlook) promoter and his family members. There was a case in Gurgaon where me along with my mentor (Rajesh Jain) were dragged in a criminal case. This case was challenged in the Punjab & Haryana High Court, which quashed it in September 2015." 
"Then there was a case in Uttarakhand where I, my editor and my wife (in her capacity as director) had bailable warrant issued against us for non-appearance. This is on a case where we never received any summons. My dear wife courageously told me that she was ok being jailed as long as she has me for company in her cell. The Uttarakhand High Court quashed this case famously saying 'The common expression in a Court room is 'Satyamev Jayate'- Truth shall triumph. Truth is also the best defence in a case of defamation. A truth spoken for public good can never be called defamatory'," he added.
Peri was also slapped with Rs100 crore defamation case by IIPM. He says, "This was a case in Kamrup (Assam), a civil defamation case worth Rs100 crore, which made one probable investor back-out of investing in Careers360 even without understanding the nature of the case. There was a contempt petition too in the same court."
In the meantime, according to Peri, Arindam Chaudhuri carried a cover story in his magazine titled 'B-School scamsters exposed", which charged Careers360 of demanding money to give ranks to B-Schools. "This cover story made multiple charges against me, my integrity and character. It called 'Careers360' a yellow journal. When I think of each of them, my blood boils. It was meant to harass us, bully us and make us submit to their whims. The article insulted us, humiliated us and meant to destroy Careers360."
"It had a chilling effect on every other journalist in the country. Newspapers like Indian Express fell silent after trying to take it up. Even at Outlook, one incapable administration in-charge tried to get into a 'settlement' behind my back. It all fell apart because I refused to concede my rights as Publisher of Careers360. But for a supportive boss at Outlook, friends, understanding Angels and a great mentor, Careers360 would not have survived the onslaught. It was a battle between David and Goliath. It was just that I was a determined David," Peri says.
According to Peri, for some time during that period, IIPM was looking out for a settlement. He sent a message to Arindam Chaudhuri. The message reads, "Arindam, Please do what is good for you. Don't do favours as I never sought them. That will help you take the right decision. I have fought your cases for 6 years and will continue to do so. I never seek favours nor am I silent when I am needed to speak up. That is my DNA. For me, this battle is long over. I am only defending myself against your false accusations. I have much work to do and you are nowhere on my radar. The battle with you is long over. If you have learnt anything in the past 5 years, I am the happiest."
Peri says he was clear about one thing that he will defend himself as long as the cases would go on. "The only way out was for all cases against me to be withdrawn unconditionally. The battle started in courts and must end in courts but not in board rooms," he added.
In December 2015, Peri along with Pathfinder Publishing filed a case in the Supreme Court accusing IIPM for abuse of judicial process and also requested transfer of all cases in the North-East before the apex court. They contended that all the parties are located in Delhi and the subject matter of the cases in Assam has been adjudicated in Delhi, Uttarakhand and Chandigarh, so it should be heard together before the SC.
He said, "It seems that IIPM and its promoter have become wise. They realised that the fight will lead to another adverse order, another loss. And an order from the Supreme Court can be crippling. Remember what happened to Sahara? So, on 22 January 2016, on the day of the hearing, they decided to withdraw all cases against me that were pending in Kamrup and by extension, in Guwahati High Court. I was also informed that they also withdrew all cases against Outlook pending in various Delhi courts".
"...after six years of exhausting battle and legal costs that ran into eight figures, closes all my battles with IIPM. Lawyers are advising me to charge them with malicious litigation. I neither have love nor hate. I am immune to any negative feelings. I am cold. It is over. And this is my last word on IIPM, for I have loads if work to do before I sleep, miles to go before I sleep," Peri concluded the note on his Facebook page.
Earlier in May 2014, the UGC issued a circular informing public at large and students that IIPM was not a recognised university and cannot award MBA/BBA degrees. "As per Section 22 of the UGC Act, 1956, the IIPM does not have the right to conferring or granting degrees as specified by the UGC under Section 22 (3). It is further clarified for information that IIPM is neither entitled to award MBA/ BBA. BCA degree nor it is recognised by UGC," the Commission said in an advertisement dated 18 May 2014.
  • Like this story? Get our top stories by email.



    Ponnu Duraiswamy

    3 years ago

    So where is this jerk Arindam Chaudhary now? And has the great SRK tender any apology?

    Joseph Korah

    4 years ago

    God bless you Mr. Maheshwar Peri. Though you had a very tough fight you have finally won!! By proving that IIPM was a big fraudulent Organisation you have saved the future of many students and saved them from wasting their parent's money.

    J Pinto

    4 years ago

    Why is Arindam not in Jail for outright fraud ? Swachha Bharat should sweep away this filth from our societies.

    Even in Pakistan a "software company" called Axact did the same thing and the promoter is in Jail. Of course he was exposed by the foreign press and not his own.

    Leslie Menezes

    4 years ago

    A BIG SAUTE to Peri Jee... but it leaves the judiciary in a bad light. The judiciary needs to recognise such fraudsters and take suo moto action against them for defrauding society. One such action will prevent thousand fraudsters . IIPM may be one such case there are thousands of smaller ones who defraud the gullible

    Satish Janipalli

    4 years ago

    Hats off to Mr. Maheshwar Peri.
    Looks like he's battle weary ....if its 8 figure expense ..then someone in the stature of Mr.Maheshwar Peri's Guru should insist Mr.Maheshwar Peri to file a case ( I donot know of the Court jargon) and get the money back . It will be the final Justice to him and his Friends who stood by him .

    there's a dialogue in the much acclaimed "the insider" movie ....something I remember vaguely ...."they say you put Edward R. Murrow to shame.."......same goes to the group that knowingly did not report or act or least support Mr.Maheshwar Peri. Hope I get a chance to meet Mr. Maheshwar Peri in person , to know more about his steely resolve.


    4 years ago

    as regards the claim of Maheshwar Peri that "where we never received any summons" this happens that persons manning lower judiciary are highly compromised and many a times courts are known to entertain cheap false cases. No one can deny IIPM is a finishing school which gave confidence to many a youngsters to wear a tie and converse in English confidently

    Sarala Kurup Jagan

    4 years ago


    Between poseurs like these and
    those raising their hoods in JNU .... the indian education falters. The true educators don't stand a chance against the weeds.They spread like wild fire and eat at the roots of what should fundamentally be a mode of generating thought, questions , answers and debates.Money is just an incidental factor in the whole process.All who demean education need such Davids...may his tribe increase....

    nilesh prabhu

    4 years ago

    Great Job, standing up to a bully.

    Any one with a bit of common sense would have known that it was an unrecognized institution.

    Why were the establishment silent?


    4 years ago

    Hats off to you, Mr Peri.

    Your resilience and patience has finally paid off. Kudos to your untiring efforts in bringing the 'influential' fraudsters to book. Truly appreciated Sir.

    Satyameva Jayate !!

    Manoj R Golikeri.
    Jogeshwari, Mumbai.

    Parimal Shah

    4 years ago

    Mr Peri should now lodge a case of defamation and frivolous complaint against Arindam and seek compensation of 1000 crore for the defamation through IIPM journal and mental agony through all theose cases.


    4 years ago


    Raja Laks

    4 years ago

    For someone who went through hell in Indian court, believe me even though you win the case you actually loose valuable time, money and work.

    Its only advocates who ultimately win.

    Six percent DA hike for central government staff
    New Delhi : The central government on Wednesday hiked the dearness allowance for its employees by six percent.
    Making the announcement, union Telecom Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad said the decision is in tune with the 6th Pay Commission recommendations.
    The higher DA to employees will cost the exchequer an additional Rs.6,796.50 crore and Rs.799.24 crore more on account of relief for persioners from 2016-17.
    Disclaimer: Information, facts or opinions expressed in this news article are presented as sourced from IANS and do not reflect views of Moneylife and hence Moneylife is not responsible or liable for the same. As a source and news provider, IANS is responsible for accuracy, completeness, suitability and validity of any information in this article.
  • User

    Headley says Rana opposed his links with LeT
    Mumbai : Pakistani-American terrorist-turned-approver David Coleman Headley on Wednesday claimed that his associate Tahawwur Rana was opposed to his (Headley's) links with the terror group Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT).
    Headley, 56, said that Pakistani national Rana -- who ran an immigration consultancy in Chicago, US, had knowledge that he worked as an operative of the LeT.
    The revelation came during Headley's cross-examination by Abdul Wahab Khan, lawyer of another alleged LeT terror operative Abu Jundal, before the Special Court of Judge G.A. Sanap, via video-conferencing from a US jail where he his serving a 35-year sentence.
    "Rana was aware of my association with LeT and I informed him about the training imparted to me by LeT operatives. I also told Rana that I was spying for LeT... That must be around four-five months before the 26/11 Mumbai terror attacks," Headley told Khan.
    "Rana had objected to my association with LeT... He asked me to stop using his office in Mumbai. I conceded to his objections and took steps to close down the office in July 2008," Headley added.
    When asked by lawyer Khan about his business activities and the income from it, Headley said he had invested in it by buying four-five shops in the United Arab Emirates.
    To a question whether the LeT funded him for his various activities, Headley countered by revealing that actually it was he (Headley) who donated money to the terror group.
    "It was for various things and I have donated round Pakistani rupees six-seven million, the last being in 2010," Headley informed the court when asked whether his funding was used for terror acts.
    However, Headley declined to answer questions posed about his wife Shazia, with whom he continues to be legally wedded.
    "She never visited India... I had informed her about my association with the LeT. Originally, she is from Pakistan, I don't want to disclose Shazia's present location... I will not answer any questions about her," he made it clear to Khan.
    On her reaction to his disclosures, Headley said he did not want to speak about it.
    "It (reaction) is between me and her... It's our personal relation and don't want to disclose whether she objected or not or what she said," Headley said, adding that she was aware of his plans to change his name from Dawood Gilani to David Coleman Headley.
    When Khan persisted on questions about Shazia, Special Public Prosecutor Ujjwal Nikam objected and pointed out that under Indian Evidence Act Section 122, the communication between a husband-wife is a privileged one and need not be disclosed.
    Headley's cross-examination, which was due to start Tuesday was taken up on Wednesday after his weeklong deposition was conducted in February.
    Disclaimer: Information, facts or opinions expressed in this news article are presented as sourced from IANS and do not reflect views of Moneylife and hence Moneylife is not responsible or liable for the same. As a source and news provider, IANS is responsible for accuracy, completeness, suitability and validity of any information in this article.
  • User

    We are listening!

    Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.

    To continue

    Sign Up or Sign In


    To continue

    Sign Up or Sign In



    online financial advisory
    Pathbreakers 1 & Pathbreakers 2 contain deep insights, unknown facts and captivating events in the life of 51 top achievers, in their own words.
    online financia advisory
    The Scam
    24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
    Moneylife Online Magazine
    Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
    financial magazines online
    Stockletters in 3 Flavours
    Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
    financial magazines in india
    MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
    (Includes Moneylife Online Magazine)
    FREE: Your Complete Family Record Book
    Keep all the Personal and Financial Details of You & Your Family. In One Place So That`s Its Easy for Anyone to Find Anytime
    We promise not to share your email id with anyone