IRDA health insurance guidelines help cumulative bonus and claim in overlapping policy periods

IRDA health insurance guidelines issued last month will ensure that your cumulative bonus does not go down to zero after you file a claim. Claim in overlapping policy periods will get benefit of available sum insured in the two policy periods. Will the insured misuse it for planned hospitalisation?

Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA) health insurance guidelines addresses several issues like lifelong renewals, special provisions for senior citizens, transparency in premium and claims based loading as well as restricting role of TPA to claims processing and not settlement. Other important change includes ensuring that your no-claims-bonus (NCB) does not go down to zero if you lodge a claim. Claim in overlapping policy period will benefit from having sum insured in the two policy periods being available to pay your hospital bill.

 

NCB change – IRDA health insurance guidelines states that insurers may offer cumulative bonuses on indemnity based health insurance policies (mediclaim), which shall be stated explicitly in the prospectus and the policy document. If a claim is made in any particular year, the cumulative bonus accrued may be reduced at the same rate at which it is accrued. Cumulative bonus shall not be allowed on benefit based policies.

 

The new change will surely help mediclaim policyholders. But, will insurance companies be keen to offer NCB at all? Some insurance companies have dropped the NCB feature and possibly more will follow as the policyholder will not fear filing low value claim as NCB will not be completely lost. Earlier, the insured thought twice before filing low value claims due to NCB going down to zero.

 

For e.g. Many mediclaim policies offer 5% NCB every claims free year with a maximum of 50% NCB. If your base sum insured (SI) is Rs2 lakh then after 10 claims free year, the NCB will give benefit of additional 50% of base SI which is Rs1 lakh. If there was claim in 11th year, the policyholder used to lose all the NCB. It would go back to zero NCB. With the new rules given in health insurance guidelines, having a claim in 11th year will only reduce the NCB from 50% to 45%.

 

Insurer and not TPA to settle health insurance claims

 

The second important change is claim overlapping policy period. There have been real examples of policyholder hospitalised for a duration which falls across two policy periods. The insurance companies would consider the sum insured available on the day of hospital admission and ignore the sum insured of the subsequent policy period. Under the new guidelines, the insurance companies will have to consider the leftover sum insured of the existing policy and new sum insured as the claim is overlapping in the two policy periods. While this will certainly benefit policyholders, it is possible to misuse this feature for planned hospitalization. It can be done by manipulating the dates to overlap the two policy periods for specific procedures planned in advance.

 

IRDA health insurance guidelines states – If the claim event falls within two periods, the claims shall be paid taking into consideration the available sum insured in the two policy periods, including the deductibles for each policy period. Such eligible claim amount to be payable to the insured shall be reduced to the extent of premium to be received for the renewal/due date of premium of health insurance policy, if not received earlier.

 

For e.g. Policyholders may have mediclaim of Rs1.5 lakh SI of which only Rs1 lakh SI is available due to prior claim of Rs50,000. If the insured if hospitalised for a period that overlaps two policy periods, then the insured can benefit from leftover SI of existing period (Rs1 lakh) and SI of the new policy period (Rs1.5 lakh). If there is a claim up to Rs2.5 lakh, the policyholder can expect full recovery of claim amount from the insurance company subject to other sub-limits imposed by the contract. If the insured has not paid the premium for the new policy period, then it will be deducted from the claim amount.

 

Other stories by Raj Pradhan
 

Comments
483818
6 years ago
Hi, I have Apollo Munich Optima Restore Policy purchased for two years.
Policy date - 22Mar2019 to 21Mar2021
Patient is in hospital since 5th Mar (year 1) and still there in hospital (year 2).
Insurance company is denying to pay from year two sum insured after exhaust of year 1 limit. As per them there is no such IRDA guideline. Can you please help with circular number or something, I am getting burden of claim now.

Please take this an urgent issue. Please
Biplab Paul
7 years ago
Hello, can anyone guide me if this rule or any other similar guideline may vary between retail vs group insurance policies or are they applicable all across?
Nagaraj T S
8 years ago
To day I renewed my mediclaim policy at New India Assurance Tumkur Branch, and in my policy ending 10th May 2018 I was eligible for 35% cumulative bonus. After renewal also my cumilative bonus remained at 35% only. I have not made any claims since the date of commencing the policy. Pl let me know about NCB.
MOHAN SIROYA
1 decade ago
Dear Raj Pradhan

New India Assurance Co. is playing truent. It has pegged down my policy ( sr. citizen)NCB to 30 percent of the sum insured. AS per this, IRDA guideline says it has to be 50 percent.

Can you enlighten ,if this amendment is from prospective period or applicable to existing renewed policies also ?
Thanks and regards
arun adalja
1 decade ago
in case of overseas travel insurance new india asked me to pay 50% extra premium if policy is extended for another 180 days.here they issue policy for 180 days with one premium and for another 180 days you have to pay 50% extra premium.is there any justification for such condition?
s joshi
1 decade ago
stop this fraud and illegal call centers

i am a senior citizen, few day ago i was received a call some Mr. Pradhan(no.-8802963703) he sad, he was calling from irda compliant department and i will help to withdrawal your old insurance money and he transfer call to some mr. lamba (his sound like old man ) he sad, he is a senior officer at fund department and fund received you with in a 20-25 days but you will buy the comparison policy of total fund's 10% amounted policy than you received that amount.

this is all fraud but unfortunately i am trapped in it than my son was complaint this no. and its location was locate at noida Sec-2 near narula's , my son sad to me that there was lots of illegal call center working at sec-2 noida doing this type of frauds. some address details :-(1) basement D-61, sec-2, noida (2) c-23 iind floor, sec-2 noida, (3) C-48, sec- 2, noida, (4) c-29, sec-2 (5) c-31 iind floor sec-6 noida. they are not registered at trai in telemarketer.

why government not stop this fraud and illegal call centers.
thanks

s joshi
Ludhiana, Punjab
nagesh kini
1 decade ago
A lot of credit for IRDA's new guidelines ought to go to MoneyLife efforts and the active follow up with the former Chairman, Mr.Hari Narayan.
Gaurang Damani's persistence with his PIL has also played a major role.
A clear case of Peoples' Action being heard!
arun adalja
1 decade ago
inspite of guidelines by irda i think insurance companies does not follow them.they just ignore it and they will find out some loopholes to avoid it.
PRABHAT
1 decade ago
THESE ARE GOOD PROVISIONS.BUT WHETHER THESE ARE IMPLEMENTED AND AVAILABLE TO EXISTING POLICY HOLDER AS I AM A SENIOR CITIZEN AND HAVING THE POLICY FOR THE LAST EIGHT YEARS WITHOUT ANY CLAIM TILL DATE .
MOHAN SIROYA
1 decade ago
I hope, Mr Raj Pradhan has considered this important point that IRDA's guidelines cover only the Public sector Insurance Complanies ,and all private insurers. They are free to adopt their own standrds. FOr instance ,if a seotugenarian with a mediclaim policy with accumulated NCB of more 7 years, can not be allowed to deport the policy by MAX BUPA . They not only will deny the entire accumulated NCB but will even charge more than double the yearly insurance premium than what the senior citizen has been paying to the PSU Co. I have thee cases on record.
raj
Replied to MOHAN SIROYA comment 1 decade ago
Dear Mr Mohan Siroya,

IRDA health insurance guidelines are for both Government and Private insurance companies. The same is true for portability guidelines. For more on portability current status, Moneylife cover story will give clarity. It will be available in the market next week.
MOHAN SIROYA
Replied to raj comment 1 decade ago
Dear Raj

1.I just happened to go thru' the PDF copy of 'Extraordinary Gazette of India' dt. 13 th Feb. 2013 on the subject. Although I saw the provision of giving benefit of accuumulated Bonus by the deported Insurer alongwith the basic risk cover amount of the policy ; it is silent about on what amount the new Insurer will charge the premium. An illustration is given that if the basic policy cover amount is Rs. 2 lakhs and if Bonus is 50K, the New Insurer should offer 2.5L policy amount. If the Co. does not have 2.5L slab, then it can give the nearst higher amount; in this case Rs. 3 lakhs.But the benefit limit of re-imburement amount will remain confied to Rs. 2.5 L. Further it is not clear on what amount the premium will be calculated ;on 2.5 L or 3 Lakh? Common sense says, it has to be 3 lakhs. So here , the IP will have to pay premium on 50k more amount.
2.However, I did not notice any clause, which specifically says that the rate of Annual Premium for the covered risk amount will remain the same as was before 'Deporting' with the new company. If it is ,indeed there, I would be grateful if you can enlighten me on that, where and whihc clause/page. .

Regards

Mohan Siroya
MOHAN SIROYA
Replied to raj comment 1 decade ago
Dear Raj Pradhan

Sorry, I beg to differ. I have quoted the instance of Max Bupa and this is from Horse's mouth. I myself wanted to Deport my 5 Lakh Medi-Claim policy which is with NO Claim accumulation since I had purchased--- 7 years back)with New India. MAX BUpa flatly "Refused" to give any benefit for "No Claim Bonus" accumulated ; and quoted me an annual premium which was almost double than what I am paying to New India. When questioned Under IRDA guidelines, they said, That is not Binding on them. My Complaint /seeking clarification from IRDA still remains unanswered.
If interested, can give some instances of other persons too .

Thanks
Mohan Siroya
PRABHAT
Replied to MOHAN SIROYA comment 1 decade ago
PL. REFER YR. MATTER TO IRDA
MOHAN SIROYA
Replied to PRABHAT comment 1 decade ago
I have already mentioned about my complaint to IRDA , but no response /resolution. May be now "New Guidelines" may be more stringent.
raj
Replied to MOHAN SIROYA comment 1 decade ago
Dear Mr Mohan Siroya,

IRDA guidelines are applicable to both Government and Private insurers, but still gives them lot of freedom for premium pricing and on NCB handling.

Please read Moneylife cover story on health insurance portability which will be available in the market this week.

It will answer all your questions related to portability. If you still have questions after reading the cover story, please let me know.
MOHAN SIROYA
Replied to raj comment 1 decade ago
Dear Raj
Thanks a ton for reply.
AS your own story says that these guidelines are issued LAST MONTH as regards carry forward the NCB while deporting , may be then it will be binding. What I talked was last year's postion. As U said rightly, ler us wait and watch the efficacy of these guidelines.
Surely, Will comeback ,if I have anything to clarify further.
raj
Replied to MOHAN SIROYA comment 1 decade ago
Dear Mr Siroya, Portability guidelines were issued 18 months ago. No change to it. NCB handling will remain the same.

Last month was health insurance guidelines which talks about NCB cannot go down to zero if there is claim. Nothing to do with portability. Two different issues.
Vinay Joshi
Replied to MOHAN SIROYA comment 1 decade ago
IRDA, Feb'13 regulations are across the board.

Regards,
MOHAN SIROYA
Replied to Vinay Joshi comment 1 decade ago
Yes, these are from Feb. 2013. I have talked of the postion till Dec. 2012
rupeshrastogi
Replied to MOHAN SIROYA comment 3 years ago
There is no such a Practice being followed now which provide facility to claim amount from next policy year in case of overlapping hospitalization, I read this article and get fooled, My health insurance provider which is HDFC ERGO denied about such guidelines according to them "The insurance companies would consider the sum insured available on the day of hospital admission and ignore the sum insured of the subsequent policy period. " I am leaving this comment so that no one in future get in to trouble due to this outdated article, it would be better if you can update your own article with latest info.
Free Helpline
Legal Credit
Feedback