IDBI Bank Wrote Off Rs45,693 Crore Bad Loans and Recovered Just 8% in 7 Years
IDBI Bank Ltd, which has received multiple bailouts in the past few years, is the latest to join the list of lenders that wrote off tens of thousand crore rupees as bad loans. The Bank was re-categorised as a private sector lender in January 2019 after the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) increased its stake to 51% in the lender. During the past seven years, IDBI Bank wrote off total bad loans worth Rs45,693 crore but could recover just 8% of it after spending more than Rs29 crore, as the analysis of annual reports of the Bank shows. The analysis is done by well-known activist Vivek Velankar as per response from IDBI Bank under the Right to Information (RTI) Act.  
 
The government has repeatedly infused large sums of money to bailout the Bank and help it meet capital adequacy requirements; this in addition to LIC acquiring a 51% stake in a bailout move. 
 
IDBI Bank flatly refused to share information on loans of Rs100 crore and above that were written off, the names of these borrowers and the money recovered from these big defaulters with the activist.
 
As in the cases of the State Bank of India (SBI), Bank of Baroda (BoB), Bank of Maharashtra (BoM), and Union Bank of India (UBI) that have been reported by Moneylife, this is yet another example of massive ‘technical’ write-off with minuscule recoveries, leading to frequent recapitalisation of banks with the taxpayers’ money. Such write-offs also debunk the aggressive posturing by the government and policy-makers about their so-called recovery efforts. 
 
Rather than furnishing information about the written off debts, IDBI Bank directed the RTI activist to find out details for himself from the Bank’s annual reports for it. Mr Velankar did that and found that during FY13-14 to FY19-20, IDBI Bank wrote off bad loans of Rs45,693 crore, including technical or prudential write-offs and loans written off other than technical or prudential. The Bank recovered just Rs3,704 in the same period crore for which it incurred an expense of Rs29.34 crore.
 
 
(Source: Vivek Velankar, Pune)
 
As on March 2020, IDBI Bank has shown Rs40,313.95 crore as the written off amount, of which it had recovered Rs1,247.60 during the fiscal year. The annual report, however, does not mention the period during which this amount has been accumulated. 
 
What is even stranger is the reply given by IDBI Bank to Mr Velankar about sharing information on loan accounts worth Rs100 crore and more that were written off. In its reply to the RTI, the lender says, "Sought information is disproportionately diverting the resources of the Bank; Hence the same is exempted from disclosure under section 7(9) of the RTI Act."
 
Further, IDBI Bank ought to have published on its website the names of big defaulters whose loans of Rs100 crore and above have been written off. Yet, in its reply the Bank told Mr Velankar, "The information sought is pertaining to the customers/ borrowers of the bank, which is in the nature of commercial confidence and also held such information by the bank in its fiduciary relationship, and hence the same is exempted from disclosure under section (8)(1)(d) and 8(1)(e) of RTI Act. Further, there is no larger public interest that warrants disclosure of such information under RTI Act." 
 
However, much of this information has also been published by the All India Bank Depositors Association (AIBEA), and, yet, IDBI Bank’s sympathies seem to lie with the big defaulters.
 
The amounts written off by the IDBI Bank eat into its profits and cause a range of charges to be slapped on ordinary depositors. Yet, the Bank asserts that there is no larger public interest involved, even though it relates directly to money in the form of savings accounts and deposits made by common people.
 
Yet, almost all PSBs (public sector banks) hide behind the so-called fiduciary relations, overlooking the judgement given by the Supreme Court. In November 2015, a division bench of justice MY Eqbal and justice C Nagappan had held that the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) cannot withhold information citing 'fiduciary relations' under the RTI Act. (Read: RBI cannot withhold information under RTI citing ‘fiduciary relations’: SC)
 
"In the instant case, the RBI does not place itself in a fiduciary relationship with the financial institutions (though, in word it puts itself to be in that position) because, the reports of the inspections, statements of the bank, information related to the business obtained by the RBI are not under the pretext of confidence or trust. In this case neither the RBI nor the Banks act in the interest of each other. By attaching an additional 'fiduciary' label to the statutory duty, the regulatory authorities have intentionally or unintentionally created an in terrorem effect," the apex court had said.
 
All banks are mandated to furnish information to RBI on bad loans, loans written off and recovery on a periodic basis as part of the statutory requirements. Under such a situation, banks cannot even use the clause of fiduciary relation to deny information under the RTI Act, since this information that they have, had already been submitted to the RBI as a statutory obligation. 
 
As the Supreme Court had rightly pointed out, RBI and the banks have sidestepped the general public’s demand to give the requisite information on the pretext of 'fiduciary relationship' and 'economic interest'. This attitude of the RBI will only attract more suspicion and disbelief in them. RBI as a regulatory authority should work to make the banks accountable to their actions, the apex court had said.
 
Mr Velankar, president of the Pune-based Sajag Nagrik Manch, also says the same thing. He says, "If this information is in commercial confidence or held under fiduciary relation, then how did SBI share the names of its top 225 defaulters, whose loans were written off? Or does the definition of commercial confidence or fiduciary relations change with every bank? Moreover, why do the names and loan amounts written off by these big defaulters need to be kept a secret?" 
 
 "When a common borrower defaults, the same bank publishes his name and all the details through advertisements in newspapers. Why do they want to keep the names of bigger defaulters hidden? Why don’t the 'confidentiality' and 'fiduciary relation' clauses apply while publicising the names of the common borrowers?" he asks.
 
Technically speaking, when debts are written off, they are removed as assets from the balance sheet because the bank does not expect to recover payment. 
 
This practice is frowned upon by experts but is routinely done by banks as part of their tax management clean-up process. The beneficiaries are invariably some of our biggest industrialist defaulters. 
 
 In contrast, when a bad debt is written down, some of the bad debt value remains as an asset because the bank expects to recover it. However, as SBI, BoB, BoM and UBI have shown, most of the times, there is no recovery or negligible recovery for the amounts written off.    
 
As reported by Moneylife, Union Bank of India wrote off bad debt worth Rs26,072.81 crore between FY11-12 and FY19-20 (this information pertains only to loans of over Rs100 crore).
 
 
Bank of Maharashtra has written off bad loans of over Rs7,402 crore in the past years, while recovering a paltry 4% in over eight years through recovery efforts. The lender wrote off bad debts worth Rs7,402 crore during four out of the past eight years, while recovering just Rs253.55 crore. (Read: Bank of Maharashtra Writes Off Rs7,100 Crore Bad Loans; Recovers Just 4% in 8 Years)
 
From 2012 to 2020, BoB had technically written off 97 accounts with bad debts of Rs100 crore and more. These add up to Rs21,476.89 crore over eight years, while recovery in that same period is just 4.91% or Rs1,056.53 crore. (Read: Bank of Baroda Follows SBI, Writes Off Rs21,474 Crore in Bad Loans; Recovers only Rs1,057 Crore in Past 8 Years)
 
Similarly, from FY12-13 to FY19-20, SBI, the country's largest lender, wrote off bad loans worth Rs1.23 lakh crore of bad debt but recovered a paltry Rs8,969 crore. (Read: SBI Writes Off Rs1.23 Lakh Crore of Bad Debt, Recovers Paltry Rs8,969 Crore in 8 Years!)
 
A few months ago, there were a lot of heated arguments about written off loans of big defaulters. In April, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) had said that Indian banks have technically written off a staggering amount of Rs68,607 crore due from 50 top wilful defaulters, including absconding diamantaire Mehul Choksi. RBI had revealed this information in reply to an RTI query filed by Saket Gokhale. 
 
 However, at that time, everyone from the government, including the Union finance ministry and supporters of the government had insisted that technical write-off does not mean waiving off loans and efforts are on for the recovery of these written off loans.
 
Meanwhile, State-run lenders continue to write off huge amounts of bad loans without any real effort on recovery. All this happens, as Mr Velaknar has rightly pointed out, due to lack of checks and balances in banks by the regulator and the concerned authorities. In the end, it is the common bank customer who pays for all this financial manipulation and bad book-keeping, either through increased charges for every service or by receiving lower interest rates from the lenders on deposits or savings account. 
 
  • Like this story? Get our top stories by email.

    User 

    COMMENTS

    ssk.pab

    2 months ago

    One more Public Sector Bank squandering away public money-and the responsible authority - GOI - remaining silent!!!

    hamungel

    2 months ago

    These banks seem to have set themselves a recovery target of 8% only.

    karan.kabirnagar

    2 months ago

    All State owened PSU banks should merged in two or three banks. No government owned bank should be sale. This shows government,s negligence about banks. No bank should be privatised. Stop privatised rhe nationalized banks.

    karan.kabirnagar

    2 months ago

    Now government want there should be only four State owened PSU nationalized banks. My suggestions is that Modi government should merge all remaining eight banks into these four banks. 1. Pb&Sind bank, bank of mahrastra. Bank of India, should merged in Punjab National Bank. 2 Union Bank of India, central Bank of India, Uco Bank merged in Bank of Baroda. In this way there should be be four main banks. No bank should be privatised. No discrimination in PSU banks. Stop privatised the banks. In this way bank can run efficiently.

    REPLY

    s5rwav

    In Reply to karan.kabirnagar 2 months ago

    If Bigger is Better then All Private Sector Banks should be Merged into One Bigger Private Sector Bank. I am Babubhai Vaghela from Ahmedabad. Thanks.

    karan.kabirnagar

    2 months ago

    Modi government should merge remaining 8 Eight State owened PSU in four PSU, s. Stop privatised the banks. In this way only four banks can efficiently run the economy.

    REPLY

    s5rwav

    In Reply to karan.kabirnagar 2 months ago

    Smaller the Better or Bigger the Better so far as the Public Sector Banks of India is Concerned is an Unanswered Question. Smaller Private Sector Banks doing Better is Another Unanswered Question. Love to Know. I am Babubhai Vaghela from Ahmedabad. Thanks.

    s5rwav

    2 months ago

    Dear #ChiefElectionCommissioner of India and Election Commissioners of India, #NoTicketModi No Ticket to Mr Narendra Modi the #BJPPM for Unabated Giant Financial Frauds and Open Brazen Loot of Thousands of Crores of Public Money. Election Commission of India Must Refuse Ticket to Mr Narendra Modi to Contest Any Election hereafter as that is What the Political Accountability in India that is Missing but is Desperately Needed. I am Babubhai Vaghela from Ahmedabad. Thanks.

    REPLY

    Newme

    In Reply to s5rwav 2 months ago

    Congress and BJP are alternatively setting new records in looting the Banks.

    s5rwav

    In Reply to Newme 2 months ago

    Why should #WeThePeopleOfIndia be Victim of Political Corruption? I am Babubhai Vaghela from Ahmedabad. Thanks.

    SC Stays Default Bail Granted to DHFL's Kapil & Dheeraj Wadhawan in Yes Bank Case
    The Supreme Court on Thursday stayed default bail granted to Kapil and Dheeraj Wadhawan by Bombay High Court in the Yes Bank fraud case. Kapil Wadhawan, chairman and managing director of Dewan Housing Finance Ltd (DHFL), and Dheeraj Wadhawan, are being investigated in several cases of fraud and mismanagement. The Wadhawans, along with their beleaguered DHFL, are also co-accused in a cheating and money laundering case registered against Yes Bank co-founder, Rana Kapoor.   
     
    Last month, granting the Wadhawan brothers 'default' bail, Justice Bharati Dangre of the Bombay HC directed them to surrender their passports and deposit Rs1 lakh each as surety. The default bail was granted citing failure of Enforcement Directorate (ED) in filing charge-sheet against the Wadhawan brothers within the mandatory 60-day period after the arrest.
     
    While staying the default bail, a bench of justices SK Kaul, Ajay Rastogi and Aniruddha Bose posted the special leave petition (SPL) for hearing on 7 October 2020. 
     
    During the hearing, the counsel for ED contended that the agency had sent an email about  the chargesheet on the 58th day from the arrest of the Wadhawan brothers. 
     
    The Wadhawans had moved the Bombay HC seeking bail on grounds that the ED failed to file the charge-sheet within the stipulated 60-day period after the ED arrested them on money-laundering charges on 14 May 2020.
     
    The Wadhawan brothers hace contended before the HC that the ED had filed its charge-sheet a day after the deadline—on 15th July—against them as well as Yes Bank founder Rana Kapoor, his wife Bindu Kapoor and their daughters Roshni and Rekha, besides others.
     
    The ED launched its probe in the case after the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) filed its first information report (FIR) in the case on 7 March 2020 before the lock-down, over dubious loans granted by the Yes Bank and alleged quid pro quo between Kapoor and the Wadhawans.
     
    In its charge-sheet, the ED has claimed that Dheeraj Wadhawan, the then non-executive director of DHFL, owned 44 companies of the Wadhawan group and also managed the works of the real estate business of the Wadhawan group.
     
    The ED investigation into the Yes Bank-Rana Kapoor money-laundering probe had also found that Kapil Wadhawan, started his realty business in 2007-08, pursued it in United Arab Emirates (UAE) by forming Wadhawan International Investments Ltd (WIIL), and the company has some assets in Australia worth Rs1,000 crore.
     
  • Like this story? Get our top stories by email.

    User 

    COMMENTS

    s5rwav

    2 months ago

    Madam Nirmala Sitharaman should Retire Enforcement Director in Larger Public Interest of Accountability of the Public Administration in India. I am Babubhai Vaghela from Ahmedabad. Thanks.

    Roll out resolution scheme for Covid-related stress by Sep 15: FM
    Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman on Thursday directed banks to roll out resolution schemes for Covid-related stress by September 15.
     
    During her interaction with the heads of scheduled commercial banks and NBFCs, through video conference, she focused on lenders immediately putting in place board-approved policy for resolution, identifying eligible borrowers and reaching out to them, said an official statement.
     
    Sitharaman also called for quick implementation of a sustained resolution plan by lenders for revival of every viable business.
     
    She told the lenders that as and when moratorium on loan repayments is lifted, borrowers must be given support and Covid-19-related distress must not impact the lenders' assessment of their credit-worthiness.
     
    Further, she also called for a sustained media campaign to create awareness among the borrowers for the resolution scheme. She advised lenders to ensure that regularly updated FAQs on the resolution framework are uploaded on their websites in Hindi, English and regional languages, and also circulated to their offices and branches.
     
    "The lenders assured that they are ready with their resolution policies, and have started the process of identifying and reaching out to eligible borrowers, and that they will comply with the timelines stipulated by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI)," said the Finance Ministry statement.
     
    The ministry said that it has also been engaging with the RBI to ensure that the lenders are assisted by the central bank in the resolution process.
     
    As the pandemic has led to severe economic stress across sectors, the RBI in August announced to provide a resolution framework to enable the lenders to implement a resolution plan, in respect of eligible corporate borrowers without change in ownership while continuing the account status as standard, subject to specified conditions.
     
    Jyoti Prakash Gadia, Managing Director of Resurgent India, said that the resolution framework can be in several forms including restructuring of debt with extended repayment period, conversion of working capital debt to term debt, reduction in rate of interest, conversion of debt to equity instruments, one-time settlement of debt among others.
     
    During the virtual meet on Thursday, the Finance Minister also reviewed the progress made by various lenders under ECLGS, PCGS 2.0 and subordinate debt schemes announced as part of the 'Aatmanirbhar Bharat Abhiyaan', and advised lenders to try and extend the maximum possible relief to borrowers before the festive season.
     
    As per the government, an amount of Rs 1.58 lakh crore has been sanctioned as on August 31, under ECLGS, out of which more than Rs 1.11 lakh crore has been disbursed. Under PCGS 2.0, bonds or commercial papers of Rs 25,055.5 crore have been approved for purchase by public sector banks so far, out of which Rs 13,318.5 crore amounting to more than 53 per cent of the portfolio pertains to bonds or commercial papers rated below 'AA-'.
     
    Disclaimer: Information, facts or opinions expressed in this news article are presented as sourced from IANS and do not reflect views of Moneylife and hence Moneylife is not responsible or liable for the same. As a source and news provider, IANS is responsible for accuracy, completeness, suitability and validity of any information in this article.
  • Like this story? Get our top stories by email.

    User 

    We are listening!

    Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.
      Loading...
    Close

    To continue


    Please
    Sign Up or Sign In
    with

    Email
    Close

    To continue


    Please
    Sign Up or Sign In
    with

    Email

    BUY NOW

    online financial advisory
    Pathbreakers
    Pathbreakers 1 & Pathbreakers 2 contain deep insights, unknown facts and captivating events in the life of 51 top achievers, in their own words.
    online financia advisory
    The Scam
    24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
    Moneylife Online Magazine
    Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
    financial magazines online
    Stockletters in 4 Flavours
    Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
    financial magazines in india
    MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
    (Includes Moneylife Online Magazine)
    FREE: Your Complete Family Record Book
    Keep all the Personal and Financial Details of You & Your Family. In One Place So That`s Its Easy for Anyone to Find Anytime
    We promise not to share your email id with anyone