In your interest.
Online Personal Finance Magazine
No beating about the bush.
Its much smaller rivals Dabur and Emami continue to record strong growth quarter after quarter
Despite endless restructuring of its business portfolios and continuous high-profile change of its top management, Hindustan Unilever is unable to generate any traction on its sales and profits. For the September quarter, HUL’s revenues were up by 4% while operating profit was completely flat. Compare this with the performance of Dabur India whose revenues were up by 15% while Emami Group’s sales were up by 27%.
HUL’s revenue growth has been stagnant for many quarters now. Over the past three quarters, average topline growth has ranged between 4%-6% which does not even cover inflation. Revenue growth has been continuously declining from a high of 20% it recorded in September 2008.
The recent September quarter has been especially good for fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG) companies mainly because raw material prices were sharply down in that quarter. For instance, Emami’s raw material cost was down by 35% and even Godrej Consumer Products Limited’s (GCPL’s) raw material cost was down by 15%. Both these companies took advantage of lower cost of raw materials and steady demand for their products. Emami’s operating profit was up by as much as 65%. On the other hand, even though HUL’s raw material cost was down by 9%, it had no profit growth. Dabur’s raw material cost has gone up by 3% and yet it has reported a sales growth of 15% compared to the same quarter last year. What is remarkable about HUL is that it had to spend 41% more on advertising compared to same quarter last year to get only a 4% growth in turnover this quarter (Q2 FY 10).
Another key issue with HUL is that it would maintain its high operating profit margin (39% in September 09) rather than creating growth in sales and operating profit. Interestingly, Dabur also enjoys an OPM of 36% which is as high as HUL but Dabur is able to increase its operating profit and revenues virtually every quarter. In the September quarter Dabur’s operating profit jumped by 21% compared to the same quarter last year.
–Debashis Basu with Pallabika Ganguly [email protected]
There has been a surge in foreign institutional investment over the past six months. The sensitive index of the Bombay Stock Exchange has gone up by more than 100% between early March and now, mainly because of investment by foreign institutional investors (FIIs). Collectively, they have put in Rs18,677 crore between March and June 2009. Who have been the big beneficiaries of this investment? Interestingly, it is the real estate companies that seemed to be going under in late last year and early this year which have got most of the money from FIIs.
The austerity move adopted by the babus got a new dimension when corporate affairs minister Salman Khurshid pointed out that even private sector companies should refrain from doling out obscene salaries. But Mr Khurshid should also pay attention to the quasi-government companies, especially the National Stock Exchange (NSE).
The National Stock Exchange (NSE) has created a perception of being a government entity with its virtual monopoly over running the stock market. But it has the highest paid non-promoter executives in the country, Ravi Narain, managing director, and Chitra Ramakrishna, deputy managing director.
Mr Narain and Ms Ramakrishna had an astounding gross annual income of Rs6.89 crore and Rs4.21 crore respectively, besides other perks in 2008-09. The salary of Mr Narain is more than London Stock Exchange (LSE) chief Xavier Roulet (around Rs 5.6 crore) and equal to NYSE Euronext CEO’s, Jean-Fancoise Theodore (around Rs7 crore).
Comparatively, NSE’s supposed competitor Bombay Stock Exchange’s (BSE) CEO Madhu Kannan earned a gross income of Rs1.6crore.
Interestingly, the stock exchanges which are in charge of regulating listed companies themselves refrain from maintaining transparency. NSE refrains from giving any information via Right to Information (RTI). Even its annual reports are not easily available nor does it comply with the Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG) norms.
The NSE has even filed a petition for a stay order on a request by the Chief Information Commissioner (CIC) in Delhi from revealing any information relating to NSE. In its petition, NSE has stated that ‘they are a non-government private sector company’ and not under the jurisdiction of RTI. But how just is the argument of the NSE not to reveal any information, considering it has large public sector undertakings like State Bank of India, Life Insurance Company (LIC) etc. as investors? If NSE is a private sector company, it is the only one to have a virtual monopoly in a crucial business that deals with million of citizens.
- Aditya Kshirsagar [email protected]