How To Provide SBO Details to SEBI
Market regulator Securities Exchange Board of India (SEBI), vide its circular no. SEBI/HO/CFD/CMD1/CIR/P/2018/0000000149 dated 7 December 2018 (SEBI circular) has mandated listed entities to disclose the details of significant beneficial owners (SBO), while submitting the shareholding pattern for the quarter ending 31 March 2019.
The details of the SBOs identified, pursuant to the Companies (Significant Beneficial Owners) Rules, 2018 (SBO Rules) as amended from time to time, are required to be provided to SEBI while submitting the shareholding pattern by the listed entity.
The ministry of corporate affairs (MCA), with effect from 8 February 2019 has amended the SBO Rules and accordingly the SBO will be required to be identified as per the new definition of SBO provided in the amended SBO Rules.
This article discusses the practical difficulties in providing details of the SBO as per the SEBI circular.
Mismatch of Timelines
MCA grants a timeline of 90 days from the date of enforcement of the amendment to the SBO Rules, i.e., till 8 May 2019 for submission of details of beneficial ownership by the SBO to the company. 
In case it is required to be filed with the shareholding pattern, the disclosures will have to be obtained prior to 21 April 2019 being the last day for filing shareholding pattern for the quarter ending 31 March 2019. Non-receipt of any SBO declaration within the said time cannot be regarded as violation by the listed entity as the onus of declaration is on the SBO. 
Recommendation: SEBI should consider aligning their timeline with that provided by the MCA. 
While companies have already begun the process of complying with SBO Rules, SEBI should also ensure that the reporting timeline and the format are aligned with that provided in SBO rules in order to enable listed entities to file the correct information. 
(CS Vinita Nair is Partner at Vinod Kothari & Company)
  • Like this story? Get our top stories by email.


    Infosys pays Rs 34 lakh to settle case with SEBI
    IT major Infosys Ltd has paid Rs 34 lakh to settle a case related to alleged lapses regarding a severance payment done in 2015, Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) said in an order.
    "The proposed adjudication proceedings for the defaults... are settled," the market regulator said in a settlement order dated February 15. "SEBI shall not initiate any enforcement action against the applicant for the said defaults," it added.
    SEBI, in 2017, had issued a notice seeking to initiate adjudication proceedings against the company. The notice was with regard to the examination in the scrip of Infosys.
    During the examination, SEBI probed the issues pertaining to severance payment made by Infosys to its former Chief Financial Officer Rajiv Bansal who had resigned from the company on October 11, 2015. 
    "The examination prima facie revealed that the severance payment was not in accordance with the remuneration policy and the same was without the approval of the Nomination and Remuneration Committee," it said.
    Further, the payment had no prior approval of Audit Committee and the company failed to make detailed and timely disclosure of the severance agreement. 
    "The High Powered Advisory Committee in its meeting held on February 26, 2018 considered the settlement terms proposed and recommended the case for settlement upon payment of Rs 34,35,000 by the applicant towards settlement charges for the aforementioned defaults," it said.
    The Panel of Whole Time Members of SEBI accepted the recommendation on January 22 this year and Infosys made the payment on February 4.
    Disclaimer: Information, facts or opinions expressed in this news article are presented as sourced from IANS and do not reflect views of Moneylife and hence Moneylife is not responsible or liable for the same. As a source and news provider, IANS is responsible for accuracy, completeness, suitability and validity of any information in this article.
  • User



    1 year ago

    what will sebi do with the amount of Rs. 34,35,000?

    Amended Rules for Significant Beneficial Ownership Will Be Real Test for Companies
    The revised rules determining significant beneficial ownership (SBO) have been drastically changed by the ministry of corporate affairs (MCA) only with the intent to facilitate the implementation of the provision and to remove the practical difficulties faced by the stakeholders in complying with the requirements of the provisions. 
    While the revised rules and forms seem to simplify and ease the practical implementation of the rules, the real test will be for the companies to ensure compliance of the revised requirements and to implement them. Due to the lowered threshold limit for determining the ownership, the compliance burden of the companies will increase drastically and, hence, it will be interesting to witness how the companies implement the provisions of the revised rules.
    Amendments to Sections 89 and 90 are some of the key changes brought in by the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2017 (‘Amendment Act’). While the Amendment Act has been enforced in phases, stakeholders were given the option to provide public comments on the draft rules in relation to SBO, which was issued by the MCA on 2 February 2018. Thereafter, on 14 June  2018, the MCA vide its notification, has enforced the provisions of the amended Section 90 of the Companies Act, 2013 and has also issued the Companies (Beneficial Interest and Significant Beneficial Interest) Rules, 2018 (‘SBO Rules’)  in relation to the determination of SBO. 
    Thereafter, considering various practical difficulties in implementing the provisions of the SBO rules, MCA on 8 February 2018 has notified the revised rules in order to facilitate better implementation of the provisions. 
    The following article explains the revised requirement of the rules and responsibilities of the companies and the immediate actionables to be taken in order to comply with the revised requirements.
    Meaning of SBO
    As per the amended Section 90 of the Companies Act, 2013 (‘Act’), SBO is understood as:
    “Every individual, who, acting alone or together, or through one or more persons or trust, including a trust and persons resident outside India, holds beneficial interests, of not less than twenty-five per cent or such other percentage as may be prescribed, in shares of a company or the right to exercise, or the actual exercising of significant influence or control as defined in clause (27) of section 2 of the Act.
    As per the definition provided in the Act, the government is empowered to prescribe other holding percentages even for the determination of the SBO. Accordingly, the revised rules provides the following definition as -
    “Significant Beneficial Owner in relation to a reporting company means an individual referred to in sub-section (1) of section 90, who acting alone or, together, or through one or more persons or trust, who possesses one or more of the following rights or entitlements in such company, namely:-
    • Holds indirectly, or together with any direct holdings, not less than ten percent of the shares;
    • Holds indirectly, or together with any direct holdings, not less than ten percent of the voting rights in the shares;
    • Has the right to receive or participate in not less than ten percent of the total distributable dividend, or any other distribution, in a financial year through indirect holdings alone, or together with any direct holdings;
    • Has the right to exercise or actually exercises, directly or indirectly, significant influence or control, in any manner other than through direct holdings alone.
    Significance of Indirect Holding / Entitlement
    The definition clarifies that if an individual does not hold any right or entitlement indirectly as per the above-mentioned clauses, then he should not be considered to be a significant beneficial owner. Therefore, as per this clarification, in order to be an SBO, a person must have an indirect right or entitlement and where the person has only direct holding, he shall not be termed as the SBO. This is mainly because the provisions have been framed to identify the ultimate beneficial owners—‘Parde ke peche ka insaan’, so, where the owners are well disclosed to the company, the application of the said rules will be of no use.
    Determining ‘Direct Holding’
    An individual shall be considered to hold a right or entitlement directly in the reporting company, if he satisfies any of the following criteria:
    • the shares in the reporting company representing such a right or entitlement are held in the name of the individual – this means that the name of such person should be reflected in the register of members of the company.
    • the individual holds or acquires a beneficial interest in the share of the reporting company under sub-section (2) of section 89, and has made a declaration in this regard to the reporting company – this means that the company must be fully informed about the details of such person by furnishing form MGT 4 and MGT 5.


    The significant beneficial ownership, in case of persons other than individuals or natural persons, shall be determined as under:

    Determining ‘indirect holding’
    An individual shall be considered to hold a right or entitlement indirectly in the reporting company, if he satisfies any of the following criteria:
    Meaning of the Term Majority Stake
    This term has been newly inserted in the revised Rules, which has been defined to mean:
    a) holding of more than 50% of the equity share capital in the body corporate; or
    b) holding of more than 50% of the voting rights in the body corporate; or 
    c) having the right to receive or participate in more than 50% of the distributable dividend or any other distribution by the body corporate.
    Meaning of the Phrase ‘Persons Acting Together’
    The erstwhile rules did not specify the meaning of this phrase and, hence, it was left open for different interpretations. In this regard, the revised Rules prescribe the meaning of the phrase, as per which: 
    If any individual, or individuals acting through any person or trust, act with a:
    • common intent; or 
    • purpose of exercising any rights or entitlements; or 
    • exercising control; or 
    • significant influence, 
    over a reporting company, pursuant to an agreement or understanding, formal or informal, such individual, or individuals, acting through any person or trust, as the case may be, shall be deemed to be 'acting together'.
    Meaning of Shares
    As per the revised Rules, apart from the equity shares, the instruments in the form of global depository receipts, compulsorily convertible preference shares or compulsorily convertible debentures shall also be treated as ‘shares’.
    Declaration of Beneficial Interest by SBO 
    Responsibility of the reporting company:
    Every reporting company is required to take necessary steps to find out if there is any individual who is the SBO in relation to that reporting company, and if so, identify him and cause such individual to make a declaration in Form No. BEN-1.
    Responsibility of the SBO:
    Initial Disclosure:
    Every individual who is an SBO in a reporting company, is required to file a declaration in Form No. BEN-1 to the reporting company within 90 days from 8 February 2019. 
    Continual Disclosure:
    Every individual, who subsequently becomes an SBO/ or where his significant beneficial ownership undergoes any change, shall file a declaration in Form No. BEN-1 to the reporting company, within 30 days of acquiring such significant beneficial ownership or any change therein. 
    Clarification with Regard to Becoming the SBO or any Change Therein during the Transition Time
    Where an individual becomes a SBO, or where his significant beneficial ownership undergoes any change, within 90 days of the commencement of the Companies (Significant Beneficial Owners) Amendment Rules, 2019, it shall be deemed that such individual became the significant beneficial owner or any change therein happened on the date of expiry of ninety days from the date of commencement of the said rules, and the period of 30 days for filing will be reckoned accordingly.
    Filing of Return of SBO
    The declaration of beneficial interest received by the company, is required to be filed in Form No. BEN-2 with the registrar in respect of such declaration, within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of declaration by it.
    Register of SBO in a Company
    Every company is required to maintain a register of SBOs in Form No. BEN-3. 
    Also, this register shall be open to for inspection during business hours, at such reasonable time of not less than two hours, on every working day as the board may decide, by any member of the company on payment of such fee as may be specified by the company but not exceeding fifty rupees for each inspection.
    Duty of the Reporting Company
    Every reporting company should in all cases where its member (other than an individual), holds not less than 10% of its;- 
    (a) shares, or
    (b) voting rights; or
    (c) right to receive or participate in the dividend or any other distribution payable in a financial year, 
    give notice to such member whom the company knows or has reasonable cause to believe— 
    • to be a significant beneficial owner of the company; 
    • to be having knowledge of the identity of a significant beneficial owner or another person likely to have such knowledge; or 
    • to have been a significant beneficial owner of the company at any time during the three years immediately preceding the date on which the notice is issued, 
    • and who is not registered as a significant beneficial owner with the company as required under this section. 
    Seeking information from such person, in Form No. BEN-4:
    Exemptions Provided 
    The rules are not applicable to the extent the shares of the reporting company are held by:
    • IEPF authority;
    • its holding reporting company, however, the details of such holding reporting company shall be reported in Form No. BEN-2;
    • the Central government, state government or any local authority;
    • reporting company; or a body corporate; or an entity, controlled by the Central government or by any stare government or governments or partially by the Central government and partly by one or more state governments;
    • SEBI registered Investment Vehicles such as mutual funds, alternative investment funds (AIF), Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs), Infrastructure Investment Trust (lnVITs) regulated by the Securities and Exchange Board of India;
    • Investment vehicles regulated by Reserve Bank of India, or Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India, or Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority.
    Format of Form/ e-Form
    The revised format of the Forms BEN-1, BEN2, BEN-3 and BEN -4 has been provided; however, the electronic version of the BEN-2 is still awaited. 
    (CS Nikita Snehil works with Vinod Kothari & Co)
  • Like this story? Get our top stories by email.


    We are listening!

    Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.

    To continue

    Sign Up or Sign In


    To continue

    Sign Up or Sign In



    online financial advisory
    Pathbreakers 1 & Pathbreakers 2 contain deep insights, unknown facts and captivating events in the life of 51 top achievers, in their own words.
    online financia advisory
    The Scam
    24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
    Moneylife Online Magazine
    Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
    financial magazines online
    Stockletters in 3 Flavours
    Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
    financial magazines in india
    MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
    (Includes Moneylife Online Magazine)
    FREE: Your Complete Family Record Book
    Keep all the Personal and Financial Details of You & Your Family. In One Place So That`s Its Easy for Anyone to Find Anytime
    We promise not to share your email id with anyone