At least five banks are headless, the FM has little time to spare for the banking industry, but the finance ministry is only focussed on the PM’s pet project JanDhan Yojana
The entire banking industry, led by the finance secretary, is so focussed on enrolling people into the JanDhan Yojana that there is no time for appointments to several top nationalised banks, say agitated senior bankers. While as many as four nationalised banks remain headless and two more will join their numbers, all we have is talk of more accountability and better appraisal from the Reserve Bank of India.
At a seminar earlier this week, RBI Governor Raghuram Rajan said that there will be stricter evaluation of the role of senior bankers before appointing them to the post of chairman and managing (CMD) after Syndicate Bank chairman S K Jain was arrested for corruption.
A committee headed by the RBI governor, which includes finance ministry bureaucrats, has been set up to select candidates. But senior bankers complain that that there is no hurry at any level to act even though non-performing assets (NPAs) are sky-high and there is a need for dynamic leadership and tough action at each of the many government banks.
Now consider this. If the arrest of the Syndicate Bank chairman was a trigger for better selection, why is the post of CMD at United Bank of India (UBI) lying vacant, even after Mrs Archana Bhargava's extremely controversial exit in February, which is seven months ago. That she was allowed to leave without any action against her only hints at dubious appointment considerations. Bank of Baroda (BOB) is headless after Mr S S Mundra moved to the RBI. Syndicate Bank remains headless at a time when it needs a clean and dynamic chairman. Indian Overseas Bank has no chairman either.
At the end of September, R K Dubey of Canara Bank and S L Bansal of Oriental Bank of Commerce will also complete their terms while the Punjab National Bank (PNB) chairman completes his term on 31st October and the Vijaya Bank chairman’s post falls vacant a little later.
While the top posts are vacant, things are no better at the Executive Director (EDs) level.
At least four or five positions are already vacant and every one of the current crop of EDs across all 20 nationalised banks are full engaged in doing only one thing – lobbying for the post of CMD by meeting every politician or politically-connected person who they think will carry clout with this government. And those a level below are lobbying hectically to become EDs or to get transfers to better banks. It is such lobbying that ends in quid-pro-quo deals, later leading to bad loans.
A senior banker says that the JanDhan Yojana is seen as the fastest way to attract the attention of the Finance Secretary and hopefully the Prime Minister (PM) and Finance Minister (FM). So the entire industry is focussed on furious enrolments rather than sensible deployment of funds or effective recovery of bad loans.
It is well known that industry houses have always lobbied for appointments to banks and regulatory bodies in exchange for big favours in the form of fresh loans or write offs. This has been going on for at least three decades. Nothing much seems to have changed.
A disgusted senior banker says, “this government has no time for appointments or banking reforms or for implementing the P J Nayak committee report on making the appointment process more transparent. The only focus of government JanDhan”. All bankers have been told that they will not be permitted to go on foreign tours until JanDhan targets are met.
Even proposals to raise capital are in a suspended animation. Finance Minister Arun Jaitley is already overburdened with three major ministries (finance, defence and corporate affairs) and has also been out of action when he underwent a bariatric surgery.
Meanwhile, the RBI officials are more concerned with the internal re-organisation and lateral appointments (hugely resented by all senior central bankers at the RBI) to worry about vacancies at nationalised banks.
Bankers also say that despite Mr Narendra Modi’s promise of being a chowkidar of public funds, it is business as usual when it comes to shady practices. Interestingly, this paralysis in RBI’s and MoF’s decision-making does not seem to affect private banks. The government has acted swiftly to allow private bank CEOs to continue in office until the age of 70, almost as a birthday gift to for two powerful CEOs who are soon to hit the previous limit of 65.
So what will it take for the new government to give focussed attention to the finance ministry? Another big scandal?
Inside story of the National Stock Exchange’s amazing success, leading to hubris, regulatory capture and algo scam
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance.
1-year online access to the magazine articles published during the subscription period.
Access is given for all articles published during the week (starting Monday) your subscription starts. For example, if you subscribe on Wednesday, you will have access to articles uploaded from Monday of that week.
This means access to other articles (outside the subscription period) are not included.
Articles outside the subscription period can be bought separately for a small price per article.
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance.
30-day online access to the magazine articles published during the subscription period.
Access is given for all articles published during the week (starting Monday) your subscription starts. For example, if you subscribe on Wednesday, you will have access to articles uploaded from Monday of that week.
This means access to other articles (outside the subscription period) are not included.
Articles outside the subscription period can be bought separately for a small price per article.
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance.
Complete access to Moneylife archives since inception ( till the date of your subscription )
DOES OUR BANKS{PSU} HAVE E.D. OR C.M.D. WITH HEAD ??
IN MY CASE UNITED BANK , MADE R.B.I.{AFI} INSPECTION TO REPORT IN SEPT 2008 ., WRONG -BASELESS O/STANDING AMOUNT + WRONG & BASELESS USE OF TERM LOPAN + WRONG DEBITS ETC ., YET IT ALLOWED R.B.I. TO MENTION UNIT N.P.A. ON 31-12-2005 ., WHILE BANK SANCTIONED ENHANCEMENT OF TERM LOAN BY 12 CRORES ON 7.4.2007 AND DISBURSED LOAN TILL MARCH 2008 AND MADE NABARD TO JOIN-IN TERM LOAN EFFECTIVE JULY 2007 ., STILL RBI OPINION ''N.P.A. ON 31.12.2005''
UBI IS HANDLING THE MATTER IN DRT/SARFEASI WITH FULL CRIMINAL APPROACH I.E. SHOW PHOTOS OF SHED OF 2 FLOOR AS VALUED MENTIONING GROUND FLOOR OR 80' FT HT SHED AS METAL SCRAP., THUS NOW AT LAST RBI OFFICER SUGGEST THAT TO MAKE R.B.I. A PARTY IN COURT.
THUS FOR SURE OUR BANKING HAS HEADLESS BRAINS AT HELM OF P.S.U. BANKS
RAJU MANSINGHKA
KOLKATA
[email protected]
033 22360360
Government should also change the existing practice of exporting candidates from one Bank to another which has resulted in cultural contamination. Instead it
should promote people from within as being done in SBI.
But the unfilled vacancies indicates that nothing has
changed in the bureaucracy
after the new Govt. came to
power and it is business as
usual.
Hope the PM will show
his resolve to bring
transparency.
When I lodged a complaint to Mr. Rajan , the Governor of RBI, against one of the officials for handling my complaint in a shoddy manner, I was surprised that instead of investigating my charges, the complaint was forwarded to the same accused officer to handle the same and reply me. I had expected that being an honest Governor, he will issue orders for investigation and also necessary action. But , in vain. Being the head of an Apex Bank rules are made for others.
Such laments may give some temporary relief from the frustrated feeling the writer and the reader get looking at the mismanagement of institutions. My guess is that the HR management is not much superior in the private sector organizations too, though some exceptions are there(Just for a diversion, please read the story “How many Bank VPs to Change a Bulb? 1000s” published in Economic Times on September 23, 2014). Such exceptions are there among public sector organizations also. In Indian situation, destroying public sector the way in which it(the destruction) is being managed by vested interests has long term negative impacts. The one and only option is to revamp public sector. The debate should be taken forward by suggesting how best this can be done.
some 10 years ago i brought to the notice of the then rbi governor, how an internal auditor is being hounded and harassed for bringing out the irregularities in a nationalized bank. and after 5 years of my report rbi issued a circular that the transactions done as reported by me by banks is violation of fema, import export policy. but to me they replied that rbi as a policy will not interfere in internal matters of the bank. and today after 14 years rbi penal is taking about hr in banks. and surprisingly all those involved have been made cmds of bigger nationalized banks, in spite of bringing their involvement to cvc, rbi, and pmo. it is not the frustration it is the fact.
He is supporting Aadhar(Nandan Nilekani project-who lost to Ananth Kumar ( who is also not in reckoning by Modi as he was seen more with L.K.Advani.
Jaitley lost Lok Sabha elections but defended Modi Godhra riots so Finance where is clueless & Defence where he is lost are with him.Subramanian Swamy is also languishing.
NPA's are hot potatoes & Public Sector & Private sector with Politicians/Businessmen/Builders have created Ghost buildings which may soon haunt them & all of us hence no placements of Heads possibly & mergers to cover the mess in Banking in air.
Mahesh
Finance Ministry and political leadership have been ‘enjoying’ the advantages of vacant or inefficient top positions in public sector organizations. Weakening of UTI and several other PSUs including Hindustan Machine Tools can be traced to this approach of GOI and political leadership. Dr Rajan and the new leadership at New Delhi should revamp the whole PSU structure. They together can.
The ‘ownership rights’ being exercised by Finance Ministry over PSUs including statutory bodies in a negative manner has been an issue which affected the good governance of all organizations in the public sector. Mild protests against this from several stakeholders were being ignored by successive governments which had an eye on using these organizations for short-term gains. Even this well-argued case for PSUs to be provided a level playing field comparable with well managed private sector entities may get diverted as an issue between RBI and GOI.
The debate being opened by Dr Raghuram Rajan should be taken forward in national interest. Good governance in public sector alone can handle national priorities with the speed needed for catching up the developed world, as private sector in India has so far been showing interest more in the creamy layer of development cake concentrating mostly on certain industrial and services sectors catering to the urban and well to do clientele. If an example is needed, private sector banks have not so far been able to capture even one-third of the business share or penetrate to rural areas, where India lives.
M G Warrier, Mumbai
BARODA WALE JITNE MURKH PURE INDIA ME AUR KAUN HAI UNHI DINO JAB FLOOD KI CHAPET ME FANSE THE TUB KASHMIRI O KO. PUCHH NE PAHCHE MAGAR BARODA KI KHABAR TAQ NAHI LI FIR BHI UNHI KE UMEDWAR KO JITAYA YISH SE BADE MURKH KAUN HOGE SAIKETU SHAH JI JISH KI MINISTRY DAGGI MINISTER'S SE BHARI HO WOH KIYA DESH KO AGE LE JAYEGE FDI FDI KAR KE YEH JAICHAND AMICHANDO KI AULAD DESH BECH KHAYEGE