FASTag Fixation or Just Harassment? Vehicle-owners Mandated To Complete ‘Know-Your-Vehicle’ Verification or Face Toll Block
Moneylife Digital Team 13 June 2025
Just when vehicle owners thought they were done with compliance fatigue—having paid for smart number plates and e-registrations—they now find themselves staring at yet another bureaucratic hurdle: know-your-vehicle (KYV) verification. Rolled out quietly but enforced stringently since August 2024, the KYV mandate for FASTag users has triggered widespread resentment, with many calling it a form of 'digital harassment'. According to National Payments Corporation of India (NPCI)'s October 2024 circular, re-KYV is to be done every three years. 
 
On paper, KYV sounds like a security measure—linking your FASTag to actual vehicle details and images to prevent fraud. But in practice, it feels like a privacy minefield and a logistical nightmare for countless law-abiding citizens. 
 
What is even more surprising is that, to maintain a standardised and reliable database across all toll collection points, details like the vehicle registration number (VRN), chassis number, and engine number provided during the FASTag application are already verified with the VAHAN database to confirm their accuracy and authenticity. No surprises, then, that frustrated vehicle owners are questioning the real purpose behind the additional KYV requirement. 
 
What is KYV and why is it required?
The KYV process mandates vehicle owners to upload clear, well-lit images of their vehicle, including front and side angles, ensuring the FASTag sticker is visible on the windshield, and the number plate is legible. In addition, images of the registration certificate (RC)—front and back—must be uploaded. Only unmasked digital copies sourced from DigiLocker or mParivahan are accepted.
 
According to a circular issued by NPCI (https://www.npci.org.in/PDF/netc/circular/2024/NETC-OC-001-FY-24-25- Guidelines-for-Customer-Onboarding-and-Re-Know-Your-Vehicle-(KYV).pdf ), the aim is to strengthen the one vehicle one tag (OVOT) initiative and weed out duplicate or fraudulent FASTag issuances. The verification is valid for three years, but non-compliance may result in FASTag deactivation, making vehicles ineligible for toll payments on national highways.
 
The intent may be administrative accuracy, but for vehicle owners, it’s yet another 'compliance compulsion' added to an already overloaded list.
 
Users Voice Frustration: ‘Make life hell, not ease of living’
“I am sure my car photos will be rejected a dozen times—for angle, clarity, shadows, or god knows what,” one frustrated car owner posted on social media. “We just paid for smart number plates. Why should we have to do this again? What is the point?”
 
Vehicle owners are not protesting the idea of accountability—but the sheer rigidity of the image requirements, the lack of clear communication, and the repetitive nature of KYV after already submitting registration and identification proofs during FASTag purchase.
 
The process requires:
  • Front view photo showing vehicle edges, number plate, and FASTag
  • Side view showing front and rear edges
  • Internal photo of the FASTag sticker showing the serial number
  • Digital RC copy from authorised apps (no screenshots or edited versions)
 
Some users sarcastically suggested that vehicles may be impounded for not meeting photo standards, highlighting just how intrusive the requirements feel.
 
Enforcement without Empathy 
The NPCI’s directive to all FASTag-issuing banks calls for:
  • Automatic deactivation of tags without a valid KYV
  • Blocking duplicate tags linked to the same vehicle registration number (VRN)
  • Ensuring faulty or manual entries are weeded out
  • Mandating re-KYV every three years or whenever deficiencies are found
 
While these protocols may sound reasonable to administrators, they have been enforced without any grace period or public awareness campaign. For lakhs of users who already have functioning FASTags, this feels like retroactive punishment.
 
Moreover, many banks have buried KYV requirements deep inside customer portals without proactive SMS or email alerts. In several cases, users only realised their FASTag had stopped working while crossing toll plazas, leading to fines and confusion.
 
Where is the Consumer Convenience?
The entire FASTag system was introduced with the promise of seamless travel and cashless tolling. Yet, with frequent new requirements like KYV, mandatory re-verification, and poorly designed mobile interfaces, that promise now seems like an afterthought.
 
Most troubling is the burden of proof placed on the consumer. Uploading high-quality, perfectly angled images is a non-trivial task, especially for senior citizens or those without digital literacy.
 
The rule also fails to account for edge cases: what if a sticker was damaged but the tolls continued to work? What happens if someone changes their car’s number plate or upgrades their vehicle? The process offers no clarity on such transitions.
 
An unreasonable ask in the name of security?
Security and fraud prevention are important, but regulatory overreach without thoughtful execution leads to public resentment. Like KYC in the banking sector, KYV now feels like a 'tick-the-box' ritual that punishes the average consumer instead of deterring bad actors.
 
If the authorities truly want to ensure compliance, they must:
  • Streamline the process across all bank portals
  • Allow flexibility in image uploads with AI-driven tools to auto-correct minor deficiencies
  • Launch awareness campaigns instead of issuing silent mandates
  • Avoid penalising users who have already followed previous FASTag rules
 
The lack of transparency around how photos are judged, or what counts as an 'acceptable' image, only worsens the anxiety.
 
In a country already weary of document uploads, verification cycles, and overlapping compliance regimes, the KYV requirement comes as one more avoidable stress point. Instead of 'ease of living', it seems the average citizen is once again stuck in a cycle of photo submissions, digital portals, and faceless rejections.
 
Unless corrected with empathy, KYV might become a textbook example of how good intentions go wrong when applied without consideration for the end-user.
 
Comments
Browbeaten Citizen
2 weeks ago
Must ask chaiwala to first do KYW (Know your wife) and KYD (Know your degree)
milindhonwad
1 month ago
Partial Reply To Comment of "Narayansa" made 2 days ago : Policy matters relating to introduction of "FASTag" and any modification to this scheme/ system falls in the domain of Ministry of Road Transport and Highways ( MoRTH).
milindhonwad
1 month ago
There are many vehicle owners who drive only within the city limits and don't drive on expressways and national highways to other cities. They have already been forced to buy a FASTag ( with the minimum subscription of Rs 100 ) while purchasing the vehicle. Will such people face deactivation or closure of their FASTags? Such vehicle owners have NOT USED their FASTags even once. What if they are required to go to another city by an expressway or NH? THE POLICYMAKERS NEED TO TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION SUCH CASES AND PROVIDE SOME SOLUTION.
narayansa
1 month ago
After reading the link provided by you in the article to NPCI circular, it appears that the KYV guidelines are issued by Indian Highway Management Co. Ltd(IHMCL).[ In the IHMCL website there were emailids for fasttag complaints and inf0 to IHMCL. To both those emailIDs, I sahred the link to your article and sent the following mail:
Pl carefully read the above article and readers' comments and tell me if even the Directors of the Board can themselves implement these onerous guidelines for their personal vehicles.
Most authoritarian and ivory tower, bureaucratic directions!
Instead of tracking criminals who are misusing your fastag system for stolen cars, you are by these guidelines treating the entire car owning population of the country as criminals and asking them to prove their innocence!
Please get some eminent human rights lawyers to whet your guidelines and mandates before you issue them.
rgds
pst123
1 month ago
Citizens are subject to all unnecessary and unproductive regulatory burden so that they are made lifeless and don't raise any voice.Can we become 5 trillion economy this way.Citizens should prove their identity,their assets like vehicles etc.but they don't know who is the owner of public assets like roads,bridges.That comes to light only after a major accident and after "passing the buck buck"game.Why authorities don't display boards of ownership of public assets just like RC of vehicles.Citizens are required to revalidate RCs,KYVs.Listed cos are required to file quarterly,half yearly,annual reports.Similarly,Why public assets like roads,bridges are not subject to periodical audit/review. Authorities should strengthen their surveillance and intellgence system so that they catch culprits and not harrase all and sundry presuming that all citizens are culprits.
akbardesh96
1 month ago
Similar to bank KYC. Customers every now and then asked for KYC but frauds committed by staff as seen recently in ICICI bank.
ustripoct23
1 month ago
Fastag was.supposed to be for payment of tolls. Now they have permitted Malls and parking lots to collect parking fees from the Fastag which could lead to illegal access and debits without any accountability by the issuing authority. It is nothing but taking money from your bank account without verification. THIS SHOULD BE BANNED!!!
vicky.gonsalves88
1 month ago
So now even my car has to prove its identity… Should I start taking it to the passport office too?
devilsworld.undefined
1 month ago
Morons in offices. They are supposed to go to each citizens house and do their duty instead of citizens going to them. But just to take BRIBE these illiterate BABUS come up with low minded tricks
pst123
1 month ago
There is competition
among bureaucracy as to who can make life more hellish.KYV is Kill Your Vehicle and KYC is Kill Your Customer.
Kamal Garg
Replied to pst123 comment 1 month ago
Good one : Kill your vehicle and Kill your customer.
nandan.maluste
1 month ago
To make matters worse, the KYV software easily rejects uploads
narayansa
1 month ago
This is alarming? When was it introduced and by which ministry?
Kamal Garg
Replied to narayansa comment 1 month ago
And where and how to comply with these requirements. On which platform one is supposed to do KYV ?
smdegaonkar
Replied to Kamal Garg comment 1 month ago
I am a senior citizen & I don't know about KYV. Infact I came accross this term now only. Many such seniors will not be knowing about KYV.
Housing Society Problems and Solutions: Avoiding Pitfalls in Redevelopment and AGM Practices
Shirish Shanbhag 12 June 2025
Week after week, we receive a steady stream of questions from cooperative housing society (CHS/the Society) members who are grappling with the complexities of society management—be it redevelopment, maintenance charges, or annual...
If Non-veg Food Hurts Religious Sentiments, Why Order from a Restaurant That Serves It? Mumbai Consumer Court
Giti Pratap (Bar  and  Bench) 10 June 2025
A consumer court in Mumbai recently remarked that if non-vegetarian food hurts one's religious sentiments, one always has the option to order food from restaurants that serve exclusively vegetarian food. (Gargi Prakash Joshi & Anr. v....
Reliance General Insurance Asked To Pay Rs15 Lakh to Widow in Personal Accident Claim Dispute
Moneylife Digital Team 09 June 2025
In a significant consumer protection ruling, the national consumer disputes redressal commission (NCDRC) has directed Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd to pay Rs15 lakh to a Himachal Pradesh woman who lost her husband in a road...
How To Use DIGIPIN and Know Your PIN Code
Moneylife Digital Team 09 June 2025
India has taken a major leap in modernising its postal and address infrastructure with the launch of two innovative web platforms by the department of posts (DoP) under the Union ministry of communications: ‘Know Your DIGIPIN’ and...
Free Helpline
Legal Credit
Feedback