Employee shareholders turn whistleblower over irregularities in Metropolitan Stock Exchange; Exchange denies allegations
Some employee shareholders of Metropolitan Stock Exchange of India Ltd (MSEI) allege that MSEI, the youngest and the third national level stock Exchange had used member's fund for its working capital requirements and other activities, which was pointed out in an audit report. MSEI, however, has denied all allegations made by whistleblowers and said that it has initiated appropriate action against the ‘suspected perpetrators’.
Sharing their communication with the Exchange and market regulator SEBI, the whistleblowers allege that “The New Management and Directors had used member’s funds for working capital requirement of Exchange and for illegal activities from March 2016. This is breaching the bylaws and violating Investment policy and risk management practices of our Exchange, which lays down the risk management of the members and own fund. This is also clearly captured in the special audit carried out by Kalyaniwala & Mistry at behest of SEBI and SEBI too had informed the Exchange to earmark members fund separately in investment and not to use it for working capital requirements. Moreover, this fund was used for market making activities (Prohibited by SEBI/ Reserve Bank of India-RBI) in currency derivative (CD) segment and for other direct and indirect modes of siphoning funds of Exchange. 
Accorfing to them “This was gross negligence carried out by the management and Board risking members fund and did not maintain net surplus of member’s fund and used it for nine months before whistleblowers escalated the matter and SEBI instructing the Exchange to close the facility in December 2016. However, no action was initiated by SEBI against the management and the board for this gross violation.”
The Exchange, however, has refuted all allegations made by the whistleblowers. In an email, MSEI says, "It has come to our attention that a handful of people have been trying to malign the image of the exchange by making baseless allegations and malicious statements against the Board of Directors, Management, Auditors and key people at MSEI. We strongly refute these baseless allegations and have initiated appropriate legal action against the suspected perpetrators."
Here are the questions we sent to MSEI, based on documents and correspondence shared by the whistleblowers, and replies given by the Exchange...
1. Was the Exchange using member's fund for its working capital requirements and activities, especially in currency derivative (CD) segment as pointed out in the Audit report conducted at behest of SEBI. If yes, what action was taken by the Exchange against those involved in this activity?
MSEI: As a responsible market infrastructure institution of the country, we operate in a highly regulated environment. Every action and every business decision passes through a process that is defined by regulators and with consent of our highly respected PIDs (Public interest Director) and the Board of Directors. As far as financial transparency is concerned, all statutory provisions are followed and duly complied including the matter of availing OD facility. This was done with due intimation to SEBI. The details as desired are published periodically and are available in the Public domain. 
2. Has the Exchange ever used market making in CD segment using own fund?
3. There are allegations that the Exchange does not follow Whistleblower Policy and several such persons/entities were allegedly harassed, for which complaints were made to the Board/Committee. How many complaints were received by the Exchange Board or Committee from Whistleblowers and what action was taken on such complaints?
MSEI: All complaints, queries and “whistle blowing" concerns are treated with utmost sensitivity, seriousness and were found to be lacking any merit by the Audit Committee Chairman. In fact, the Board and the committees appointed by the board undertook a rigorous enquiry and submitted the reports. The complete process took place as required under the whistle blowing policy, followed by the audits duly completed. 
4. There are allegations that one such complaint from a Whistleblower was closed after 292 days (as against 45 days specified in the Whistleblower Policy of the Exchange) based on a report from an internal auditor. Is this true?
MSEI: As per the Whistle Blower Policy, the Investigation needs to be completed within 45 days. However there is no obligation for the findings of the Investigation to be shared. The Whistle Blower may have been informed of the closure of the complaint at a later date as a courtesy and not as a requirement under the policy.
5. During its rights issues in August 2016 and September 2017, the Exchange allegedly allotted unsubscribed portion to about 200 entities. Is this true?
MSEI: As per the Companies Act 2013, shares can be allotted to up to 200 entities from the unsubscribed portion. The exchange has fully complied with the requirements as per Companies Act 2013.
6. It is alleged that the Exchange is unable to retain employees and there have been over 100 retrenchments over the past two years. Those who left the Exchange include, two CFOs, two Company Secretaries, IT Heads (2), and Legal Head (2). Is this true? If yes, what is the reason for this type of mass exits?
MSEI: There has been no retrenchments of employees during the last 2 years. Every business has ups and downs and there was a phase when our Clearing Corporation was struggling to meet SEBI mandated Net worth Requirements. The exchange and its employees worked together to make the Clearing Corporation get well capitalized. The period of uncertainty was triumphed and today we stand on strong foundation. While, in the tough times, we did witness some talent quit for better prospects, however, we were overwhelmed with the confidence that our shareholders and employees bestowed upon us. In fact, the exchange has inducted many new faces from reputed Indian and MNC Financial Institutions.  
The Annualized Attrition rate for the Organization is well within the benchmark for the financial services sector. 
7. The Exchange's Annual Report for FY2016-17 reportedly does not mention complaints filed by whistleblowers. Also shareholders' approval was sought to increase remuneration of the Exchange's MD without obtaining approval from SEBI. Is this true?
MSEI: While the Exchanges Annual Report for the Financial Year 2016-17 has necessary disclosures regarding the Whistle Blowers Policy, there is no requirement for disclosure of any specific whistle blower complaints. 
  • Like this story? Get our top stories by email.



    Ramesh Poapt

    2 years ago

    so...the junior copies seniors!

    BSE recognised as a DOSM by US SEC
    Stock exchange major BSE on Wednesday said that it has been recognised as a "Designated Offshore Securities Market" (DOSM) by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
    According to the stock exchange major, the DOSM status allows sale of securities to US investors through the trading venue of BSE without registration of such securities with the US SEC and "thus eases the trades by US investors in India".
    Further, BSE said that the DOSM status is expected to primarily benefit securities issued in US private placements to institutional investors. 
    "The availability of a liquid resale market is expected to make exempt offerings by BSE-listed companies more attractive to US investors," the exchange said in a statement.
    "The recognition will also enhance the attractiveness of Indian Depository Receipts (IDRs) amongst US investors."
    Disclaimer: Information, facts or opinions expressed in this news article are presented as sourced from IANS and do not reflect views of Moneylife and hence Moneylife is not responsible or liable for the same. As a source and news provider, IANS is responsible for accuracy, completeness, suitability and validity of any information in this article.
  • User 

    SEBI suggests listed entities with unlisted subsidiaries set up governance unit
    The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) on Thursday recommended setting up of 'Governance Committee' within listed entities which have a large number of unlisted subsidiaries.
    According to a SEBI circular, listed entities may monitor "their governance through a dedicated group governance unit" which shall comprise of Board members. 
    "A strong and effective group governance policy may be established by the entity," the market regulator said in a circular.
    "The decision of setting up of such a unit or committee or having such a policy shall lie with the board of directors of the listed entity."
    The circular further said that listed entities may "disclose, under the 'Management Discussion and Analysis' section of the annual report, within the limits set by its competitive position, its medium-term and long-term strategy based on a time frame as determined by its board of directors".
    "The listed entity may articulate a clear set of long-term metrics specific to the company's long term strategy to allow for appropriate measurement of progress."
    The recommendations have been suggested by the 'Committee on Corporate Governance' under the Chairmanship of Uday Kotak. 
    On May 9, the regulator in a notification mandated listed entities on some of the suggestions made by the Committee.
    SEBI has mandated top 500 listed entities on the basis of market capitalisation, as at the end of the immediate previous financial year to appoint at least one woman independent director by April 1, 2019, and in the top 1,000 companies by April 1, 2020.
    It has also called for separate positions of MD and Chairperson in the top 500 companies by April 1, 2020.
    In March, the securities market regulator approved most of the measures suggested by the Kotak Committee for enhancing corporate governance, along with steps to strengthen algorithmic trading and encourage participation through the MF route.
    Disclaimer: Information, facts or opinions expressed in this news article are presented as sourced from IANS and do not reflect views of Moneylife and hence Moneylife is not responsible or liable for the same. As a source and news provider, IANS is responsible for accuracy, completeness, suitability and validity of any information in this article.
  • User 

    We are listening!

    Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.

    To continue

    Sign Up or Sign In


    To continue

    Sign Up or Sign In



    online financial advisory
    Pathbreakers 1 & Pathbreakers 2 contain deep insights, unknown facts and captivating events in the life of 51 top achievers, in their own words.
    online financia advisory
    The Scam
    24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
    Moneylife Online Magazine
    Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
    financial magazines online
    Stockletters in 3 Flavours
    Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
    financial magazines in india
    MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
    (Includes Moneylife Online Magazine)
    FREE: Your Complete Family Record Book
    Keep all the Personal and Financial Details of You & Your Family. In One Place So That`s Its Easy for Anyone to Find Anytime
    We promise not to share your email id with anyone