ED attaches properties worth Rs200 crore of Basil International, others in ponzi case
The Enforcement Directorate on Thursday said it has attached properties totalling Rs 200 crore of different companies of the Basil International Ltd in several states in its probe into a ponzi scheme case.
 
In a statement, the agency said: "The ED has attached assets to the tune of Rs 200 crore under the provisions of Prevention of Money Laundering Act in a ponzi scheme case."
 
The agency said the attached assets include lands, flats, factories, hotels, amusement park, tea estate, office spaces, shops, registered in the name of 16 companies of BIL in Assam, West Bengal, Odisha, Jharkhand, Uttar Pradesh, Tripura and Maharashtra along with balances lying in the company's bank accounts. 
 
The ED has registered a case of money laundering on the basis of a chargesheet filed by the CBI against BIL and others for cheating common public by propagating and selling illegal schemes and by promising huge and unsustainable returns. 
 
The agency said it was found that the funds were fraudulently collected by selling illegal schemes through chain of agents in Assam, West Bengal, Tripura, Odisha, Jharkhand and several other states.
 
These schemes were sold not only in the name of BIL but also in the name of other companies like Vamshi Chemicals Ltd, Nixcil Pharmaceuticals and Specialties Ltd. and Basil Express Ltd. 
 
The agency aid that funds collected through the schemes were illegally diverted by creating a web of shell companies. It said that more than 60 private and public limited shell companies had been identified so far.
 
A scrutiny of the accounts maintained by these companies lead to a trail in the proceeds of the crime.
 
Disclaimer: Information, facts or opinions expressed in this news article are presented as sourced from IANS and do not reflect views of Moneylife and hence Moneylife is not responsible or liable for the same. As a source and news provider, IANS is responsible for accuracy, completeness, suitability and validity of any information in this article.
  • User

    COMMENTS

    Veeresh

    1 month ago

    Interestingly enough, this case along with others will now face the "multiple FIRs" route, with sentences applied consecutively and not concurrently or for just a single case.



    https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/builders-to-face-separate-trials-on-victims-complaints-hc/articleshow/70165845.cms

    Jailed Arun Saha centrifugal force in fixing rating agencies at IL&FS
    The rating agencies fiasco viz IL&FS is now common knowledge. Triple A rated IL&FS Group entities enjoyed best of credit worthiness in the market place and a whole catalogue of high profile MNCs, trusts and corporate entities subscribed to its bonds.
     
    On Wednesday, it accounted for another victim. CARE Ratings placed Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Rajesh Mokashi on leave until further notice, making it the second rating agency to do so amid regulatory concerns. Earlier this month, ICRA Ltd, the Indian unit of Moody's Investors Service, placed its CEO Naresh Takkar on leave after Sebi forwarded concerns raised anonymously to the company. 
     
    CARE said Mokashi would be on leave until the company had examined an anonymous complaint against him sent to the Sebi. The same Mokashi connect emerges in the questioning of joint Managing Director (MD) at IL&FS, Arun Saha.
     
    Saha, a key member of the operating cabal who was arrested by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) in mid-June, has during the course of his interrogation dropped quite a few clangers and implicated himself and the clique which ran the Group headed by Ravi Parthasarthy on the jiggery pokery that was going on. 
     
    The malfeasance stems from the role played by this closed user group. The narrative that emerges from Saha's questioning on this issue is a telling tale of how the collusion between managements and ratings agencies functions to the detriment of corporate India. 
     
    Take a gander at the questioning of Saha by the Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO), which reveals the world of complicity. On a question posed to him by the SFIO during the course of the interrogation, Saha is asked about a mail dated December 30, 2015 from Ravi Parthasarthy to him. His response is that he intimated Ravi that IL&FS had not given CRISIL any business and only once the negative rating in ITNL was removed by them would business be given to them again for new ratings. 
     
    On being asked about how extreme pressure was brought to bear in the context of forwarding of the Rating letter with the mail subject, IEECL-CARE RATING BBB- OUTLOOK STABLE, Saha's retort was that it was done in the context of achieving the result for FY 2017 with only two months left in the financial year. 
     
    Extreme pressure being in the context of the Rating Agency agreeing to the company's Plan. So brazen and naked was the threat of removing or giving business by Saha and Parthasarthy that it was used as a lever for power play. 
     
    Here is a sample of the line of questioning:
     
    Q4. Please state the issues which you were handling in rating agencies in absence of Ravi in light with the answer to question no.30 in your statement dated 9.4.2019.
     
    Ans. The matters handled were with regard to update on fund raising plan, Operational issues raised by the Rating agencies. Post Mr Parthasarathy's illness attending meeting with Rating Agencies along with Mr Hari Sankaran on matters relating to capital raising plan in IL&FS that was contemplated and the shareholder support and divestment initiatives of ITNL and other assets.
     
    Q5. What are the operational issues which were handled by you with the rating agencies?
     
    Ans. Issues, if any that the agency wanted to have discussions on any operational matters. Like various discussions were held with regard to adoption of IND AS account standard, compliance of norms, observations of auditors etc.
     
    Q8. You have been shown email dated 24.11.2016 from Hari to you regarding appointment of an Independent director, why have you stated that in the reply of the same that the person has to be non-intrusive and obedient?
     
    Ans. That was inappropriate communication. What I wanted to communicate was that the person should be a nice gentleman.
     
    Q9. Are you suffering from any mental illness?
     
    Ans. No, I am not suffering from any mental illness.
     
    Q10. Then in that situation how can the words non-intrusive and obedient mean nice? Which in fact are the very reasons why an independent director is mandated in Companies Act?
     
    Ans. It was a judgmental error to use those terms.
     
    Q11. Are you saying today on 17.04.2019 that the words used by you in 2016 were inappropriate for the appointment of an independent director?
     
    Ans. Yes I am saying this today.
     
    Q13. Please see the email dated 4.5.2018 from you to Ravi wherein you have stated that I have told ICRA to keep in abeyance the downgrade in rating to A- (negative) for ITNL. Can you do so?
     
    Ans. I had requested ICRA on intimation from ITNL, that to keep the rating decision in abeyance for discussions and I wanted the CFO of ITNL to meet them asap.
     
    Q14. Were you not interfering in the independent process of rating agencies to the advantage of your company?
     
    Ans. No. As soon as a rating mandate is given to the rating agency, the agency has the unfettered right to go ahead with their rating decisions. As a customary practice, rating agencies keep a communication with the Company till it's formally published and provide draft of their communication for review and comments.
     
    Q20. Were such communications with Mr Anjan Ghosh done previously also by you for ratings given by ICRA for instruments raised by your companies?
     
    Ans. I do''t think so, it has been done by me previously for ratings given by ICRA for instruments raised by our companies. This would be a one off case, where such telephonic communication has been made with Mr Anjan Ghosh and email to that effect (dated 04.05.2018) had been sent to me which is mentioned above.
     
    Q21. So you mean to say that you were influencing the rating agencies after the customary practice of communication sent to your company?
     
    Ans. No, in this case no formal communication was sent to me.
     
    Q23. Having written -- "I have already spoken to CARE and India Rating"", please explain what does this mean? Were you speaking directly and if so to whom?
     
    Ans. I do‘'t recollect to whom I have spoken in the rating agency.
     
    Q24. Do you know anyone in CARE and India Ratings?
     
    Ans. Mr Rajesh Mokashi, MD of CARE and Mr Anando Bhowmik, head of financial services ratings of India Ratings were known to me.
     
    Q16. In case the interactions were done by the officials of the companies with the rating agencies then in what capacity were these rating agencies informing you?
     
    Ans. The communications take place at the credit department and accounts department and the credit department handling these rating agencies communications were headed by Sujoy Das and in case of ITNL it was handled by Mr Dilip Bhatia, CFO.
     
    Q17. So you mean to say in the context of the mail above that Dilip Bhatia informed you about the downgraded rating of ITNL by ICRA?
     
    Ans. The name of the person who intimated me over the phone about this downgrade is not recollected today but he was reporting to Dilip Bhatia, CFO in ITNL.
     
    Q18. So after this telephonic communication by this person in ITNL you mailed Ravi immediately about this downgrade.
     
    Ans. Yes.
     
    Q25. Is''t it coincidental that you are knowing all the heads of the rating agencies in spite of not having any mandate for taking up the task of rating of the IL&FS entities?
     
    Ans. I have been dealing for IL&FS rating for over two decades and in this process have made various officials of rating agencies from time to time and on few occasions interacted with rating agency officials for group rating if needed by the group entity.
     
    Disclaimer: Information, facts or opinions expressed in this news article are presented as sourced from IANS and do not reflect views of Moneylife and hence Moneylife is not responsible or liable for the same. As a source and news provider, IANS is responsible for accuracy, completeness, suitability and validity of any information in this article.
  • Like this story? Get our top stories by email.

    User

    IL&FS Mess: Grant Thornton Submits Interim Report on Forensic Audit of Credit Rating Agencies

    Infrastructure Leasing & Financial Services (IL&FS) says Grant Thornton, which was appointed to conduct forensic audit on credit rating agencies (CRAs) engaged its group companies over the past 10 years, has submitted its first report.

    In a statement, IL&FS says, the audit evaluates the role of CRAs in rating various debt instruments and facilitating excessive borrowings from money markets across group companies that eventually led to defaults.

    The board had appointed Grant Thornton to undertake this forensic audit on CRAs and submit the report in time bound manner. Grant Thornton has submitted its findings in the interim report to IL&FS.

    The report has been shared with relevant stakeholders, sector experts, and legal teams for information, consultation and opinion, the company says.

    The mandate for the forensic report was to audit the role of CRAs and discover any possible wrong-doings in rating IL&FS group companies during the period of 2008 to 2018.

    The report has analysed several email communications between the erstwhile management and the representatives of credit rating agencies during the specified period.

    CARE Ratings, ICRA, India Ratings and Brickwork have been the main rating agencies for IL&FS Transportation Networks Ltd (ITNL), IL&FS Financial Services Ltd (IFIN) and IL&FS during the period reviewed by Grant Thornton.

    During September 2018, rating agencies ICRA, CARE and India Ratings downgraded the bonds, long-term loans and short-term commercial papers of IL&FS and its subsidiaries. It is interesting to note that IL&FS did not seek ratings from CRISIL.
     
    The credit ratings of IL&FS' bond papers went down by nine notches to 'BB' grade, which is considered non-investment grade, from 'AA+' which indicates a strong financial profile.
     
    The ratings of commercial papers, which are debt papers that mature within a year, went down by six notches to A4 from A1+, another instance of sharp change in the financial profile from strong to very weak.
     
    Several mutual fund (MF) schemes hold the debt papers of IL&FS, and its subsidiaries, in large numbers. The total amount of currently outstanding debt papers held by MF schemes was valued at around Rs2,400 crore as at end-August, before the downgrade.

    Brickwork was introduced in IFIN and ITNL from 2016, replacing CRISIL (in ITNL), during this period under review, the statement from IL&FS says.

  • User

    We are listening!

    Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.
      Loading...
    Close

    To continue


    Please
    Sign Up or Sign In
    with

    Email
    Close

    To continue


    Please
    Sign Up or Sign In
    with

    Email

    BUY NOW

    online financial advisory
    Pathbreakers
    Pathbreakers 1 & Pathbreakers 2 contain deep insights, unknown facts and captivating events in the life of 51 top achievers, in their own words.
    online financia advisory
    The Scam
    24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
    Moneylife Online Magazine
    Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
    financial magazines online
    Stockletters in 3 Flavours
    Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
    financial magazines in india
    MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
    (Includes Moneylife Online Magazine)