Doing PhD in India: Think Thrice!
Chandraprabha Venkatagiri 09 February 2018
Sumithramma (not her real name) is in her late 40s. It has been nine years since she enrolled for a doctoral programme and she is almost on the verge of getting disqualified from the course. She was working with a guide who was a senior faculty member in a well-known state university in south India. “I did not make proper referrals before agreeing to be her student,” rues Sumithra. She recalls with horror the amount of mental torture this lady gave her. “It is often said that women are women’s biggest enemies. It proved to be true in my case.  In state universities you don’t have much of a choice when it comes to a doctoral guide.” Sumithra suffered such mental agony and depression in the last few years that her family suggested that she abandon the course, instead of allowing her health to get affected. 
 
Luckily, for Sumithra, she diverted her mind to spirituality and has now finished writing the thesis. “I have run every errand possible for my guide. Shadow-writing books and research papers for her; booking tickets for her family vacation; carrying home-cooked food for her; visiting banks and post offices…” Sumithra stops for a while and then she says “I would not recommend that anyone does a PhD, at least not in India. It is not worth the effort, unless you are lucky to manage a job in a government institution.”
 
If you do a PhD in India, the guide should be someone who should lead you towards the path to completion. Most guides lead their doctoral students into a rabbit hole. Out of the total number of enrolments in a doctoral course, only 8%-10% of the scholars manage to complete the programme. Guides play no small role in this. The moment a student’s doctoral degree becomes dependent on a guide, ego intervenes. In state-run universities, the torture is in the form of asking scholars to run a number of personal errands for the guide. In private universities, the fees are much higher; but the torture manifests in a different form. Guides end up asking scholars to do lot of unnecessary stuff delaying the completion of the degree by two to three years. Then, there are universities that have made a mockery of the doctoral programme by (literally) selling the degrees. Imagine scholars completing the doctoral degree in 18 months or 36 months. 
 
Unless the scholar has a passion for research and unless the guide has the mental aptitude to guide the scholar, the entire experience of working for a doctoral degree faces numerous challenges. Many educational institutions do insist on a doctoral degree while recruiting faculty but fail to estimate the rigour with which the research has been pursued. Acquiring a degree and acquiring knowledge are not the same. This is the reason why the corporate world has an aversion for doctoral students. The main component of a doctoral dissertation is the research question and identification of research gap. Gap identification ideally takes anywhere between two to three years and is the result of an exhaustive review of existing literature. Most students manipulate the process by reading only the abstract and conclusion of research papers, to cut short the time. This ends up short-circuiting the process of knowledge acquisition.
 
Research is about offering something new—not offering old wine in a new bottle. The Western world is years ahead of us in terms of path-breaking research. In India, despite having skilled people, we end up succumbing to the lure of selecting patently absurd topics for research. Be it marketing, human resources or information technology or finance, the area of research is a fecund ground for exploring areas that have not been hitherto explored for their research potential. But this needs one to arrive at the precise statement of the problem based on the identification of the research gap.
 
Private universities in cities like Pune, Chennai and Bengaluru have been luring software geeks to pursue a doctoral degree. Some of these universities have amassed huge sums of money in the form of fees. While the total cost of pursuing a doctoral degree in a state university is somewhere between Rs2 lakh and Rs3 lakh (excluding the ‘other’ costs of the course), private universities charge anywhere between Rs5 lakh and Rs7 lakh. Return on investment? Your guess is as good as mine. For young doctoral graduates, the starting salary in an educational institution varies from Rs25,000-Rs40,000—the salary an MBA from a middle-rung business school draws. Strangely, none of the Indian universities seems to have a feedback mechanism for evaluating the capabilities of their doctoral programme guides. As most students drop out even before the course work is complete, universities end up with loads of cash. 
 
One of the doctoral research guides says, “I request scholars not to have huge expectations from the degree. The lesser your expectations, the lesser is the stress that you will subject yourself to. On most occasions, a doctoral degree produces a halo effect that is temporal in nature.” Unless the individual pursues his passion for research, the doctoral degree becomes a full stop. 
 
After acquiring a doctoral degree, individuals generally join educational institutions. Very few join industry. Some become entrepreneurs, if they have some financial backing. Some pursue a post-doctoral fellowship abroad. Others keep their interest in research alive by publishing papers in renowned, peer-reviewed journals and guiding young doctoral scholars.
 
Through this column, I make a humble appeal to all doctoral guides to support the deserving scholar in every way possible. Leave your egos aside. Doctoral scholars, who shirk work and have joined the course only for its (so-called) prestige value, do not deserve any mercy or empathy. But doctoral scholars passionate about research and those who are keen to make significant research contributions deserve empathy, attention and kindness. 
 
Scholars need a reasonable level of emotional intelligence to deal with the doctoral guide and committee members. They must develop inter-personal skills. If there is a problem, postpone thinking about it and then revisit the problem. Hours of reading in solitude and taking down notes creates a lot of pressure. So, scholars need breaks in between. A good effort in research entails reading anywhere between 250-350 research papers—though the number may vary depending on the topic. Scholars need to develop highest levels of patience while skimming the literature, to identify the research gap.
 
Research is not just about usage of statistical tools. Tools exist to validate your study so that your research outcomes are aligned with the objectives. Modern tools, like structural equation modelling, are useful to validate the conceptual model. 
 
But age-old tools, like multiple regression, factor analysis, discriminant analysis and Chi-square are no less relevant. Most statistical software programs are available for a free trial for three-months. Most guides insist on using a modern tool without realising that the tool must be relevant for the research in question. 
 
Some scholars have the tendency to outsource the statistical part to statisticians, but that is a grave mistake on their part. Every scholar should devote considerable time to learn new tools to support his/her research effort. Doctoral guides must avoid playing to the gallery. Their style must be an ideal blend of firmness and accommodativeness. 
 
This is, of course, easier said than done. Some institutions invite scholars to take part in doctoral consortiums. But a word of caution is necessary here. Ideas can easily get stolen in these so-called consortiums/ conferences. Additionally, few institutes organise such consortiums to earn money and get credits from statutory/ regulatory bodies. The scholar has to be careful not to share his research agenda with anyone outside the circle of influence. 
 
Unless an individual is ready to face all these challenges while pursuing a doctoral degree, it is advisable that he/she stays away from such a pursuit. There are those with a doctoral degree who are denied a promotion and languish in the same role for years together. I once asked an HR manager from Accenture whether she would recruit PhDs and there was a deafening silence from her end. 
 
Comments
johnresident70
1 year ago
Yes its true education in india needs total revamp. Only MHRD and Central government needs to intervene. in this 21st centre atleast indian proffesors need to change there attitude this all comes from the government ministers who are wrong idols for the society with there inept atttitude of bossing around common citizens. The HOD,Dean and Proffessor are jackasses for state,private universities producing dumbasses every year out of college taking crores of donation.
murtidevi111111
2 years ago
Absolute Truth.
People have described their ordeal that they have to do their Post office to bank , tickets , give them ghee 10kg in each meeting , jaggery (several kilos ) , sugar cane , take their kids from home to school , just watch this Jaspal Bhatti PHD episode: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JCy9BfqMw2c , this is reality even in 2020.
PHD should be awarded based on new invention , there should be no role of universities in it.
anyone made any discovery , he/she can apply to patent office and get his/her degree, no college fee, enrollment.
content1188
2 years ago
Agreed with the article written by you . It is true before joining any programme in india not think only thrice think atleast 100 a time before enroll in any programme in India unviersities.
Sqn Ldr J P Singh
2 years ago
I can understand the agony of Ms. Sumithramma. In fact Guides are facilitators to the research scholar, but in contrast it becomes hindrance in the pursuit of the objective of research leading to Ph.D. I hope in due course of time Guides with humility will come forward to help scholars.
Sqn. Ldr. (Dr.) J. P. Singh
Amit Pandya
3 years ago
Yes, your article is true. I know many people who are doing there PhD and are facing harassment. And they have also to do their Guides personal work. I feel that in total every Education Institute has become a profit mongering mafia which is the reason mostly highly talented people leave the country. Those who are sitting in the colleges and universities are even not able to do the job of a clerk in the Corporate Sector. It's not only about PhD when I was doing my graduation, we have a 30 mark internal system which is in the hands of the Professor, so one of my madams had once told me to go to the ticket centre to book two tickets for her, I had clearly told her that it is not my work to do and don't feel that I will do it for that 30 marks, this degree is just a piece of paper of me, but everyone cannot do that, so once you fall for such people, you will never be able to come out.
sudipt Maitra
3 years ago
The quality of Ph.D discourse in management from state universities(govt. b-schools) 'awarded' dissertation topics and their enclosed texts are not worthy of reading, let alone referencing. The govt. has done its bit of 'shoveling the shit upwards' by asking for Ph.D degree as a mandatory requirement for teaching management in universities. Aspirants of all hues have sought to gain a Ph.D degree to be eligible for a teaching job. Courtesy this policy, compounded by reservation policy, the teacher of management courses in most state run management institutes are a nomenclature in themselves...completely nonsynchronous with corporate requirement of management regimen. End result is that we have ever increasing batches of students spewing out of these institutes with little or dated inputs of management theories and practice, Time the government starts to think on establishing a professional body of management which would conduct examination of standing/award degrees( preferably after post graduation) for absorption into the business/corporate world like the Chartered Accountant/Company Secretary
hareesh
4 years ago
Well written article and it's a long due to be appeared in magazines such as MoneyLife and other main stream news about the plight most of the research scholars in India(PhD & MS).
First of all thanks for bringing this article and get the people know what's behind curtains of these so-called research groups in India.
All the events narrated by the author are no exaggeration and are the true stories across the Pan-Indian universities. I was worst victim in the same scenario in one of best IIxx in India.
Just replace the name in the article and story is more or like same as Mine. After much ordeal and going through some of the toughest entrance tests(GATE), in-house entrance test and interviews,
gone to IIxx to do my MS ( Master of Science) after by BTech [ Success Ratio is almost 1:100 in this process]. My torture started with in few weeks and I had Two guides but none seem to give any direction to my Research and I too had a little idea of what I am going to in vast field of Semi-Conductors.
In almost all the research meetings, what I get is the worst abuse of words which alone is sufficient for mental and emotional breakdown. Threats like 'We will send you' are normal phrases.
Yeah it is true that they sent some of my colleagues in a similar manner - Just take them to HOD office and send them. No process is there to listen to the problems of these research scholars even if it there, they are not effective.
At last I found some helping hands in Lab-supervisor who happened to be a electronic-hobbyist and able to finish my Thesis. All it took me ~ 4 years to finish my MS. There is not a single MS or PhD in my entire stay that haven't gone through their these toubles in form or other.
I could able to produce 6 Journal/conference papers and my project done attracted huge funds from government Research agencies such as DST. The memories still haunting me though it is around 10 years.
Truly think hundred times (Not just Thrice)before joining any of the research programs in Indian universities.

Yogeshwar More
Replied to hareesh comment 4 years ago
our analysis is alsoappropriate...but these must be spread to society, media and MHRD and goverment decisive authorities...let us come forward
Mentes
4 years ago
Well written article. But there is a bigger problem the author left to say is the sexual torture by guides.
Nitin Verma
Replied to Mentes comment 3 years ago
Even female guides can be blood suckers. I know one who hates male scholars and never let them complete their doctoral work. The higher education industry is based on unjust and incapable professors who take delight in making lives of scholars hell.
Free Helpline
Legal Credit
Feedback