Colonial-era law in Canada has no place for “truth as defence”

Satinder Paul Dhillon has been fighting for his right to say the truth in the face of court orders, which led to criminal contempt proceedings being initiated against him.

 

In a few days from now, 36 year old Satinder Singh Dhillon, a Canadian citizen born to Indian origin parents, will know his fate under the Contempt Law in Canada. His case stems from an involuntary bankruptcy proceeding against Mr Erwin Braich, which was initiated all the way back in 1999, as Mr Dhillon says, in an attempt to extort Mr Braich. KPMG was engaged as the administrator of the allegedly insolvent's assets, Mr Dhillon was one of the creditors to the allegedly insolvent party and was owed $3 million at the time. Mr Dhillon has pointed out over the years of the proceedings that KPMG has not executed the court's orders on the involuntary bankruptcy for over 14 years, making it the longest running bankruptcy case in Canada.

 

In 2009, then Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of British Columbia passed an order which said, “all persons having notice of this Order shall not, either directly or indirectly, make or continue to make or continue any publication of any kind including in a pleading which expresses any disparaging or defamatory statements about the Trustee, or any other person or entity connected to the administration of this bankruptcy." The trustee in this case was KPMG, the global consulting giant.

 

However, It is alleged that Mr Dhillon later published a blog titled “KPMG Stifles Freedom of Speech in Desperate Move.” Consequently, Satinder Dhillon was arrested and interrogated under section 127 of the Criminal Code of Canada, which deals with contempt of court. Mr Dhillon, a businessman and an activist himself, has been through various health troubles in the course of this fight. Finally, on 17 September 2014, the court convened to rule on whether “truth can be used as a defence” in cases of contempt.

 

Mr Dhillon has been arguing his own case, sometimes dramatically appearing in court with a wheelchair and a yoga mat and pillow handy in case he collapsed. There is bound to be more drama with Mark Stephens, lawyer of Wikileak's founder Julian Assange joining the last phase of his defence, along with Mumbai based advocate Jamshed Mistry, who even stood up for Mr Dhillon at the last hearing in the Supreme Court of British Columbia on 17th September.

 

Contempt laws have been decried as draconian and unfair all over the world. A vestige of the colonial past, it was recently in the limelight following Justice Katju's tirade against contempt laws. In this present case too says Mr Dhillon, “the arguments being presented will be to see if truth is allowed as a defence in this great nation!(sic)”

 

In contempt cases like that of Sahara's Subroto Roy, the court eventually acted against him when his disobedience of court orders was clear. The prosecutor on behalf of the Crown (Canadian state still pleads under the Crown) has argued that Mr Dhillon's alleged actions directly disobeyed the court's instruction. “I am fed up with being treated as a second class citizen and having to live at the whim of KPMG's power in this country,” he said in a release uploaded on the internet.

 

Finally, the judgement will test whether Mr Dhillon's arguments that his freedom of expression has been impinged, and in exercise of his freedom of expression whether a contempt law can ignore the contents of what is said or written. Mr Dhillon insists that what is written is true and in public interest, therefore the contempt proceedings are not justified and that the larger public good is also compromised by not allowing him to speak out against KPMG's actions. Mr Dhillon also alleges that KPMG is involved in trying to cover up what could quite possibly be the largest income tax fraud in the history of Canada. The well-known Mumbai-based lawyer Jamshed Mistry has been helping Mr Dhillon and has also appeared for him in the court.

Like this story? Get our top stories by email.

User

COMMENTS

simplified laws

4 years ago

oh great to know this.thanks to given this information about http://www.simplifiedlaws.com/">nri taxation in India

Neil Chudleigh

4 years ago

You would think that if there was no proof at the time of his arrest. With no proof that an investigation had taken place then you would think mr Dhillon should have been questioned by police in the form of an investigation, before a warrant issued and property seized also why was property other than that of the computer, for the proof would only be on the hard drive.Not even a disk copy would be proof of a posting, and certainly not paper files seized over whether or not he is guilty of writing a blog.It seems to me the police overstepped the bounds of only seizing property that pretains to the warrant, also in no way do the conductors of an investigation hand over records and files seized to the accuser. Those files should be held as evidence and returned. Because in no statement that I have heard, was mr Dhillon accused of theft of KPMG property.

ram

4 years ago

The Canadian court system does not uphold common sense or "justice". It is about "control" over the "process" which is known to the likes of the most serpentine lawyers and is not for the common man.

Where has the system come to when a judge must "ponder" if truth is a "defense".

What is contemptuous is a justice system that gives greater value to a side "show" rather than attacking the central issue of (in this case) outright fraud.

And by the way, isn't the justice system supposed to be based on the fact that "Truth trumps ALL"??

$1.1 Billion in Drug, Device Payments to Doctors Not Included in New US Database

The new Open Payments database of industry payments to doctors and teaching hospitals is more incomplete than previously known

 

The US government's new database of drug and device industry payments to doctors is even more incomplete than has been reported previously.


In a fact sheet posted online, federal officials disclosed that the database, dubbed Open Payments, is missing more than $1 billion in payments made between August and December 2013. These omissions are in addition to information the government has redacted from the payments it has disclosed, citing inconsistencies.


Open Payments was unveiled last week and included data on 4.4 million payments valued at $3.5 billion. More than half a million doctors and about 1,360 teaching hospitals received at least one payment.


The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, the agency overseeing the database, had said last week that it was not publishing any details on 9,000 payments that had been disputed by doctors or hospitals because those disputes hadn't been resolved. It also said it would withhold data on 190,000 research payments related to drugs and devices that are not yet on the market, as is mandated by law.


On a conference call with reporters, though, federal officials did not disclose that the unpublished data amounted to almost a quarter of the money drug and device makers dispensed in the final five months of last year.


That so much data is missing has been among the primary complaints lodged about Open Payments. The government withheld the names of doctors and hospitals associated with 40 percent of published payments and promised to disclose this information next year once it has been corrected and verified.


Early reviews of the Open Payments website, including our own, also have noted how difficult it is for consumers to use. In addition, doctors and pharmaceutical companies have been critical of the government for not being willing to immediately correct errors identified in the database, the Wall Street Journal reported. The government plans to correct them next year.

 

Courtesy: ProPublica.org

Like this story? Get our top stories by email.

User

Doctor-Industry Financial Connections Revealed
It's D-Day for the Sunshine Act in the US. Find out who has been wining and dining your doctor
 
Consumers now have access a database that allows them to find out what ties their doctors have to medical companies and whether there are any financial incentives for a physician to recommend or prescribe a particular product. 
 
Under a provision of the Patient Protection and Affordable Health Care Act (ACA), consumers can view the database, which will shed light on financial ties between drug and device manufacturers and health care providers. The provision, known as the Physician Payment Sunshine Act, grew out of the government’s desire to enforce anti-kickback statutes and reveal conflicts of interests between doctors and the medical industry.
 
Last winter, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), a division of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services that is overseeing the regulations, finalized rules for the provision, but consumers won’t see the benefits until next year when the information has to be disclosed to the public.
 
Who’s covered under the rules?
The rule requires that manufacturers of drugs, medical devices and medical supplies covered by Medicare, Medicaid, or the Children’s Health Insurance Program report financial payments for meals, travel, entertainment, royalties, licenses, gifts, research, or education provided to physicians or hospitals. The government can fine companies up to $1 million if the payments aren’t disclosed.
 
Companies don’t have to reveal payments under $10, product samples, education materials provided to patients, loans of covered devices during trial periods, or discounts.
 
Why are these regulations important to consumers?
Laws already on the books prevent physicians from prescribing a drug or recommending a particular medical device if the physician or close family member has a vested financial interest in the company making the products. Advocates for the regulations say the rules will help prevent medical companies from concealing ties with medical providers, help reduce conflicts of interest, and empower consumers to make informed decisions about products they are being advised to use.
 
Said Peter Budetti, a doctor and deputy administrator for CMS,
 
You should know when your doctor has a financial relationship with the companies that manufacture or supply the medicines or medical devices you may need. Disclosure of these relationships allows patients to have more informed discussions with their doctors.
 
 
Like this story? Get our top stories by email.

User

We are listening!

Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.
  Loading...
Close

To continue


Please
Sign Up or Sign In
with

Email
Close

To continue


Please
Sign Up or Sign In
with

Email

BUY NOW

online financial advisory
Pathbreakers
Pathbreakers 1 & Pathbreakers 2 contain deep insights, unknown facts and captivating events in the life of 51 top achievers, in their own words.
online financia advisory
The Scam
24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
Moneylife Online Magazine
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
financial magazines online
Stockletters in 3 Flavours
Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
financial magazines in india
MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
(Includes Moneylife Online Magazine)