Mr Gandhi said, "RTI and Right to Service acts of the Maharashtra government have come about eight to 10 months ago. These require improvements and a discussion is required with the Government. More powers are needed in the Right to Services Act. After the improvements, these Acts will transform Maharashtra into a true participative democracy."
Mr Ravat said, "Two Acts have been enacted - RTI and Prevention in Delay of Services Act. There is now one more - Right to Services Act. There is a flaw in the Right to Services Act, as it says that services will be notified. Why should the government repeat a notification, when it is there in the Prevention in Delay of Services Act. The Citizen's Charter should be final."
Inside story of the National Stock Exchange’s amazing success, leading to hubris, regulatory capture and algo scam
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance.
1-year online access to the magazine articles published during the subscription period.
Access is given for all articles published during the week (starting Monday) your subscription starts. For example, if you subscribe on Wednesday, you will have access to articles uploaded from Monday of that week.
This means access to other articles (outside the subscription period) are not included.
Articles outside the subscription period can be bought separately for a small price per article.
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance.
30-day online access to the magazine articles published during the subscription period.
Access is given for all articles published during the week (starting Monday) your subscription starts. For example, if you subscribe on Wednesday, you will have access to articles uploaded from Monday of that week.
This means access to other articles (outside the subscription period) are not included.
Articles outside the subscription period can be bought separately for a small price per article.
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance.
Complete access to Moneylife archives since inception ( till the date of your subscription )
Please refer CMO Feedback No
1902222/2016/TAPAL
Brief story of manage Registrar of co-operative (C.I.D.C.O.) and disrespecting LAW & JUDITIARY to get acquired large size of Prime located land parcel in the name of ‘Shree Ganesh Co-operative Housing Society’ plot No-1,Secter No-28,Nerul (W), Navi-Mumbai and then long-term poor maintenance through remote controlled MC to get premature ‘CIRTIFICATE OF DILAPIDATED’ Buildings to get Redevelopment Rights ‘UNOPPSED’ by chief promoters based on ‘UNDEMOCRETIC BAYLAWS’ with POLITICLE INFLUENCE and without any Capital investment (Finance) A ‘MODEL LITIGANT’
(A) Reference to a directive issued from State Government vide letter No-1093-3112-14C dated, 6th February 1993 to the Registrars of Co-operative to Register only FIVE (5) co-operative Housing societies to the A.P.M.C. traders/market functionary for residential accommodation (As per submission to the HC/Mumbai from ‘C.I.D.C.O.’ legal department ) In the year of 1993, but instead of FIVE, registered SIX (6) and surprisingly all of the allotted plots from ‘C.I.D.C.O.’ are developed and sold as ‘GENRAL-CATEGORY’ with a contractual ‘RIDER’ in all development agreements were assured to membership of the respective Housing Societies by a single developer i.e. MAYURESH DEVLOPERS, including the sixth one, is listed as plot No. 1, at Sector 28, Nerul (W) , allotted to ‘Shree Ganesh Co-operative Housing Society’, but immediately after getting Occupation Certificate, Society Committee adopted an ‘undemocratic’ bye-laws to deny our membership even after most of the individuals having sale agreements as ‘TRI-PARTY’ i.e. - Builder / developer + Society Promoters + We, individually
(it is a matter of an Investigation by agencies like Anti Corruption Bureau (ACB)),
(B) Since last ,15 years blocking of Basic Membership rights of 314 families by MC has created unwarranted litigation on a/c of A.P.M.C. and NON-A.P.M.C. with hidden material from an already decided PIL -474/1996 & of rejected WP-5771/97 with remark as ‘it is an abuse of the process of law’ then Supreme Court also rejected the SLP/10922 -10998 with respondent as chief Promoter appearing on No-12 and was one of the part of WP-5771/97 and
(C) At present WP-8508/2003 to get STAY order against the final order of State Government to change by laws and accommodate us as member based on our HC WP-No 4481/2001 vide No- RVA 2702/CR-208/15-C, Date-25/08/2003 it is an contempt of court again