Big Win for Gujarat Fishermen & Farmers. US Supreme Court Rules IFC, a WB Group Unit Is Not Above The Law & Can be Sued
In a landmark 7-1 decision, the US Supreme Court has ruled that World Bank group organisation, like International Finance Corporation (IFC) can be sued in US courts. This is a big victory for fishing community and farmers from Mundra in Gujarat, who were one of the petitioners in the case. The IFC had loaned $450 million for the construction of Tata Power’s Mundra power plant in 2008. These communities had sued IFC claiming that it was the failure of the World Bank group organisation to supervise this plan had caused environmental damage — pollution from the plant harmed the surrounding air, land, and water.
 
The Court’s decision marks a defining moment for the IFC – the arm of the World Bank Group that lends to the private sector. For years, the IFC has operated as if it were 'above the law', at times pursuing reckless lending projects that inflicted serious human rights abuses on local communities, and then leaving the communities to fend for themselves. 
 
The case involves an IFC-financed Tata Mundra coal powered power plant at Mundra in Gujarat. The petitioners in the Jam vs IFC case are members of local fishing and farming communities whose livelihoods, air quality, and drinking water have been devastated by the project. They alleged that the IFC and the project developers knew about these risks in advance but nevertheless chose to recklessly push forward with the project without proper protections in place.
 
Despite knowing the risks, the IFC provided a critical $450 million loan in 2008, enabling the project’s construction and giving the IFC immense influence over project design and operation. 
 
The IFC’s own internal compliance mechanism, the Compliance Advisor Ombudsman (CAO), issued a scathing report in 2013 confirming that the IFC had failed to ensure the Tata Mundra project complied with the environmental and social conditions of the IFC’s loan at virtually every stage of the project and calling for the IFC to take remedial action. 
 
IFC’s management responded to the CAO by rejecting most of its findings and ignoring others. In a follow-up report in early 2017, the CAO observed that the IFC remained out of compliance and had failed to take any meaningful steps to remedy the situation.
 
Welcoming the judgement, Dr Bharat Patel, general secretary, Machhimar Adhikar Sangharsh Sangathan, one of the petitioners in the case, said, “This is a huge victory for the people of Mundra in particular and other places in general, where World Bank’s faulty investments are wrecking communities and the environment.
 
This is a major step towards holding World Bank accountable for the negative impacts their investments are causing.” 
 
International organizations like the IFC have long claimed they are entitled to 'absolute' immunity, even as they engage in commercial activities, like the coal-fired power plant at the heart of this case. Because the relevant statute only gives the IFC the same immunity as foreign governments, and foreign governments do not have absolute immunity in US courts when they engage in commercial activities, the Supreme Court rejected this position “The International Finance Corp is therefore not absolutely immune from suit,” the Supreme Court ruled.
 
According to Joe Athialy, executive director of Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA), this is a victory of all who have fought for a more accountable World Bank since the past many decades world over and has fought valiant struggles against bank-funded projects on the ground, exposing the monumental human and environmental costs of their lending.
 
"This judgment will strengthen communities’ efforts to hold the Bank accountable and is a step in the direction of bringing accountability in financial institutions," he added.
 
The complainants originally tried to raise their concerns through the CAO, the IFC’s internal grievance mechanism, but when the IFC’s leadership ignored the grievance body’s conclusions, they reluctantly filed suit in the US as a last resort.
 
The EarthRights International represented the villagers, along with the Stanford Law School Supreme Court Litigation Clinic.
 
The Tata Mundra coal-fired power plant has caused significant harm to the communities living in its shadow. Construction of the plant destroyed vital sources of water used for drinking and irrigation. Coal ash has contaminated crops and fish laid out to dry, air pollutants are at levels dangerous to human health, and there has already been a rise in respiratory problems. The enormous quantity of thermal pollution – hot water released from the plant – has destroyed the local marine environment and the fish populations that fishermen like Budha Ismail Jam rely on to support their families. Although a 2015 law required all plants to install cooling towers to minimize thermal pollution by the end of 2017, the Tata plant has failed to do so.
 
A nine-mile-long coal conveyor belt, which transports coal from the port to the Plant, runs next to local villages and near fishing grounds. Coal dust from the conveyor and fly ash from the plant frequently contaminate drying fish, reducing their value, damage agricultural production, and cover homes and property. Some air pollutants, including particulate matter, are already present at levels dangerous to human health, in violation of Indian air quality standards and the conditions of IFC funding, and respiratory problems, especially among children and the elderly, are on the rise.
Like this story? Get our top stories by email.

User

COMMENTS

Ashok m Rane

3 months ago

GOOD LESSON FOR MIGHTY cCAPITALISTS, who r destroying nature for their Profits.

Meenal Mamdani

3 months ago

This is very good news indeed! Most if not all corporations and big banks behave as if they are above the law.
The sad part is that the bad decisions that result in such judgements against the corporation/bank do not affect the people who have actually made those decisions. The institution pays up the money affecting the shareholders while leaving the employees unharmed, ready to make bad decisions again.

Shankhadeep Nath

3 months ago

Isn\'t Tata regarded as a group with high ethics!

REPLY

Ashok m Rane

In Reply to Shankhadeep Nath 3 months ago

Every one is Sane unless contrary is proved!

Sun Pharma Promoter Shanghvi Finance Pledges More Shares in December Quarter
The promoters of Sun Pharma, who owned about 54.38% of the company, mainly through Shanghvi Finance Pvt Ltd as on December 2018, have marginally increased number of shares pledged. Of the 54.38% stake, 40% is held through Shanghvi Finance and 14.38% by others. Of the total promoters' holding, 4.10% (as a percentage of total number of shares) stake was pledged. Shanghvi Finance itself had pledged 2.7% of its 40%, which has now gone up to 3.29%.
 
Further, over the past few days, Shanghvi Finance has pledged shares in Sun Pharma on six occasions. The details of these pledges are as follows:
 
1. Pledge of 57,50,000 equity shares on 18 February 2019 in favour of Standard Chartered Investments and Loans Ltd as a security for loan availed by the third party.
 
2. Pledge of 40,00,000 equity shares on 18 February 2019 in favour of Standard Chartered Investments and Loans Ltd as a security for loan availed by the third party.
 
3. Pledge of 87,50,000 equity shares on 21 February 2019 in favour of IDBI Trusteeship Services Ltd as a trustee for scheme managed by Kotak Mahindra Mutual Fund in respect of commercial papers (CPs) issued by third party.
 
4. Pledge of 43,75,000 equity shares on 22 February 2019 in favour of IDBI Trusteeship Services Ltd as a trustee for scheme managed by Kotak Mahindra Mutual Fund in respect of CPs issued by third party.
 
5. Pledge of 41,57,000 equity shares on 22 February 2019 in favour of IDBI Trusteeship Services Ltd as a trustee for scheme managed by Kotak Mahindra Mutual Fund in respect of CP issued by third party.
 
6. Release of Pledge of 87,50,000 equity shares on 25 February 2019 which was created in favour of IDBI Trusteeship Services Ltd as a trustee for scheme managed by Kotak Mahindra Mutual Fund in respect of CPs issued by third party.
 
As a result of these transactions, the percentage of shares pledged by Shanghvi Finance, out of its 40% holding, now stands at 3.29%.
Like this story? Get our top stories by email.

User

COMMENTS

Ramesh Poapt

3 months ago

will sun set?!

Motherson Sumi to buy Bombardier’s UK rolling stock electrical business for 10.87 mln pounds
Motherson Sumi Systems Ltd (MSSL) said it will acquire Bombardier's UK rolling stock electrical component and systems business in a transaction valued at 10.87 million pounds or over Rs100 crore.
 
In a statement, Motherson Sumi said, “The company's wholly-owned arm Motherson Rolling Stock Systems GB Ltd (MRSS) has signed a definitive agreement with Bombardier Transportation (Rolling Stock) UK Ltd to acquire the latter's assets in connection with production and installation of electrical components and systems for applications in the rail industry”.
 
The assets include Bombardier Transportation’s Derby, UK-based facilities for wiring harness, panel and cabinet build and electromechanical assemblies. 
 
As per the deal, MRSS will enter into a lease agreement for the part of Bombardier's Derby site currently occupied by the business and will continue to operate the business with its current employees, it added.
 
Through this, MSSL will expand its supply of electricals and wiring systems to Bombardier Transportation to cover UK rolling stock projects.

User

COMMENTS

Ramesh Poapt

3 months ago

why the stock is losing momentum...

We are listening!

Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.
  Loading...
Close

To continue


Please
Sign Up or Sign In
with

Email
Close

To continue


Please
Sign Up or Sign In
with

Email

BUY NOW

online financial advisory
Pathbreakers
Pathbreakers 1 & Pathbreakers 2 contain deep insights, unknown facts and captivating events in the life of 51 top achievers, in their own words.
online financia advisory
The Scam
24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
Moneylife Online Magazine
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
financial magazines online
Stockletters in 3 Flavours
Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
financial magazines in india
MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
(Includes Moneylife Online Magazine)